Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    Magazine - Rubric and Peer Evaluation

    Uploaded by

    Robelle Grace M. Cula
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating magazines with categories for overall appearance, cover, content, elements of graphics, and elements of composition. The rubric assigns points for how elements are addressed, from a target audience represented always to a target audience forgotten. Graphics, content, and writing quality are also evaluated.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Magazine - Rubric and Peer Evaluation

    Uploaded by

    Robelle Grace M. Cula
    9 views2 pages
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating magazines with categories for overall appearance, cover, content, elements of graphics, and elements of composition. The rubric assigns points for how elements are addressed, from a target audience represented always to a target audience forgotten. Graphics, content, and writing quality are also evaluated.

    Original Description:

    Rubric

    Original Title

    Magazine_Rubric-and-Peer-Evaluation

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document provides a rubric for evaluating magazines with categories for overall appearance, cover, content, elements of graphics, and elements of composition. The rubric assigns points for how elements are addressed, from a target audience represented always to a target audience forgotten. Graphics, content, and writing quality are also evaluated.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    9 views2 pages

    Magazine - Rubric and Peer Evaluation

    Uploaded by

    Robelle Grace M. Cula
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating magazines with categories for overall appearance, cover, content, elements of graphics, and elements of composition. The rubric assigns points for how elements are addressed, from a target audience represented always to a target audience forgotten. Graphics, content, and writing quality are also evaluated.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    MAGAZINE RUBRIC

    20 -18 points 17-15points 14-10 points 10-5 points TOTAL:


    OVERALL - target audience - target audience given - target audience inconsistent - target audience forgotten -
    APPEARANCE represented always some thought - theme inconsistent - no theme evident
    - theme consistent - theme consistent - font adequate - font inadequate
    - font superior and consistent - font good and consistent - generally adequate - poorly done
    - generally inviting - generally good - somewhat creative - shows little creativity
    -high degree of creativity - creative
    COVER - highly creative - creative - somewhat creative - shows little creativity -
    (Front and back ) - excellent title - good title - adequate title - poor choice of title
    - effective image included - good choice of image - image included - poor choice of image
    - fits theme of magazine - fits theme of magazine well - adequately suited to - theme unclear
    very well - inviting theme of magazine - poorly done
    - very attractive - adequate
    CONTENT - Complete content - most components completed - did not include one of - fewer content -
    ( Feature Articles, - all components are as assigned each as assigned. - some articles completed
    Comics, etc) completed as - good variety of topics - adequate variety of topics as assigned.
    assigned - most components - most components - some illustrations
    - excellent variety of topics are illustrated. are illustrated - writing adequate
    - an illustration included with - well written - writing adequate
    each component - lacking three content - Few content
    - well written
    ELEMENTS OF - included a minimum of four. - included a minimum of four - included a minimum of four - less than four -
    GRAPCHICS - all graphics are connected - most graphics connected - artwork not always - seldom connected to theme
    DESIGNING to theme. to theme connected to theme - mostly reproductions
    - highly creative - very creative - lacks originality - few or no graphic elements.
    - excellent colour - good colour and composition - some colour and
    and composition. graphics elements used.
    Elements of - use of writing - use of writing process evident - careless use of - first draft is only draft. -
    Compostion process evident - minor spelling errors writing process. - major spelling errors.
    - correct spelling - minor grammatical errors - minor spelling errors - major grammatical errors.
    - correct grammar - minor errors in construction - minor grammatical errors - lacks organization, disjoint,
    -correct sentence, paragraph of sentences, paragraphs - written work lacks and lacks unity.
    and essay structure and essays. organization - some headlines included.
    - inviting headlines -good headlines - headlines included
    TOTAL:

    Strand and Section: Group no: Date:

    Group Members:
    Peer Evaluation Form for Group Work
    GROUP #
    Grade/ Strand & Section: SCORE:
    Activity : Leader:

    Write the name of each of your group members in a separate column. For each person, indtitleicate the extent to which you agree with the statement on the left, using a scale of 1-10.
    Total the numbers in each column.
    Values: 10=Superior 8-Above Average 6=Average 3=Below Average 1=Weak

    Evaluation Criteria

    Attends group practices regularly and arrives on time.

    Contributes meaningfully to group discussions


    Collaborates ideas to enhance group performance

    Prepares himself/herself in a quality manner.

    Demonstrates a cooperative and supportive attitude.

    Contributes significantly to the success of the performance

    TOTAL

    Feedback on team dynamics:


    1. What did you learn about working in a group from this project that you will carry into your next group
    experience?

    You might also like