Hla Hla San 2 Teaching Observation

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

LESSON PLAN AND DELIVERY EVALUATION FORM

FACULTY OF EDUCATION & PSYCHOLOGY

Name: Hla Hla San Subject: Math Date: April 1, 2022

Instructions:
Read through the evaluation criteria and circle the most appropriate score for each criterion. Provide comments for each section
as relevant/appropriate.

CRITERIA MARKING KEY:

5 = Excellent
4 = Very Good
3 = Good
2 = Average
1 = Needs Improvement

Criteria for Grading Comments

1. Lesson Plan 5

 The lesson plan was organized correctly, with 4


appropriate goals and objectives.
3 The lesson plan was well prepared

2. Clear Behavioral Expectations 5

 The students were given very clear behavioral 4 Students were ready and excited about
expectations. the lesson. Some welcoming
 Classroom rules were reinforced. 3 conversation helps students to feel
comfortable and safe. Rules were
2
reinforced sometimes. You need to be
1 consistent.

3. Anticipatory Set/Introduction to the Lesson 5

 The teacher gained the children’s attention. 4


 The class was quiet, seated and waiting in
anticipation. 3 Measuring the traditional way – sharing
 The teacher used aids, IT, pictures to stimulate and discussion
student’s curiosity. 2
 The teacher used an element of surprise to create
curiosity and interest with his/her students. 1

4. Procedural steps in the lesson were followed. 5

 The lesson had a logical flow. 4


 Remember, however, that you teach children not the
3 Introduce the lesson (group discussion)
plan. Therefore, procedural steps can change or be Flexible and responded to students’
altered when appropriate. Questions and comments appropriately
 Be flexible to capture a teachable moment. 2

5. Content 5

 The teacher has a good working knowledge and 4 Sufficient and interesting lesson
understanding of the topic and objectives.
 Content was delivered accurately and confidently. 3 Provided a lot of examples

2 Presented various activities

6. Teaching manner 5

 Good eye contact 4 Accommodating and encouraging a full


 Confident; encouraged students to participate participation
 Positive facial expressions 3
 Student-centered methodology Calm, composed, and confident
2

7. Voice Projection 5

 Clear diction and enunciation 4 Quite animated – used various voice and
 Voice pitched at an audible level body expressions.
 Voice projection was appropriate and not above the 3
noise of the class.
2

8. Pace of the Lesson 5

 Appropriate time for each step in the lesson (be 4


flexible)
 The lesson moved along at an appropriate pace. 3 Sufficient time to discuss and explore the
lesson
2

9. Rapport with students 5

 Teacher demonstrates professional distance. 4 Accommodating and helpful. Students


 Teacher was firm, assertive, fair, and friendly. were engaged in the lesson most of the
 Teacher showed that good rapport is built on good 3 time
teaching.
 Teacher encouraged positive communication. 2

1
10. Questions 5

 A good selection of HLQ (higher level questions) and 4 Students were encouraged to share and
LLQ (lower level questions) were asked. participate in the discussion (questions
 Wait time was appropriate. 3 were prepared well). You need to ask
 Teacher responded/accepted answers positively.
some questions that encourage critical
 Additional questions extended the student’s thinking. 2
thinking.
1

11. Effectiveness of the Lesson’s Resources/Aids/Materials 5

 IT-PPT/overheads/DVD 4 Used PPT to enhance the effectiveness of


 Charts/books/pictures/Objects/artifacts the lesson delivery
 Drama 3
 Games Utilized teaching aids appropriately
2

12. Student Involvement 5

 Students were actively participating and engaged in 4


learning.
 Collaborative learning process. 3 Students were on task most of the time
 Students remained on task.
2

13. Classroom management Whole class/ paired/ group 5


teaching
4
 Students were given clear expectations.
 Students were well organized and on task. 3 Group discussion and randomly selected
 Behavioral expectations were reinforced. students to answer the question.
2 Students were engaged most of the time.

14. Guided Practice 5

 The teacher circulated among the students, 4


answering questions, explaining tasks and assisting
when needed. 3 Addressed students’ questions
appropriately. Checking students’
2 understanding

15. The teacher gave praise when students remained 5


focused.
4
 Positive praise was given for appropriate: Behavior;
thoughtful answers; being on task, etc. 3 Very generous and expressive in giving
2 the students words of praise and
encouragement.
1

16. Closure 5

 The teacher returned to the initial objectives to revise 4 Checking the worksheet together
and appropriately sum up the lesson at the
conclusion. 3

17. OVERALL SCORE 68/80 (85%)

General Comments:

Strengths:
1. Well prepared (Procedure, activities, materials, etc.)
2. Calm and confident
3. Stimulating discussions, and activities
4. Prepared various activities, enhanced participation

Improvement needed:
1. The students need to learn to talk only when they are allowed or their turn to talk
2. Student needs to be reminded to pay attention
3. You are lagging because of the internet connection

Supervising Teacher Date

You might also like