See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/349492468

Handbook of AGRICULTURE, ENVIRONMENT AND BIOTECHNOLOGY

Chapter · February 2021

CITATION READS
1 16,557

4 authors, including:

Riti Chatterjee Amit Baran Sharangi

International Rice Research Institute Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya (Agricultural Univ)
67 PUBLICATIONS 83 CITATIONS 214 PUBLICATIONS 1,662 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Sankar Kumar Acharya

Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya
496 PUBLICATIONS 384 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Riti Chatterjee on 22 February 2021.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 Handbook of
AGRICULTURE, ENVIRONMENT AND
BIOTECHNOLOGY

— Edited by —

A. Rakshit, H.B. Singh, A.K. Singh, P.C. Abhilash,

B.K. Sarma, V.K. Tripathi and H.P. Parewa
“
“Handbook of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology” edited by A. Rakshit, H.B. Singh,
A.K. Singh, P.C. Abhilash, B.K. Sarma, V.K. Tripathi and H.P. Parewa, Published by Association of
Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology, New Delhi, India

© Editors

First Edition 2021

ISBN: 978-81-948260-0-2

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced stored in a retrieval system or transmitted,
by any means, electronic mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without written
permission from the publishers.

90, Sainik Vihar, Mohan Garden, New Delhi – 110 059

7/28, Room No.-208, Vardaan House, Mahavir Lane, Ansari Road, Daryaganj,
New Delhi-110002
216, Flat-GC, Green Park, Nerendrapur, Kolkata - 700103
Tel: 011-23256188, 9971676330
[email protected]/gmail.com
www.ndpublisher.in
 List of Contributors
A.S. Raghubanshi, Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development, Banaras Hindu University,
Varanasi, India.
Abhishek Dutt Tripathi, Department of Dairy Science and Food Technology, Institute of Agricultural
Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India. [email protected]
Abhishek Singh, Assistant Professor, Department of Farm Engineering, Institute of Agricultural
Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India. [email protected]
Ajit Kumar Dubedi Anal, National Research Centre on Litchi, Muzaffarpur, Bihar, India.
Amit Baran Sharangi, Department of Plantation, Spices, Medicinal & Aromatic Crops, Faculty of
Horticulture, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Agricultural University, Mohanpur, Nadia, West
Bengal, India.
Amit Kumar Singh, Hydrogeology and Environmental Geochemistry Lab, School of Environmental
Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
Division of Agronomy, ICAR-IARI, New Delhi, India. anchal_d@rediffmail.
com
Anil K. Singh, Department of Horticulture, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University,
Varanasi, India. [email protected]
Anita Vishwanath Handore, Research and Development Department, Sigma Wineries Pvt. Ltd.,
Sinnar, Nashik, Maharashtra, India.
Anjana Sisodia, Department of Horticulture, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu
University, Varanasi, India.
Anupam Das, Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Bihar Agricultural University,
Sabour, Bhagalpur, India. [email protected]
Arvind, Department of Dairy Science and Food Technology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras
Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. [email protected]
Ashish Kumar, Department of Farm Engineering, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu
University, Varanasi, India.
Ashok Kumar Yadav, Department of Dairy Science and Food Technology, Institute of Agricultural
Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
B. Duary, Institute of Agriculture, Visva-Bharati, Sriniketan, West Bengal, India. bduary@
yahoo.co.in
B.K. Sarma, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
[email protected]
 Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Institute of Agricultural
Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Dawa Dolma Bhutia, Department of Mycology and Plant Pathology, I. Ag. Sc., BHU, Varanasi, U.P.
India. [email protected]
Debajit Datta, Department of Geography, Taki Government College, Taki, West Bengal, India.
[email protected]
Debashish Sen, College of Agriculture Tripura, Lembucherra, West Tripura, India. dr.d.sen@
gmail.com
Division of Natural Resources, ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute,
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Dheeraj Mishra, Department of Extension Education, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras
Hindu University,Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Dibyendu Mukhopadhyay, Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Uttar Banga
Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Cooch Behar, West Bengal, India. [email protected]
Dinesh Chandra Rai, Department of Dairy Science and Food Technology, Institute of Agricultural
Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Dipak Kumar Dipu, Department of Agronomy, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur,
Bihar, India.
G.P. Juyal, Hydrology and Engineering Division, ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation,
218, Kaulagarh Road Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Gopal Shukla, Department of Forestry, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, West Bengal,
India.
Hema Singh, Ecosystems Analysis Laboratory, Department of Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras
Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Hemavathi, M., Department of Farm Engineering, I.Ag.S., BHU, Varanasi, India.
Jyotshnarani Maharana, OUAT-KVK, Semiliguda, Koraput, Odisha, India.
K. Charan Teja, Institute of Agriculture, Visva-Bharati, Sriniketan, West Bengal, India.
Kalyan Ghadei, Department of Extension Education, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu
University,Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. [email protected]
Kanad Mukherjee, Department of Agricultural Chemicals, Faculty of Agriculture, Bidhan Chandra
Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, Nadia, West Bengal, India.
Kirti Rani, Division of Crop Improvement, ICAR-Directorate of Groundnut Research (DGR), Ivnagar
Road, Junagadh, Gujarat, India.
Department of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology,Institute of Agricultural
Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
 Government of West Bengal, Directorate of Agriculture, Jessop Building, 63,
N.S. Road (Strand Road Side), Kolkata, West Bengal, India. bhowmick_malay@rediffmail.
com
Mendup Tamang, Department of Forestry, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, West
Bengal, India.
Minakshi Padhi, Department of Horticulture, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu
University, Varanasi, India.
Mithlesh Kumar, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, S. D. Agricultural
University, Tharad, Gujarat, India. [email protected]
Informatic Assistant, Department of Information Technology and Communication,
Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. [email protected]
Nazir, A. Pala, Department of Forestry, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, West Bengal,
India.
Neeharika Kanth, Department of Horticulture, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu
University, Varanasi, India.
Nintu Mandal, Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Bihar Agricultural University,
Sabour, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India. [email protected]
O.P. Singh, Department of Agricultural Economics, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu
University, Varanasi, India.
P. Boominathan, Department of Crop Physiology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore,
India. [email protected]
