FMP Special Board Meeting Deck

FACILITY MASTER PLAN
DISTRICT UPDATE
What the Facility Master Plan seeks to accomplish...
Provide a 20-year facilities vision and plan within the constraints of funding. We have a ~$2.1 billion need
with ~$700 million of one-time funding. This Plan identifies recommendations for full ~$2.1 billion in long -
term investments and immediate work for ~$700 million.
Protect neighborhood schools and feeder patterns; placing students in the best school building as
possible with the review of Facility Condition Index, enrollment, local demographic studies, and school
building utilization.
Continue to maximize use of our school buildings (students v. seats), improve overall condition of
schools through some new school buildings and renovations focused on HVAC, roofs, and masonry.
Invest in early education to provide feeder patterns into K-12 schools.

Where we are and where we’re going with our facilities
investments.
2018-2020 2020 2021-2022 The Future
Facilities Assessment and Initial Anchor Investments: The Facility Master Plan: Future Investments:
Community Engagement: Building Our Foundation Setting a Path Forward Fully Realizing Our Vision
Understanding Our Need
The District conducted a facility assessment Through our Fund Balance and the With the federal relief funds available to We know that the work does not stop
which identified $1.5B in facility needs by creation of a Capital Fund, we have the District, we are now able to set a here. We know that there are more
2023. committed to over $132M in anchor path forward to address many, but not than $1.4B in investments we need
investments to make the first set of all, of our needs. to make to fully realize our vision.
In 2019, the District reactivated schools improvements to our facilities.
Barton, Edmonson, Hamilton and Academy of With continued rising costs, our Facility
Americas at Logan to address facility needs Master Plan proposes the most
and enrollment changes. Through additional immediate investment needs totaling
community engagement, the District $700M out of a $2.1 billion need.
reactivated White, moved CMA to Ludington,
moved Pulaski, shifted King to an exam 3
school, and made investments totaling $8.5M.
Overview:
Total Districtwide
Renovation Needs 4
4
PROPOSED INITIAL INVESTMENTS
DISTRICT
Our Immediate Commitments
An anchor $132M investment and a further, initial $700M in investments that will address the most immediate priorities and set a foundation to catalyze future
facility investments across the District.
Schools and Neighborhoods of Physical Spaces that Equip Students Healthy, Safe and Sustainable Facility
Opportunity for Children and Families and Educators for Success Design, Financing and Operations
• 5 new buildings and 7 building reactivations • Upgraded technology infrastructure at all • Critical building renovations that ensure schools are
across the District that dramatically improve facility schools, including school-wide WIFI upgraded and safe, focusing on upgrading heating and
quality and energy efficiency for students and staff. improvements. cooling systems, roofs and exterior enclosure. All schools
• 5 new additions to existing buildings that create • Upgrades to outdoor spaces in most schools, slated for renovations will receive updated roofs and
new, exemplary spaces. such as playgrounds, providing spaces for active exterior enclosure improvements.
• A PreK-to-career approach for our neighborhood learning and connection. • Key investments with a focus on environmental and
schools, starting with expanded Pre-K facilities. financial sustainability and lowering long-term
• Ensuring the health of students and families with at maintenance costs, including LED lighting at all high
least one health center in every feeder pattern. schools slated for renovations.
• Ensuring safety of our school campuses by demolishing
vacant buildings on previous active school campuses.
FACILITY MASTER PLAN
A DATA-INFORMED APPROACH
Process for Data Analysis Investment Criteria
Needs Assessment • School Building Utilization Rate and

• Initial 2019 OHM data Enrollment
• Updated 2021 data reflecting revised need and costs
• Building Condition (Facility Condition Index)
Neighborhood Context
• Population trends (birth rates, women of child-bearing age,
neighborhood pop growth) • Enrollment and Utilization of Nearby Schools
• Demand for programs (population age range, % of children not
served by DPSCD, student residence) • Demographic Balance of Investments
• Neighborhood investments (housing and economic development
investments likely to grow population)
Site Identification
• Equity across neighborhoods
• Long-term sustainability and maintenance costs
• High-opportunity neighborhoods to increase enrollment and support
population growth
• Economic development impact of school facilities
FACILITY ASSESSMENT
KEY INDICATORS
Now By 2027:
Average District FCI:

