Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 33 views

    ENSP386.Paper Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Maricris Jane Perante
    This rubric outlines the criteria for grading an academic research paper worth a total of 90 points. It evaluates the paper based on the introduction/topic (12-15 points), content knowledge and quality of research (12-15 points), content application and support of thesis and analysis (12-15 points), conclusion (12-15 points), writing (12-15 points), and annotated bibliography (12-15 points). Each category describes what is required to earn full points, partial points, or few points based on the depth, quality, and completeness of the content and writing.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    ENSP386.Paper Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Maricris Jane Perante
    33 views5 pages
    This rubric outlines the criteria for grading an academic research paper worth a total of 90 points. It evaluates the paper based on the introduction/topic (12-15 points), content knowledge and quality of research (12-15 points), content application and support of thesis and analysis (12-15 points), conclusion (12-15 points), writing (12-15 points), and annotated bibliography (12-15 points). Each category describes what is required to earn full points, partial points, or few points based on the depth, quality, and completeness of the content and writing.

    Original Description:

    notes

    Original Title

    ENSP386.Paper_rubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This rubric outlines the criteria for grading an academic research paper worth a total of 90 points. It evaluates the paper based on the introduction/topic (12-15 points), content knowledge and quality of research (12-15 points), content application and support of thesis and analysis (12-15 points), conclusion (12-15 points), writing (12-15 points), and annotated bibliography (12-15 points). Each category describes what is required to earn full points, partial points, or few points based on the depth, quality, and completeness of the content and writing.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    33 views5 pages

    ENSP386.Paper Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Maricris Jane Perante
    This rubric outlines the criteria for grading an academic research paper worth a total of 90 points. It evaluates the paper based on the introduction/topic (12-15 points), content knowledge and quality of research (12-15 points), content application and support of thesis and analysis (12-15 points), conclusion (12-15 points), writing (12-15 points), and annotated bibliography (12-15 points). Each category describes what is required to earn full points, partial points, or few points based on the depth, quality, and completeness of the content and writing.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 5

    RUBRIC FOR ENSP386 ACADEMIC RESEARCH PAPER—90 points total

    Note: grading between increments is at the discretion of the advisor

    CATEGORY 12-15 points 8-11 points 4-7 points 0-3 points


    Introduction/Topic Exceptional introduction Proficient introduction Basic introduction that Weak or no
    that grabs interest of that is interesting and states topic but lacks introduction of topic.
    reader and states topic. states topic. interest. Thesis/topic is Paper’s purpose is
    Thesis/topic is Thesis/topic is clear somewhat clear and unclear. Thesis/topic
    ____ points
    exceptionally clear, well- and arguable statement arguable. is weak or missing.
    developed, and a of position.
    definitive statement.
    Content Paper is exceptionally Information relates to Information relates to Information has little
    knowledge: researched, contains 7 the main topic. the main topic, but few or nothing to do with
    sources total (including 3 Paper, is well- details and/or examples the thesis.
    Quality of peer reviewed articles); researched in detail and are given. Shows a Information has weak
    Research the sources support the from 7 good sources limited variety of or no connection to
    thesis argument in a (including 3 peer- sources. References are the thesis. References
    logical manner. reviewed articles). not cited correctly. are not cited
    References are correctly References are correctly.
    cited. correctly cited.
    ____ points
    Content Exceptionally critical, Consistent connections Some connections made Limited or no
    application: relevant and consistent are made between between evidence and connections made
    connections made evidence and thesis. thesis. Some analysis. between evidence and
    Support of Thesis between evidence and Good analysis. thesis. Lack of
    & Analysis thesis. Excellent analysis. analysis.

    ____ points

    Conclusion Excellent summary of Good summary of topic Basic summary of topic Lack of summary of
    thesis argument with with clear concluding with some final topic.
    concluding ideas that ideas. concluding ideas.
    impact reader. Introduces no new Introduces no new
    ____ points
    Introduces no new information. information.
    information.

    Writing Writing is clear and Most ideas are stated Many ideas require Paper does not meet
    relevant, with no clearly and are related clarification, are off- the criteria for the
    grammatical and/or to the topic, with only topic or have little assignment (too short
    spelling errors – polished minor grammatical relevance to the or incomplete, too
    and professional. and/or spelling errors. assignment. Many long, and/or
    Reference, citations and References, citations grammatical and/or completely off-topic).
    images are properly and images are spelling errors; very Reference, citations
    formatted. adequate. challenging to read, and images section is
    poor writing flow. missing.
    ____ points Improper references
    and/or citations section.
    Annotated Annotations sufficiently Annotations Some annotations Most annotations
    Bibliography and succinctly summarize, sufficiently and provide inadequate provide inadequate
    evaluate, and reflect on adequately summarize, summary, evaluation, summary, evaluation,
    the source. evaluate, and reflect on and/or reflection. and/or reflection.
    ____ points
    the source.
    Total: _____/90

    Created May 2018 – A. Mazur-Gray


    \

    Created May 2018 – A. Mazur-Gray


    Created May 2018 – A. Mazur-Gray
    Created May 2018 – A. Mazur-Gray
    Created May 2018 – A. Mazur-Gray

    You might also like