Appendix D.

1
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: DEBIE P. DIZON Name of Rater: JOCELYN O. GEROLAGA

Position: Teacher- I Position: HEAD TEACHER-I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: QUEVEDO-BA[PTISTA E/S Date of Review:
Rating Period:
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Weight Performance Indicators RATING

Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor SCORE
Results Q E T AVE
KRA (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge of content Quality Showed Showed Showed Showed No
Education Knowledge and within and across curriculum knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of acceptable
Services Pedagogy teaching areas. content and its content and its content and its content and its evidence
integration within integration integration within integration within was shown
and across subject within and and across and across
in MOV 1 with a across subject subject in MOV 1 subject in MOV 1
areas as shown areas as shown with a areas as with a areas as
rating of 7 in MOV 1 with a shown rating of 5 shown rating of 4
rating of 6

7.50% 5 5 5 0.375
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No
least 4 lessons least 3 lessons least 1 lessons any 1 of the acceptable
evidence
using MOV 1 using MOV 1 using MOV 1 other given was shown
and supported and supported and supported MOV
by any 1 of the by any 1 of the by any 1 of the
other given other given other given
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic 2. Used a range of Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No
Education acceptable
Services teaching strategies different different different different evidence
that enhance learner teaching teaching teaching teaching was shown
achievement in strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that 5 5 5 0.375
literacy and numeracy promote promote promote promote
skills reading, writing reading, writing reading, writing reading, writing
7.50% and/or and/or and/or and/or
 Weight Performance Indicators RATING
Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor SCORE
Results Q E T AVE
KRA (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills
as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No
least 4 least 3 least 2 least 1 acceptable
lessons as
learnercentered lessons as
learnercentered lessons as
learnercentered lessons as
learnercentered evidence
evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown was shown
in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and
supported by supported by supported by supported by
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
other MOV other MOV other MOV other MOV
given given given given
Timeliness
Basic 3. Applied a range of Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No
Education teaching strategies to teaching teaching teaching teaching acceptable
evidence
Services develop critical and strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that was shown
creative thinking, as develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical
well as other higher order and creative and creative and creative and creative
thinking skills. thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or
other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
least 4 lessons lessons lessons lessons acceptable
as evidenced by as evidenced by as evidenced by as evidenced by evidence
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and was shown
supported by supported by supported by supported by
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
other given other given other given other given
MOV MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
 Weight Performance Indicators RATING
Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor SCORE
Results Q E T AVE
KRA (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No
Education Environment classroom structure to management management management management acceptable
Services and Diversity of engage learners, strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence
Learners individually or in engage learners engage learners engage learners engage learners was shown
groups, in meaningful in in in in
exploration, discovery activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks
and hands-on as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
activities within a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
range of physical rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
learning
environments.
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
least 4 lessons lessons lessons lessons acceptable
supported by supported by supported by supported by evidence
MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any was shown
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed learner Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No
Education behavior management management management management acceptable
Services constructively by strategies of strategies of strategies of strategies of evidence
applying positive and learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior was shown
non-violent discipline that promote that promote that promote that promote
to ensure learningfocused positive and positive and positive and positive and
environments. non-violent non-violent non-violent non-violent
discipline as discipline as discipline as discipline as
shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
 submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No
least 4 of the least 4 of the least 4 of the least 4 of the acceptable
given strategies given strategies given strategies given strategies evidence
as observed in was shown

