Yashas sp2.0

VISVESVARAYA TECHNOLOGY
UNIVERSITY BELAGAVI, KARNATAKA-

570014
PROJECT REPORT
On
“ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF MULTISTORIED

COMMERCIAL BUILDING USING ETABS”
Submitted by
G S VANAJA (4GM17CV014)
HAREESH K (4GM17CV015)
MANOJ G ALADAKATTI (4GM17CV019)
SRIDEVI N (4GM17CV044)
Under the Guidance of
VIRUPAKSHA H V
Assistant Professor
2020-2021
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
G M INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, DAVANAGERE-577006
G M INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, DAVANAGERE
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
# 4, P B Road, Davanagere-6
(Affiliated To Visvesvaraya Technological University)
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the project report titled
“ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF MULTISTORIED

COMMERCIAL BUILDING USING ETABS”
Is an authentic record of the project report submitted by “G S VANAJA, HAREESH K,

MANOJ G ALADAKATTI, SRIDEVI N” bearing USN; 4GM17CV014, 4GM17CV015,
4GM17CV019, 4GM17CV044, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of
Bachelor Degree in Civil Engineering of Visvesvaraya Technological University, Belagavi
under our guidance and supervision during the year 2020-2021.
…………………………………….. ………………………………………. …………………………...

VIRUPAKSHA H V Mr. Y B BHARATHARAJ ETIGI Dr.Y VIJAY KUMAR
Assistant Professor Professor & Head Principal
Department of Civil Engineering Department of Civil Engineering GMIT, davanagere
GMIT, Davanagere. GMIT, Davanagere.
.
Name of the Examiners Signature with date
1. …………………………………. 1. ………………………………….
2. …………………………………. 2. ………………………………….
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We sincerely owe our gratitude to all the persons who helped and guided us in completing this
project work. I am thankful to Dr. Y. VIJAYKUMAR, Principal, GMIT, Davanagere without
his help this project would have been a dream.
We would like to thankful to Dr. Y B BHARATHARAJ ETIGI, Professor & Head of

Department of Civil Engineering for his suggestions for the effectiveness of project.
With specific reference to the Project, I would like to sincerely thank to VIRUPAKSHA H V
Asst, Professor of Civil Engineering for his guidance, and for taking time to review our work
and providing in sighting comments and suggesting corrections that helped to improve the
quality of the final version of this project.
We would like to acknowledge my sincere thanks to all faculty of Civil Engineering

Department for their support and various people assisted directly or indirectly in preparing
seminar report. We take this opportunity to thank all of them who have helped us in successful
completion of project.
CONTENTS
CHAPTER PAGE NO
1. INTRODUCTION R0-1
2. LITERATURE REVIEW 2
3. SOFTWARE 3-5
4. METHODOLOGY AND MODELING OF STRUCTURE 6-19
5. DESIGN OF FOTTING 20
6. DESIGN OF COLUMNS 21-28
7. DESIGN OF BEAMS 29-37
8. DESIGN OF SLABS 38-42
9. CONCLUSION 43
10. REFERENCE 44
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF MULTISTORIED COMMERCIAL BUILDING USING ETABS
CHAPTER I
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 GENERAL
Urbanization is increasing rapidly in present world. There is an increase in housing

requirement with increased population and urbanization. Therefore, the creation of high-
rise constructions became very often. Urbanization is beneficial but, the problem arises
when the high- raise buildings are not designed and constructed properly. A building as a
shelter represents a physical division of the human habitat (Nishanth et al.).
Structural analysis means determination of the general shape and all the specific
dimensions of a particular structure so that it will perform the function for which it is
created and will safely withstand the influences which will act on it throughout its useful
life. Due to concentration and increase of population into urban cities, there is a need to
accommodate the influx in urban cities. However, due to rapid increase of land cost and
limited availability of land, constructions of multi-storied buildings are taken part in our
daily life. A multistoried is a building that has multiple floors above ground in the
building. Multi-storied buildings aim to increase the floor area of building without
increasing the area of the land, the building is built on and hence saving land and in most
cases money (depending on material used and land prices in the area).The design process
of multi-storied building requires not only imagination and conceptual thinking but also
sound knowledge of science of structural engineering (Deshpande et al.).
Structure analysis is a subject which involves designing, planning to build up a

perfect building. Basically, each project is different with their design criteria such as
incoming load, soil properties, dynamic load, built up area etc (Ibrahim et al.).
Davangere is a Developing smart city, with fast economy thus resulting in expansion of the
city. As day by day population increases, demand for shelter also increases. it becomes
responsibility of a civil engineer to build a structure, ensuring all safety measures causing no
failure in the structure and achieve economy.ETABS is the present-day leading design
software in the market. Many design company’s use this software for their project design
purpose. So, this paper mainly deals with the comparative analysis of the results obtained
from the analysis of a multi storied building structure when analysed manually and using
ETABS software. Structural
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL 1
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF MULTISTORIED COMMERCIAL BUILDING USING
intensity,duration and frequency content of existing ground motion. Structural analysis

means determination of the general shape and all the specific dimensions of a particular
structure so that it performs the function for which it is created and will safely withstand the
influences which will act on it throughout its useful life (Mai.).
Here we made an attempt to learn the steps which are involved in constructions
activity from the under taken project. The project mainly deals with analysis and design of
multi-storey building at Davangere city.
We selected a plan of symmetrical (G+3) commercial building .
1.2 OBJECTIVES
 The main objective of this study is to analyse and design a G+3 commerical
building using ETABS software and verifying it by manually.
 Test for safe bearing capacity of soil.
 To study and plan the project site, identify problems, analyse, apply appropriate
parameters, assumption and design criteria in consideration of safety, ethics,
economic, environment and sustainability.
 To perform analysis and design of the structure without any type of failures.
 To design structural components like beam, slab, column and footing using
ETABS software.
 By analysis on ETABS we will study various forces and factors affecting on the
structure.
CHAPTER II
LITERATURE REVIEW
R.D.Deshpande et al. (2017): This project attempts to understand the structural
behaviour of various components in the multi-storied building. Analysis, designing and
estimation of multi-storeyed building has been taken up for Basement+G+2 Building,
thereby depending on the suitability of plan, layout of beams and positions of columns
are fixed. Dead loads are calculated based on material properties and live loads are
considered according to the code IS875-part 2, footings are designed based on safe
bearing capacity of soil. For the design of columns and beams frame analysis is done by
limit state method to know the moments they are acted upon. Slab designing is done
depending upon the type of slab (one way or two way), end conditions and the loading.
From the slabs the loads are transferred to the beams, thereafter the loads from the beams
are taken up by the columns and then to footing finally the section is c hecked for the
components manually and using ETABS
15.0.0 software for the post analysis of structure, maximum shear force, bending moment
and maximum storey displacement are computed.
M. Mallikarjun, Dr P V Surya Prakash (2016): Carried study on analysis and design of