P.K. Dhakad, Department of Mycology and Plant Pathology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras
Hindu University, Varanasi, U.P. India.
P.K. Singh, Department of Agricultural Economics, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu
University, Varanasi, India. [email protected]
P.R. Saabale, ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, India.
Pavan Siddeswara, Department of Entomology & Agricultural Zoology, Institute of Agricultural
Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Prabal Pratap Singh, Department of Dairy Science and Food Technology, Institute of Agricultural
Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Praveen Jakhar, ICAR-CIWA, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Prithusayak Mondal, Regional Research Station (Terai Zone), Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya,
Pundibari, Cooch Behar, West Bengal, India.
R.K. Mishra, ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, India.
R.N. Singh, Department of Entomology & Agricultural Zoology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences,
Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
R.S. Meena, Department of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences,
Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India. [email protected]
R. Sivakumar, Department of Crop Physiology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
Raghuraj Singh, ICAR-Directorate of medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research, Boriavi, Anand,
Gujarat, India. [email protected]
Rajeev Padbhushan, Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Bihar Agricultural
University, Sabour, Bihar, India.
Rajesh Kumar Singh, Department of Agronomy, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu
University, Varanasi, India. [email protected]
Rajib Karmakar, Department of Agricultural Chemicals, Faculty of Agriculture, Bidhan Chandra
Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, Nadia, West Bengal, India. [email protected]
Rajiv Rakshit, Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Bihar Agricultural University,
Sabour, Bihar, India. [email protected]
Ramavtar Sharma, Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur, India.
Ram Chandra, Department of Mycology and Plant Pathology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences,
Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, U.P. India. [email protected]
Ranjit Chatterjee, Department of Vegetable and Spice Crops, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya,
Pundibari, Coochbehar, West Bengal, India. [email protected]
Ravi Kiran Thirumdasu, Department of Vegetable and Spice Crops, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya,
Pundibari, Coochbehar, West Bengal, India.
Professor and Department Head, Agricultural Leadership and Community Education,
Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Riti Chatterjee, Department of Agricultural Extension, Faculty of Agriculture, Bidhan Chandra Krishi
Viswavidyalaya, Agricultural University, Mohanpur, Nadia, West Bengal, India.
Romen Chhetri, Department of Forestry, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, West Bengal,
India.
S. Dash, Institute of Agriculture, Visva-Bharati, Sriniketan, West Bengal, India.
S. Nadaradjan, Crop Physiology Unit, Department of Plant Breeding and genetics, Pandit Jawaharlal
Nehru College of Agriculture and Research Institute, Karaikal, Puducherry, India.
S. Patra, Hydrology and Engineering Division, ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation,
218, Kaulagarh Road Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. [email protected]
Sampad R. Patra, Government of West Bengal, Directorate of Agriculture, Jessop Building, 63, N.S.
Road (Strand Road Side), Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Sandeep Kumar Sathua, Department of Entomology & Agricultural Zoology, Institute of Agricultural
Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India. [email protected]
Department of Agricultural Extension, Faculty of Agriculture, Bidhan
Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Agricultural University, Mohanpur, Nadia, West Bengal, India.
Satyanshu Kumar, ICAR-Directorate of medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research, Boriavi, Anand,
Gujarat, India.
Satya Prakash Yadav, Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Institute of Agricultural
Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Shashi Shekhar, Department of Farm Engineering, I.Ag.S., BHU, Varanasi, India. shekhar.
[email protected]
Shovik Deb, Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya,
Pundibari, Cooch Behar, West Bengal, India.
Shrinivasa D.J., Department of Farm Engineering, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu
University, Varanasi, India.
Shrvan Kumar, Department of Mycology and Plant Pathology, I. Ag. Sc., BHU, Varanasi, U.P. India.
Shweta Upadhyay, Delhi College of Arts & Commerce, University of Delhi, New Delhi-110023, India.
[email protected]
Shyamashree Roy, Regional Research Station, Old Alluvial Zone, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya,
Majhian, Dakshin Dinajpur, West Bengal, India. [email protected]
Department of Plantation, Spices, Medicinal & Aromatic Crops, Faculty of
Horticulture, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Agricultural University, Mohanpur, Nadia, West
Bengal, India. [email protected]
Sudhanshu Singh, ISARC, Varanasi, India.
Sumit Chakravarty, Department of Forestry, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, West
Bengal, India. [email protected]
Sundharavadivu, S., Department of Extension Education, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras
Hindu University,Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sunil Kumar Ghosh, Department of Agricultural Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Bidhan Chandra
Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, Nadia, West Bengal, India.
Suresh Kumar Srivastava, School of Biochemical Engineering, IIT(BHU), Varanasi, India.
Sushil Kumar, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Anand Agricultural University, Anand,
India. [email protected]
Swati Kumai, Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Bihar Agricultural University,
Sabour, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India.
Talat Afreen, PG Department of Botany, Gaya College (A constituent unit of Magadh University),
Bodhgaya, Bihar, 823001, India.
Tanusri Dey, Department of Forestry, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, West Bengal,
India.
Tejraj Singh Hada, Department of Horticulture, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu
University, Varanasi, India.
College of Agriculture Tripura, Lembucherra, West Tripura, India.
Department of Forestry, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, West Bengal,
India.
V. Yeka Zhimo, Department of Plant Pathology, BCKV, West Bengal, India.
Vikram Pratap, National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology, IARI, Pusa Campus New Delhi,
India.
Vineeta, Department of Forestry, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, West Bengal, India.
Vinod Kumar, National Research Centre on Litchi, Muzaffarpur, Bihar, India. vinod3kiari@
yahoo.co.in
Vinod Kumar, National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology, IARI, Pusa Campus New Delhi,
India.
Vinod Kumar Paswan, Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Institute of Agricultural
Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. [email protected]
Vinod Kumar Tripathi, Department of Farm Engineering, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras
Hindu University, Varanasi, India. [email protected]
Yash Gautam, Department of Agricultural Economics, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras
Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
 Contents