Our facility assessment is based on two If we make the full
$2.1B in Facility
key indicators:
Average
Master Plan
investments
0 Excellent
▪ Facility Condition, which is a District FCI: Average District FCI:
measure of the amount of repair Facility If we make the initial
needed to get the building up to
minimum standards. The lower the
Condition 40 $700M in
investments 28 Fair
number, the better the facility’s
Deficient
condition. For Facility Condition: Average District FCI:
▪ Good: 0-10 If we make no
49 Poor
▪ Fair: 11-30 investments
▪ Deficient: 31-60
▪ Failing: 60+
▪ Utilization, which shows how much

of the school building we’re using. Average
The higher the number, the better, District Average District
If we make Facility
because that means we’re fully Utilization: Utilization:
maximizing our spaces.
Utilization Master Plan
investments
71% 81%
INITIAL INVESTMENT
KEY INDICATORS
Where we are
currently
The proposed $700M in initial investments
under the Facility Master Plan will set a solid
foundation for future investments and full Low FCI High FCI
implementation of the vision. However, we
know that even after making these initial Good Fair Deficient Failing
investments, there will be an ongoing need to
maintain our facilities. 0 – 10 11 - 30 31 - 60 61 - 100
Under the current proposal, the operating

cost to maintain our buildings would be
$123M per year. This is based on an industry
standard of annual operating costs of 4% of a If we make the If we make no
If we fund the If we make no
building’s Replacement Value. proposed new investments
full $2.1B in investments in
$700M in beyond current
facilities at all
investments operating budget
This is why ongoing advocacy is critical to investments
ensure DPSCD receives the necessary
funds for facility maintenance and Estimated annual Estimated annual operating
improvements. operating cost after full cost after initial $700M in
$2.1B in investments: investments:
$123M to maintain $123M to maintain

buildings at 0 FCI buildings at average 28 FCI
INITIAL INVESTMENT
KEY INDICATORS
Before Investment After Initial $700M
Investment
8
The proposed, initial $700M in 18
investments will significantly increase 19
the number of DPSCD buildings in
Good or Fair condition.
40
The remaining buildings still in Failing 59
condition are to be addressed in a
future phase of investments once
additional funds are secured, ensuring 46
that after all investments are made, all
DPSCD buildings fall within the Good 32
condition. 13
Low FCI High FCI
Good Fair Deficient Failing

0 – 10 11 - 30 31 - 60 61 - 100
SUMMARY OF DISTRICT-WIDE RECOMMENDATIONS
Together, these strategies are expected to decrease the District's average FCI from 40 to 28 and increase average
utilization from 71% to 81%.
REBUILD: $281M REACTIVATION: NEW & PHASED RENOVATION: DECOMMISSION

ADDITION: $82M
Rebuild 5 schools. $35M OUT PROGRAMS $296M $11M
Investment Considerations
• Original building not in • Vacant or underutilized • New-build additions to • Opportunities to offer new • Buildings in need of repairs in • Demolishing or selling
repairable state buildings that can be existing buildings that need programs or consolidate roofing, heating, cooling, vacant buildings that are
• High-demand areas to attract reactivated at low cost with a additional capacity or spaces buildings with low utilization lighting or exterior enclosure not a part of 20-year
new families focus on Pre-K expansion due to overcrowding in the and high repair costs • Focused on buildings likely to facility plan
• Neighborhoods underserved • High-demand areas with neighborhood or schools. • Maximize utilization of remain open in the long-term • Positive impact on
by DPSCD schools insufficient District schools • Alternative to completely new buildings and offer students and/or will not require wall-to- neighborhood stabilization
• Establish new standard for and seats school buildings. and families access to newly wall renovations in a next • Decrease neighborhood
school buildings in the renovated or brand new-built phase blight by removing vacant
District facilities. • Lowering long-term buildings.
maintenance and utilities
costs.
ACTIVE BUILDINGS: KEY HIGHLIGHTS
REACTIVATION NEW/PHASED OUT DECOMMISSION

REBUILD • Vacant or underutilized
ADDITION
• Original building not in
buildings that can be
• New-build additions to PROGRAMS • Demolishing or selling
repairable state. existing building. • Opportunities to buildings that are
reactivated at low cost.
• High-demand areas to • Providing new spaces for consolidate buildings with structurally unrepairable.
• High-demand areas
attract new families. low-cost at high-capacity low utilization or are
where current capacity is
schools. structurally unrepairable.
insufficient.
• Cody • Vetal K-8 • Charles Wright New Programs Active Buildings

• Robeson / Marshall • Chrysler @ Bunche Prep • CMA • CTC @ Southeastern • Thurgood Marshall
• Pershing • Chrysler (Pre-K) • JR King • Sampson Webber
• Carstens @ Golightly CTC • Fleming (Pre-K) • Western Phas e Outs • Carstens
• Phoenix • Adult Ed West (Pre-K) • Southeastern CTC • Ann Arbor Trail • Ann Arbor Trail
• Hancock (Pre-K) • Sampson Webber • Clark
• Northern High School • Clark • Blackwell
• Catherine Blackwell • Greenfield Union Main
• Thurgood Marshall
S urplus Buildings
Program Moves • Post
• Davis Aerospace → City Airport • Biddle
• Davison → DIA • Van Zile
• DIA → Davison Annex • Carrie/Law
• Turning Point → West Side • Foch
• Lions, WSA, Legacy → Douglass • Phoenix
(Murray Wright) 12
• Douglass, Virtual --> Northern
First Phase of New Central Office Location and District Multi-
Purpose Center at Former Northern High School Building
There is an opportunity to reimagine the currently vacant Northern High School building as a district multi-purpose
center and future Central Office that will integrate best practices in instructional technology and virtual learning.
Accessible Meeting Spaces Newly Renovated