a multi-storied residential building of ung-2+G+10 by using most economical column
method and the dead load and live load was applied on the various structural component
like slabs, beams and found that as the study is carried using most economical column
method this was achieved by reducing the size of columns at top floors as load was more
at the bottom floor. The economizing was done by means of column orientation in longer
span in longer direction as it will reduce the amount of bending and the area of steel was
also reduced.
Nirmal S. Mehta: Present study represents the analysis and design of ten storey
residential building with basement. The build2ing is considered in Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
region. The sizes of various structural elements are decided after optimization. For
analysis and design, building model is generated in ETABS 2013 software. The various
parameters like centre of mass, centre of stiffness, displacement of building, storey drift
and rotational displacement are considered for analysis purpose. It is observed that centre
of mass and centre of stiffness are depending on the orientation of column. It is also
observed that eccentricity in Y-direction is very high as compared to Xdirection due to
unequal mass distribution at top floor. According to design report provided by ETABS
all the values of stresses and storey drift are under limit as mentioned in IS 456:2000 and
IS 1893:2002.
Ragy Jose, Restina Mathew et.al: Analysis and design of commercial building using
ETABS software (2017). ETABS (Extended three dimensional analysis of building system)
is a software which is incorporated with all the major analysis engines that is static, dynamic,
linear and non-linear, etc. and especially this software is used for the analysis and design of
the buildings. Thier project is an attempt to analyse and design of a commercial building
using ETABS. G+3 storey building is considered for the study analysis is carried out by static
method and design is done as per IS 456-2000 guidelines also an attempt has been made to
design the structural elements manually, drawing and detailing are done by using AUTO
CAD as per SP- 34.
Balaji.U and Selvarasan M.E: Worked on analysis and design of multi-storied

building under static and dynamic loading conditions using ETABS (2016) . In this work a
G+13 storey residential building was modelled & studied for the earthquake loads using
ETABS. They assumed that material property to be linear, static and dynamic analysis were
performed. The non-linear analysis was carried out by considering severe seismic zones Ⅳ
and Ⅴ. The behaviour was assessed by considering soil type Ⅱ condition.As per IS: 1893
(Part Ⅰ) 2002. Different results like displacements, base shear were plotted and studied. As
soon as the structural mannequin has been selected, it is possible to perform evaluation to
examine the seismically brought about forces within the structures .
Chandrashekar et.al:Analyzed and designed the multi-storied building by using ETABS
software (2015). A G+5 storey building under the lateral loading effect of wind and
earthquake was considered for this study and analysis is done by using ETABS. They have
also considered the chances of occurrence of spread of fire and the importance of use of fire
proof material up to highest possible standards of performance as well as reliability. They
suggested that the wide chance ETABS software which is very innovative and easier for high
rise buildings so that time incurred for designing is reduced. This project presents (B+G+5),
upper stories are RCC framed building and this software was considered to analyse and
design under the lateral loading effect of wind and earthquake using ETABS. Building can be
modeled as per the arrangement of the members of the project in practical and this software
consider the beams, columns as line members, slabs, ramps or staircases walls are as area
members.
Varalakshmi V et.al: Analyzed a G+5 storey residential building and designed the various
components (2014) like beams, slabs, columns and foundation. The loads namely dead load and
live load were calculated as per IS:875(Part I & II)-1987 and HYSD bars ie. Fe 415 are used as
per IS:1786-1985. They concluded that the safety of the reinforced concrete building depends
upon the initial architectural and structural configuration of the total building, the quality of the
structural analysis, design and reinforcement detailing of the building frame to achieve stability
of elements and their ductile performance . Helps to view the shear force , bending moment,
torsion diagram at level of the building . Initially slabs were designed after that columns were
placed in there desired locations.
CHAPTER-III
SOFTWARE
3.1 ETABS
ETABS [EXTENDED 3D ANALYSIS OF BUILDING SYSTEM] is a stand-
Alone structural analysis program with a special purpose features for structural design and
analysis of building systems. ETABS is simple to use and user-friendly and it is unique in
its ability to address the full spectrum of tasks involved in the process of structure
analysis and design. ETABS is a very suitable package for, Multi-storied building
analysis. The entire input data may be generated either graphically or by typing simple
English language based commands. It is equipped with the sophisticated algorithms and
state of the art graphics, residing in an extremely user- friendly environment. It provides
the Structural Engineer with all the tools necessary to create, modify, analyse, design, and
optimize building models.
These features are fully integrated in a single, Windows-based, graphical user
interface that is unmatched in terms of ease-of- use, productivity, and capability. The
innovative and revolutionary new ETABS is the ultimate integrated software package for
the structural analysis and design of buildings. Incorporating 40 years of continuous
research and development, this latest ETABS offers unmatched 3D object based
modelling and visualization tools, blazingly It provides the Structural Engineer with all
the tools necessary to create, modify, analyse, design, and optimize building models.
fastlinear and nonlinear analytical power, sophisticated and comprehensive design
capabilities for a wide-range of materials, and insightful graphic displays, reports, and
schematic drawings that allow users to quickly and easily decipher and understand
analysis and design results.
From the start of design conception through the production of schematic

drawings, ETABS integrates every aspect of the engineering design proce ss. Creation of
models has never been easier - intuitive drawing commands allow for the rapid
generation of floor and elevation framing.
CAD drawings can be converted directly into ETABS models or used as

templates onto which ETABS objects may be overlaid. Design of steel and concrete
frames (with automated optimization), composite beams, composite columns, steel joists,
and concrete and masonry shear walls is included, as is the capacity check for steel
connections and base plates. Models may be realistically rendered, and all results can be
shown directly on the structure. Comprehensive and customizable reports are available
for all analysis and design output, and schematic construction drawings of framing plans,
schedules, details, and cross-sections may be generated for concrete and steel structures.
ETABS provides an unequalled suite of tools for structural engineers designing

buildings, whether they are working on one-story industrial structures or the tallest
commercial high-rises. Immensely capable, yet easy-to-use has been the hallmark of
ETABS since its introduction decades ago, and this latest release continues that tradition
by providing engineers with the technologically-advanced, yet intuitive, software they
require to be their most productive.
3.2. FACILITIES IN ETABS
ETABS is one of the most powerful and popular structural engineering software.
It is well known for its user- friendly interface, powerful tools for modelling and loading,
design facilities. Let us have a look at the various facilities available in ETABS from the
viewpoint of a structural designer.
3.2.1 Model Generating Facilities
a) Inter-active menu driven on-screen model generation with simultaneously 3-D

display.
b) Library of commonly used structures.
c) CAD facilities like mirroring copying, moving etc.
d) Facility to read DXF (AutoCAD) files and generate corresponding ETABS- input.
e) Menu driven facilities to specify member properties and material properties, loading,
supports etc.
3.2.2 Model Verification Facilities
a) Basic 2-d and 3-d drawings.
b) Capabilities of cutting section for sectional views.