SECTION I : NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

1. Basics of Remote Sensing and GIS and Applications in Agriculture 2

2. Fundamentals of Pedology 27

3. Analysis of Chemical, Physical and Biological Parameters in Soils 40

4. Soil Resource Inventory and Problem Soils 59

5. Agrobiodiversity: The treasure of nature needs to be conserved for the

livelihood security 73

6. Conservation Technologies for Sustaining Natural Resources 85

7. Fundamentals and Applications of Nanotechnology 100

8. Watershed Management 108

9. Fundamentals of Irrigation Methods 122

10. Farm Equipment for Crop Cultivation Practices 137

11. The Major Environmental Issues: A Current View 172

12. Agronomy of Field Crops 193

13. Cropping Systems: An Overview 202

SECTION II : PLANT SCIENCE

14. Introduction to Crop Physiology 239

15. Fundamentals of Horticulture 244

16. Production Technology of Vegetable and Spice Crops 264

17. Important Medicinal and Aromatic Plants of India 292

18. Fundamentals of Plant Pathology 328

19. Diseases of Fruit Crops in India and their Management 334

20. Major Diseases of Pulse Crops and their Management 349

21. Mushroom Biology and Production 367

22. Fundamentals of Entomology 377

23. Precise Guide to Injurious Mite Pests of Major Cultivated Crops in India and
their Integrated Management Practices 394

24. Forest and Forestry 405

25. Pesticide Residues: Analysis, Impact and Mitigation 425

26. Weed Management 450

27. Fundamentals and Applications of Biotechnology 500

28. Applied Plant Biotechnology 511

SECTION III : ANIMAL AND FOOD SCIENCE

29. Prospects of Livestock Production in India 521

30. Processes for Dairy and Food Industry 533

31. Functional Foods and New Product Development 547

 SECTION IV : STATISTICS AND SOCIAL SCIENCE
32. Fundamentals of Information Technology 561

33. A Brief Overview of Statistical Methods 586

34. Experimental Design: Concepts and Principles 596

35. Rural Sociology and Educational Psychology for Agriculture Extension Service 615

36. Different Initiatives under Agriculture Extension since Independence 625

37. Agricultural Marketing in India: Challenges and Opportunities 641

Chapter

36

Different Initiatives under Agriculture

Extension since Independence

Agriculture is the part and parcel in the process of economic development in India. Besides providing
food to nation, agriculture releases labour, provides saving, contributes to market of industrial goods and
earns foreign exchange. Agricultural development is an integral part of overall economic development.
In India, agriculture was the main source of national income and occupation at the time of Independence.
Agriculture and allied activities contributed nearly 50 per cent to India’s national income. Around 72 per

backward and agricultural based economy at the time of Independence. After 61 year of Independence,
the share of agriculture in total national income declined from 50 per cent in 1950 to 18 per cent in
2007- 08. But even today more than 60 per cent of workforce is engaged in agriculture. In spite of this,
it is also an important feature of agriculture that is to be noted that growth of other sectors and overall
economy depends on the performance of agriculture to a considerable extent. Because of these reasons
agriculture continues to be the dominant sector in Indian Economy.
Since independence India has made much progress in agriculture. Indian agriculture, which grew at the

of about 2.6 per cent per annum in the post-Independence era. Expansion of area was the main source

agricultural production has declined over time and increase in productivity became the main source
of growth in agricultural production. Another important facet of progress in agriculture is its success
in eradicating of its dependence on imported food grains. Indian agriculture has progressed not only
in output and yield terms but the structural changes have also contributed. All these developments in
Indian agriculture are contributed by a series of steps initiated by Indian Government. Land reforms,
inauguration of Agricultural Price Commission with objective to ensure remunerative prices to
producers, new agricultural strategy, investment in research and extension services, provision of credit
facilities, and improving rural infrastructure are some of these steps.
in 1966-67. The fundamental of this strategy is the application of science and technology for increasing
yield per hectare. This strategy, known as New Agricultural Strategy or Green Revolution, is based
on the extension of high yielding varieties responsive to heavy doses of fertilizers and the package
of improved practices in selected areas with assured rainfall or irrigation facilities. The programmes
included under the new strategy are: (1) the high yielding varieties programme, (2) multiple cropping
programme, (3) integrated development of dry areas, (4) plant protection measures, (5) increased use of
fertilizers, and (6) new irrigation concept.