Permanent Location for Central Location for New Print Shop
for Board Meetings and Space for Douglass
Virtual School and IT Hub Student STEAM Hub Location
Professional Development Academy
Creation of new spaces Dedicated space to provide Community friendly centralized Renovation of space for Central location for District
for Virtual School teachers to students districtwide with and permanent location for students, families and staff at print shop services with
deliver instruction using the opportunities for STEAM monthly School Board and the Frederick Douglass opportunities.
latest instructional technology competitions, makerspace Committee meetings. First floor Academy, including athletics
to support student activities, and fabrication will be modernized for Board and pool, to provide
learning, advance outcomes, labs. Offices. First floor will also serve opportunity to increase
and provide students with as Professional Development enrollment for an eventual
after-school meeting areas. space, including School Board long-term location.
The building will also serve as auditorium.
the permanent IT Hub for
device repairs and service.
13
Proposed Changes
Recommendations for $700M in investments
14
14
Proposed Changes
New Builds, Reactivations, Additions, Phase
15
Outs and Program Moves
RECOMMENDATIONS
VACANT BUILDINGS
Recommendations for
Currently Vacant Buildings
17
Recommendations for District Owned (Landlord)
Currently Leased Buildings & Land District Leased (Tenant)
18
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR VACANT BUILDINGS
2021-2025 INVESTMENTS Next Phase
DEMOLISH SELL or HOLD FULL DEMOLITION
+
The Facility Master Plan proposes an • Sell buildings that can
be repurposed profit
initial investment to demolish all vacant • All vacant buildings on • All remaining buildings
from sales will go
active school campuses that are not demolished
buildings on active campuses, with a • Active buildings that are
toward demolishing b
or sold as part of the
future phase of investments to demolish uildings on district
moving to new rebuilds first phase of
properties that are
all vacant district-owned buildings or are consolidated due
unsold.
investments, or are
citywide. to building condition. redeveloped under a
• Hold buildings that can
future phase of
be repurposed for other
investments.
The following criteria were used to uses within DPSCD.
identify which buildings are slated for
Active Buildings S urplus Buildings S ell • Stark
demolition, sale or hold under the first • Thurgood • Post • Larned • Von Steuben
phase of investments: Marshall • Biddle • Rutherford • Old Westside
• Sampson • Van Zile • Robeson ELC • Cooley
• Building assessments conducted in 2019- Webber • Carrie/Law • Henderson Lower • Virtual School/
• Carstens • Foch • Jemison Former CMA
2020 by Interboro Partners.
• Ann Arbor Trail • Cody/Ruddiman • Courtis
• Health and safety impacts for students and • Clark • Lawton Ho ld
families on active school campuses. • Blackwell • Old Pulaski • Murphy
• Enrollment and utilization of nearby • Greenfield • Trix • Lions
schools. Union main • Yost • Legacy
• Demand for new spaces in the building • Lodge • Poe
neighborhood. • Golightly CTC • McColl
• Brady
• Level of investment needed to maintain or
• Stewart
reactivate buildings.
COMMUNITY
ENGAGEMENT PROCESS
• 3 in-person, citywide community engagement meetings

• 4 virtual feeder pattern community engagement meetings
• Cody, Mumford and Henry Ford areas
• Osborn, Denby and Pershing areas
• East English Village and Southeastern areas
• Northwestern, Central, Western
• Separate In Person Engagement with Faculty and Staff at Proposed
Phased Out Schools
• Separate engagement sessions with Principals, District and Schools
Employees, and Parents
• Website launch of proposed changes and survey
www.detroitk12.org/fmp
20
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED
CHANGES
CODY AREA
CODY
Current Context
KEY METRICS
Current FCI: 44
Current Utilization: 83%
Investment Need: $96M
22
CODY
Feeder Pattern Recommended Investments
KEY METRICS
New FCI: 26
• Improved from 44
New Utilization: 86%

• Improved from 83%
Investment Total: $86M
KEY INVESTMENTS
REBUILD & REACTIVATION
New building at Cody High School as a model
for sustainability and reactivated Vetal K-8
RENOVATION
Renovations at most schools focused on
roofing, heating, cooling or exterior enclosure
PHASED OUT PROGRAMS

Phasing out programs from Ann Arbor Trail;
families to be able to access renovated
facilities at Dixon 23
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED
CHANGES
FORD AREA
FORD
Current Context
KEY METRICS
Current FCI: 37
25
FORD
KEY METRICS
New FCI: 24

• No change
KEY INVESTMENTS
ADDITION
New addition at Charles Wright; new arts
wing at J.R. King; new athletics at CMA
NEW PROGRAMS
Pre-K early education center at Adult
Education West building
RENOVATION
Renovations at most schools focused
on roofing, heating, cooling or exterior
26
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED
CHANGES
MUMFORD AREA
MUMFORD
Current Context
KEY METRICS
Current FCI: 40
28
MUMFORD
KEY METRICS
New FCI: 21

