Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 35 views

    2023 Lupong Tagapamayapa Incentives Awards (Ltia) Assessment Form

    Uploaded by

    TIERRA NEVADA
    The document is an assessment form for the 2023 Lupong Tagapamayapa Incentives Awards. It evaluates Lupons across several criteria to determine efficiency and effectiveness in dispute resolution. Criteria include observance of procedures, timely resolution of cases, record keeping, coordination with other agencies, and information campaigns. Lupons are scored on their compliance with these criteria, with points awarded based on the level of compliance demonstrated. The form collects both quantitative and qualitative data on the Lupons' operations and performance.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    2023 Lupong Tagapamayapa Incentives Awards (Ltia) Assessment Form

    Uploaded by

    TIERRA NEVADA
    35 views18 pages
    The document is an assessment form for the 2023 Lupong Tagapamayapa Incentives Awards. It evaluates Lupons across several criteria to determine efficiency and effectiveness in dispute resolution. Criteria include observance of procedures, timely resolution of cases, record keeping, coordination with other agencies, and information campaigns. Lupons are scored on their compliance with these criteria, with points awarded based on the level of compliance demonstrated. The form collects both quantitative and qualitative data on the Lupons' operations and performance.

    Original Title

    Untitled

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document is an assessment form for the 2023 Lupong Tagapamayapa Incentives Awards. It evaluates Lupons across several criteria to determine efficiency and effectiveness in dispute resolution. Criteria include observance of procedures, timely resolution of cases, record keeping, coordination with other agencies, and information campaigns. Lupons are scored on their compliance with these criteria, with points awarded based on the level of compliance demonstrated. The form collects both quantitative and qualitative data on the Lupons' operations and performance.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    35 views18 pages

    2023 Lupong Tagapamayapa Incentives Awards (Ltia) Assessment Form

    Uploaded by

    TIERRA NEVADA
    The document is an assessment form for the 2023 Lupong Tagapamayapa Incentives Awards. It evaluates Lupons across several criteria to determine efficiency and effectiveness in dispute resolution. Criteria include observance of procedures, timely resolution of cases, record keeping, coordination with other agencies, and information campaigns. Lupons are scored on their compliance with these criteria, with points awarded based on the level of compliance demonstrated. The form collects both quantitative and qualitative data on the Lupons' operations and performance.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 18

    2023 LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA INCENTIVES AWARDS (LTIA)

    ASSESSMENT FORM
    A. IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
    Lupong Tagapamayapa : Region :
    City: Award Category :
    Province:

    B. EVALUATION CRITERIA
    General Instruction: Please do not forget to include your observations in the remarks column.

    ASSIGNED SCORE
    TABLE
    CRITERIA POINT POINT
    ASSESS ON-SITE
    SCORE VALUE
    MENT
    I. EFFICIENCY IN OPERATION 42 0

    A. Observance of Settlement Procedure and Settlement


    20
    Deadlines

    1. a) Proper recording of every dispute/complaint

    5 points - submitted/presented the record book or logbook


    reflecting all the required details

    2.5 points - submitted/presented the record book or logbook


    reflecting some of the necessary details 5

    O point - no presented record book or logbook

    Note: Check if the record contains docket number, names of the


    parties, date and time filed, nature of the case and disposition
    b) Sending of Notices/Summons to parties within the
    prescribed period (within the next working day upon receipt
    of complaint)

    5 points - submitted/presented 80-100% of summons with


    complete and accurate information issued within the prescribed
    period

    3 points - submitted/presented 50-79% of summons with


    complete and accurate information issued within the prescribed
    period 5

    2 points - submitted/presented 1-49% of summons with complete


    and accurate information issued within the prescribed period

    0 point – have not submitted/presented any summons/notices

    Note: Scores will be given only when file copy of the summons
    issued within the next working day is with date and time stamped
    of the receipt.

    2. Settlement and Award Period


    (with at least 10 settled cases within the assessment period)
    a.) Mediation (within 15 days from initial confrontation with the
    Lupon Chairman)
    b.) Conciliation (15 days from initial confrontation with the
    Pangkat)

    c.) Conciliation (with extended period not to exceed another 15


    days) 10
    10

    d.) Arbitration (within 15 days from the date of the agreement to


    arbitrate)

    e.) Conciliation beyond 46 days but not more than 60 days


    (clearly meritorious cases)

    10 points – 80-100% cases were resolved using any mode of


    ADR (supported by minutes of proceedings) within the prescribed
    period

    8 points - 60-79% cases were resolved using any mode of ADR


    (supported by minutes of proceedings) within the prescribed
    period

    6 points - 40-59% cases were resolved using any mode of ADR


    (supported by minutes of proceedings) within the prescribed
    period

    4 points - 20-39% cases were resolved using any mode of ADR


    (supported by minutes of proceedings) within the prescribed
    period

    2 points - 1-19 % cases were resolved using any mode of ADR


    (supported by minutes of proceedings) within the prescribed
    period

    0 point - 0 cases were resolved using any mode of ADR


    (supported by minutes of proceedings) within the prescribed
    period

    B. Systematic Maintenance of Records 5

    1. Records of Cases
    For Cities - computer database with searchable case information
    - 2 points
    For Municipalities: 2
    a. Manual Records - 1
    b. Digital Record Filing - 1

    2. Copies of Minutes of Lupon meetings with attendance sheets


    1
    and notices

    3. Copies of reports submitted to the Court and to the DILG


    1
    on file

    4. All records are kept on file in a secured filing cabinet(s) 1

    C. C. Timely Submissions to the Court and the DILG 7

    1. To the Court:
    Submitted/ presented copies of settlement agreement to the
    Court from the lapse of the ten-day period repudiating the 5
    mediation/ conciliation settlement agreement, or within five (5)
    calendar days from the

    5.0 points = 80%-100% submitted on time


    4.0 points = 60%-79% submitted on time
    3.0 points = 40%-59% submitted on time
    2.0 points = 20%-39% submitted on time
    1.0 point = 1%-19% submitted on time
    0 point = 0% of reports submitted on tim
    2. To the DILG (Quarterly) 2

    2 points - Submitted/presented of the required report to the DILG


    within the prescribed period

    1 point – submitted/presented partial report of the DILG within


    the prescribed period.