The public agricultural extension system of India is one of the largest knowledge and information
dissemination institutions in the world. The system played a critical role during the Green Revolution
period; but in recent years, it has undergone a high level of scrutiny.
For the overall development of Indian agriculture, many institutional and infrastructural changes have
been introduced since Independence. Broadly, agricultural policy followed during this period can be

period from mid- sixties to 1980, third phase included period from 1980 to 1991, and forth phase
includes period from 1991/92 onwards.

development of major irrigation project and strengthens of cooperative credit institution. The Community
Development Programme, decentralised planning and the Intensive Area Development Programmes
were also initiated for regenerating Indian agriculture that had stagnated during the British period. In
order to encourage the farmers to adopt better technology, incentive price policy was adopted in 1964

prices of agricultural crops. Despite the institutional changes and development programmes introduced
by the Government during this phase, India remained dependent upon foreign countries for food to
feed the rising population. The second phase in Indian agriculture started in mid 1960s with adoption
of new agricultural strategy. The new agricultural strategy relies on high-yielding varieties of crops,
multiple cropping, the package approach, modern farm practices and spread of irrigation facilities. The

reforms during this period took back seat while research, extension, input supply, credit, marketing,
price support and spread of technology were the prime concern of policy makers. The next phase in

accelerated growth in agricultural GDP during the 1980s. There has been a considerable increase in
subsidies and support to agriculture sector during this period while public sector spending in agriculture
for infrastructure development started showing decline in real term but investment by farmers kept on
moving on a rising trend. The fourth phase of agricultural policy started after initiation of economic reform
process in 1991. Economic reforms process involved deregulation, reduced government participation
in economic activities, and liberalization. Although there is no any direct reforms for agriculture but
the sector was affected indirectly by devaluation of exchange rate, liberalization of external trade and
disprotection to industry. During this period opening up of domestic market due to new international
trade accord and WTO was another change that affected agriculture. This raised new challenges among
policymakers. Because of this, a New Agricultural Policy was launched by Indian Government in July
2000. This aims to attain output growth rate of 4 per cent per annum in agriculture sector based on

what ought to be done in agriculture but the subsequent step, how and when policy goals and objective
would be achieved is not discussed.

Extension Efforts in post-independence Era

In post independence era, government of India has organized extension activities in three distinct
phases viz. extensive (i.e. Community Development and National Extension Service embraced all-

organisation system.
1. National Extension Service (NES) is the main extension service, run by State Department of
Agriculture, is also known as training and visit system of Agricultural Extension and co-ordinated
by Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Agriculture and Co-operation at the centre.
2. The Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and State Agricultural Universities (SAUs)
Extension System also carry out limited extension work.
3. The public sector undertaking extension system which includes extension by undertaking in

boards, with no coordination among themselves or linkages with other extension

Preliminary Governmental Efforts

Alber Mayar, an American rural development enthusiast introduced principles of agricultural extension

Project (1948), U.P. The concept of multipurpose extension worker was originated from this project.
Besides. Introduction of new agricultural technologies, organisation of cooperatives and programmes of
health, sanitation, social education, etc. had been taken up.
Nilokheri experiment (1948) was another development project started under S.K. Dey for rehabilitation
of the families displaced from West Pakistan due to partition. Vocational training-cum-production centre
had been initiated It was an example of success in co-operation and community work.
These two projects were small experiments with lessons for planners and policy makers.

Community Development, a nationwide rural development programme launched during 1952. It was
a programme of overall development promoting all sided development of the village community.
Community development Blocks with about 100 villages in its jurisdiction were the centre of all
development activities. A team of extension specialists belonging to rurally oriented disciplines under

multipurpose extension agents at the grassroot level, though, it was from that the concept of Gurgaon
Project. A village guide had been posted to act as a channel through which the advice of the experts
in various departments could be passed on to the villagers. The programme of introducing improved
seed, implements, the methods of cultivation, etc. were started throughout the districts.In 1953, there
was National Extension service implemented, which was an organisational structure for carrying out
development work in the country.
Then, intensive approach to agricultural development was the call of 1960s in order to accelerate
agricultural production rapidly. In 1960, Intensive Agricultural District Programme (IADP)was launched

extension was needed to transform traditional subsistence farming habits to one of improved agriculture.
Later, new agricultural strategies were formulated like Intensive Agricultural Area Programme (IAAP)

Then State Agricultural Universities were started in every state to disseminate agricultural education.
Farmers Training centres (FTC), National Demonstration (ND) scheme, farm and home broadcasting
of All India Radio (AIR) and farmer’s functional literacy programme were launched during 1965-66.

Small Farmers Development Agency (SFDA), Marginal Farmers Development and Agricultural
Labourers agency, Drought Prone Area Programme, Hill Area Development Programme, Tribal Area
Development Programmes, etc. came up in 1970. These programmes were launched to meet the thrust of
rural development programme in the country in neglected regions, in order to improve the conditions of
small and marginal farmers, landless labourers, drought prone regions, hill areas. Then Integrated Rural
Development Programme (IRDP) also implemented in 1976 for upliftment of the poor and oppressed
group of people in rural areas and for generating income and employment. A series of schemes were
launched to provide loans, subsidy and training on income generating skills and for creation of assets.
The same approach was further strengthened in 1980s and 1990s. However, the extension functionaries
and approach of extension remained unchanged. There was not much thinking on this aspect.