c) Numbering of members and joints.
d) Isometric full 3-D view.
e) Display of load and supports.
3.2.3 Load Generation Capabilities
Specification of joints loads.

a) Specification of member loads as uniform or concentrated load/moment or linearly
varying loads, temperature, supports displacement, pre-stressing loads etc. to model
all loading conditions.
b) Automatic wind load generation from user specified wind intensity and exposure
factors.
c) Seismic load generation based on UBC and IS.1893 codes of calculating and
automatically distributing base shear according to code specifications.
d) Automatic moving loads generation for user specified wheel loads.
3.2.4 Finite Elements Capabilities
a) Plate and shell elements incorporating out of plane shear and enplane rotation.
b) Automatic mesh element generation facility.
c) Stress output at user specified points.
d) Uniform as well as linearly varying pressure loading on user specified portions.
3.2.5 Dynamic/Seismic Capabilities
a) Comprehensive dynamic analysis featuring discrete mass modeling, frequency/mode

shape extraction, participation factors, time history and response spectrum analysis.
b) Provision to combine dynamic force with static loading for use in design.
3.2.6 Analytical Capabilities
a) Two or three-dimensional analysis using stiffness method for solution.
b) Beam, truss, thin shell/plate bending/plane stress element with fixed or pinned ends.
c) Fixed, pinned and spring supports with release specifications, partial moment release
facility for partial fixity.
d) User provided member offset specification and automatic calculation of secondary

forces at eccentric points ensures accurate load transfer.
e) Facility of P-Delta (second order) or standard linear and nonlinear analysis
including user defined iteration facilities.
3.2.7 Concrete Design Capabilities
a) Design of concrete beams and columns in accordance with codes of different

Countries Indian, American (ACI 318-89), British (BS 8110), French, German,
Spanish, Canadian, Scandinavian, Japanese, Australian codes.
b) Beamdesign includes area of steel and no. of reinforcement bars.
c) Column design includes complete interaction analysis.
3.2.8 Steel Design Capabilities
a) Built in steel tables facilitating input of member properties including l- section

channels, double channels, angle, double angles, beam with cover plates, pipe and
tubes- Indian, American, British, French, German, Spanish, Canadian, Scandinavian,
Japanese, Australian steel table are available.
b) Provision of code checking as per the above codes.
c) Member selection with user controlled design parameters.
d) Optimized member selection.
e) Weld design for shapes.
All the above stated are some of the facilities available in ETABS.
In this project the analysis and design of beams, columns and slabs done by ETABS
software.
3.3 SAFE
SAFE is the ultimate tool for designing concrete floor and foundation systems.
From framing layout to detail drawing production, SAFE integrates every aspect of the
engineering design process in one easy and intuitive environment. SAFE products
unmatched productivity to the engineer with its truly unique combination of power,
comprehensive capabilities, and easeof- use.
Laying out models is quick and efficient with the sophisticated drawing tools, or
use one of the import options to bring in data from CAD, spreadsheet, or database
programs. Slabs or foundations can be of any shape, and can include edges shaped with
circular and spline curves.
Post- tensioning may be included in both slabs and beams to balance a percentage
of the self-weigh. Suspended slabs can include flat, two-way, waffle, and ribbed framing
system. Models can have columns, braces, walls and ramps connected from the floors
above and below. Walls can be modelled as either straight or curved.
Mats and foundations can include nonlinear uplift from the soil springs, and
nonlinear cracked analysis is available for slabs. Generating pattern surface loads is easily
done by SAFE with an automated option. Design strips can be generated by SAFE or
drawn in a completely arbitrary manner by the use, with complete control provided for
locating and sizing the calculated reinforcement. Finite element design without strips is
also available and useful for slabs with complex geometries.In this project footing design
is done by SAFE software.
CHAPTER VI
4.0 METHODOLOGY
4.1 COLLECTION OF DATA
• Utility of Building: Commercial Building

• Number of storeys: (G+3)
• Type of walls : Cement block wall
• No of staircases : 3
• Wall thickness : 0.23m
• Door size : Main entry door - (2*2.4) m
: Other doors – (1*2.1),(0.9*2.1),(0.8*2.1)m
• Floor thickness : 0.6m
• Ceiling height : 2.8m
4.2 SOIL INVESTIGATION
In this project, initially the site engineer provided the value of soil bearing capacity
as should not be less than 300KN/m2. By visual examination we found gravel hence
shortly they excavated the soil for further soil test.
4.3 LOCATION OF SITE
Its a proposed commercial building.
CHAPTER V
MODELLING OF STRUCTURE
Modelling is done by using ETABS (18.1.1 version) software. For this purposes
the preliminary step is to prepare grid layouts. As our selected structure is (G+3) story, we
prepared plinth beam layout, floor beam layout and roof beam layout and by using these
layouts we prepared grid system using ETABS. The next step is to define the materials
properties, beam details, column details, slab details and the load combinations by
referring to IS 456-2000.
a) Material properties:
• Material name: Concrete
• Type of material: Isotropic
• Density of concrete: 40 KN/m3
• Poisson’s ratio: 0.2
• Grade of concrete: M40
• Grade of steel: Fe415
b) Beam properties:
• Beam size:
Plinth Beam = (300x500) mm
Floor Beam = (300x500) mm
Roof Beam = (300x500) mm
• Material: Concrete
• Grade of steel: Fe415
c) Column details:
• Column size:
Column = (450x450) mm
• Type of column: Squre

• Grade of steel: Fe 415
d) Slab properties:
• Material: Concrete
• Type: Membrane
• Thickness: 150mm
e) Load combinations:
Analysis is carried out for gravity loads using partial safety factor as 1.5. The following
Loads have been considered in the structural analysis and design as per IS code 456-
2000.
• Density of RCC= 40KN/m3
• Density of burnt brick masonry = 19 KN/m3
• Floor
1. Live load= 5KN/m2
2. Floor finishing= 1KN/m2
• Roof live load= 1.5KN/m2
• Burnt brick masonry wall thickness= 230mm.
• Parapet wall thickness=115.
Fig 3.1 Building Plan
Fig 3.2 Building Plan in ETABS Fig 3.3 Elevation in ETABS
Fig 3.4 3D view of model
.
Fig 3.5 Brick wall load on beam. Fig 3.6 Slab load on slab
Fig 3.7 3D Deformed model after Analysis Fig 3.8 Elevation after analysis.
Fig.3.4 Bending Moment Diagram Fig.3.5 Shear force diagram.
Fig.3.6 Design values of Beams. Fig.3.7 Design values of column.
ANALYSIS
CHAPTER-4
Analysis is carried out using etabs-18.1.1 version software. The results

thus provide us the details regarding factored lodes; factored bending moments (i.e.
sagging or hogging) factored shear force and reactions.
CHAPTER-V
DESIGN OF FOOTING
5.1 GENERAL APPROACH

