Project Sample 1
Project Sample 1
Project Sample 1
On
BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY
IN
CIVIL ENGINEERING
Submitted to
Submitted by
Dr. R. GOPI
Associate Professor
2019 - 2020
i
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
CERTIFICATE
Associate Professor
I hereby declare that the matter embodied in the report of major project entitled
“SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF A REINFORCED CONCRETE MULTISTORIED (G+3)
STRUCTURE” is genuine research work carried out by me under the guidance of
Dr. R. GOPI, Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Marri Laxman
Reddy Institute of Technology and Management, Dundigal, Hyderabad.
The work embodied in this report is original & has not been submitted to the basis for
the award of degree, diploma, associateship or fellowship of any other University or Institution.
NATHYAM MOUNIKA
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I express my indebtedness and gratitude to my guide Dr. R. GOPI, ME, Ph.D
Associate professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Marri Laxman Reddy Institute of
Technology and Management for his guidance and care taken by him in helping me to
complete the project work successfully.
I express sincere thanks to all the teaching staff of Department of Civil Engineering
for providing a great assistance in the accomplishment of my project.
Among three basic needs of human beings, shelter is one of the most important features. The
study of project deals with the effect of earthquake on the structures and design of the structure
according to IS 1893 code.
A number of naturally occurring disasters as earthquake are capable of causing death injuries
& damage of properties. These natural hazards causes tremendous the losses around the world in
every year it can be designing the structures to resist vibration to with stand the damage caused by
earthquake.
The proposed Apartment building is in SRINAGAR city falls under the zone 5 region as per IS
1893- 2002 (part 1). In this Apartment building consist of ground floor + 3 floors, hall, bedroom,
kitchen, bathroom. Total Plinth area 536.63 sq.m.
The Apartment building drawings are prepared & the structural components like beams,
columns, & footing are analyzed by STAAD pro v8.i software with reference to IS 1893-2000
(Criteria For Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures). The structural designs are carried out by
manually as per IS 13920-1993 (Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected to
Seismic Forces
— Code of Practice), IS 456-2000 (Plain and Reinforced Concrete - Code of Practice) & SP:16
(Design Aids For Reinforced Concrete).
The project details can be used to construction the similar earthquake resistant building which
can reduce the damage caused to the environment.
Keywords: Analysis, Structural design, IS: 456-2000, Framed structure, Earth Quake,
Ductility.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CERTIFICATE ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iv
ABSTRACT v
LIST OF FIGURES xi
1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.4. Ductility 5
1.4.1. Ductile for Good Seismic Performance 6
1.4.2. Advantages of Ductility 8
1.5. Objective 8
2. LITERATURE REVIEW 9
3. METHODOLOGY 10
5. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 17
5.1. General 17
6. DESIGN OF MEMBERS 55
6.1. Design of Slab 55
7. CONCLUSION 88
REFERENCES 89
LIST OF TABLES
L Length of member
A Area
d Effective depth
DL Dead load
LL Live load
EL Earthquake load
Pu Axial load
M Bending moment
Vu Shear force
Sv Spacing of stirrups
B1 Beam no
S1 Slab no
CHAPTER-1
INTRODUCTION
All over the world, there is a high demand for construction of tall buildings due to increasing
urbanization and spiraling population, and earthquakes have the potential for causing the greatest
damages to tall structures. Reinforced concrete multi-storied buildings are very complex to
model as structural systems for analysis. Usually, they are modeled as two-dimensional or three-
dimensional frame systems using finite beam elements. Since earthquake forces are random in
nature and unpredictable, the engineering tools need to be sharpened for analysing structures
under the action of these forces. Earthquake loads are required to be carefully modeled so as to
assess the real behaviour of structure with a clear understanding that damage is expected but it
should be regulated. Analysing the structure for previous earthquakes of different intensities and
checking for multiple criteria at each level has become essential and pivotal these days. The
main parameters to be checked in the seismic analysis of structures are load carrying capacity,
ductility, stiffness, damping and mass. The design can be divided into two main steps. First, a
linear analysis is conducted with dimensioning of all structural elements, ensuring the
functionality of the structure after minor earthquakes, and then the behaviour of structures
during strong earthquakes has to be conducted using nonlinear methods. Dynamic analysis
should be performed for symmetrical as well as unsymmetrical buildings. In unsymmetrical
building structures the major parameter to be considered is Torque.
