Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 82 views

    Peer Review Form For ARGUMENT ESSAY

    Uploaded by

    dlal
    This peer review form contains 3 sections to evaluate an argumentative essay: (1) Introduction, (2) Main Points/Body Paragraphs, and (3) Organization/Mechanics. Reviewers are asked to assess elements such as the quality of the background information, thesis statement, supporting points, refutation, conclusion, organization, and writing mechanics. The form is intended to provide feedback using the same rubric that will be used to grade the essay.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Peer Review Form For ARGUMENT ESSAY

    Uploaded by

    dlal
    82 views2 pages
    This peer review form contains 3 sections to evaluate an argumentative essay: (1) Introduction, (2) Main Points/Body Paragraphs, and (3) Organization/Mechanics. Reviewers are asked to assess elements such as the quality of the background information, thesis statement, supporting points, refutation, conclusion, organization, and writing mechanics. The form is intended to provide feedback using the same rubric that will be used to grade the essay.

    Original Title

    Peer Review Form for ARGUMENT ESSAY Copy

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This peer review form contains 3 sections to evaluate an argumentative essay: (1) Introduction, (2) Main Points/Body Paragraphs, and (3) Organization/Mechanics. Reviewers are asked to assess elements such as the quality of the background information, thesis statement, supporting points, refutation, conclusion, organization, and writing mechanics. The form is intended to provide feedback using the same rubric that will be used to grade the essay.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    82 views2 pages

    Peer Review Form For ARGUMENT ESSAY

    Uploaded by

    dlal
    This peer review form contains 3 sections to evaluate an argumentative essay: (1) Introduction, (2) Main Points/Body Paragraphs, and (3) Organization/Mechanics. Reviewers are asked to assess elements such as the quality of the background information, thesis statement, supporting points, refutation, conclusion, organization, and writing mechanics. The form is intended to provide feedback using the same rubric that will be used to grade the essay.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    Peer Review Form for Argumentative Essay

    Reviewer's Name_________________________ Writer's Name___________________


    This peer review form is derived from the rubric your instructor will use to grade your
    argumentative essay. Be sure to address each of the main categories listed on the form.

    3 2 1 0
    INTRODUCTION Well-developed Introduction creates Introduction Background details are
    Background/History introduction engages interest and contains adequately a random collection of
    Define the Problem the reader and creates background explains the information, unclear, or
    Thesis Statement interest. Contains information. Thesis background of not related to the topic.
    detailed background clearly states the the problem, Thesis and/or problem
    information and a problem. but may lack is vague or unclear.
    clear explanation of detail. Thesis
    the problem. Thesis states the
    clearly states a problem.
    significant and
    compelling position.

    Does the essay include these three items in the introductory paragraph:

    • background information
    • an explanation of the controversy
    • a clear thesis statement

    3 2 1 0
    MAIN POINTS Well-developed main Three or more main Three or more Less than three main
    Body Paragraphs points directly related points are related to main points points, and/or poor
    Refutation to the thesis. the thesis, but one are present, development of
    Conclusion Supporting examples may lack details. ideas. Refutation
    are concrete and Refutation paragraph missing or
    detailed. Refutation acknowledges the vague. Conclusion does
    acknowledges opposing view and not summarize main
    opposing view summarizes points. points. Commentary is
    logically and Conclusion effectively not present.
    clearly. Conclusion summarizes
    effectively wraps up topics. Commentary
    and goes beyond is present.
    restating the
    thesis. Commentary
    is logical, and well
    thought out.
    Does the following body paragraphs contain:

    • body paragraphs that contain the three classifications (3) - each begins with a topic sentence and
    contains detailed supporting sentences
    • Conclusion:

    1. began with a summary of your topic


    2. restated your thesis
    3. ended with a closing suggestions for change are included in conclusion

    Dr.Reem Aloud
    3 2 1 0
    ORGANIZATION Logical progression of Logical progression of Organization is No discernable
    Structure ideas with a clear ideas. Transitions are clear. Transitions organization. Transitions
    Transitions structure that enhances present equally are present. are not present.
    the thesis. Transitions throughout essay.
    are mature and
    graceful.
    • is the organizational pattern clear?

    Comments:
    3 2 1 0

    MECHANICS AND Writing is smooth, Writing is clear and Writing is clear, Writing is confusing, hard
    STYLE skillful, sentences have varied but sentences to follow. Contains
    Sentence flow, coherent. Sentences structure. Diction is may lack fragments and/or run-on
    variety are strong and consistent. Punctuation, variety. Diction sentences. Inappropriate
    Diction expressive with varied spelling, capitalization are is appropriate. A diction. Distracting errors
    Spelling, structure. Diction is generally correct, with few errors in in punctuation, spelling,
    punctuation, consistent and words few errors. (1-2) punctuation, capitalization.
    capitalization well spelling,
    chosen. Punctuation, capitalization. (3-
    spelling, capitalization 4)
    are correct. No errors
    in grammar.
    Circle the grammatical, punctuation, capitalization, and spelling errors

    Overall, what is good about the essay?

    What needs more work?

    Dr.Reem Aloud

    You might also like