The part which lies below ground is referred to as substructures or the
foundation structure. Footing belongs to the category of shallow foundation and is used
when soil of sufficient strength is available within a relatively short depth below the
ground surface.
Footing are designed to sustain the applied load, moments and forces and the induced
reactions and ensure that aASny settlement which may occur shall be as nearly uniform
as possible, and the sbc of soil is not exceeded.
In reinforced and plain concrete footing, the thickness at the edge shall be not less than
150mm for footing on soil, nor less than 300mm above the top of the piles for footing
on piles.
ALL FOOTING COMES UNDER RECTANGULAR FOOTING.
Foundation should be designed
1. To transmit the load of the structure safely on to a sufficient area of the soil so that
stresses induced in the soil are within safe limits.
2. To ensure uniform settlements i.e., the intensity of soil reaction should be the same
under all the footings of a structure.
3. To ensure no possibility of structures i.e., the foundation area should be designed such
that the centre of gravity (C,g) of loads in plan coincides with the (C.g) of the
foundation
area.
5.2 GENERAL RULES OF DESIGN
While designing a foundation the following points must be considered in mind. When a
soil is yielding soil a certain amount of settlement of the foundation is sure to occur. It is
necessary that the settlement must be reduced as much as possible by bringing down the
pressure intensity. It is necessary that a foundation shall be designed so that if at all a
settlement should
occur it would be uniform. In other words, the settlement of all the footing must be more or
less the same. This is a very important point in reinforced concrete structures due to the rigid
connections between the components of the structure.
CHAPTER-VI
DESIGN OF COLUMNS
In reinforced concrete construction, a compression member is one, which is
having an effective length greater than three times its least lateral dimension, and is
defined as a column or strut.
A vertical compression member coming under the above definition is usually

called as a column, while that in any other direction, as in case of frames or trusses is
called as a strut. A column with an effective length less than three times the least lateral
dimension is considered as a pedestal.
6.2 CLASSIFICATION OF COLUMNS

6.2.1 On the basis of transverse reinforcement:
a) Column with lateral ties.
b) Helically reinforced column.
6.2.2 On the basis of shape of cross section:
a) Square
b) Rectangular
c) Circular
d) Polygonal
e) T&L shaped column.
6.2.3 On the basis of nature of loading:
a) Axially loaded column.
b) Eccentrically loaded column.
6.2.4 On the basis of slenderness:
a) Long column.
b) Short column.
Long columns
The columns fail by buckling or bending. A column is considered long when the
“Ratio of its effective length to its least lateral dimension exceeds 12 or the radius of
gyration exceeds 40.”
Short columns
The columns fail by crushing. A column is considered short when the “ratio of
its effective length to its least lateral dimension not exceeds 12 or the radius of gyration
not exceed 40.”
Short columns can take more loads as compared to a long column of the same
dimension and reinforcement.
6.3 CONSTITUENTS OF COLUMN

Concrete:
Concrete being very strong in compression should not theoretically require any
reinforcement. However, because it is very weak in tension, all circumstances leading to
development of tension need to be examined, and reinforcement provided for resisting
the same.
Reinforcement:
Tension is likely to develop in columns due to accidental transverse loads,

eccentric loads and the end moments, which cause bending in the member. And since
this bending can occur in any direction, including tension on any face, the
reinforcementis required on all the extreme faces running parallel to the axis of the
member. This thus forms the longitudinal reinforcement.
For short members, there is a possibility of failure by longitudinal splitting due

to development of transverse tension or failure by shear, i.e., a diagonal tension. This
therefore requires transverse reinforcement.
Longitudinal reinforcement required:-

1. To resist any tension that might develop due to bending caused by transverse
loads, eccentric loads or the moments.
2. To assist concrete in the resulting compression so as to reduce the overall size of
the column.
3. To reduce the effects of creep and shrinkage due to sustained loading.
4. To impart necessary ductility to the column.
5. To prevent or delay sudden brittle collapse.
6. To hold the transverse reinforcement.
Transverse Reinforcement required:-
1. To prevent buckling of individual bars.

2. To resist diagonal tension due to transverse shear.
3. To prevent longitudinal splitting of concrete.
4. To confine the concrete.
5. To hold the longitudinal bars in position.
6. To prevent or delay sudden collapse and impart ductility to concrete.
6.4: COLUMN RESULTS - FIRST FLOOR LEVEL