Seismic analysis is a tool for the estimation of structural response in the process of designing
earthquake resistant structures and/or retrofitting vulnerable existing structures. Seismic forces
are inertia forces. When a building experiences acceleration, inertia force is generated when its
mass resists the acceleration. We experience inertia forces while travelling. Inertia forces act
within a building.
For the determination of seismic responses it is necessary to carry out seismic analysis of the
structure. The analysis can be performed on the basis of external action, the behaviour of
structural materials, structure and the type of structural model selected. Based on the type of
external action and behaviour of structure, the analysis can be further classified as:
1
(1) Linear Static Analysis
(2) Nonlinear Static Analysis
(3) Linear Dynamic Analysis
(4) Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis
This method is also known as Equivalent Static Analysis method. This procedure does not
require dynamic analysis, however, it account for the dynamics of building in an approximate
manner. The static method is the simplest one among all the other analysis procedures. It
requires less computational efforts and is based on formulas given in the code of practise.
Response spectrum method is a linear dynamic analysis method. In this method the peak
response of structure during an earthquake is obtained directly from the earthquake response, but
this is quite accurate for structural design applications. In this approach multiple mode shapes of
the building are taken into account. Computer analysis can be used to determine the different
modes for a structure. Based on the modal frequency and the modal mass, for each mode a
response is read from the design spectrum, and they are then combined to provide an estimate of
the total response of the structure using modal combination methods
Nonlinear static analysis also known as Pushover Analysis procedure is mainly used to estimate
the strength and drift capacity of existing structure and the seismic demand for this structure
subjected to selected earthquake. This analysis procedure can be used for checking the adequacy
of new structural design as well. The effectiveness of pushover analysis and its computational
simplicity brought this analysis procedure in to several seismic guidelines (ATC 40 and FEMA
356) and design codes (Eurocode 8 and PCM 3274).
Fig.1.1.3 Pushover Analysis
Nonlinear dynamic analysis is also referred as Time history analysis. It is an important method
for structural seismic analysis especially when the evaluated structural response is nonlinear.
To perform this analysis, a representative earthquake timehistory data is requiredfora structure
being evaluated. Time history analysis is used to determine the seismic response of a structure
under dynamic loading for a representative earthquake.
In India, reinforced concrete structures are designed and detailed as per the Indian Code IS 456
(2002). However, structures located in high seismic regions require ductile design and detailing
(Shown in Fig 1.2). Provisions for the ductile detailing of monolithic reinforced concrete frame
and shear wall structures are specified in IS 13920 (1993). After the 2001 BHUJ earthquake, this
code has been made mandatory for all structures in zones III, IV and V. Similar provisions for
seismic design and ductile detailing of steel structures are not yet available in the Indian codes.
Fig.1.2 Indian Seismic Zone Map as per IS:1893(Part1)-2002
Gravity loading on building causes RC frame to bend resulting in stretching and shortening at
various location. Tension is generated at surface that stretch and compression at those that
shorten. Under gravity load, tension in the beam in the centre location and is at the top surface at
the end. On the other hand, earthquake loading causes tension on beam and column face at
location
different from those under gravity loading the relative levels of this tension generated in member.
The level of bending moment due to earthquake loading depends on severity of shaking and can
exceed that due to gravity loading. (Shown in Fig.1.3) Thus under strong earthquake shaking, the
beam ends can develop tension on either of the top and bottom face of beam. Since concrete
cannot carry this tension, steel bars are required on both face of beam to resist reversals of
bending moment. Similarly, steel bars are required on all face of column too.
1.4 DUCTILITY
Ductility can be defined as the “ability of material to undergo large deformations without rupture
before failure”.The property of the material or a structure indicating the extent to which it can
deform beyond the limit of yield deformation before failure.
The ratio of ultimate to yield deformation is defined as ductility. Ductile detailing is provided in
structures so as to give them adequate toughness and ductility to resist severe earthquake shocks
without collapse. Mild steel is an example of a ductile material that can be bent and twisted
without rupture.