KEY INVESTMENTS
REBUILD RENOVATION
New state-of-the-art Renovations at most
building at schools focused on
Robeson/Malcom X roofing, heating, cooling
or exterior enclosure
Primary
PHASED OUT REACTIVATION
PROGRAMS Newly renovated and
Phasing out programs reactivated Hancock
from Thurgood building as a Pre-K
Marshall to nearby early education center.
renovated buildings.
29
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED
CHANGES
PERSHING AREA
PERSHING
Current Context
KEY METRICS
Current FCI: 46
31
PERSHING
KEY METRICS
New FCI: 19

KEY INVESTMENTS
REBUILD
New state-of-the-art building at Pershing High
School with additional CTE programs.
RENOVATION
NEW + PHASED OUT PROGRAMS

• Expanded spaces for Davison @ DIA
• DIA to move to the Davison Annex site as
a high school program 32
• Culinary Program at new Pershing
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED
CHANGES
OSBORN AREA
OSBORN
Current Context
KEY METRICS
Current FCI: 42
34
OSBORN
KEY METRICS
New FCI: 38

• No change
KEY INVESTMENTS
REACTIVATION
New Pre-K early education center at Fleming
RENOVATION
PHASED OUT PROGRAMS

Turning Point transition to West Side
Academy. CTE graphic design program to
Osborn 35
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED
CHANGES
DENBY AREA
DENBY
Current Context
KEY METRICS
Current FCI: 38
37
DENBY
KEY METRICS
New FCI: 20

• No change
KEY INVESTMENTS
RENOVATION
RENOVATION
Sustainability-focused renovations, including
air conditioning and LED lights
38
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED
CHANGES
EAST ENGLISH VILLAGE
AREA
Current Context
KEY METRICS
Current FCI: 31
40
KEY METRICS
New FCI: 13

KEY INVESTMENTS
REBUILD & REACTIVATION
New state-of-the-art building for Carstens at
the Golightly site on Jefferson
RENOVATION
PHASED OUT PROGRAMS

Phasing out programs from Clark; families will
be able access the brand-new facility at
Carstens 41
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED
CHANGES
SOUTHEASTERN AREA
SOUTHEASTERN
Current Context
KEY METRICS
Current FCI: 38
43
SOUTHEASTERN
KEY METRICS
New FCI: 22

KEY INVESTMENTS
REACTIVATION
New Pre-K early education center at Chrysler;
expansion for Chrysler to K-8 space
ADDITION
Advanced manufacturing and CTC wing at
Southeastern
PHASED OUT PROGRAMS

Phasing out programs from Catherine
44
Blackwell and Lions
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED
CHANGES
WESTERN AREA
WESTERN
Current Context
KEY METRICS
Current FCI: 29
46
WESTERN
KEY METRICS
New FCI: 20

KEY INVESTMENTS
REBUILD
New state-of-the-art PreK-8 building at
Phoenix
RENOVATION
ADDITION
Expanded building at Western High School
with innovative new spaces for students
47
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED
CHANGES
CENTRAL AREA
CENTRAL
Current Context
KEY METRICS
Current FCI: 39
49
CENTRAL
KEY METRICS
New FCI: 36

• No change
KEY INVESTMENTS
RENOVATION
Renovations at Central focused on roofing,
heating, cooling or exterior enclosure
REACTIVATION
Newly renovated and reactivated Hancock
building as a Pre-K early education center.
50
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED
CHANGES
DCP / NORTHWESTERN AREA
DCP / NORTHWESTERN
Current Context
KEY METRICS
Current FCI: 42
52
DCP / NORTHWESTERN
KEY METRICS
Lions to Douglass
New FCI: 33

KEY INVESTMENTS
RENOVATIONS COMBINING
Renovations at most PROGRAMS
schools focused on West Side, Legacy, &
heating, cooling and Lions consolidated
roofing programs at Douglass
NEW PROGRAMS PHASED OUT

Expanded PROGRAMS
neighborhood access to Phasing out programs
Burton International from Sampson Webber
Academy to renovated buildings 53
APPENDIX
FEEDER PATTERN RENOVATION COST SUMMARY - Cody
School Building Exterior Building Interior Heating Cooling Site Systems