Column Load PU(KN) V2 V3 T MY MX
(KN) (KN) (KN-m) (KN-m)
C1 GRAVITY 1582.9 30.25 26.44 0.0014 40.3708 46.21
C2 GRAVITY 2844.5 56.464 2.465 0.0048 2.41 54.85
C3 GRAVITY 2254.4 45.58 12.4728 0.0071 12.23 44.28
C4 GRAVITY 1955.72 39.8 3.809 3.8217 6.0262 60.8502
C5 GRAVITY 1869.46 38.64 5.293 0.0019 5.3324 37.541
C6 GRAVITY 1765.66 35.44 1.1079 0.0059 1.9115 54.16
C7 GRAVITY 2116.56 44.055 7.7851 0.0035 12.1614 67.3358
sC8 GRAVITY 1414.32 27.38 19.2285 0.0227 18.96 26.634
C9 GRAVITY 2752.69 7.19 48.04 0.008 73.3745 10.92
C10 GRAVITY 4988.79 13.26 4.33 28 4.2157 12.9456
C11 GRAVITY 3933.8 10.5782 22.817 0.0028 22.255 10.3506
C12 GRAVITY 3388.1 9.1206 7.173 0.0012 22.255 10.3506
C13 GRAVITY 3230.4 8.7744 9.467 0.0014 9.3832 8.6059
C14 GRAVITY 3038.6 8.1244 2.2316 0.0007 3.6387 12.33
C15 GRAVITY 3654.7 10.04 14.37 0.0037 22.2527 15.28
C16 GRAVITY 2418.2 6.4023 34.5392 0.009 33.8362 6.2974
C17 GRAVITY 1969 12.467 35.77 0.0076 54.6 18.89
C18 GRAVITY 3533.6 23.3489 3.1162 0.0035 3.0162 22.85
C19 GRAVITY 2799.9 19.07 17.17 0.0033 16.78 18.72
C20 GRAVITY 2419.9 16.92 5.5482 0.0014 8.67 25.68
C21 GRAVITY 2308.4 16.56 7.4462 0.0028 7.43 16.28
C22 GRAVITY 2135.2 15.26 1.31 0.002 2.26 23.12
C23 GRAVITY 2216.5 23.0206 2.9346 0.0013 4.7669 5.006
C24 GRAVITY 1302.3 15.7818 17.573 0.0038 17.3862 15.5197
C25 GRAVITY 1618.1 1.733 28.983 0.0033 44.20088 2.8731
C26 GRAVITY 2868.8 3.3695 2.3782 0.0034 2.2913 3.0253
C27 GRAVITY 2284.4 2.8992 14.0805 0.0036 13.7638 2.5586
C28 GRAVITY 1981.9 2.668 4.5419 0.0023 7.1162 4.3388
C29 GRAVITY 1889.4 2.6225 6.2231 0.0024 6.2344 2.2803
C30 GRAVITY 1751 2.5007 1.023 0.0016 1.7951 4.093
C31 GRAVITY 1758.8 6.8187 1.4958 0.0019 2.5539 10.7108
C32 GRAVITY 1030.3 5.6238 13.4872 0.00133 13.4166 5.1753
C33 GRAVITY 1609.4 2.771 28.575 0.0034 43.5744 0.0178
C34 GRAVITY 2849.4 4.8288 2.3522 0.0029 2.2567 4.9174
C35 GRAVITY 2268.8 4.2691 13.8647 0.0024 13.5459 4.3944
C36 GRAVITY 1967.6 3.99 4.4683 0.0031 6.9938 5.8409
C37 GRAVITY 1877 3.9084 6.0411 0.0026 6.0473 4.0631
C38 GRAVITY 1764.6 3.5683 1.2195 0.003 2.083 5.183
C39 GRAVITY 2073.8 3.6965 8.2245 0.005 12.8455 5.3749
C40 GRAVITY 1380.7 2.1148 20.7119 0.0012 20.4102 2.3415
C41 GRAVITY 1947.3 13.647 35.917 0.0135 54.7936 21.1429
C42 GRAVITY 3485 25.782 3.0326 0.0026 2.9121 24.719
C43 GRAVITY 2760.1 20.85 17.3538 0.0033 16.9227 19.917
C44 GRAVITY 2381.6 18.272 5.6108 0.0065 8.7342 28.2727
C45 GRAVITY 2276.1 17.786 7.3423 0.0015 7.2998 16.927
C46 GRAVITY 2137.6 16.227 1.6557 0.0023 2.7395 25.1571
C47 GRAVITY 2575.8 20.408 10.778 0.0042 16.7414 31.5608
C48 GRAVITY 1720.3 12467 26.0244 0.0077 25.5569 11.758
C49 GRAVITY 1432.9 23.4385 24.328 0.0118 37.0582 35.514
C50 GRAVITY 2548.6 43.473 2.1529 0.0003 2.052 42.5446
C51 GRAVITY 2026.7 35.2931 11.5981 0.0051 11.33 34.6192
C52 GRAVITY 1758.6 30.9278 3.6582 0.0009 5.7261 46.929
C53 GRAVITY 1683.4 30.0606 4.9564 0.0023 4.9695 29.5591
C54 GRAVITY 1586.9 27.5386 1.0101 0.0075 1.7319 41.73
C55 GRAVITY 1901 34.2028 7.1884 0.0088 11.2224 51.915
C56 GRAVITY 1277.7 21.2911 17.7112 0.0076 17.4682 21.0768
6.4.1 C1: BIAXIAL
BENDING Data
Size of the column 450×450mm
Pu = 1582.9 KN d’ = 40 mm
Mux = 46.21 KN-m fy = 415 N/ mm2
Muy = 40.3708 KN –m fck = 40 N /mm2
1. Check for eccentricity:
ex = Mux / Pu = (46.21×106 ) / (1582.9× 103) = 29.19 mm
ey = Muy / Pu = (40.3708×106 ) / (1582× 103) = 25.50 mm
Min eccentricity > 20mm
ex & ey > emin
Hence the column is designed as short column subjected to axial lode and biaxial bending.
2. Finding the equivalent moment:
The reinforcement section is designed for the axial compressive load Pu and the
equivalent moment is given by the reaction
Mu = 1.15 √(M 2u + M 2)u
Mu = 1.15 √(46.212 + 40.3702)
= 70.56 KN-m
3. Non dimensional parameters:
Pu / (fck x b x D) = (158209 x 103) / (40 x 450 x 450) = 0.195
Mu / (fck x b x D2) = (70.56 x 106) / (40 x 450x 4502) = 0.0193
Now d’/D = 40 / 450 = 0.1
Using SP 16, chart 56,

Fy = 450, d’/D = 0.1, and reinforcement is distributed equally on both sides.
P / fck = 0.016
3. Design of longitudinal reinforcement:
Percentage of steel, p = 0.016 x fck
= 0.016 x 25
p = 0.64 %
Asc = pbD / 100 = 0.64 x 450 x 450 / 100 = 1296 mm2
Assume 20 mm ɸ bar,
Area of one bar = π202 / 4 = 314.15 mm2
Number of bars = Asc / asc = 1296 / 314.15 = 4.12
sayAsc provided = [(π202)/4]x 5 = 1570.5 mm2

Asc provided> Asc required,
Hence OK.
Provide 5 bars of 20 mm diameter, distributed equally on all four faces.
5. Finding the moment capacities Mux1 and Muy1:
About X-axis (major axis)
d’ / D = 0.1; Pu / (fckxbxD);
Now, P = 100Asc (provided) / (bxD) = (100x1570.5) / (450x450) = 0.77%
P / fck = 0.77 / 40 = 0.0194
Refer chart 56,
Mux1 / (fckxbxD) = 0.025
Mux1 = 0.025x40x450x450x450
Mux1 = 91.125 KN-m
About Y-axis (minor axis)
d' / D = 0.1; Pu / (fckxbxD) = 2; P / fck = 0.0194;
Muy1 / (fckxb2xD) = 91.125 KN-m
6. Calculation of αn :
By referring to IS 456-2000, clause
39.6 Puz = (0.45 x fck x Ac) + (0.75 x fy x
Asc)
Ag = Ac + Asc Ag = bxD = 450x450 =
202500 202500 = Ac + 1570.5
Ac = 200929.5 mm2
Puz = 0.45 x 40 x 200929.5 + 0.75 x 415 x 1570.5
Puz = 4105.549 KN
Now, Pu / Puz = (158209x103)/ (4105.549x103) = 0.385
αn = 1.308 (from IS 456-2000, clause 39.6)
7. Check for safety under biaxial bending :