Weight Performance Indicators RATING

Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor SCORE
Results Q E T AVE
KRA (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
at least 4 as observed in as observed in as observed in
lessons 3 lessons 2 lessons only 1 lesson.
Timeliness
Basic 6. Used differentiated, Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied No
Education developmentally differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated acceptable
Services appropriate learning teaching teaching teaching teaching evidence
experiences to strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to was shown
address learners’ address learner address learner address learner address learner
gender, needs, diversity as diversity as diversity as diversity as
strengths, interests shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
and experiences. 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No
least 4 differentiated differentiated differentiated acceptable
differentiated teaching teaching teaching evidence
teaching strategies in at strategies in at strategies in at was shown
strategies in at least 2 lessons least 2 lessons least 2 lessons
least 2 lessons as evidenced by as evidenced by as evidenced by
as evidenced by MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
MOV 1 and supported by supported by supported by
supported by any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
any 1 of the other other other
other acceptable acceptable acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, managed Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No
Education and Planning and implemented implemented implemented implemented implemented acceptable
Services developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence
sequenced teaching sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced was shown
and learning teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
processes to meet curriculum learning learning learning learning
requirements and varied
teaching process as process as process as process as
contexts.

Weight Performance Indicators RATING

Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor SCORE
Results Q E T AVE
KRA (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
least 4 developmentally developmentally developmentally acceptable
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced evidence
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and was shown
teaching and learning learning learning
learning process as process as process as
process as evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown
evidently shown in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and
in MOV 1 and supported by supported by supported by
supported by any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
any 1 of the other given other given other given
other given MOV MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic 8. Participated in Quality Consistently Frequently Ocassinally Rarely No
Education collegial discussions participated in participated in participated in participated in acceptable
Services that use teacher and LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ evidence
learner feedback to meetings to meetings to meetings to meetings to was shown
enrich teaching discuss discuss discuss discuss
practice. teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner
feedback to feedback to feedback to feedback to
 enrich enrich enrich enrich
instruction as instruction as instruction as instruction as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Participated in Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No

at least 4 LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/ acceptable
LACs/FGDs/ meetings as meetings as meeting as evidence
meetings as evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown was shown
evidently shown in any 1 of the in any 1 of the in any 1 of the

Weight Performance Indicators RATING

Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor SCORE
Results Q E T AVE
KRA (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
in any 1 of the given MOV given MOV given MOV
given MOV
Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No
Education developed, organized used varied used varied used varied used varied acceptable
Services and used appropriate teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence
teaching and learning learning learning learning learning was shown
resources, including resources, resources, resources, resources,
ICT, to address including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
learning goals. address address address address
learning goals learning goals learning goals learning goals
as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any No

least 4 varied varied teaching varied teaching teaching and acceptable
teaching and and learning and learning learning evidence

learning resources, resources, resource, was shown

resources, including ICT, including ICT, including ICT,
including ICT, as evidently as evidently as evidently
as evidently shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in any of
shown in MOV 1 and supported 1 and supported the acceptable
 1 and supported by any 1 of the by any 1 of the MOV
by any 1 of the acceptable acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness

Weight Performance Indicators RATING

Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor SCORE
Results Q E T AVE
KRA
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Basic 4. Assessment 10. Designed, Quality Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed, No
Education and Reporting selected, organized selected, selected, selected, selected, acceptable
Services and used diagnostic, organized and organized and organized and organized and evidence
formative and used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, was shown
summative formative and formative and formative and formative and
assessment summative summative summative summative
strategies consistent assessment assessment assessment assessment
with curriculum strategies strategies strategies strategies
requirements. consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
least 4 varied varied varied assessment acceptable
assessment assessment assessment tools as evidence
tools as tools as tools as evidently shown was shown
evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown in any 1 of the
in any 1 of the in any 1 of the in any 1 of the acceptable
acceptable acceptable acceptable MOV
 MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored and Quality Consistently Frequently Frequently Frequently No
Education evaluated learner monitored and monitored and monitored and monitored and acceptable
Services progress and evaluated evaluated evaluated evaluated evidence
achievement using learner progress learner progress learner progress learner progress was shown
learner attainment and and and and
data. achievement achievement achievement achievement
using learner using learner using learner using learner
attainment data attainment data attainment data attainment data
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Weight Performance Indicators RATING

Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor SCORE
Results Q E T AVE
KRA (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No
combination of combination of combination of acceptable acceptable
at least 4 of the 3 of the 2 of the MOV evidence
acceptable acceptable acceptable was shown
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed acceptable
across 4 across 3 across 2 in only 1 quarter evidence
quarters quarters quarters was shown
Basic 12. Communicated Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No
Education promptly and clearly showed prompt showed prompt showed prompt showed prompt acceptable
Services the learners’ needs, and clear and clear and clear and clear evidence
communication communication communication communication was shown
progress and
achievement to key of the learners’ of the learners’ of the learners’ of the learners’
stakeholders, needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress
including and and and and
parents/guardians. achievement to achievement to achievement to achievement to
key key key key
stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders,
including including including including
 parents/ parents/ parents/ parents/
guardians as guardians as guardians as guardians as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 No
combination of combination of combination of of the given acceptable
at least 4 of the 3 of the 2 of the MOV evidence
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable was shown
MOV MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed acceptable
across 4 across 3 across 2 in only 1 quarter evidence
quarters quarters quarters was shown

Weight Performance Indicators RATING

Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor SCORE
Results Q E T AVE
KRA (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No
Education related performed performed performed performed acceptable
Services works/activities that various related various related various related various related evidence
contribute to the work/activities work/activities work/activities work/activities was shown
teaching-learning process that contribute that contribute that contribute that contribute
to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching
learning learning learning learning
process as process as process as process as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No
least 4 different different kinds different kinds of the acceptable
kinds of of acceptable of acceptable acceptable evidence
acceptable MOV MOV MOV was shown
MOV
Timeliness
 RATING FOR
OVERALL
ACCOMPLISHME
NTS

JOCELYN O. GEROLAGA DEBIE P. DIZON AKMAD M. MANTOG

Rater Ratee Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

Name of Employee: JEANIFER C. BATISLAONG Name of Rater: JOCELYN O. GEROLAGA

Position: MASTER TEACHER I Position: HEAD TEACHER I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: QUEVEDO-BAPTISTA E/S, SULTAN KUDARAT Date of Review:
Rating Period:
Date of Review:
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
Performance Indicators RATING
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results SCORE
KRA Q E T AVE
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Basic 1. Content 1. Modeled effective Quality Modeled Modeled Modeled Modeled No
Education Knowledge applications of effective effective effective effective acceptable
Services and content knowledge applications of applications of applications of applications of evidence
Pedagogy within and across content content content content was shown
curriculum teaching knowledge knowledge knowledge knowledge
areas. within and within and within and within and
across across across across
curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
teaching areas teaching areas teaching areas teaching areas
as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
rating of 8 rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
least 4 lessons lessons as lessons as lesson as acceptable
as evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidence
MOV 1 and MOV 1 from MOV 1 from MOV 1 from was shown
supported by colleagues and colleagues and colleagues and
any 1 of the supported by supported by supported by
other MOV any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
given other MOV other MOV other MOV
 Performance Indicators RATING
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results SCORE
KRA Q E T AVE
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
given given given
Timeliness
Basic 2. Collaborated with Quality Conducted, Conducted and Conducted Proposed action No
Education colleagues in the completed and completed action research research with acceptable
Services conduct and disseminated action research with colleagues colleagues evidence
application of action research with colleagues was shown
research to enrich with colleagues
knowledge of content
and pedagogy.
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No
least 4 of the of the MOV MOV acceptable
given MOV acceptable evidence
MOV was shown
Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the Proposed the No
research report research report research report research report acceptable
within the rating within the rating within the rating within the rating evidence
period period period period was shown
Basic 3. Developed and Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated No
Education applied effective effective effective effective effective acceptable
Services teaching strategies to teaching teaching teaching teaching evidence
promote critical and strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to was shown
creative thinking, as promote critical promote critical promote critical promote critical

and creative and creative and creative and creative

well as other higherorder
thinking skills. thinking, as well thinking, as well thinking, as well thinking, as well
as other higherord as other higherordeas other higherordas other higherorder
thinking thinking thinking thinking
skills as shown skills as shown skills as shown skills as shown
in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
rating of 8 rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
 Performance Indicators RATING
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results SCORE
KRA Q E T AVE
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3 Submitted 3 Submitted 1 No

more lessons as lessons as lessons as lesson as acceptable

evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown evidence
in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and was shown
supported by supported by supported by supported by
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the any of the other
other MOV other MOV other MOV MOV given
given given given

Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Worked with Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No
Education Environment colleagues to model management management management management acceptable
Services and
Diversity of evidence
and share effective strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
Learners techniques in the engage learners engage learners engage learners engage learners was shown
management of in in in in
classroom structure to activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks
engage learners, as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
individually or in MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
groups, in meaningful rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
exploration, discovery
and hands-on least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson acceptable
activities within a supported by supported by supported by supported by evidence
range of physical MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any any of the was shown
learning 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other acceptable
environments. acceptable acceptable acceptable MOV
MOV MOV MOV
 Timeliness

Performance Indicators RATING

Weight per Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline QET Actual Results SCORE
KRA Q E T AVE
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Basic 5. Exhibited effective Quality Exhibited Exhibited Exhibited Exhibited No
Education and constructive effective and effective and effective and effective and acceptable
Services behavior constructive constructive constructive constructive evidence
management skills by behavior behavior behavior behavior was shown
applying positive and management management management management
non-violent discipline skills by skills by skills by skills by
to ensure
applying applying applying applying
learningfocused
environments. positive and positive and positive and positive and
non-violent non-violent non-violent non-violent
discipline to discipline to discipline to discipline to
ensure ensure ensure ensure
learningfocused learningfocused learningfocused learningfocused
environments environments environments environments
shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
of 8 of 7 of 6 of 5
Efficiency Applied at least Applied at least Applied at least Applied any of No
7 of the given 7 of the given 7 of the given the given acceptable
strategies as strategies as strategies as strategies as evidence
observed in at observed in 3 observed in 3 observed in only was shown
least 4 lessons lessons lessons 1 lesson
Timeliness
Basic 6. Worked with Quality Worked with Worked with Worked with Worked with No
Education colleagues to share colleagues at colleagues in colleagues in colleagues but acceptable
Services differentiated, least in the the school level the department no evidence of evidence
 developmentally district/cluster to share lesson or grade level to sharing with was shown
appropriate level to share share lesson others
opportunities to lesson
address learners’
differences in gender,
needs, strengths,
interests and
Performance Indicators RATING
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results SCORE
KRA Q E T AVE
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
experiences.
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No
least 1 lesson least 1 lesson least 1 lesson least 1 lesson, acceptable
as evidently as evidently as evidently as evidenced by evidence
shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV either MOV 2 or was shown
1 and supported 1 and supported 1 and supported 3 but no
by any by any by any evidence of
acceptable acceptable acceptable sharing with
MOV MOV MOV others
Timeliness
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Developed and Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No
Education and Planning applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective acceptable
Services strategies in the strategies strategies strategies strategies evidence
planning and showing showing showing showing was shown
management of developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally
developmentally -sequenced -sequenced -sequenced -sequenced
sequenced teaching teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
and learning learning learning learning learning
processes to meet process as process as process as process as
curriculum shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
requirements and 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
varied teaching of 8 of 7 of 6 of 5
contexts.
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 2-3 Submitted 1 Submitted 1 No
 least 4 lessons lessons as lesson as lesson as acceptable
as evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidence
MOV 1 and 2 MOV 1 and 2 shown in MOV any 1 of the was shown
and supported and supported 1 and/or 2 and acceptable
by any 1 of the by any 1 of the supported by MOV
other other any 1 of the
acceptable acceptable other