Training and Visit System (T & V)

To start with pilot projects were started in Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh in 1974 the positive results
inspired gradual expansion of the project throughout the country. The training and visit system called
for major overhaul of the existing agricultural extension system by initiating reorganisation at all
levels. The new system called for single line of command from the state headquarters to the grass
root level. The extension personnel were made responsible only for professional agricultural extension
works. Systematic visits are conducted soon after training to disseminate messages. At the grassroot
level, contact farmers are selected (almost 10 per cent out of total farm families), they serve as key
communicators. The village extension workers (grassroot level functionary) contact those selected
farmers on their visits. There is close and constant interaction with the research system. The State
Agricultural Universities and their outreach stations do not only conduct monthly workshops for subject
matter specialists but also take interest in research problems based on needs of the farmers. There is

to time.
A Village Extension Worker (VEW) form a group of 500 farm families in intensive areas like major
irrigation systems or areas with large distance or having other special considerations and for a group

for VBWat the block level.

Sub-divisional Level-A sub-division covering about 3-5 blocks, is the basic unit for the operation of
this system. Since the sub-division is the responsible unit for training for the extension workers, it is

Matter Specialists covering 3-5 subdivisions is normally the unit for implementation of programmes at
this level.
Zonal Level- In case of too many districts to be supervised directly by the headquarters, one additional

extension activities in the districts under him. In other matters, the links between the department and the
districts will be through the ZEO.
State Level- The extension service is placed under a whole time Additional Director of Agriculture
(Extension) with suitable technical assistance under the overall charge of the Director of Agriculture.
The A.D.A. (Extension) is fully responsible for the implementation of Extension activities, in the state
he is assisted by a team of most senior SMSS.

The key features of Training and Visit system are as follows

Professionalism, single line of command, time bound work, regular and continuous training and linkage
with research.

technologies among the farming community, enhanced farm employment, but limited use of mass media
made hindrance in reaching small and marginal farmers.

The Indian Council of Agricultural Research, an apex organisation for co-ordinating agricultural
research and education in the country, has a limited role in extension. It has launched a few programmes
popularly known as transfer-of-technology projects or First-Line Extension Projects. The major goal
behind launching these programmes is to demonstrate latest agricultural technologies in the farmers’

that experiences gained in such sound extension programmes would help in designing model extension
programmes to be implemented by general extension system. Brief description of each programme is
given below.
Lab-to-Land project was launched as part of the ICAR Golden Jubilee programme in 1979 It aimed to
bring scientists and farmers in close contact and demonstrate potentials of low cost technologies relevant
for small marginal farmers as well as landless labourers. The emphasis was made on developing farm

creating supplementary sources of income. The programme was implemented through State Agriculture
Universities, ICAR Institutes, State Departments of Agriculture Voluntary Organizations. The activities
under Lab-to-Land project included creation of farm plan, and training, and demonstration. The whole
programme was acted as feedback mechanism for the scientists and extension functionaries

Krishi Vigyan Kendra

Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK) was launched in 1974 as vocational training institution for farmers and

agricultural production. Training courses of each Kendra should be tailored according to felt-needs and
existing resources of particular area. Three fundamental principles or mandates of KVK are as follows:
(i) Agricultural production is the prime-goal,
(ii) Work experience is the main method of facilitating training, and
(iii) Priority of training should be on the weaker section of the society.

The KVKs are now engaged with four major functions, as given below:
(i) To organise long-term vocational training for rural youths for generating self-employment,
(ii) To organise training of farmers and extension functionaries,
(ii) To organise front-line demonstrations, and
(iv) To collaborate with subject matter specialists (SMS) of Agricultural Universities in on-farm

National Demonstration Project (1964) had mainly taken care of multiple cropping demonstration Rainfed
cultivation demonstration Special problem soil demonstration Entire farming system demonstration

Operational Research Projects (ORP) were initiated in 1975 by ICAR with the aim of demonstrating the
technologies to the farmers and the extension workers on a watershed basis to evoke community action.

or cluster of contiguous villages waters area,

(iii) To demonstrate group action as a method of popularising the most of the technologies at faster
rate.
Institution Village Linkage Programme (IVLP)

Institution Village Linkage Programme (IVLP) was started on a pilot basis in 1995 as a programme
of the ICAR emphasizing on technology integration. The technology integration in contrast to

agricultural information is put to use in any farm production system. In view of three districts types of
agriculture, viz. commercial green revolution and complex, diverse and risk prone (CDR), there is need

in case of commercial farm production system. This was implemented in 42 centre of selected ICAR

assessing innovation generated by scientists knowledgeable about their respective disciplines. However,
various factors operating in the farm production system of small farmers hitherto not considered by

objectives:
(i) To introduce technological intervention with emphasis on stability and sustainability along with
productivity of small production systems.
(ii) To introduce and integrate the appropriate technologies to sustain technological interventions

(iii) To introduce and integrate the appropriate technologies to increase the agricultural productivity
with marketable surplus in commercial farm production systems.
(iv) To facilitate adoption of appropriate post-harvest technologies for conservation and on-farm
value addition of agricultural products, by-products and wastes for greater economic dividend
and national priorities

women.
(vi) To monitor socio-economic impact of technologies for removal of the technological
intervention(%)for different production systems.
(vii) To identify extrapolation domains for new technology/technology modules based on
environmental characterization at meso and mega levels.