By referring to IS 456-2000, clause 39.6, we get
[MUx / Mux1 ]α +n [Muy / Muy1 α ≤ 1.0

]1
=0.75 < 1
Hence, column is safe under biaxial bending.
8. Design of lateral ties:

Diameter shall not be less than:
i. ¼(40) = 10 mm
ii. 6 mm. Say 8 mm.
Pitch of transverse reinforcement shall not be more than:
i. Least lateral dimension, b = 450

mm. ii. 16 x ɸ = 16 x 20 = 230 mm
iii. 300 mm
Provide 10 mm ɸ bars @ 300 mm c\c.
CHAPTER-VII
DESIGN OF BEAMS
Structural concrete beam elements are designed to support a given system of
external loads such as walls and slabs of roof and floors system. The cross sectional
dimensions are generally assumed based on serviceability requirements. The width is
fixed based on thickness of walls and housing of reinforcements and depth is selected to
control deflection within safe permissible limits.
Depending on the position of neutral axis, the bending moment is calculated.

Suitable diameter and number of steel bars required in tension and compression zone is
calculated.
The reinforcements in beams are designed for flexure and shear forces along the
length of the beam based on structural analysis. The designed beam is checked for limit
states of serviceability and safety against collapse. The section is then checked for shear
and if needed shear reinforcement is provided as per IS 456-2000. Reinforced concrete
beam should be able to resist tension, compression and shear stress induced in it by the
loads on the beam. Concrete is very strong in compression and weak in tension steel is
very strong in tension. Thus the tensile weakness of the concrete is overcome by the
provision of the reinforcing steel in the tensile zone round the concrete to make a
concrete beam.
7.2 TYPES OF BEAMS
There are three types of reinforced concrete beams
1. Singly Reinforced Beams.
2. Doubly Reinforced Beams.
3. Flanged Beams.
7.2.1 SINGLY REINFORCED BEAMS
In a singly reinforced beam, the reinforcing steel bars are placed in the bottom of
the beam where they are weaker in resisting the tensile bending.
If the limiting moment of resistance is greater than the factored moment, then the
section is designed as singly reinforced beam.
7.2.2 DOUBLY REINFORCED BEAMS
A doubly reinforced concrete beam is reinforced in both compression and

tension region. The necessity of steel arises due the following reasons.
1. When the depth of continuous beam is restricted, the strength available from
a singly reinforced beam.
2. At a section of continuous beam where BM changes its sign, a situation may
also arise in the ring beam.
If the limiting moment of resistance is less than the factored moment, then the
section is designed as doubly reinforced beam.
7.2.3 FIANGED BEAMS.
TEE –BEAM
The most common type of RC floors and roof system comprises of concrete slabs
monolithically cast with floor beams in span range of 5 to 10 m. In such cases the
compressive flange is made up of the widths of the rib and a portion of the slab length on
either side of the rib referred to as effective width of flange
L - BEAM
The edge beam which are cast monolithic with slab on the side of the rib only
are designed as L beams Due to eccentricity of loads transferred from the flange,
tersional moments developed in the beams in addition to bending moments and shear
force.
All the beams are designed as singly reinforced or doubly reinforced of the rectangle
section based on moments.
7.3 MANUAL DESIGN OF BEAMS
7.4.1 DESIGN OF PLINTH
BEAM: Data
Breadth of the beam, b = 300 mm
Over all depth of the beam = D = 500 mm
Factored BM of mid span section, Mu = 9.2 KN-m
Factored BM of support section, Mu = 18.74 KN-m
Factored Shear force = 18.64 KN
Let effective cover = 0.1D = 0.1x 500 = 50 mm
∴ Effective depth, d = 500-50 = 450mm
At mid span
Limiting bending moment = Mu lim
Mu lim = 0.138 x fck x b x d2
= 0.138 x 40 x300 x4502
= 335.34 x106 KN-m
∴ Mu < Mu lim
Design the section as singly reinforced.
Area of tension reinforcement
Mu = 0.87 x fy x Ast x d x [1- (fy x Ast/ fck x b x d)]
= 0.87 x 415 x Ast x 450 [1-( Ast x 415/ 40 x 300 x 450)]
= 16247205 Ast – 12486 Ast2
12.486 Ast2 – 162472.5 Ast + 9.2 x106 = 0

On solving Ast = 56.87 mm2
Ast min = [0.85 x b x d/ fy] = 276.50

mm2Ast
< Ast min ∴ Provide minimum Ast.

∴ Provide 2 bars of 16mm diameter (Astpro = 402.12 mm2 ) & 2 hanger bars
of 10 mm dia on compression side.
At support
= 0.138 x 40 x300 x4502
= 335.34 x 106 KN-m
∴ Mu < Mu lim
= 0.87 x 415 x Ast x 450 [1-( Ast x 415/ 40 x 300 x 450)]
= 16247205 Ast – 12486 Ast2
12.486 Ast2 – 162472.5 Ast + 18 x106 = 0
On solving Ast = 119 mm2
Ast min = [0.85 x b x d/ fy] = 276.50 mm2
Ast < Ast min ∴ Provide minimum Ast.
∴ Provide 2 bars of 16mm diameter (Astpro = 402.12 mm2 ) & 2 hanger bars
of 10 mm dia on compression side.
Shear reinforcement
𝜏v = Vu / bxd
= 18.64 x 103 / 300x450
= 0.138 N/ mm2
Pt = 100x Ast / bxd
= 100 x 402.12 / 300 x450
= 0.297 N / mm2
Refer table 19 of IS 456-2000 (table 6.11) & read out
The design strength of concrete as,
𝜏c = 0.404 N / mm 2
∴ 𝜏c < 𝜏v
∴ Provide shear reinforcement.
Vuc = 𝜏cbd = 0.462 x 300 x 450 = 62.37 KN
Vus = Vu – Vuc = ( 18.64 – 62.37) = 43.73 KN
Using 8mm dia bars 2- legged vertical stirrups,
Spacing is given by,
Minimum of these three
1. Sv = 0.87 x fy x Asv x d / Vus
= 0.87 x 415 x 100.53 x 270 / 43.73 x 103 = 224.10 mm
2. 0.75d = 0.75 x450 = 337.5
3. 300
∴ Provide 8 mm dia 2- legged vertical stirrups at 200mm c/c at mid span.
7.4.2 DESIGN OF FIRST FLOOR
BEAM: Data
Breadth of the beam, b = 300 mm
Over all depth of the beam = D = 500 mm
Factored BM of mid span section, Mu = 150.53 KN-m
Factored BM of support section, Mu = 150.53 KN-m
Factored Shear force = 178.29 KN
Let effective cover = 0.1D = 0.1x 500 = 50 mm
∴ Effective depth, d = 500-50 = 450mm
At mid span
= 0.138 x 40 x300 x4502
= 335.34 x 106 KN-m
∴ Mu < Mu lim
= 0.87 x 415 x Ast x 450 [1-( Ast x 415/ 40 x 300 x 450)]
= 16247205 Ast – 12486 Ast2
12.486 Ast2 – 162472.5 Ast + 150.30 x106 = 0