Performance Indicators RATING

Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results SCORE
KRA Q E T AVE
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
MOV MOV acceptable
MOV
Timeliness
Basic 8. Reviewed with Quality Consistently led Frequently led Occasionally led Rarely led No
Education colleagues, teacher collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative acceptable
Services and learner feedback reviews of reviews of reviews of reviews of evidence
to plan, facilitate and teacher and teacher and teacher and teacher and was shown
enrich teaching learner learner learner learner
practice. feedback as feedback as feedback as feedback as
evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by
the MOV the MOV the MOV the MOV
submitted submitted submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative acceptable
reviews of reviews of reviews of review of evidence
teacher and teacher and teacher and teacher and was shown
learner learner learner learner
feedback as feedback as feedback as feedback as
evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown
in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in any of the
supported by supported by supported by acceptable
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the MOV
 acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely advised No
9. Advised and guided
Education colleagues in the advised advised advised colleagues in acceptable
Services selection, colleagues in colleagues in colleagues in the selection, evidence
organization, the selection, the selection, the selection, organization, was shown
development and use organization, organization, organization, development

Performance Indicators RATING

Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results SCORE
KRA Q E T AVE
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
of appropriate development development development and appropriate
teaching and learning and appropriate and appropriate and appropriate use of teaching
resources, including use of teaching use of teaching use of teaching and learning
ICT, to address and learning and learning and learning resources as
specific learning resources as resources as resources as shown in the
goals. shown in the shown in the shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
least 4 teaching teaching and teaching and teaching and acceptable
and learning learning learning learning evidence
resources as resources as resources as resource as was shown
evidenced by at evidenced by at evidenced by at evidenced by
least 1 of the least 1 of the least 1 of the any of the
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely reviewed No
4. Assessment 10. Worked
Education and collaboratively with reviewed reviewed reviewed collaboratively acceptable
Services Reporting colleagues to review collaboratively collaboratively collaboratively assessment evidence
 the design, selection, assessment assessment assessment tools with was shown
organization and use tools with tools with tools with colleagues as
of a range of effective colleagues as colleagues as colleagues as shown in the
diagnostic, formative shown in the shown in the shown in the MOV submitted
and summative MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
assessment
strategies consistent
with curriculum
requirements.

least 4 assessment assessment assessment tool acceptable

Performance Indicators RATING
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results SCORE
KRA Q E T AVE
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
assessment tools as tools as as evidently evidence
tools as evidently shown evidently shown shown in any of was shown
evidently shown in any of the in any of the the acceptable
in any of the acceptable acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic 12. Applied skills in Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No
Education the effective applied skills in applied skills in applied skills in applied skills in acceptable
Services communication of the effective the effective the effective evidence
the effective
learner needs, communication communication communication communication was shown
progress and of learner needs of learner needs of learner needs of learner needs
achievement to key and progress to and progress to and progress to and progress to
stakeholders, parents/ parents/ parents/ parents/
including guardians as guardians as guardians as guardians as
parents/guardians. shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No
 least 3 of the MOV MOV MOV acceptable
acceptable evidence
MOV was shown
Timeliness
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No
Education related performed performed performed performed acceptable
Services works/activities that special tasks special tasks special tasks special tasks evidence
contribute to the and/or and/or and/or and/or was shown
teaching-learning assignments as assignments as assignments as assignments as
process. shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Performance Indicators RATING

Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results SCORE
KRA Q E T AVE
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted only Submitted only Submitted any 1 No
least 4 different 3 different kinds 2 different kinds of the acceptable
kinds of of acceptable of acceptable acceptable evidence
acceptable MOV MOV MOV was shown
MOV
Timeliness