Structures are subjected to unexpected overloads, load reversals, impact and structural
movements due to foundation settlement and volume changes. These items are generally
ignored in the
analysis and design. If a structure is ductile than taken care by the presence of some ductility in
the structure.
Ductile detailing is provided in structures so as to give them adequate toughness and ductility to
resist severe earthquake shocks without collapse. Mild steel is an example of a ductile material
that can be bent and twisted without rupture.
Buildings should be designed like the ductile chain. It consists of horizontal and vertical
members, namely beams and columns. The seismic inertia forces generated at its floor levels are
transferred through the various beams and columns to the ground. The correct building
components need to be made ductile. The failure of a column can affect the stability of the
whole building, but the
failure of a beam causes localized effect. It is better to make beams to be the ductile weak than
columns. This method of designing RC building is called the Strong-column weak-beam design
method.
The following are the advantages of a reinforced concrete structure having sufficient Ductility:
1. A ductile reinforced concrete structure may take care of overloading, load reversals,
impact and secondary stresses due to differential settlement of foundation.
2. A ductile reinforced concrete structure gives the occupant sufficient time to vacate the
structure by showing large deformation before its final collapse. Accordingly, the loss of
life is minimised with the provision of sufficient ductility.
3. Properly designed ductile joints are capable of resisting forces and deformations at the
yielding of steel reinforcement. Therefore, these sections can reach their respective
moment capacities, which is one of the assumptions in the design of reinforced concrete
structures by limit state method.
1.5 OBJECTIVE
To carry out complete analysis and design of the main structural elements of a multi-
storey building including beam, column, slab, foundation etc.
To compare manual results with the results of structural analysis and design software
STAAD pro.v8i.
To resist the Seismic loads acting on a building and stay stable with out collapse.
LITERATURE REVIEW
S. Abhishek (2018) : Discussed about the design and analysis of a residential building using
ETABS located at pilibhit in a built-up area of 140 sq.m providing height 3.1m per floor. The
drawing details are done in AUTOCAD and REVIT and the analysis was done using the
software ETABS. The structural components were designed manually in addition to the software
design. All the dead loads, live loads and seismic loads are calculated by using IS codes. After
the analysis of the entire structure the building was found to be safe and economical. The
structure ensured to be serviceable, habitable in healthy environment for its occupants and have
longer design period.
S. Akshara (2017) : Explained about the various procedures to analyse the seismic loads based
upon the accuracy of the results.
Raja Venkatesh (2011) : carried a study on ductility design of reinforced concrete apartment.
The project deals with the effect of earthquake on the structures and their environment & also the
method of reducing its effort. The building is located at Bhuj falls under zone 5 in a built-up area
297 sq.m providing height of 3.2m per floor as g+3 residential building with plinth level 0.6m.
Abhilash Chandra Dey (2017) : Discussed about the analysis and design of G+3 storied
Reinforced concrete structure using STAAD pro.V8i. He carried a study to design a good Rc
building requiring the stability to resist the gravity, seismic and wind loads.
Krishna GNR (2016) : Carried out an seismic analysis of RC Buildings. He has explained about
about different types of seismic analysis procedures and worked out analysis by using linear
static analysis and compared design values manually and using SAP2000.
CHAPTER-3
METHODOLOGY
The figure shows the methodology used for the design and analysis of a building. For designing
various activities are carried out. The fig 3.1 shows the flowchart of various methods used in the
proposed designing and analysis.
To achieve the objectives of the study that is to analyse the G+3 multistorey building, which
meets the basic requirements and opposes the loads acting on it and do not causes failure, it has
been proposed to follow the methodology.
3.1 GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN
3.2 LOADS
Dead load and Live Load are assigned to this structure. The first vertical load that is considered
is dead load. Dead loads are permanent or stationary loads which are transferred to the structure
throughout the life span of the structures. Live load is either movable or moving loads. Analysis
of the structure is done to know the deflection details of the structure or also by the analysis of
the structure Shear force diagram and Bending moment diagram can be obtained. And the
structure is designed to obtain the value of total amount of steel and concrete required for the
construction. The procedure of structural analysis is simple in concept but complex in detail. It
involves the analysis of a proposed structure to show that its resistance or strength will meet or
exceed a reasonable expectation. This project is mostly based on software and it is essential to
know the details about these Software’s.
