Specifics N SD Computed H P-Value Mean of Ranks

Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 13

50%

Vinegar; 400
25% Vinegar; 25% Vinegar; 25% Baking 300 180
50% Baking 25% Baking Soda; 25% 200
rust stain removal Soda; 25% Soda; 50% Lemon

Removal Time (seconds)


100
duration Lemon Juice Lemon Juice Juice 0
trial 1 180 300 360
trial 2 180 300 360
trial 3 180 215 360
average 180 271.67 360

Concentratio

trial 1 trial 2 trial 3

Mean of
Specifics N SD Computed H p-value
Ranks
25% Vinegar; 50%
Baking Soda; 25% 3 180 0
Lemon Juice
25% Vinegar; 25%
Baking Soda; 50% 3 271.67 49.07 7.78s 0.0204
Lemon Juice
50% Vinegar; 25%
Baking Soda; 25% 3 360 0
Lemon Juice
s
= significant at alpha level of 0.05

50%
Vinegar;
25% Vinegar; 25% Vinegar; 25% Baking
50% Baking 25% Baking Soda; 25%
MOLD stain removal Soda; 25% Soda; 50% Lemon
duration Lemon Juice Lemon Juice Juice
trial 1 59 109 92
trial 2 51 60 90
trial 3 50 58 60
average 53.33 75.67 80.67
Mean of Computed
Specifics N SD p-value
Ranks H

25% Vinegar; 50% 3 53.33 4.93


Baking Soda; 25%
Lemon Juice

25% Vinegar; 25% 3 75.67 28.88 4.5 ns


0.1052
Baking Soda; 50%
Lemon Juice

50% Vinegar; 25% 3 80.67 17.93


Baking Soda; 25%
Lemon Juice
ns
= significant at alpha level of 0.05

50%
Vinegar;
25% Vinegar; 25% Vinegar; 25% Baking
50% Baking 25% Baking Soda; 25%
yellow stain removal Soda; 25% Soda; 50% Lemon
duration Lemon Juice Lemon Juice Juice

Axis Title
trial 1 47 180 206
trial 2 52 180 200
trial 3 180 156 180
average 93 172 195.33
Ba
0%
r;5
g a
ne
Vi
%
25
Mean of Computed
Specifics N SD p-value
Ranks H

25% Vinegar; 50% 3 93 75.39


Baking Soda; 25%
Lemon Juice

25% Vinegar; 25% 3 172 13.86 4.82 ns


0.0897
Baking Soda; 50%
Lemon Juice
4.82 ns
0.0897

50% Vinegar; 25% 3 195.33 13.61


Baking Soda; 25%
Lemon Juice
ns
= significant at alpha level of 0.05

50%
Vinegar; 8
25% Vinegar; 25% Vinegar; 25% Baking 7.8
50% Baking 25% Baking Soda; 25%
Soda; 25% Soda; 50% Lemon 7.6
7.33
ph value Lemon Juice Lemon Juice Juice 7.4

Axis Title
trial 1 8 8 7 7.2
trial 2 7 7 7 7
trial 3 7 7 7 6.8
average 7.33 7.33 7 6.6
6.4
25% Vinegar; 50% Baking 2
Soda; 25% Lemon Juice

trial 1

Specifics N Mean SD SD
25% Vinegar; 50%
Baking Soda; 25% 7.33 0.58
Lemon Juice 0.76
25% Vinegar; 25%
Baking Soda; 50% 3 7.33 0.58
Lemon Juice 0.76
50% Vinegar; 25%
Baking Soda; 25% 7 0
Lemon Juice 0

degrees of Sum of Mean


Source of Variation computed F p-value
freedom Squares Squares F crit
Between Groups 2 0.22 0.11 5.143253
0.5 0.6297
Within Groups 6 1.33 0.22

since the p-value is greater than the alpha 0.05


failed to reject the null hypothesis
there is no significant difference
360
400 271.67
300 180
200
100
0
kruskal-wallis

Concentration

trial 1 trial 2 trial 3 average

since the p-value is lesser than the alpha 0.05

reject the null hypothesis


there is a significant difference

120 75.67 80.67


80 53.33

40
0
ice ice ice
Axis Title

Ju Ju Ju
on on on
m m m
Le Le Le
% % %
; 25 ; 50 ; 25
oda oda oda
S S S
g g g
kin kin kin
Ba Ba Ba
0% 5% 5%
r;5 r;2 r;2
g a g a a
ne ne n eg
Vi Vi AxisViTitle
% % %
25 25 50
trial 1 trial 2 trial 3 average
Le Le Le