In 1999, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) launched National Agricultural Technology
Project (NATP). Under this project. Innovations in technology Dissemination (ITD) component has
been planned, which aims at developing transfer of technology (TOT) system that is demand driven,

development.
 1. To increase the quality and type of technologies disseminated,
2. To enable research and extension systems to become demand driven and responsible for solving
problems of farmers,
3. To strengthen research-extension-farmers (R-E-F) linkages,

5. To share ownership of Agricultural Technology System (ATS) among key stakeholders ie, farmers
especially poor, women and disadvantaged, public sector research and extension agencies like
ICAR, SAUS, DOA etc.

The World Bank assisted agricultural research programme called the National Agricultural Innovation
Project (NAIP) was launched in India in July, 2006, for a period of six years. The project focuses
on innovations in agricultural technology. The project would facilitate an accelerated and sustainable
transformation of the Indian agriculture so that it can support poverty alleviation and income generation.
This would be achieved through collaborative development and application of agricultural innovations
by public organisations in partnership with farmers’ groups, the private sector and their stakeholders.

The important objectives of NAIP are:

1. To build the critical capacity of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) as a catalyzing
agent for management of change of the Indian National Agricultural Research System (NARS),
2. To promote research in the production-to-consumption system mode in the priority areas/themes

the rural stakeholders.

3. To improve livelihood security of the rural people living in selected disadvantaged regions
through technology-led innovative systems which encompass the wide process of social and
economic change among all the stakeholders,
4. To build capacity to undertake basic and strategic research in strategic areas agricultural sciences,
to meet the technology development challenges in the immediate and predictable future.

The key components of NAIP are as follows:

Institutional development by strengthening of ICAR role,
Establishment of consortia for research on production to consumption system,
Establishment of consortium for research on sustainable rural livelihood security in
disadvantaged areas,
 Establishment of consortia to strengthen basic and strategic research in areas of
agricultural science.

27 States and 13 agro-climatic zones under NAIP.

Three variables were considered for computing the index of backwardness, they are as follows:
(i) Agricultural productivity per worker,
(ii) Agricultural wage rate, and
(iii) SC/ST population

districts of similar socio-economic and agro-ecology will be preferred for consortia formation.

an activity, healthy life. Its essential elements are availability of food and the ability to acquire it.
In view of the stagnating food grain production and an increasing consumption need of the growing
population, Government of India launched this centrally sponsored scheme, National Food Security
Mission (NFSM) in August 2007.
The major objective of the scheme is to increase production and productivity of wheat, rice and pulses
on a sustainable basis o as to ensure food security of the country The Approach is to bridge the yield
gap in respect of these crops through dissemination of improved technologies and farm management
practices.

National Food Security Mission-Rice (NFSM -Rice)

National Food Security Mission - Wheat (NFSM - Wheat)
National Food Security Mission - Pulses (NFSM - Pulses)
Various activities of NFSM were undertaken related to demonstration of improved production

support for micro-nutrients, gypsum, zero-tillage, rotavators, weeders and other farm implements, IPM,
INM, extension, water lifting and moisture saving devices, training and mass media campaign including
awards for best performing districts.

Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojana (RKVY)

A new State Plan Scheme of Additional Central Assistance for agriculture and allied sectors, namely,
Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojana
States to increase public investment to achieve 4 per cent growth rate in agriculture and allied sectors

focus attention Integrated development of food crops, including coarse cereals, minor millets and pulses
Agriculture mechanisation; Soil health and productivity: Development of rainfed farming systems;
Integrated pest management; Market infrastructure, Horticulture Animal husbandry and dairying:
Fisheries: Timely completion of projects; Support to institutions that promote agriculture horticulture
etc: Organic and bio-fertilizers, and innovative schemes. These activities are only indicative in nature.

Swarnajayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY)

The Swarnajayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana

review of prof. S. R. Hashim Committee of the neural development and poverty alleviation programmes in

approach to soup approach in implementation of self generation programme and preference was given

Supply of Improved Toolkits to Rural Artisans (SITRA). Ganga Kalyan Yojana

such as organisation of the poor into self-help groups, training, credit, infrastructure and marketing was
evolved as a means of poverty alleviation in rural areas.

The objective of the programme is to bring the assisted poor families (Swarozgar) above the poverty
line by providing them income generating assets through a mix of bank credit and government subsidy

Features-

(i) Establishing a large number of micro-enterprises in rural areas building upon the potential of the
rural poor.
(ii) Assisted families may be individuals or groups but the emphasis is on the self-help groups.

block, based on resources, occupational skills of the people and availability of market.
(iv) Project approach for each key activity.

(vi) Emphasises skill development through well designed training programmes.

(vii) Promotion of marketing of the goods produced by swarozgaris.
(viii) Special focus on vulnerable groups - SC/ST at least 50 per cent, women 40 per cent and disabled
3 per cent.
Pradhan Mantri Gramin Sadak Yojana (PMGSY)

Pradhan Mantri Gramin Sadak Yojana

August 2000, is connecting the India till date.

1. To provide easy accessibility to the rural community,

2. To conduct rural development,
3. To improve socio-economic condition of the rural population,
4. To bridge the gap between urban and rural areas.
5. To connect each and every village with a population exceeding 1000 by all-weather roads.
6. To maintain rural roads constructed under this scheme by the local panchayats with the help of
State government fund.