List of software’s used
1. Staad pro (v8i)
2. Staad foundations 5(v8i)
3. Auto cad
3.3 PROCEDURE
Structural analysis: In this project, the analysis of a frame is done manually and then for the
analysis of shear force and bending moment Staadpro.v8i software is used.
Structural design: All the structural components like Slab, Beam, Column and Footing will
be designed. These are designed by the conditions of Limit State Method. The grade of concrete
M20 and grade of steel Fe415 used in this project for the design of RCC structural members.
Hall = 4.99mX5.7m
Kitchen = 2.59mx3.1m
M.Bed room = 4.39mx5.1m
C.Bed room = 4.39mx4.2m
Pooja = 1.8mx2.4m
Bath room = 2.2mx1.6m
Staircase = 4.77mx5.1m
Door = 0.9mx2.13m
Window = 0.9mx0.9m
Ventilator = 0.61mx0.91m
Size Of Column = 230X400mm
Size Of Beam = 300X500mm
CHAPTER-5
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
5.1 GENERAL
To with stand againist Seismic loads, we must apply load combinations as per IS 1893:2002
(Part – 1), Clause 6.1.3.2, in the limit state design of reinforced and prestressed concrete
structures. The following load combinations shall be accounted
1) 1.5( DL+IL)
2) 1.2 (DL+IL+EL)
3) 1.2 (DL+IL-EL)
4) 1.5(DL+EL)
5) 1.5(DL-EL)
6) 0.9DL+ 1.5EL
7) 0.9DL-1.5EL
Totally 45 members (Columns & Beams) are analyzed by STAAD Pro for the 7 load
combinations and consumes more time therefore an alternative i.e., software solution is better
and less time consumes. There are many software packages which does structural analysis like
STAAD Pro., out of which STAAD Pro is the most popular one.
Structural analysis software makes the task an analysis easy. Usage of software have several
pitfalls. Resorting to software’s without a good knowledge of structural behaviors can be
disastrous. Therefore care should be taken when the structure is modeled and the suitable input
are given.
5.2 LOADING CALCULATIONS
Weight of wall:
2RG
Where,
Z = 0.36
I = 1.00
R = 5 (for ductility design consideration)
T = 0.075h0.75 (for RC frame building) (as per Clause 7.6.1 of IS 1893 part-1-
2002)
h = (3.2X4) +0.6
h = 13.4
T = 0.075X13.40.75
T = 0.525
Z I Sg
2 R G
0.36 1.0
2 5
a) Weight of floor
= 0.5 kN/m2
= 105.73 kN
= 1110.71+70.35+162+70.35+(89/2)+192.06+767.07+(487.13/2)
= 2715.79 kN
= 2739.98 1kN
VB=AhW
=0.09×10935.73 =984.2157kN
Wi Hi Wi Hi Wi Hi2 Qi
Level
(kN) (m) ΣWi Hi2 (kN)
Roof 2715.79 12.80 444955.03 0.53 173.88
3 2739.98 9.6 252516.57 0.30 98.42
2 2739.98 6.4 112229.58 0.13 42.65
1 2739.98 3.2 28057.39 0.03 9.84
Ground floor _ 0 0 0 0
ΣWi Hi2 =
837758.57 324.79
Fig.5.3.1 Dead Load on roof and floor level
Fig.5.3.2 Live Load on roof and floor level
Fig.5.4.4 Earth Quake Load on a frame
5.5 STAAD ANALYSIS
STAAD PLANE
DESIGN OF MEMBERS
A Slab is a structural element, made of concrete, that is used to create flat horizontal surfaces
such as floors, roof decks and ceilings. It is a flat horizontal surface supported by beam and
column and transfer load to beams. Slabs are to be designed under limit state method by
reference of IS 456:2000. On the basis of reinforcement provided , beam support and the ratio of
the spans, slabs are generally classified into one way slab and two way slab . A one way slab is
supported on two sides andthe ratio of long to short span is greater than two, whereas, the two
way slab is supported on four sidesand the ratio of long to short span is smaller than two.