Ax
% % %
; 25 ; 50 ; 25
da da da
So So So
g g g
a kin a kin a kin
B B B
% % %
50 25 25
a r; a r; a r;
g g g
ne ne n e
Vi Vi AxisViTitle
% % %
25 25 50
trial 1 trial 2 trial 3 average

since the p-value is greater than the alpha 0.05

failed to reject the null hypothesis

there is no significant difference

172 195.33
200
93
100
0
ice ice ice
Axis Title

Ju Ju Ju
on on on
m m m
Le Le Le
5% 0% 5%
;2 ;5 ;2
da da da
So So So
g g g
kin kin kin
Ba Ba Ba
0% 5% 5%
r;5 r;2 r;2
g a g a a
ne ne n eg
Vi Vi AxisViTitle
% % %
25 25 50
trial 1 trial 2 trial 3 average
since the p-value is greater than the alpha 0.05

failed to reject the null hypothesis


there is no significant difference

8
7.8
7.6
7.33 7.33
7.4
7.2 7
7
6.8
6.6
6.4
25% Vinegar; 50% Baking 25% Vinegar; 25% Baking 50% Vinegar; 25% Baking
Soda; 25% Lemon Juice Soda; 50% Lemon Juice Soda; 25% Lemon Juice
Axis Title

trial 1 trial 2 trial 3 average


rust stain removal Proposed Alternative Commercial
duration Bathroom Cleaner Bathroom Cleaner
trial 1 180 90
trial 2 180 60
trial 3 180 180
average 180 110

Specifics N SD Sum of Mean Ranks

Proposed
Alternative
3 0
Bathroom
Cleaner 13.95
Commercial
Bathroom 3 62.45
Cleaner

ns
= not significant at alpha level of 0.05

since the p-value is greater than the alpha 0.05


failed to reject the null hypothesis
there is no significant difference

60 53.33

50
40
Axis Title

30
20
MOLD stain removal Proposed Alternative Commercial
duration Bathroom Cleaner Bathroom Cleaner 10
trial 1 59 60 0
Proposed Alternative Bathroom
Cleaner
Axis

trial 1 trial 2 tri


30

Axis
20
10
0
trial 2 51 30 Proposed Alternative Bathroom
Cleaner
trial 3 50 30
Axis
average 53.33 40
4.93 17.32
trial 1 trial 2 tri

Specifics N SD Sum of Mean Ranks

Proposed
Alternative
3 4.93
Bathroom
Cleaner 12
Commercial
Bathroom 3 17.32
Cleaner

ns
= not significant at alpha level of 0.05

since the p-value is greater than the alpha 0.05


failed to reject the null hypothesis 180
there is no significant difference 160
140
120

Axis Title
100
yellow stain removal Proposed Alternative Commercial 80
duration Bathroom Cleaner Bathroom Cleaner 60
trial 1 47 120 40
trial 2 52 60 20
0
trial 3 180 180 Proposed Alternati
average 93 120 Cleane

75.39 60.00

trial

Specifics N SD Sum of Mean Ranks

Proposed
Alternative
3 75.39
Bathroom
Cleaner 12.12
12.12
Commercial
Bathroom 3 60
Cleaner

ns
= not significant at alpha level of 0.05

since the p-value is greater than the alpha 0.05


failed to reject the null hypothesis 14
there is no significant difference 12
10

Axis Title
8
Proposed Alternative Commercial 6
ph value Bathroom Cleaner Bathroom Cleaner
4
trial 1 8 13
2
trial 2 7 13
0
trial 3 7 12 Proposed Alternative Bathr
average 7.33 13
0.58 0.58
tria

Specifics N SD Sum of Mean Ranks

Proposed
Alternative
3 0.58
Bathroom
Cleaner 12.2
Commercial
Bathroom 3 0.58
Cleaner

ns
= not significant at alpha level of 0.05

since the p-value is greater than the alpha 0.05


failed to reject the null hypothesis
there is no significant difference
180
180
160
140
110
120

Axis Title
100
80
60
40
20
0
Proposed Alternative Bathroom Commercial Bathroom Cleaner
Cleaner
Axis Title
Z
U p-value
Score
trial 1 trial 2 trial 3 average

13.5 0.1826ns
0.4286

53.33

40

Proposed Alternative Bathroom Commercial Bathroom Cleaner


Cleaner
Axis Title

trial 1 trial 2 trial 3 average


Proposed Alternative Bathroom Commercial Bathroom Cleaner
Cleaner
Axis Title

trial 1 trial 2 trial 3 average

Z
U p-value
Score

15 0.0913ns
0.4641

180
160
140 120
120 93
Axis Title

100
80
60
40
20
0
Proposed Alternative Bathroom Commercial Bathroom Cleaner
Cleaner
Axis Title

trial 1 trial 2 trial 3 average

Z
U p-value
Score

11.5 -0.5477ns
0.2912
11.5 -0.5477ns
0.2912

13
14
12
10 7.33
Axis Title

8
6
4
2
0
Proposed Alternative Bathroom Cleaner Commercial Bathroom Cleaner
Axis Title

trial 1 trial 2 trial 3 average

Z
U p-value
Score

9 -1.0042ns
0.1587
110

mercial Bathroom Cleaner

average

You might also like