    0 point - the required report to the DILG was not submitted or


    submitted beyond the prescribed period

    D. Conduct of Monthly Meetings Exclusively on KP Matters 10

    ● Notice of Meeting 2

    2.0 points – minimum of 12 meetings with KP-related matters,


    complete details, each Lupon member must sign (indicating their
    name, date and time of receipt) when receiving notices of
    meeting.

    1.0 point – anything beyond the compliance document, with


    incomplete details

    0 point = no data presented


    Number of months with KP-related meetings with minutes and
    attendance sheets conducted:

    ● Minutes=of
    8.0 points 12the Meeting
    months 8
    6.0 points = 9-11 months
    4.0 points = 6-8 months
    2.0 points = 3-5 months
    II. EFFECTIVENESS IN SECURING THE SETTLEMENT OF
    1.0 point = 1-2 months
    INTERPERSONAL DISPUTE OBJECTIVE OF THE 30 0
    0 point = no meeting
    KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY

    A. Quantity of settled cases against filed 10 10


    With a minimum of 10 cases settled, the percentage of cases
    received by the Lupon resulting to settlement:

    10.0 points = 100%


    8.0 points = 80%-99%
    10
    6.0 points = 60%-79%
    4.0 points = 40%-59%
    2.0 points = 1%-39%
    0 point = 0%

    To Compute:
    Total number of settled cases x 100
    Total no. of cases filed - cases outside the jurisdiction
    of KP

    B. Quality of Settlement of Cases 2 2


    •Zero case repudiated 1

    •Non-recurrence of cases settled 1

    1 point - for non-recurrence and zero cases repudiated (out of


    the total number of settled cases)

    0 point - at least one (1) (out of the total number of settled cases)

    C. At least 80% compliance with the terms of settlement or


    8 8
    award after the cases have been settled
    8 points = 80% -100% compliance with the terms of settlement or
    8
    award
    6 points = 70% -79% compliance with the terms of settlement or
    6
    award
    4 points = 60% -69% compliance with the terms of settlement or
    4
    award
    2 points = 50% -51% compliance with the terms of settlement or
    2
    award
    1 point = 49% and below compliance with the terms of settlement
    1
    or
    III. award
    CREATIVITY AND RESOURCEFULNESS OF THE LUPONG
    TAGAPAMAYAPA
    30 0
    A. A. Settlement Technique utilized by the Lupon 10
    10 points – five or more settlement techniquecutilized
    8 points – at least four settlement technique utilized
    6 points - at least 3 settlement technique utilized
    4 points - at least 2 settlement technique utilized
    2 points - at least 1 settlement technique utilized 10
    0 points – no report

    Note: Settlement technique to be considered are those that are


    within the KP process and procedures.

    B. Coordination with Concerned Agencies relating to


    5 points -filed
    disputes with (PNP,
    proof of coordination
    DSWD, relative
    DILG, DAR, to the Office
    DENR, filed disputes
    of the 5 5
    Prosecutor, Court, DOJ, CHR, etc.)
    0 point - without proof of coordination relative to the filed disputes
    C. Sustained information drive to promote Katarungang
    5
    Pambarangay
    1. For Cities
    • IEC materials developed 2
    • IEC activities conducted 1
    • Innovative Campaign Strategy 2

    2. For Municipalities
    • IEC materials developed 2
    • IEC activities conducted 2
    • Innovative Campaign Strategy 1
    D. D. KP Training or seminar participated within the
    10
    assessment period
    Organized skills training participated by the Lupong
    10
    Tagapamayapa
    Trainings or seminars should cover the following, and the Lupon
    should be able to articulate during validation their learnings
    therefrom:

    1) General/basic orientation or review of the KP system


    2) Skills training on conduct of KP proceedings e.g. relevant ADR
    systems, KP case management
    3) Advanced knowledge on laws, policies, and standards in
    relation to the KP system e.g. gender and human rights,
    criminal/civil justice

    10 points = at least 6 qualified training/seminar


    8 points = at least 5 qualified training/seminar
    6 points = at least 4 qualified training/seminar
    4.0 points = at least 3 qualified training/seminar
    2.0 points = at least 2 qualified training/seminar
    0 point = No qualified information training/seminar

    IV. AREA OR FACILITY FOR KP ACTIVITIES 5 5


    • Building structure or space

    For cities – the office or space should be exclusive for KP


    matters 5

    For municipalities – KP office or space may be shared or used


    for other Barangay matters.

    V. FINANCIAL OR NON-FINANCIAL SUPPORT 3 3


    1. City, Municipal, Provincial, or NGAs 2

    2. People's Organizations, NGOs or Private Sector 1

    TOTAL SCORE 100


    National Board of Judge
    Date: ________________ (Signature over printed Na
    GAPAMAYAPA INCENTIVES AWARDS (LTIA)
    ASSESSMENT FORM

    Award Category :

    ations in the remarks column.

    REMARKS/OBSERVATION
    National Board of Judges
    (Signature over printed Name)

    You might also like