RATING FOR
OVERALL

ACCOMP-
LISHMENTS

NINFA R. CATIPAY
Rater Ratee Approving Authority
 COMPETENCIES
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES
Self-Management Teamwork
1. Sets personal goals and directions, needs and development. 1. Willingly does his/her share of respo
2. Understands personal actions and behavior that are clear and purposive and takes 2. Promotes collaboration and removes
into account personal goals and values congruent to that of the organization. across the organization.
3. Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher goals. 3. Applies negotiation principles in arriv
4. Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through Gantt chants, checklists, etc.) to achieve 4. Drives consensus and team ownersh
goals. 5. Works constructively and collaborativ
5. Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others. accomplish organization goals and obje
Professionalism and Ethics Service Orientation
1. Demonstrate the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms and Conduct and Ethical 1. Can explain and articulate organizati
Standards for Public Officials and Employees (RA 6713). 2. Takes personal responsibility for dea
2. Practice ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the impact of issues and concerns.
his/her actions and decisions. 3. Initiates activities that promote advoc
3. Maintains a professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of attendance and punctuality, 4. Participates in updating office vision,
good grooming and communication. DEPED strategies and directions.
4. Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization’s needs. 5. Develops and adopts service improv
5. Act with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the organization’s needs, improve will further enhance service delivery.
system and help others improve their effectiveness.
Results Focus Innovation
1. Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time. 1. Examines the root cause of problem
2. Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by placing ideas, processes and suggests better w
organizational needs before personal needs. efficiency).
3. Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating 2. Demonstrates an ability to think “bey
procedures correctly and consistently. Able to produce very satisfactory quality work in personal productivity to create higher v
terms of usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no supervision required. 3. Promotes a creative climate and insp
4. Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or inefficiency. solutions.
May focus on new or more precise ways of meeting goals set. 4. Translates creative thinking into tang
5. Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve unit and organization.
performance. Examples may include doing something better, faster, at a lower cost, more 5. Uses ingenious methods to accompl
efficiently, or improving quality, customer satisfaction, morale, without setting any specific and the ability to succeed with minimal
goal.

5 – Role model; 4 – Consistently demonstrates; 3 – Most of the time demonstrates; 2 – Sometimes demonstrate; 1 – Rarely demonstrate
her share of responsibility.
ation and removes barrier to teamwork and goal accomplishment

n principles in arriving at win-win agreements.

and team ownership of decisions.
ely and collaboratively with others and across organizations to
ion goals and objectives.

rticulate organizational directions, issues and problems.

sponsibility for dealing with and/or correcting customer service

hat promote advocacy for men and women empowerment.

ating office vision, mission, mandates and strategies based on
nd directions.
pts service improvement program through simplified procedures that
service delivery.

cause of problems and suggests effective solutions. Foster new

d suggests better ways to do things (cost and/or operational

ability to think “beyond the box”. Continuously focuses on improving

to create higher value and results.
ve climate and inspires co-workers to develop original ideas or

e thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work

ethods to accomplish responsibilities. Demonstrates resourcefulness

ceed with minimal resources.

OVERALL COMPETENCY RATINGS

 PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Strengths Development Needs

A. Functional Competencies

B. Core Behavioral Competencies

Feedback:

_________________________
RATEE
: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Action Plan
(Recommended Developmental Timeline Resources Needed
Intervention)

_________________________ _________________________
RATER APPROVING AUTHORITY
RUBRIC LEVEL SUMMARY
LEVEL LEVEL NAME DESCRIPTION

The teacher demonstrates a limited range of loosely-associated pedagogical

3 ORGANIZING
aspects of the indicator.

The teacher demonstrates a range of associated pedagogical aspects of the

4 DEVELOPING
indicator that sometimes align with the learners’ developmental needs.
 The teacher demonstrates a range of associated pedagogical aspects of the in
5 APPLYING that usually align with the learners’ developmental needs.

The teacher uses well-connected pedagogical aspects of the indicator consiste

6 CONSOLIDATING aligned with student development that supports students to be successful learn

The teacher uses well-connected pedagogical aspects of the indicator to creat

7 INTEGRATING
environment that addresses individual and group learning goals.
PTION

ociated pedagogical

ogical aspects of the

mental needs.
ogical aspects of the indicator

f the indicator consistently

s to be successful learners.

f the indicator to create an