SLAB DESIGN:
= 4390mm x5100mm
Ly = 5100mm
Lx = 4390mm
ly/lx <2
5100
Span
4390
= ….……………… = (32)
EFFECTIVE SPAN:
c/c of an support
4390+230/2+230/2 = 4620 mm
4390+116 =4506mm
Lx=4506mm
c/c of an support
5100+230/2+230/2 = 5330mm
5100+116 =5216 mm
Ly=5216mm
LOADING:
1. S wt.of slab = 3.5 kN/m2
e (0.14x25)
=7.4x1.5
ly/lx = 5100/4390
=1.61
MX= αxwlx2
0.084-0.075
αx = 0.075+----------------------------X (1.61-1.5)
1.75-1.5
αx = 0.079
MX= αxwlx2
= 0.079X11.1X4.392
MX = 16.89 kN.m
MX= αxwlx2
0.063-0.056
1.75-1.5
α x = 0.059
MX = 12.62 kN.m
My=
αywlx2 αy
=0.047
MY =
0.047x11.1x4.392
MY = 10.05 kN.m
My= αywlx2
αy = 0.035
MY =
0.035x11.1x4.392 MY
= 7.487 kN.m
TYPE OF SECTION:
= 0.138X20X1000X1162
= 37.13 kN.m
fy fck bd
fy fck bd2
0.5X20 4.6 X10.05X106
= ----------- 1-√1- ---------------------- X1000X116
415 20X1000X1162
Ast = 251.38 mm2
= 0.0012X1000X140
Spacing =-------------1000
Ast
50.26
=--------------------1000
437.76
Spacing = 114.81 mm say 110 mm
SPACING LIMIT:
less 2. 300mm
ast
Spacing =-------------1000
Ast
50.26
=--------------------1000
251.38
Spacing = 199.93mm say 200mm
SPACING LIMIT:
2.300mm
= 0.0012X1000X140
Min Ast = 168
Spacing =-----------1000
Ast
28.27
=----------------1000
168
Spacing = 168.27 mm say 160mm
SPACING LIMIT:
2.450mm
=10.125 x 4.39 /2
= 22.22 kN
Nominal shear stress ﺡv = VU/bd
= 0.19 N/mm2
Ast
Ast(prov) =--------------------1000
Spacing
50.26
=-------------------------------1000
110
Ast (prov) = 456.90 mm2
% Ast =
bd
100 X 456.90
=
1000 X 116
= 0.39%
0.48-0.39
= 0.39+--------------------X (0.39-0.25)
0.50-0.25
ﺡc = 0.44N/mm2
= 0.44X1.30
= 0.57
ﺡv<k ﺡc
L L
------ = -------- X kt X kc X kf
d actual d prov
where
kc =1
kf=1
ast(req)
ast(pro)
437.76
fs=0.58X415X ------------
456.90
456:2000) Kt =1.50
4506
---------- = 32X1.50X1X1
116
38.84< 48
TORSIONAL REINFORCEMENT:
= ¾ X (437.76)
=328.32mm2
Provide 8mm dia bars 4 layers @ top and bottom in each corner of the slab
Mini length of torsional reinforcement:
= 1/5 X shorter span eff.length
= 1/5 X 4506
= 901.2mm
Provided 8mm dia bars of 4nos @ 4 layers for a distance of 900mm for each corner.
Fig.6.1 Slab Reinforcement
6.2 DESIGN OF FLEXURAL MEMBER (BEAM)
A Beam is a structural element that primarily resists loads applied laterally to the beam’s
axis. Its mode of deflection is primarily by bending. The loads applied to the beam result in
reaction forces at the beam’s support point. Beam is a member which transfers the loads
from slab to columns and then foundation to soil. Beam is a tension member.