Ast min = [0.85 x b x d/ fy] = 276.50 mm2Ast
> Ast min
∴ Provide 4 bars of 20 mm diameter (Astpro = 1256 mm2 ) & 2 hanger bars of
10 mm dia on compression side.
At support
= 0.138 x 40 x300 x4502
= 335.34 x 106 KN-m
∴ Mu < Mu lim
= 0.87 x 415 x Ast x 450 [1-( Ast x 415/ 40 x 300 x 450)]
= 16247205 Ast – 12486 Ast2
12.486 Ast2 – 162472.5 Ast + 150.30 x106 = 0
Ast min = [0.85 x b x d/ fy] = 276.50 mm2
Ast > Ast min.
∴ Provide 2 bars of 20mm diameter (Astpro = 1256 mm2 ) & 2 hanger bars of
10 mm dia on compression side.
Shear reinforcement
𝜏v = Vu / bxd
= 178.29 x 103 / 300x450
= 1.320 N/ mm2
Pt = 100x Ast / bxd
= 100 x 1256 / 300 x450
= 0.930 N / mm2
Refer table 19 of IS 456-2000 ( table 6.11) & read out
The design strength of concrete as,
𝜏c = 0.657 N / mm 2
∴ 𝜏c < 𝜏v
∴ Provide shear reinforcement.
Vuc = 𝜏cbd = 0.657 x 300 x 450 = 88.69 KN
Vus = Vu – Vuc = (88.69 – 62.37) = 26.32 KN
Using 8mm dia bars 2- legged vertical stirrups,
Spacing is given by,
Minimum of these three
1. Sv = 0.87 x fy x Asv x d / Vus
= 0.87 x 415 x 100.53 x 450 / 26.32 x 103 = 620.56 mm
2. 0.75d = 0.75 x450 = 337.5
3. 300
∴ Provide 8 mm dia 2- legged vertical stirrups at 300 mm c/c at mid span.
CHAPTER-VIII
DESIGN OF SLABS
8.1 GENERAL APPROCH
Slabs are elements forming floors and roofs of buildings and carrying
distributed loads primarily by flexure. A slab may be simply supported or continuous
overcome or more supports and is classified according to manner of support and there
are two types slabs.
One way slabs spanning in one way direction.
Two way slabs spanning in both the direction.
Slabs are designed by using the following theories of bending and shear.
The following methods of analysis are available.
• Yield line theory

• Elastic analysis-idealization into strips, Finite
element method.
8.2 INTRODUCTION TO SLABS
Slabs are plate elements forming floors and roofs of building and carrying
distributed loads primarily by flexure. Inclined slabs may be used as ramps for multi-
storey car Parks. A stair case can be considered to be an inclined slab. A slab may be
supported by beams or walls and may use as the flange of a T-or L-beam. Moreover, a
slab may be simply supported or continuous over one or more supports and is classified
according to the manner of support:
a) One way slabs spanning in one direction,

b) Two way slab spanning in two directions,
c) Circular slabs,
d) Flat slabs resting directly on columns with no beam and
e) Grid floor and ribbed slabs.
8.3 ONE WAY SLAB
One way slabs are those slabs in which the longer span to shorter span ly/lx ratio
is greater than 2. This type of slab is also called as slab spanning in one direction as the
bending takes place only along the shorter span. Therefore, the main reinforcement is
provided along the shorter span. The one way slab is analyzed by assuming it to be a
beam of 1m width.
One way slabs are those supported on two opposite sides so that the loads are
carried along one direction only. Verandah slab spanning in the shorter direction with
main reinforcement and distribution reinforcement in the transverse direction.
8.4 TWO WAY SLAB
When slabs are supported on four sides, two-way spanning action occurs. Such
slabs may be simply supported or continuous on any or all sides. The deflectio ns and
bending moments in a two-way slab are considerably reduced as compared to those in a
one way slab.
Thus, a thinner slab can carry the same load when supported on all the four
edges. In a square slab, the two way actions equal in each direction. In long narrow
slabs, where the length is greater than twice the breadth, the two way action effectively
reduces to one way action in the direction of the short span although the end beams to
carry some slab load. Two way slabs should have their longer span not exceeding two
times the shorter span.
8.5 MANUAL DESIGN OF SLAB PANEL
Data
Shorter span, Lx= 5.540 m
Longer span, Ly = 6.030 m
Aspect ratio = (Ly / Lx) = (6.030/5.540)
= 1.088 m
Assuming clear cover = 20mm
Required depth = 130+20 = 150 mm
Load Calculation
Self- weight of slab = 0.15 x 1 x 40 = 6 KN/m
Live load =5x1 = 5 KN/m
Dead load =5x1 = 5 KN /m
∴ Factored ultimate load, Wu = 1.5 x 16 = 24 KN/m
Bending moment calculation
IS-456: 2000, Annex-D, D-1
Mux = 𝛼x x Wu x L 2
x
Muy = 𝛼y x Wu x L 2
x
By referring table No: 27
𝛼x = 0.072
𝛼y = 0.061
Mux = 0.072 x 24 x 5.542 = 53.035 KN -m
Muy = 0.061 x 24 x 5.542= 44.932 KN –m
Check for depth
Equating Mux = Mu lim = 0.133 fck b d2
d = √Mu / 0.133 fck b =√53.035 x 106/0.138x40x1000
d required = 98.02 mm
d provided = 130
Hence the design is safe.
Main reinforcement along shorter span (Ast)
Mu = 0.87fy x Ast x d [1-(fy x Ast / fck x b x d)]
= 0.87 x 415 x Ast x 130 [1- (415 x Ast / 40 x 1000 x 130)]
3.7458 Ast2 -46936.5 Ast +53.035 x 106=0
Ast = 1255 mm2
Check for minimum reinforcement = Ast = 0.12/100 x1000 x 150 = 180 mm2
Ast > Astmin Hence ok
Provide 12 mm
Spacing = S = 1000 ast / Ast = 1000 x 113.09 / 1255 = 90.11
Provide 12 mm dia bars @ 90 mm c/c along shorter span
[ Ast provided = 1256.56 mm2
Main reinforcement along longer span (Ast)
Mu = 0.87fy x Ast x d [1-(fy x Ast / fck x b x d)]
= 0.87 x 415 x Ast x 130 [1- (415 x Ast / 40 x 1000 x 130)]
3.7458 Ast2 -46936.5 Ast +44.93 x 106=0
Ast = 1044 mm2
Provide 12 mm
Spacing = S = 1000 ast / Ast =1000 x 113.09 / 1044 = 108.32
Provide 10mm dia bars @ 100mm c/c along shorter
span[ Ast provided=1044.03 mm2
Check for shear stress
Consider the shorter span
Vu = Wu × Lx / 2 = 24 x 5.540 / 2 =66.48 KN
𝜏v = Vu/ / b x d = 66.48 x 10 3
/ 1000 x130 = 0.511 N/mm2
Pt = 100 Ast pro / b x d = 100 x 1044.03 / 1000 x 130 = 0.80 %
Fromtable 19, using Pt =0.80 %
∴𝜏c = 0.616 N/ mm2
Permissible shear stress, k 𝜏c

