Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT

DILG-NAPOLCOM Center, EDSA corner Quezon Avenue, West Triangle, Quezon City
http://www.dilg.gov.ph

LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA INCENTIVES AWARDS

CRITERIA POINT
SCOR
E
I. EFFICIENCY 42
IN
OPERATION
A. Observance of 10
Settlement
Procedure and
Settlement
Deadlines
1. a) Proper 5 5 points - submitted/presented the record book or logbook reflecting all th
Recording of
every 2.5 points - submitted/presented the record book or logbook reflecting so
dispute/compl
aint O point - no presented record book or logbook

Note: Check if the record contains docket number, names of the partie

b) Sending of 5 5 points - submitted/presented 80-100% of summons with complete and

Notices and
Summons with 3 points - submitted/presented 50-79% of summons with complete and a
complete and
accurate 2 points - submitted/presented 1-49% of summons with complete and ac
information to
the parties 0 point – have not submitted/presented any summons/notices
within the
prescribed Note: Scores will be given only when file copy of the notices and summon
period (within
the next
working day
upon receipt of
complaint)
2. Settlement and 10 10 points – 80-100% cases were
Award Period
8 points - 60-79% cases were resolved using any mode of ADR (support
 (with at least 10 6 points - 40-59% cases were r
settled cases
within the 4 points - 20-39% cases were r
assessment
period) 2 points - 1-19 % cases were resolved using any mode of ADR (supporte

a.) Mediation 0 point - 0 cases were resolved using any mode of ADR (supported by m
(within 15
days from
initial
confrontatio
n with the
Lupon
Chairman)
b.) Conciliation
(15 days
from initial
confrontatio
n with the
Pangkat)
c.) Conciliation
(with
extended
period not to
exceed
another 15
days)
d.) Arbitration
(within 10
days from
the date of
the
agreement
to arbitrate)
e.) Conciliation
beyond 46
days but not
more than
60 days on
a clearly
meritorious
cases

B. Systematic 5
Maintenance of
Records
1. Record of
Cases For cities:
2 2 points if presented photos of the computer database with searchable e
 For Cities - For Municipalities:
computer 1 point if presented copy/photo of the manual record
database with 1 point if presented digital record filing
searchable 1
case 1 To check the actual document during onsite validation
information
To check the quality of the file management - Record of dockets cases sh
For
Municipalities
:
a. Manual
Records
b. Digital
Record
Filing

2. Copies of 1 1 point – complete and accurate compilation

Minutes of
Lupon Note: During the table assessment, the MOVs presented should suffice. H
meetings with
attendance
sheets and
notices

3. Copies of 1 1 point – complete and accurate compilation

reports
submitted to Note: During the table assessment, the MOVs presented should suffice. H
the Court and
to the DILG
on file

4. All records are 1 1 point if judicial standard is observed, where filing cabinets is secured w
kept on file in a
secured filing Note: During the table assessment, the MOVs presented should suffice. H
cabinet(s)
C. Timely 7
Submissions to
the Court and
the DILG
1. To the Court: 5 5.0 points = 80%-100% submitted on time
Submitted/ 4.0 points = 60%-79% submitted on time
presented 3.0 points = 40%-59% submitted on time
copies of 2.0 points = 20%-39% submitted on time
settlement 1.0 point = 1%-19% submitted on time
agreement to 0 point = 0% of reports submitted on time
the Court
from the Note: Copies of transmittal letters must be stamped as received by the Co
lapse of the
ten-day
period
 repudiating
the
mediation/
conciliation
settlement
agreement,
or within five
(5) calendar
days from the
date of the
arbitration
award
2. To the DILG 2 2 points - Submitted/presented of the required report to the DILG within t
(Quarterly)
1 point – submitted/presented partial report of the DILG within the prescr

0 point - the required report to the DILG was not submitted or submitted b

Note: Copies of transmittal letters must be stamped as received by the DI

D. Conduct of 10
monthly
meetings for
administration
of the
Katarungang
Pambarangay
(KP)

1. Notice of 2 2.0 points – minimum of 12 meetings with KP-related matters, complete

Meeting
1.0 point – anything beyond the compliance document, with incomplete d

0 point = no data presented

Notes: This indicator should only be given scores if the agenda of the mee

Copies of Notices of Meetings must be signed/stamped as acknowledged

In case a meeting for a particular month was not conducted due to instan
2. Minutes of the 8 Number of months with KP-related meetings with minutes and attendance
Meeting
8.0 points = 12 months
6.0 points = 9-11 months
4.0 points = 6-8 months
2.0 points = 3-5 months
1.0 point = 1-2 months
0 point = no meeting