Reinforcement at a section 4 due to hogging moment = 116KNm (24 th member is
taken for the design)
BEAM DESIGN:
d = 500 – 25 – (25/2)
d = 462.5mm
Mu(lim) = 0.138
fckbd2
= 0.138X20X300X462.52
Mu(lim) = 177.11kNm
Mu< Mu(lim)
Mu 116X106
= = 1.807
bd2
300X462.52
p(top) = 0.565 (from sp16 page 48 table-2)
Ast @ top = (0.565/100)X300X462.5 = 783.93 mm2
Ast = 783.9 mm2
provide 2bars of 20mm dia + 2bars of 10mm dia (astpro= 785.39 mm2)
Reinforcement at section 4 due to sagging moment = -42kNm
Mu< Mu(lim)
Hence the section is singly reinforced section
Mu 42X106
= = 0.65
bd2 300X462.52
p(bottom) = 0.187 (from sp16 page 48 table-2)
ast @ bottom = (0.187/100)X300X462.5 = 259.46mm2
Ast = 259.46 mm2
provide 1bar of 12mm dia + 2bars of 10mm dia (astpro= 270.17 mm2)
= 0.138X20X300X462.52
Mu(lim) = 177.11kNm
Mu< Mu(lim)
Mu 112.8X106
= = 1.75
bd2
300X462.52
p(top) = 0.547 (from sp16 page 48 table-2)
Ast @ top = (0.547/100)X300X462.5 = 758.96mm2
Ast = 758.96mm2
provide 3bars of 16mm dia + 2 bars of 10mm dia (astpro= 760.26 mm2)
= bd2
300X462.52
= 0.55
p(bottom) = 0.158 (from sp16 page 48 table-2)
Ast @ bottom = (0.158/100)X300X462.5 = 219.225mm2
Ast = 219.225 mm2
Provide 3bars of 10mm dia (astpro= 235.62 mm2)
SHEAR REINFORCEMENT:
At node 4
ast 785.39
p(top) = ----------X100 = -----------------X100 = 0.56% @ top
bd 300X462.5
ast 270.17
p(bottom) = ----------X100 = -----------------X100 = 0.19% @ bottom
bd 300X462.5
Mu(lim)
= 115.50 kNm
Mu(lim)
= 112.94 kNm
Mu(lim)
1.2(D+L)
2
1.2(14.40+3.57)
= ------------------------X1.5 = 16.173 kN
2
For Sway To Right :
Mu(lim) As + Mu(lim) Bh
LAB
44.92+112.94
Vu , a = 16.173 - 1.4 = ---------------------------- = 52.62kN
1.5
Mu(lim) As + Mu(lim) bh
LAB
44.92+112.94
Vu , a = 16.173 + 1.4 = ----------------------------
1.5
= 91.90kN
For Sway To Leftt :
Mu(lim) Ah + Mu(lim) bs
LAB
115.50+35
Vu , a = 16.17 - 1.4 = ----------------------------
1.5
= 5.67kN
Mu(lim) Ah + Mu(lim) bs
LAB
` 105.88+73.79
Vu , a = 16.17 + 1.4 = ---------------------------- = 104.31kN
1.5
DETERMINATION OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT:
104.31X103
300X462.5
ﺡv =
0.75N/mm2
= X 100
bd
191.62
= X 100
300X462.5
= 0.138%
ﺡv> ﺡc
Vus = vu - ﺡc bd
= (104.3X103) - (0.280X300X462.5)
Vus = 65.46kN
Since ﺡv> ﺡc shear reinforcement are provide in the form of vertical stirrups
Sv = 256mm
Hence provide 8mm dia bar @ 100mm c/c 2d from supports in between 200mmc/c
Fig.6.2 Beam Reinforcement
6.3 DESIGN OF EXTERIOR COLUMN
A column is defined as a vertical compression member which is mainly subjected to axial loads
and the effective length of which exceeds three times its least lateral dimension.
777.614 × 103
230 × 400
= 8.45 >2
Hence ok.
Minimum dimension of column ≤ 250 mm (as per Clause 7.1.2of IS IS13920-1993)
Therefore provide minimum dimension as 230 mm
Hence ok.
Shortest cross sectional dimension (as per Clause 7.1.2of IS IS13920-1993)
Shortest cross sectional dimension
= (230/400) = 0.0.57 > 0.4
Longer cross sectional dimension
VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT:
Assume 20mm dia. bars with 40mm cover. (d = 40+10 =50)
d/D = 50/400 = 0.125
Y = Pu/fck bD (From chart 44 of SP-16 )
Y = (777.614X103/(20X230X400)) = 0.422
X = Mu/ fck bD2 = = 0.157
(116×106/(20X300X5002))
p/ fck
= 0.04
P
= 0.04 × fck = 0.04 × 20 = 0.8 %
0.8
Asc = ----------- × 230 × 400 = 736
mm2 100
The design shear force for column shall be maximum of the following.