Sampoorna Gramin Rozgar Yojana

Sampoorna Gramin Rozgar Yojana

schemes, namely, Employment Assurance Scheme (EAS) and Jawahar Gram Samridhi Yojana
administered by the Panchayats and Rural Development Department have been merged effect from
2001-02.

1. To provide additional wage employment and food security in the rural area.
2. To create of durable community, social and economic assets, and
3. To develop rural infrastructures.

The Parliament passed the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA) 2005 that guarantees
100 days of wage employment in a year to every rural household whose adult members are willing to do
nd
February 2006. In
st
April,
2008, NREGA has been extended to all districts in the country. NREGA is renamed as Mahatma Gandhi
National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) on 2 nd October, 2009.

The main objective of the MGNREG Act is to provide for the enhancement of livelihood security of the
households in rural areas by providing at least one hundred days of guaranteed wage employment in

(The Gazette of India Extraordinary 2006: 1).

There are other objectives also, such as:
1. Reduction of number of distressed migration from the rural to urban areas and from one part of
rural to another part of rural areas,
2. Creation of durable assets in rural areas,
3. Empowering rural women through opportunity to earn income independently and to participate
in social groups,
4. Overall development of the rural economy,
5. Promotion of inclusive growth and development.

Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY)

In January, 2016, the government of India launched Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana
crop insurance scheme, which covered risks of weather, pests, diseases, prevented sowing and damages
on standing and harvested crops. Although government continued to subsidize premiums paid by
farmers, empanelment of private insurers for quoting competitive actuarial rates invited private sector
participation. Modern technology accelerated the pace and intensity of collection of yield data so that

against climate change but a weather calamity can strike a vast area and large numbers. The nation’s
satellite and meteorological capabilities are strengthened to generate early and reliable alerts. A disaster
response force was instituted with passage of a Disaster Management Act in 2005 whereby Central
forces are deployed to support the states as and when needed. Drought is treated as a disaster calling for

Role of State Agricultural Universities (SAUs) in Extension

State Agricultural Universities (SAU) were set up in India on the pattern of Land Grant Universities of
U.S.A. with integrated teaching, research and extension functions. Each SAU was expected to perform
some extension roles in the area under its jurisdiction. However, extension role of SAU was supposed to

extension roles of SAUs are as given below.

(i) To prepare personnel to perform various extension roles and provide dynamic and analytic
leadership to extension programmes through a sound, systematic and integrated undergraduate
and post-graduate teaching in extension education.

clientele through appropriate methods and media

the concerned subject e departments

(iv) To produce information materials and teaching aids for extention personal, trainers and farmers.
(v) To plan, organise and conduct production and problem oriented training of various types and
duration for extension personnel, farmers and others concerned with development programmes
(vi) To provide authentic and systematic guidance through an uptodate and specialised Farm and
Home Advisory Service to farmers, farm women, farm youth, extension personnel, bankers,
 input dealers manufacturers, voluntary farm organisations and others concerned with agricultural
development.
(vii) To undertake researches on various facets of extension education with a view to enriching
programme formulation and operation, and gaining insight into the process of dynamics of
planned change.
(vii) To undertake adaptive and operational research projects with a view to testing applicability of

of the state.
In order to assist and perform these roles each SAU must have Directorate of Extension with following
major units.

Extension workers and farmers need advice on technical matters such advice should be readily available
with the help of concerned subject matter specialists with the help of SAUs.

Training
Training of farmers, farm women, youth and extension personnel has become one of the major
responsibilities of SAUs and appropriate infrastructure have been created for the purpose.

Field Extension

matter specialists of Directorate of Extension or regional stations. Besides the transfer of technology
programmes of ICAR viz. National Demonstration, KVK, LLP, ORP and Technology.

Extension Role of Voluntary Organisations

Voluntarism is derived from latin word ‘Voluntas’ which means will. The free will assumes various
forms of impulses, passions and desire to act. The term ‘volunteer’ is normally used to mention someone
who offers unpaid service for a noble cause. There are many sources of motivation behind voluntarism

set up by a group of persons on voluntary basis to help people of a locality in self-reliant development in
order to satisfy their needs. Voluntary organisations must be representatives of the needs and aspirations
of the people and should not expect to get in return for the services rendered. It must also be free from
external control. People’s involvement in all the activities is essential. Ideally the emphasis should be
on raising consciousness of the people and strengthening their capacities to solve their own problems.

New Dawn in Indian Extension

Extension work is undergoing a phase of transition due to various factors such as technological
innovations, new age media, changes in organisations and perception about development.
Thus, many new trends are emerging such as inclusion of new subject matter area, in the area of extension
education, privatisation, media use, participatory methods of extension work, farmers network, that will
be discussed below:

Extension though started with improvement in agriculture and home economics in early years, it soon

etc. However, with changing demography in the developed nations bulk of population in Europe and
North America is urban. Extension in many of these countries is now focussing on new subject matter
areas of relevance to the majority viz. environment, energy, social-ecology, occupational health hazards
of both farmers and farm women, consumer education, natural resources management, etc. With success

public awareness about many new areas like family welfare, teenage pregnancy, drug prevention, care
of the elderly through time tested methods of extension education. The World Bank supported extension
is broadening its narrow focus from crops to livestock, land use, water-management, conservation of
natural resource, climate-smart agriculture, and precision agriculture in order to provide much needed
technological support to farmers

Privatisation of Extension

fund generation is becoming highly needful day by day. Many large scale farmers and agribusiness
organisations can willingly pay for the advice and assistance received from extension organisations. In
Britain, the main goal of its extension service is to be leading consultancy to farmers and agribusiness
to provide quality service: Of late, Government of Rajasthan State of India has decided to involve
private sector voluntary agency to undertake extension at the grassroot level and gradually minimise
government’s role in extension work. This new trend is giving rise to misperception that public-funded
extension service is biased towards those who can afford the high price With increasing emphasis on

Further, the public organisation would be weakened in comparison to private organisation.

