Rubric Oral Defense
Rubric Oral Defense
Rubric Oral Defense
Direction: Rate your own paper using the rubric below. For the purpose of improvement, rate
your output as honestly as you can. Use the following scale in evaluating your own
paper.
5 – Very Good, 4 – Good, 3 – Fair, 2 – Poor, 1 – Needs Improvement
NAME:
RESEARCH TITLE:
Indicator Self-Rating
1. Research Design
Type and definition were presented, and rational is
discussed.
2. Sampling Procedure and Sample
Population and samples are described, and sampling
procedure is clear and relevant.
3. Research Instrument, and its Validity and Reliability
Basis of decision is explained, instrument is well
described, and its validity and reliability were clearly
presented.
TOTAL
Direction: Rate your own paper using the rubric below. For the purpose of improvement, rate
your output as honestly as you can. Use the following scale in evaluating your own
paper.
5 – Very Good, 4 – Good, 3 – Fair, 2 – Poor, 1 – Needs Improvement
NAME:
RESEARCH TITLE:
Indicator Self-Rating
1. Research Design
Type and definition were presented, and rational is
discussed.
2. Sampling Procedure and Sample
Population and samples are described, and sampling
procedure is clear and relevant.
3. Research Instrument, and its Validity and Reliability
Basis of decision is explained, instrument is well
described, and its validity and reliability were clearly
presented.
TOTAL
Direction: Rate your own paper using the rubric below. For the purpose of improvement, rate
your output as honestly as you can. Use the following scale in evaluating your own
paper.
5 – Very Good, 4 – Good, 3 – Fair, 2 – Poor, 1 – Needs Improvement
NAME:
RESEARCH TITLE:
Indicator Self-Rating
1. Research Design
Type and definition were presented, and rational is
discussed.
2. Sampling Procedure and Sample
Population and samples are described, and sampling
procedure is clear and relevant.
3. Research Instrument, and its Validity and Reliability
Basis of decision is explained, instrument is well
described, and its validity and reliability were clearly
presented.
TOTAL
Rubric for Research Title Proposal Presentation
Research Title
Researchers
Content (35%)
▪ The parts of the paper are complete and appropriate.
▪ The parts of the research methodology are clearly described and justified.
▪ Overall content is comprehensive.]
Coherence (25%)
▪ Cohesive of devices are effectively used.
▪ Organization of ideas is smoothly presented.
Creativity (20%)
▪ Writer’s voice is showcased.
▪ Paper uses variety of sentence structures.
▪ Uses appropriate language.
Communication (20%)
▪ Sentences are well structured
▪ Grammatical conventions are observed.
▪ Correct spelling and proper research
format is followed.
TOTAL
Research Title
Researchers
Content (35%)
▪ The parts of the paper are complete and appropriate.
▪ The parts of the research methodology are clearly described and justified.
▪ Overall content is comprehensive.]
Coherence (25%)
▪ Cohesive of devices are effectively used.
▪ Organization of ideas is smoothly presented.
Creativity (20%)
▪ Writer’s voice is showcased.
▪ Paper uses variety of sentence structures.
▪ Uses appropriate language.
Communication (20%)
▪ Sentences are well structured
▪ Grammatical conventions are observed.
▪ Correct spelling and proper research
format is followed.
TOTAL