Full Need Initial Full Need Initial Full Need Initial Full Need Initial Full Need Initial Full Need Initial
Investment Investment Investment Investment Investment Investment
Barton $ .10M $ .00M $ 1.04M - $ 1.66M - $ .49M - $ .96M - $ 1.40M -
Burns $ 1.30M $ .00M $ 1.76M - $ 3.64M - $ 1.64M - $ 1.64M - $ 1.49M -
Carver $ .71M $ .71M $ 2.54M - $ 4.91M - $ 1.68M $ 1.68M $ .17M - $ 2.43M -
Mackenzie $ .08M $ .08M $ 2.47M $ 1.77M $ .00M - $ .00M - $ 1.05M - $ .04M -
Dixon $ 1.93M $ 1.93M $ 4.41M - $ 2.79M $ 2.79M $ 2.33M $ 2.33M $ .14M - $ 2.08M -
Dossin $ .65M $ .65M $ 1.29M - $ 3.52M - $ 1.26M $ 1.26M $ .91M - $ 1.82M -
Edison $ .52M $ .00M $ 2.86M - $ 2.48M - $ 1.11M - $ 2.02M - $ 1.66M -
Henderson $ .00M $ .00M $ 4.61M - $ 1.13M $ 1.13M $ .00M - $ .53M - $ 1.62M -

Former
$ .69M $ .00M $ 3.60M - $ 3.35M - $ .99M - $ .87M - $ 2.22M -
CMA
Gardner $ .05M $ .05M $ 1.88M - $ 1.52M $ 1.52M $ .82M $ .82M $ 1.23M - $ .74M -
Gompers $ .08M $ .08M $ 2.99M - $ .00M - $ .00M - $ .03M - $ .06M -
Breithaupt $ .23M $ .00M $ 2.80M - $ 9.36M - $ .00M - $ 1.02M - $ .84M -
Mann $ .59M $ .59M $ 2.52M - $ .38M $ .38M $ .00M - $ .87M - $ 1.22M -

Total $6.9M $4M $34.8M $1.8M $34.7M $5.8M $10.3M $6.1M $41.7M - $17.6M - 55
FEEDER PATTERN RENOVATION COST SUMMARY - Ford
Area Building Exterior Building Interior Heating Cooling Site Systems

AEW $ .44M $ .44M $ 1.95M - $ 2.36M $ 2.36M $ .00M - $ .06M - $ 1.33M -
Bow $ 6.74M $ 6.74M $ 1.79M - $ .13M - $ .44M - $ .75M - $ 1.49M -

Charles
$ .08M $ .08M $ 3.37M $ 1.51M $ 3.80M $ 3.80M $ .00M - $ .07M $ .01M $ .87M -
Wright
Cooke $ .07M $ .07M $ 1.35M - $ .73M $ .73M $ 1.13M $ 1.13M $ 1.52M - $ .88M -
Emerson $ 2.53M $ 2.53M $ 4.67M - $ 2.34M $ 2.34M $ 2.03M - $ 1.94M - $ 2.38M -
Ford $ .32M $ .32M $ 17.02M $ 4.29M $ 10.27M $ 10.27M $ 9.76M $ 9.76M $ 1.80M $ .12M $ 5.66M -
FLICS $ 3.78M - $ 8.56M - $ 6.60M - $ .13M - $ .12M - $ 3.83M -
JR King $ .00M - $ 9.89M - $ 1.57M $ 1.57M $ 2.35M $ 2.35M $ 3.17M - $ 3.58M -

CMA @
$ .81M $ .81M $ 4.31M $ 1.52M $ 4.39M $ 4.39M $ 1.20M - $ 1.20M - $ 3.01M -
Ludington
Randolph $ 3.40M - $ 4.12M - $ 2.86M - $ .00M - $ .71M - $ 3.43M -
Renaissance $ .67M $ .67M $ 2.10M $ 1.08M $ 2.21M $ 2.21M $ .00M - $ .67M - $ .10M -
Coleman
$ 1.57M - $ 2.80M - $ 1.60M - $ .00M - $ .43M - $ 2.44M -
Young
Total $20.4M $11.7M $61.9M $8.7M $38.9M $27.7M $17M $13.2M $19.3M $134K $29M - 56
FEEDER PATTERN RENOVATION COST SUMMARY - Mumford

Bagley $ 2.43M $ 2.43M $ 3.56M - $ 3.65M - $ 1.63M - $ .72M - $ 2.34M -
Bates $ 2.70M - $ 5.90M - $ .00M - $ .00M - $ .49M - $ 2.11M -
Bethune - $ 2.85M $ 2.85M $ 8.50M - $ 1.40M - $ .00M - $ 3.75M $ .31M $ 3.66M -
Mumford $ .21M $ .21M $ 7.00M $ 1.08M $ .13M $ .13M $ .00M - $ .02M - $ .00M -
Palmer Park $ 1.83M $ 1.70M $ 6.77M - $ 15.36M $ 15.36M $ 5.77M $ 5.77M $ .43M $ .24M $ 2.16M -
Pasteur $ .64M $ .64M $ 1.59M - $ 2.61M $ 2.61M $ 1.42M - $ 1.05M - $ 2.04M -
Schulze $ .11M $ .11M $ 3.06M - $ .90M $ .90M $ 2.38M $ 2.38M $ .32M $ .02M $ .87M -
Vernor $ .52M $ .52M $ 1.12M - $ 3.26M $ 3.26M $ 1.12M $ 1.12M $ 1.17M - $ .97M -
Total $11.3M $8.4M $37.5M $1M $27.3M $22.3M $12.3M $9.3M $14.8M $573K $14.1M -
57
FEEDER PATTERN RENOVATION COST SUMMARY - Pershing

