Extemporaneous Speech - FINAL
Extemporaneous Speech - FINAL
Extemporaneous Speech - FINAL
Speech
Prepared by: Ms. Aneisha
Walker
Objectives
1 2 3 4
Tell the different Explain what the State the Outline the
types of speeches extemporaneous characteristics of sections of the
speech is the expository speech
extemporaneous
speech
Methods of There are FOUR basic methods of delivering a
Delivery
public address. Your speech will fall into one
particular style.
Methods of Delivery
• UTPMORPMI
• MTPANIUSC
• OMEMDEZIR
• SEUXOTEENMAPRO
Methods of Delivery
• Gives the speech an elevated tone through the use of polished vocabulary and
sentence structure.
• Does not allow for much flexibility to adjust content to suit audience.
• Runs the risk of sounding flat, recycled or not relatable to the audience
EXTEMPORANEOUS
This speech is carefully prepared and rehearsed but is delivered from an outline or framework (brief
notes written in point form.) The speaker shapes the speech as he or she goes along, not just working
with a memorized script. The words therefore emerge spontaneously but guided by the outline. The
speaker practices this out loud many times and although the speech is very similar each time, it is
never exactly the same. Exactness is not a desired goal with this type of speech as the main aim is to
The speaker has the opportunity to organize the presentation and select supporting
details beforehand.
An outline also gives the opportunity to practice enough to know the length of
the speech.
A greater sense of confidence is
generally displayed by the speaker.
Advantages of an
This speech is flexible, conversational
Extemporaneous and spontaneous in tone. This helps
to increase audience attention and
Speech rapport.
If proper skills are not utilized, the speaker can veer off
topic.
The extemporaneous speech is worth sixteen (16) marks. It should be no longer than ten (10)
minutes, eight (8) minutes of which is allocated to the candidate for the presentation. The
remaining two (2) minutes is reserved for questions and answers facilitated by the panel of
adjudicators.
The Extemporaneous Speech - Mark
Scheme
A. Discussion of issues and challenges/Organization of Material (5 MARKS)
Description of key terms – (1 Mark) - Define the key terms in your topic.
Description of issues - (3 Marks) - Give a summary of the source used, highlighting the key areas as
it relates to the topic being researched. Evaluate each source after you have presented the
information found.
Challenges – (1 Mark) - Unacceptable challenges: time consuming went through a lot
of data, having to travel far and wide to retrieve data, presenter not being motivated etc.
Acceptable challenges: having to change topic due to difficulty acquiring valid and reliable sources,
interview being cancelled, COVID19 restrictions hindering comprehensive research
The Extemporaneous Speech – Mark Scheme
B. Evaluation of the effect of source, context and medium (or channel) on the reliability and validity of
the information gathered (4 MARKS)
• Source – the writer of the piece – person or institution. Explain what makes them valid and reliable (2
marks)
• Evaluation of medium - The medium is the immediate form which a message takes. Is it a book, speech,
article and how does that form affect the validity and reliability of the information received/ Evaluation of
channel – The channel is that which is responsible for the delivery of the chosen message form. how did
you get access to the information (book, internet, website) and how does that impact the validity and
reliability of the information received. (1 Mark)
• Evaluation of context - Evaluation of context - what type of writing is it; what was the purpose of the
piece and how is it relevant/useful to your topic. (1 Mark)
The word CREDIBLE is not accepted when evaluating any source, channel or medium.
The Extemporaneous Speech – Mark
Scheme
C. Organization ( 3 MARKS)
Introduction – Hook/Attention Grabber, definition of key terms (1 mark)
Body – logical sequencing of ideas, transitional words/phrases (1 mark)
Conclusion – gives an answer to the research question/statement or gives a stance on
the topic researched
The Extemporaneous Speech – Mark
Scheme
Content Example:
What are the impacts of the improper use of technological
devices on the students of St. Andrew High School for girls?
B.Then offer definitions of key words or phrases that will
clarify the topic.
Example:
In our sample topic; Impacts, Improper and technological
devices are the key words/phrases which need clarification.
Introduction – C.As far as possible use sources for the
definitions that will enhance the
Content audience’s/adjudicators’ understanding of
your topic.
Hint:
Use sources that are relevant to the discipline under
which you are conducting your research.
Example:
For the best definition of ‘Technological devices’
you may need to consult an Information
Technology related dictionary or articles from the
discipline that give precise
definitions.
Body- Discussion of Key Issues/Points
• Validity – speaks to the soundness of the data/information. Is the information current? Is it accurate? Is
it objective and not subjective?
• Reliability – speaks to the trustworthiness of a source and the data/information provided. Does the
source’s track record or background inspire trust in the researcher? Does the source have a consistent
record of producing sound and valid works in the discipline? Does the source have authority to speak
on the matter?
Body – Evaluation
Evaluation of Source
A. Your source is both:
i. who authored your document/or was the subject of your interview/questionnaire. Therefore you should speak
to:
- the authors educational/professional background. Is he/she someone with special knowledge or ability in a
specific subject area?
Eg. Dr. S. Schaaffe possesses the authority to speak on the topic of secondary pedagogy and may be deemed
a reliable source as she has been an educator for 22 years in which time she has done 15 successful studies
on effective teaching strategies for high school teachers. Her life of research has been dedicated to
academia as she holds two masters and a Phd in pedagogical studies. Dr. Schaaffe has been awarded UWI’s
Researcher of the Year title for 3 years during her tenure as resident researcher in the field of education.
Body – Evaluation
B. Evaluation of Context
The Context is two fold. The circumstances which prompted the creation of the document/information as
well as the circumstances under which the information was delivered.
Example:
The Prime Minister in Parliament.
The Prime Minister in a constituency meeting/rally.
i. How does context impact on the reliability of the information?
Eg. The context adds to the reliability and validity of the information as It is expected that in a
parliamentary setting the leaders will provide information with integrity, soundness and value, owing to
the responsibilities of their respective portfolios within the political sphere.
Body – Evaluation