Where,
Mu , bl Lim and Mu , bR Lim are moments of resistance of opposite sign of beam and hst is
the height of storeys .
Pt = 0.689 % @ top
Pb = 0.530 % @ bottom
VU = 1.4 {12.79 + 10.14 /3.2}
VU = 10.03 kN
VC = τCbd
By interpolation we get ,
0.75 0.56
0.80 ?
(0.62 – 0.56)
(1.00 – 0.56)
= 0.572
Vc = 46.04 kN
Vs = Vu - Vc
= 10.03 – 46.04
Vs = 36.01 kN
The shear reinforcement shall be provided (as per clause 26.5.1.6 of IS 456 -2000)
SPACING :
a) Asv 0.87 fy
Sv ≤
0.4 b
0.4×230
Provided 8dia. @ 2 legged stirupps @ 300 mm c/c
lo=500mm
The spacing of hoop shall not exceed (as per Clause 7.4.6 of IS 13920-1993)
Minimum area of c/s of bar forming hoop is, (as per Clause 7.4.8 of IS 13920-1993)
Foundation is an important part of the structure which transfers the load of the structure to
the foundation soil. The foundation distributes the load over a large area. So that pressure
on the soil does not exceed its allowable bearing capacity and restricts the settlement of
the structure within the permissible limits. Foundation increases the stability of the
structure. The settlement of the structure should be as uniform as possible and it should be
within the tolerable limits.
FOOTING DESIGN :
Column size = 230X400mm
SIZE OF FOOTING:
400
Column = ------------- = 1.74
230
x
= 1.74
2.69
X = 4.68 m
Size of footing = 4.68mX2.69m
(P/A) = [818.680/(4.68X2.69)] = 65.03 kN/m2
Z = [(2.69X4.682)/6] = 9.82 m3
(M/Z) = (81.869 /9.82) = 8.34 kN/m2
P m
pmax = ---------- + ----------- < SBC
A Z
P m
Pmin = ---------- - ----------- ≥ 0
A Z
pmax = 65.03+8.34 = 73.37 kN/m2 < SBC
Hence safe
providing size = 4.68mX2.69m
MOMENT CALCULATION:
Mx = [(0.4X78.63X1.65X(1/3)X1.65)+(0.4X95.64X1.65X(2/3)X1.65)]X2.69
Mx = 215.32 kNm
Mux = 215.32 X 1.5 = 322.98 kNm
My = (1.3452/2)X4.68X[(56.69+73.37)/2]
My = 275.27 kNm
Muy = 275.27 X 1.5
Muy = 412.92 kNm
Moment steel
Balance depth required for flexure
d = √Mu/(0.138bfck)
= √(322.98X106)/(0.138X2690X20)
d = 208.57 mm
provide 500mm for shear consideration try an overall depth of 500mm large depth is required for
shear requirement
dx = 500-50-6 = 444mm
dy = 444-12 = 432mm
d avg = 0.5[444+432] = 438mm
STEEL PARALLEL TO LONGER DIRECTION:
Mu/bd2 =322.98X106/(2690X4382) = 0.62
Pt = 0.176 (from sp-16 page no 48 table 2)
0.176
Ast =-------------------2690 X 438
100
Ast = 2073.66 mm2
Mini Ast = (0.12/100)bD
= (0.12/100) X 2690 X 500
Mini ast = 1614 mm2
Provide 16mmdia @14nos 0f 80mmc/c
STEEL PARALLEL TO SHORTER DIRECTION:
Mu/bd2 = 412.92X106/(4680X4322) = 0.47
Pt = 0.1326 (from sp-16 page no 48 table 2)
0.1326
Ast =-------------------4680 X 432
100
Ast = 2680.85mm2
Mini ast = (0.12/100)bD
= (0.12/100) X 4680X 500
Mini ast = 2808 mm2
Provide 12mmdia @14nos 0f 80mmc/c
Longer side of footing
β=
Shorter side of footing
4.68
=
2.69
β = 1.73
2 2
= = 0.73
β + 1 1.73+1
Reinforcement in central band of 2.69 m width
= 0.73X2680.85 = 1957.02
Spacing 16mm dia bars
2690 X area of one bar
=
Area required
2690 X 113
=
1957.02
= 155.322mm
4.68
= ------------ = 30.13
155.322
Provide 30nos of 12mm dia bars ast = 3392.92 mm2 to satisfy mini steel requirement
One way shear:
About X-X1
V = [1.206 X (83.2+73.37)/2]X2.69
V = 214.22kN
Vu = 214.22X1.5
Vu = 321.33 kN
321.33X103
=
2690X444
= 0.269N/mm2
100 Ast (prov)
=
bd
100X2815
=
2690X444
= 0.23N/mm2
Permissible shear stress = ﺡc = 0.38 N/mm2 (as per IS 456-2000 page no 73 Table
The cantilever is smaller therefore one-way shear stresses are within the limits
Two way shear:
Avg . depth = 438mm
The soil pr distribution below the footing is varying hence the two-way shear stress on
perimeter lines AB,BQ,QP,PA @ distances d/2 from column face fig will be different the max
two way shear may be checked along line AB
Longer side of footing
βc =
2.69
=
4.68
βc = 0.57
Ks = (0.5+ βc)
= (0.5+0.57).