Davison $ 1.88M - $ 2.53M - $ 5.16M - $ .00M - $ 2.14M - $ 1.98M -

Davison
$ .59M $ .59M $ 1.54M - $ 1.04M - $ 1.11M - $ .25M - $ .59M -
Annex
DIA @
$ 1.11M - $ 1.98M - $ 2.29M - $ .00M - $ .31M - $ 1.34M -
White
Greenfield
$ .44M $ .44M $ .84M - $ 1.18M - $ .39M - $ .06M - $ .09M -
Union
Mason $ 1.91M $ 1.91M $ 5.60M - $ 2.88M $ 2.88M $ 2.46M $ 2.46M $ .77M - $ 2.66M -
Nolan $ 3.07M $ 3.07M $ 5.01M - $ 6.13M $ 6.13M $ 2.81M - $ 1.90M - $ 2.24M -
Total $9M $6M $17.5M - $18.7M $9M $6.8M $2.5M $35.7M - $8.9M -
58
FEEDER PATTERN RENOVATION COST SUMMARY - Osborn

Turning
Point / $ 1.22M $ 1.22M $ 3.35M - $ 3.51M $ .00M $ .00M - $ .40M - $ 2.25M -
Fleming
Pulaski @
$ .06M $ .06M $ 1.91M - $ .42M $ .42M $ .00M - $ .08M $ .02M $ .20M -
AE East
Brenda
$ 3.84M $ 3.84M $ 6.68M - $ 1.32M $ 1.32M $ .00M - $ 2.69M - $ 1.36M -
Scott
Holmes, A.L $ 2.03M - $ 3.92M - $ 2.91M $ .00M $ 2.56M - $ 1.13M - $ 1.81M -
Law $ 1.05M $ .90M $ 5.22M - $ 1.12M $ 1.12M $ .00M - $ .20M $ .09M $ 1.16M -
Osborn $ 5.46M - $ 10.88M - $ 9.19M $ .00M $ 5.05M - $ 26.11M - $ 5.63M -
Total $13.7M $6M $32M - $18.5M $2.9M $7.6M - $37.4M $121K $12.4M -
59
FEEDER PATTERN RENOVATION COST SUMMARY - Denby

Beckham $ 1.26M $ 1.26M $ 4.02M $ 1.36M $ .72M $ .72M $ 2.02M $ 2.02M $ .11M $ .02M $ .73M -
Brewer $ .91M $ .91M $ 1.88M - $ 2.93M $ 2.93M $ 1.31M $ 1.31M $ 1.61M - $ 1.89M -
Carleton $ .95M $ .95M $ 1.55M - $ 3.84M $ 3.84M $ 1.30M $ 1.30M $ .77M - $ 1.88M -
Denby $ .19M $ .19M $ 7.98M $ 2.39M $ .29M $ .29M $ 5.38M $ 5.38M $ 4.59M $ .33M $ .73M -
Fisher
$ .08M $ .08M $ 3.37M $ 1.51M $ 2.52M $ 2.52M $ .00M - $ .52M $ .03M $ .87M -
Lower
Fisher
$ .05M $ .05M $ 6.86M $ 2.34M $ 1.32M $ 1.32M $ .00M - $ 1.21M $ .03M $ 1.46M -
Upper
Wayne $ .42M $ .42M $ 2.84M - $ 3.31M $ 3.31M $ 1.13M $ 1.13M $ .93M - $ 1.63M -
Total $3.9M $3.9M $28.5M $7.6M $14.9M $14.9M $11.1M $11.1M $16.5M $416K $9.2M -
60
FEEDER PATTERN RENOVATION COST SUMMARY - EEV
Building Exterior Building Interior Heating Cooling Site Systems

Detroit Lions $ .85M $ .00M $ 1.56M $ .00M $ .96M $ .00M $ .81M $ .00M $ .10M $ .00M $ .70M $ .00M
EEV $ .00M $ .00M $ 2.99M $ 1.89M $ .00M $ .00M $ .01M $ .01M $ .15M $ .00M $ .00M $ .00M
Hamilton $ .88M $ .88M $ 2.18M $ .00M $ 3.76M $ 3.76M $ 1.29M $ 1.29M $ 1.78M $ .00M $ 1.85M $ .00M
Marquette $ 1.33M $ 1.33M $ 3.93M $ .00M $ 2.65M $ 2.24M $ 1.19M $ .00M $ 1.67M $ .11M $ 1.61M $ .00M
Ronald Brown $ 1.20M $ 1.20M $ 4.74M $ .00M $ .99M $ .94M $ 3.09M $ .00M $ 1.35M $ .00M $ 1.93M $ .00M
Total $ 4.26M $ 3.41M $ 15.4M $ 1.89M $ 8.36M $ 6.94M $ 6.39M $ 1.3M $ 5.05M $ .11M $ 5.46M -
61
FEEDER PATTERN RENOVATION COST SUMMARY - Southeastern