k = 1.3, for slab depth 140mm.
∴ k 𝜏c =1.3 x 0.616 =0.80 N/
mm2 k 𝜏c < 𝜏v
Design is safe.
Hence the shear stress is within safe permissible limits.
CONCLUSION
 In this we analysed a G+3 commercial building using ETABS software, and determined the
bending moment diagram ,shear force diagram etc,.
 Test for safe bearing capacity of the soil is done, to determine the bearing capacity of the soil.
 As we done a proposed project ,so proper site selection,analysis , applying appropriate
parameters should be done before whith proper precautions.
 Attained analysis and design of the structure without any type of failure.
 Designed structural components like beam ,slab,column and footing using ETABS.
 We studied various forces and factors affecting on the structure.
 Finally,we would like to conclude that this project made us to learn the various procedures
needed to complete the constructions work and also made us aware regarding the responsibility
of a structural engineer.
REFERENCES
- N.KRISHNARAJU
 Varalakshmi V.G (2014) “Design and G+5 residential building by ETABS” ,
International conference on advancing and technology.
 Chandrashekaranand and Rajashekar (2015) “ Analysis and design of multistoried
building by using ETABS software” , International journals of scientific and
research vol.4: issue.7: ISSN no.2277-8179.
 Balaji and Selvarasan (2016), “Design and Analysis of multistoried building under
static and dynamic loading conditions using ETABS” , International journal of
technical research and applications e-ISSN : 2320-8168 , www.ijtra.com vol.4 ,
issue 4 , pp.1-5.
 Limit state theory and design of reinforced concrete Dr V.L .Shah and Dr S. R.
Karvei.
 Theory of structures by S Ramamrupham.
 Limit state design Dr Ramachandra.
 IS:456-2000, Indian standard plain and reinforced concrete code of practice, bureau
of standards .New Delhi.
 IS:875(Part Ⅰ) 1987.Indian standard code of practice for design loads (other
than earthquake) (Dead loads) for buildings and structures ,bureau of Indian
standards
,New Delhi.
IS CODE BOOKS
1. IS 456-2000, Code of practice for plain & reinforced concrete.

2. IS: 875 Part 1- Unit weight of materials.
3. IS: 875 Part 2 -Live loads.
4. SP: 16- Design aid for reinforced concrete to IS 456.

Yashas sp2.0

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Yashas sp2.0

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Yashas sp2.0

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

VISVESVARAYA TECHNOLOGY

UNIVERSITY BELAGAVI, KARNATAKA-

“ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF MULTISTORIED

Under the Guidance of

This is to certify that the project report titled

“ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF MULTISTORIED

Is an authentic record of the project report submitted by “G S VANAJA, HAREESH K,

…………………………………….. ………………………………………. …………………………...

Name of the Examiners Signature with date

We would like to thankful to Dr. Y B BHARATHARAJ ETIGI, Professor & Head of

We would like to acknowledge my sincere thanks to all faculty of Civil Engineering

4. METHODOLOGY AND MODELING OF STRUCTURE 6-19

6. DESIGN OF COLUMNS 21-28

7. DESIGN OF BEAMS 29-37

8. DESIGN OF SLABS 38-42

Urbanization is increasing rapidly in present world. There is an increase in housing

Structure analysis is a subject which involves designing, planning to build up a

intensity,duration and frequency content of existing ground motion. Structural analysis

We selected a plan of symmetrical (G+3) commercial building .

M. Mallikarjun, Dr P V Surya Prakash (2016): Carried study on analysis and design of

Balaji.U and Selvarasan M.E: Worked on analysis and design of multi-storied

ETABS [EXTENDED 3D ANALYSIS OF BUILDING SYSTEM] is a stand-

From the start of design conception through the production of schematic

CAD drawings can be converted directly into ETABS models or used as

ETABS provides an unequalled suite of tools for structural engineers designing

3.2. FACILITIES IN ETABS

3.2.1 Model Generating Facilities

a) Inter-active menu driven on-screen model generation with simultaneously 3-D

b) Library of commonly used structures.

c) CAD facilities like mirroring copying, moving etc.

3.2.2 Model Verification Facilities

a) Basic 2-d and 3-d drawings.

b) Capabilities of cutting section for sectional views.

c) Numbering of members and joints.

d) Isometric full 3-D view.

e) Display of load and supports.

3.2.3 Load Generation Capabilities

Specification of joints loads.

d) Automatic moving loads generation for user specified wheel loads.

3.2.4 Finite Elements Capabilities

b) Automatic mesh element generation facility.

c) Stress output at user specified points.

d) Uniform as well as linearly varying pressure loading on user specified portions.

3.2.5 Dynamic/Seismic Capabilities

a) Comprehensive dynamic analysis featuring discrete mass modeling, frequency/mode

3.2.6 Analytical Capabilities

a) Two or three-dimensional analysis using stiffness method for solution.

d) User provided member offset specification and automatic calculation of secondary

3.2.7 Concrete Design Capabilities

a) Design of concrete beams and columns in accordance with codes of different

b) Beamdesign includes area of steel and no. of reinforcement bars.

c) Column design includes complete interaction analysis.

3.2.8 Steel Design Capabilities

a) Built in steel tables facilitating input of member properties including l- section

b) Provision of code checking as per the above codes.

c) Member selection with user controlled design parameters.

d) Optimized member selection.

e) Weld design for shapes.

4.1 COLLECTION OF DATA