Ks = 1.07
= 1.07X1.12
= 1.198N/mm2
Two way shear along line AB
= [(0.738+2.69)/2]X[(78.85+73.37)/2]X1.431
= 186.68kN
Vu = 186.68X1.5
Vu = 280.02kN
Nominal shear stress ﺡv = VU/bd
280.02X103
=
738X438
= 0.866 N/mm2
ﺡv< Ks ﺡc
A1 = a) 2.69X4.68 = 12.59 m2
b) [0.3+(4X0.438)X(0.5+(4X0.438))] = 3.30m2
A1 = 12.59m2
√A1/A2 = √(12.59/0.092) = 11.70>2
√A1/A2 = 2
1832.64X103
As =----------------------= 5888 mm2
0.75X415
P M
q0 = +
A Z
818.680X103 81.869X106
+
230X400 ((1/6)X300X5002)
q0 = 22.24 N/mm2
= (0.5/100)X230X400
= 460 mm2
Consider 1000mm
CONCLUSION
I have gained enough knowledge in Load calculation, Analysis, Structural design and Ductile
detailing of Earthquake Resistant RC buildings subjected to Seismic forces.
Finally ‘Earthquake not kills, but the building to do so…’ as per the words, in future I design the
RC buildings having adequate Ductility which can resist the seismic loads and do not cause any
type of damage.
REFERENCES
1. Analysis of G+3 RCC storied Building by Tarun kumar (2017), IARE, Hyderabad.
2. Ductility design of reinforced concrete apartment building by Saran, Venkatesh and
Nivetha (2011), K.S.R College of Engineering, Chennai.
3. Seismic Analysis of Reinforced concrete Buildings-A Review by Krishna nair and Akshara
(2017), Angamaly, India.
4. IS 13920:1993, “Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected to Seismic
Forces — Code of Practice “, BIS, New Delhi.
5. IS 1893:2002(Part 1), “Criteria For Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures”, BIS, New
Delhi.
6. IS 4326:1993, “EarthQuake Resistant Design and Construction of Buildings-Code of
Practise”, Second Revision, BIS, New Delhi
7. IS 456:2000, “Plain and Reinforced Concrete - Code of Practice, BIS, New Delhi.
8. IS 875-1987 (part-1), Code of Practice for design loads (other than Earth quake loads) for
buildings and structures: Part-1 Dead loads- Unit weights of building materials and stored
materials.
9. IS 875-1987 (part-2), Code of practice for design loads (other than Earth quake loads) for
buildings and structures: Part-2 Imposed loads.
10. SP: 16, “Design Aids For Reinforced Concrete”, BIS, New Delhi.
11. SP: 34, “Detailing of members.”
12. Pankaj Agarwal, Manish Shrikande, “Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures”, PHI
Learning Pvt. Ltd., 2006.
13. Bhattacharyya.S.K, “Guidelines for earthquake resistant design and Evaluation of
earthquake forces”, IIT, Kharagpur.