Hutchinson $ 2.68M $ 2.68M $ 3.48M - $ .87M $ .87M $ 2.50M $ 2.50M $ .26M $ .19M $ .07M -
Ben Carson $ .61M - $ 4.20M - $ 2.02M - $ 1.11M - $ .25M - $ 1.87M -
Bunche $ .10M - $ 4.20M - $ .00M - $ 2.84M - $ 1.94M - $ .70M -
Chrysler $ .42M - $ .92M - $ 1.07M - $ .00M - $ .31M - $ .74M -

Old
$ .00M - $ .00M - $ .00M - $ .00M - $ .00M - $ .00M -
Northern
Golightly
Education $ 1.69M $ 1.69M $ 2.56M - $ 1.71M - $ .00M - $ .62M - $ 1.60M -
Center
Golightly
$ .04M $ .04M $ 1.54M - $ 1.22M - $ .77M - $ .45M - $ .41M -
Annex
King $ .27M $ .27M $ 7.04M $ 1.08M $ .00M - $ .00M - $ .03M - $ .22M -
Garvey $ .26M - $ 7.00M - $ 1.00M - $ 2.99M - $ 1.02M - $ 1.80M -
Nichols $ .68M $ .63M $ 4.00M $ 1.08M $ 5.73M - $ 1.30M $ 1.30M $ 2.83M $ 2.50M $ 2.39M -
SE $ 8.77M $ .30M $ 16.90M - $ 5.27M - $ .00M - $ 5.23M - $ 2.14M -
Spain $ 2.47M $ 2.47M $ 3.86M - $ 4.31M - $ 3.60M $ 3.60M $ 2.09M - $ 2.64M -

62
Total $18M $8.1M $55.7M $2.2M $23.2M $874K $15.1M $7.4M $21.9M $2.7M $14.6M -
FEEDER PATTERN RENOVATION COST SUMMARY - Western

AOA $ 1.93M - $ 4.35M - $ 4.16M - $ 2.45M - $ .59M - $ .82M -
AOA Logan $ 1.09M $ 1.09M $ 1.46M - $ .52M - $ .00M - $ 1.35M - $ 1.25M -
Bennett $ .16M $ .16M $ 2.59M - $ .00M - $ .00M - $ .97M - $ .74M -
Clemente, $ 1.10M $ 1.10M $ 2.09M - $ 2.49M $ 2.49M $ 1.13M - $ .34M - $ .85M -
Clippert $ .44M $ .37M $ 1.52M - $ .44M $ .44M $ .00M - $ 1.19M - $ .60M -
Earhart $ .09M $ .09M $ 3.12M - $ 1.41M $ 1.41M $ .00M - $ .02M $ .01M $ .08M -
Harms $ .36M $ .36M $ 2.13M - $ .52M $ .52M $ .00M - $ .77M - $ 1.97M -
Mark Twain $ 2.25M $ 2.25M $ 2.68M $ 1.60M $ 4.03M - $ .75M - $ .59M $ .59M $ 2.17M $ 2.17M
Maybury $ .50M $ .50M $ 2.40M - $ 2.11M $ 2.11M $ .00M - $ 1.32M - $ 1.18M -
Munger $ .10M $ .10M $ 3.93M - $ .00M - $ .00M - $ .53M $ .02M $ .08M -
Neinas $ .51M $ .51M $ 2.68M - $ .57M $ .57M $ .00M - $ .69M - $ 1.58M -
Priest $ 2.09M $ 2.04M $ 5.19M - $ 2.58M - $ 1.01M $ 1.01M $ 1.11M $ .11M $ 1.97M -
Western $ .52M $ .52M $ 9.30M $ 1.08M $ 2.85M $ 2.85M $ .00M - $ .77M - $ 4.37M -
63
Total $11.1M $9M $43.4M $2.6M $21.9M $10.3M $5.3M $1.1M $17M $740K $17.7M $2.1M
FEEDER PATTERN RENOVATION COST SUMMARY - Central

Central $ 3.86M $ 3.86M $ 6.77M $ 1.80M $ 5.63M - $ .00M - $ 1.36M $ .30M $ 2.36M -
Noble $ 3.03M - $ 7.09M - $ 8.10M - $ 3.59M - $ .52M - $ 3.09M -
Total $6.9M $3.9M $13.9M $1.8M $13.7M - $3.6M - $8.7M $299K $5.5M -
64
FEEDER PATTERN RENOVATION COST SUMMARY -
Northwestern