Media Use

Agricultural extension, for long, has depended on traditional modes of communication, mostly face-to-
face contacts with individuals and groups despite the fact that number of extension workers is woefully
inadequate in many parts of the world. Many experts feel that traditional extension is labour intensive
and not well-equipped to meet diverse information needs to all categories of farmers. Communication
media, offer a lot of advantages for reaching messages to masses more precisely and quickly. Above
all, range of communication media has expanded far beyond imagination. There are exciting new
features available in the new communication technologies combining both capacity of broadcast
and miniaturization of equipments in order to facilitate grassroot level production and distribution.
Availability of computer and telecommunication facilities are opening new streets of communication

Extension work being carried out by bureaucratic government organisations under strict mandates
are seen as anti-thesis of human emphasis on people-oriented extension organisations at the grassroots
with emphasis on effective use of community›s resources. The knowledge and experiences of people
should be the starting point to solve community›s problems. Farmers are being viewed as active partners
in development of innovations and their dissemination in the community. Farming Systems Research
and Extension (FSRE), Participatory Technology Development (PTD) and Farmer First extension are
new waves of extension calling for active roles of farmers and building structures for farmer to farmer
extension. Extension in the changed scenario is more farmer-propelled and interactive.

Establishment of Networks among Indian farmers

Establishment of links among farmers with similar concerns and mission together in search of solutions
of the problems is becoming the call of decade. As these networks can provide such forum to people
with overlapping vision, and need to maintain contact. This is more relevant for wt reliance of farmers,
especially to those not having ready access advice. They can use their network to gather time-to-
time needed information. Before starting, it requires some baseline survey to determine the need of
potential member and extent of commitment to work together for the common cause. Depending
upon the objectives, formal or semiformal structure need to be formulated. A steering committee or
administrative body should be formed to pull fund, distribute responsibilities and carry out functions.
In India, a network of small and marginal farmers interested in LEISA (Low External Input Sustainable
Agriculture) was formed in Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry in 1990. The organisation for network was
initiated through a regional workshop of farmers with common interest.
Lessons learnt from experiences of farmers network in developing nations indicate that, initially an
informal organisational structure with focus on actions are perceived as important by members. Then
autonomy of members and their representation should be considered. Type of activities chosen for the
network should be within limits of time and energy so as to allow for frequent meetings and sharing.

Extension has now become part and parcel of agricultural higher education in India. General universities

walls. With initiatives of pioneering thinkers and policy makers, extension has now become third and
important dimension for general education. There are 95 universities having departments or centres of
adult, continuing and extension education (ACEE) all over the country. Though all the departments,
centres have not taken up activities equally intensively, some beginning has already been made. There
is a general fear and hitch among the educated elites about content and manner of contact with the
masses. However, there is no dearth of subject matter areas to be covered following ‘cafeteria approach’

Thus, concepts of home science, environment, commerce, botany, economics and management, law,
View publication stats

sociology, social work, etc. can be directly used to address to the information needs of the people.
However, there is need to orient the teachers about their extension roles and nature of activities to be
undertaken by the ACEE Units.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Anonymous. 1978. Report of the Review Committee on Agricultural Universities, ICAR, New Delhi,
June 1978.
Chand, R. 2001. Emerging Trends and Issues in Public and Private Investments in Indian Agriculture: a
State wise Analysis”, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56(2): 161-184.
Chand, R. 2003. Government Intervation in Foodgrain Markets in the Changing Context. Policy Paper
19, National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, New Delhi.
Ghosh, N. 2017. Securing Farmer’s Welfare: Reality to Vision. Yojana. Specia issue, pp. 33-37.
Joshi, P.K., Pal, S., Birthal, P.S. and Bantilan, M.C.S. 2005. Impact of agricultural research: Post Green
Revolution Evidence from India. National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research
(NCAP)/International Crop Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), New Delhi.
Kumar, B. and Hansra, B.S. 2000. Extension Education for Human Resource Development. Concept
Publishing Company. New Delhi.
Mishra, S.N. and Ramesh Chand 1995. “Private and Public Capital Formation in Indian Agriculture:
Comments on Complementarity Hypothesis and Others”, Economic and Political Weekly, 30(24):
A-64 –A-79.
Mondal, S. 2018. . Kalyani Publishers. New
Delhi. India.
Pal, S. 2008. Agricultural R&D policy and institutional reforms: Learning form the experiences of India
and China. Economic and Political Weekly, 69: 145-155.
Rao, V. M. 1996. Agricultural Development with a Human Face. Economic and Political Weekly, 31(26):
A-52 - A-62.
Sontakki, B.S., Samanta, R.K., Joshi, P.K. 2010. Redesigning agricultural extension in India: challenges
and opportunities. In: Paper presented at NAARM-IFPRI Workshop, National Academy of
Agricultural Research Management, Hyderabad, Telangana.