Note: KP Matters must directly pertain to complaints filed before the Lupo
II. EFFECTIVENESS IN 20
SECURING THE
SETTLEMENT OF
INTERPERSONAL
DISPUTE OBJECTIVE
OF THE
KATARUNGANG
PAMBARANGAY
A. Quantity of 10 With a minimum of 10 cases settled, the percentage of cases received by
settled cases
against filed 10.0 points = 100%
8.0 points = 80%-99%
6.0 points = 60%-79%
4.0 points = 40%-59%
2.0 points = 1%-39%
0 point = 0%

B. Quality of 1 point - for non-recurrence

Settlement of
Cases 1 0 point - at least one (1) (out of the total number of settled cases)
1
1. Zero cases
repudiated
2. Non-
recurrence of
cases settled
C. At least 80% 8 8 points = 80% -100% compliance with the terms of settlement or award
compliance
with the terms 6 points = 70% -79% compliance with the terms of settlement or award
of settlement or
award after the 4 points = 60% -69% compliance with the terms of settlement or award
cases have
been settled 2 points = 50% -51% compliance with the terms of settlement or award

1 point = 49% and below compliance with the terms of settlement or awa

III. CREATIVITY AND

RESOURCEFULNESS
OF THE LUPONG
30
TAGAPAMAYAPA
A. Settlement 10 10 points – five or more settlement technique
Technique utilized
utilized by the 8 points – at least four settlement technique
Lupon utilized
6 points - at least 3 settlement technique utilized
4 points - at least 2 settlement technique utilized
2 points - at least 1 settlement technique utilized
0 point – no report

Note: Settlement technique to be considered are those that are within the
B. Coordination 5 5 points - with proof of coordination relative to the filed disputes
with Concerned
Agencies 0 point - without proof of coordination relative to the filed disputes
relating to
disputes filed
(PNP, DSWD,
DILG, DAR,
DENR, Office of
the Prosecutor,
Court, DOJ,
CHR, etc.)

C. Sustained 5
information
drive to promote
Katarungang
Pambarangay For Cities:
2 2 points - IEC materials produced
1. For Cities 1 1 point – IEC activities conducted
 IEC 2 2 points - Innovative Campaign Strategy
materials
developed
 IEC For Municipalities
activities 2 2 points - IEC materials produced
conducted 2 2 points – IEC activities conducted
 Innovative 1 1 point - Innovative Campaign Strategy
Campaign
Strategy

2. For
Municipalities
 IEC
materials
developed
 IEC
activities
conducted
 Innovative
Campaign
Strategy

D. KP Training or 10 Trainings or seminars should cover the following, and the Lupon should b
seminar within
the assessment 1) General/basic orientation or review of the KP system
period
Organized skills 2) Skills training on conduct of KP proceedings e.g. relevant ADR system
training
participated by 3) Advanced knowledge on laws, policies, and standards in relation to the
 the Lupong 10 points = at least 6 qualified training/seminar
Tagapamayapa 8 points = at least 5 qualified training/seminar
6 points = at least 4 qualified training/seminar
4 points = at least 3 qualified training/seminar
2 points = at least 2 qualified training/seminar
0 point = No qualified information training/seminar

Note: The OADR conducts free webinar series and regional road show in
IV. AREA OR FACILITY 5
FOR KP ACTIVITIES
 Building For cities:
structure or 5 points – office or room for exclusive use during KP proceedings with ta
space
2 points – office or room for shared use during KP proceedings with table
For cities –
the office or
space should
be exclusive
for KP matters

For
municipalitie
s – KP office
or space may
be shared or
used for other
Barangay
matters.

V. FINANCIAL OR 3
NON-FINANCIAL
SUPPORT
1. From City, 2 2 points - received support from the both National & Local Governmen
Municipal,
Provincial or 1.5 points - received support from the either National & Local Governmen
NGAs
0 point - no support

Note: 1. Excluding the regular appropriations for the barangay and incen

2. Acknowledgment receipt should be signed by both the donor and recip

3. Additional honoraria or support from the Lupon on top of the mandatory

3 From People's 1 1 point – received support from either the organization or individual
Organizations,
NGOs or Private 0 point – no support received from either the organization or individual
Sector
TOTAL 100