Burton $ 1.71M $ 1.71M $ 5.86M - $ .96M $ .96M $ .00M - $ .73M - $ 1.84M -
Cass $ .00M - $ 17.31M $ 5.75M $ 3.37M $ 3.37M $ .00M - $ .11M $ .10M $ 3.92M -
DCP $ 10.60M - $ 18.12M - $ 18.79M - $ 9.52M - $ 3.19M - $ 10.62M -
DSA $ 2.75M $ 2.75M $ 9.35M - $ 2.72M $ 2.72M $ .00M - $ .02M $ .01M $ 2.81M -
Douglass $ 6.53M - $ 11.84M - $ 5.32M - $ .12M - $ 1.18M - $ 3.89M -
Edmonson $ .52M $ .47M $ 2.26M - $ 3.10M $ 3.10M $ .56M $ .56M $ 1.46M - $ 1.60M -
Legacy $ .42M - $ 1.74M - $ 3.04M - $ 1.11M - $ .82M - $ 1.63M -
Thirkell $ 1.26M $ 1.26M $ 3.77M - $ 5.02M $ 5.02M $ 1.72M $ 1.72M $ 1.39M - $ 2.48M -
Westside $ .55M - $ 3.21M $2.1M $ 1.79M - $ .00M - $ .09M - $ .57M -
Total $24.3M $6.2M $23.5M $6.8M $44.1M $15.2M $13M $2.3M $15.8M $118K $29.4M -
65
NEXT STEPS
HONORING
COMMUNITY VOICE
HOW COMMUNITY CAN GET INVOLVED
1 Attend a community meeting
2 Fill out a survey at detroitk12.org/fmp
3 Read more about the Plan and provide feedback at one of

our neighborhood partner sites
4 See updates on how feedback is shaping the final plan
at detroitk12.org/fmp
5 Invite a DPSCD representative to speak at your block

club, faith-based organization or community
organization meeting
6 Help advocate for equitable school funding to fully
realize our vision
WHAT YOU CAN DO
TO HELP US FULLY REALIZE OUR VISION
Advocate For Us Engage With Us
• Advocate for equitable funding from the • Share your feedback on our initial
State of Michigan to ensure DPSCD has recommendations at an upcoming
access to the same amount of per-pupil community meeting, through an online
funding as surrounding districts. survey, or by inviting DPSCD staff to attend
an existing community event.
• Advocate for a new funding model for
capital improvements that allow DPSCD to • Visit us at www.detroitk12.org/fmp to learn
access funding for ongoing facility more and to share your feedback with us.
improvements.
• Advocate for DPSCD to be able to access

additional one-time federal funds through
the American Rescue Plan and the
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.
Opportunity for a DPSCD Athletic Complex
DPSCD will explore public-private partnerships to build a state-of-art athletic complex in the city and
possibly on an existing district-owned property. Process will start with a proposed contractor to work
with the district to explore funding and partnership opportunities.
• Year-round indoor and outdoor facilities for football,

basketball, volleyball, soccer, baseball, track and
lacrosse
• Exclusive or priority to DPSCD students and teams for
practice and competition
• Provides all student-athletes, regardless of gender and
zip code, access to high quality fields
• Revenue generating opportunities through
tournaments for the district
69

FMP Special Board Meeting Deck

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

FMP Special Board Meeting Deck

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

FMP Special Board Meeting Deck

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

FACILITY MASTER PLAN

Invest in early education to provide feeder patterns into K-12 schools.

2018-2020 2020 2021-2022 The Future

Process for Data Analysis Investment Criteria

Needs Assessment • School Building Utilization Rate and

Average District FCI:

▪ Utilization, which shows how much

Under the current proposal, the operating

$123M to maintain $123M to maintain

Low FCI High FCI

Good Fair Deficient Failing

REBUILD: $281M REACTIVATION: NEW & PHASED RENOVATION: DECOMMISSION

REACTIVATION NEW/PHASED OUT DECOMMISSION

• Cody • Vetal K-8 • Charles Wright New Programs Active Buildings

Accessible Meeting Spaces Newly Renovated

2021-2025 INVESTMENTS Next Phase

DEMOLISH SELL or HOLD FULL DEMOLITION

• 3 in-person, citywide community engagement meetings

Current Utilization: 83%

Investment Need: $96M

New Utilization: 86%

Investment Total: $86M

PHASED OUT PROGRAMS

Current Utilization: 81%

Investment Need: $188M

New Utilization: 81%

Investment Total: $93M

Current Utilization: 74%

Investment Need: $91M

New Utilization: 78%

Investment Total: $93M

Current Utilization: 50%

Investment Need: $60M

New Utilization: 67%

Investment Total: $88M

NEW + PHASED OUT PROGRAMS

Current Utilization: 56%

Investment Need: $94M

New Utilization: 56%

Investment Total: $9M

PHASED OUT PROGRAMS

Current Utilization: 76%

Investment Need: $62M

New Utilization: 76%

Investment Total: $30M

Current Utilization: 59%

Investment Need: $46M

New Utilization: 66%

Investment Total: $67M

PHASED OUT PROGRAMS

Current Utilization: 64%

Investment Need: $124M

New Utilization: 71%

Investment Total: $28M

PHASED OUT PROGRAMS

Current Utilization: 108%

Investment Need: $99M

New Utilization: 95%