INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: JOEL F. GAUT Name of Rater: LINA O. DIAZ

Position: TEACHER II Position: MASTER TEACHER
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Date of Review: www.depedtambayanph.org
Rating Period: S.Y. 2019-2020

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Applied Quality No acceptable 5 5 5.000 0.375
Services Knowledge and knowledge of evidence was
Pedagogy content within and Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge shown
across curriculum of content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its
teaching areas. integration within integration within integration within integration within
and across subject and across subject and across subject and across subject
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
7.5%
of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
lessons using MOV lessons using MOV lessons using MOV the given MOV evidence was
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by shown
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Used a range Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable 4 5 4.500 0.337
Services of teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
enhance learner promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading
schievement in writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
literacy and numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
numeracy skills shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered evidence was
lessons as evidently lessons as evidently lessons as evidently lessons as evidently shown
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in any of the
and supported by and supported by and supported by other given MOV
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
MOV given MOV given MOV given

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Applied a range Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable 5 3 4.000 0.300
Services Knowledge and of teaching teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies evidence was
Pedagogy strategies to that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical shown
develop critical and creative and creative and creative and creative
and creative thinking skills and/or thinking skills and/or thinking skills and/or thinking skills and/or
thinking, as well other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
as other higher shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
order thinking with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
skills. 7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidenced by evidence was
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV any of the other shown
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by given MOV
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Managed Quality No acceptable 5 3 4.000 0.3
Services Environment classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom evidence was
and Diversity of structure to management management management management shown
Learners engage learners, strategies that strategies that strategies thatstrategies that
individually or in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
engage learners in
groups, in activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
activities/tasks as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
meanigful
7.5% with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
with a rating of 4
exploration,
discovery and Efficiency Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
hands-on supported by any of evidence was
lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported
activities within a the acceptable shown
by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
range of physical MOV
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
learning acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
environments. Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Managed Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable 4 4 4.000 0.300
Services learner behavior management management management management evidence was
constructively by strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner shown
applying positive behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that
and non-violent promote positive promote positive promote positive promote positive
discipline to and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
ensure learning- discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown
focused in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted
environment with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
7.5%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
of the given of the given of the given the given strategies evidence was
strategies as strategies as strategies as as observed in only shown
observed in at least observed in 3 observed in 2 1 lesson
4 lessons lessons lessons
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 2. Learning 6. Used Quality Applied Applied Applied No acceptable 4 4 4.000 0.3
Services Environment differentiated, differentiated Applied differentiated differentiated evidence was
and Diversity of developmentally teaching strategies differentiated teaching strategies teaching strategies shown
teaching strategies
Learners appropriate to address learner to address learner to address learner
to address learner
learning diversity as shown diversity as shown diversity as shown
diversity as shown
experiences to in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
address learners’ rating of 7 in MOV 1 with a rating of 5 rating of 4
gender, needs, rating of 6
strengths, Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
interests and differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was
7.5% teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategy in shown
experiences.
in at least 2 in at least 2 in 2 lessons as only 1 lesson as
lessons as lessons as evidenced by MOV evidently shown in
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the
1 and supported by 1 and supported by any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable 5 4 4.500 0.337
Services and Planning managed and implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was
implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown
developmentally sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching
sequenced and learning and learning and learning and learning
teaching and process as shown process as shown process as shown process as shown
learning in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
processes to meet rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
curriculum
requirements and Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
varied teaching 7.5% developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was
contexts. sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching shown
and learning and learning and learning and learning
process as process as process as process as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the given
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 MOV
of the other given of the other given of the other given
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 8. Participated in Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated No acceptable 1 1 1.000 0.075
Services and Planning collegial participated in participated in participated in in LAC/FGD/ evidence was
discussions that LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/ meeting to discuss shown
use teacher and gs to discuss gs to discuss meetings to discuss teacher/learner
learner feedback teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner feedback to enrich
to enrich teaching feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich instruction as
practice. instruction as instruction as instruction as shown in the MOV
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted
7.5% submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable

least 4 LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LAC/FGD/meeting evidence was
LACs/FGDs/meetin gs as evidently gs as evidently as evidently shown shown
gs as evidently shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the given
shown in any 1 of the given MOV the given MOV MOV
the given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Selected, Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable 5 4 4.500 0.337
Services developed, used varied used varied used varied used varied evidence was
organized and teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and shown
used appropriate learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources,
teaching and including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
learning address learning address learning address learning address learning
resources, goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in
including ICT, to MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
address learning of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
goals.
Efficiency Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No acceptable
7.5%
teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was
Submitted at least 4 learning resources, learning resources, learning resource, shown
varied teaching and including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as
learning resources, evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
including ICT, as MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the
evidently shown in supported by any 1 supported by any 1 acceptable MOV
MOV 1 and of the acceptable of the acceptable
supported by any 1 MOV MOV
of the acceptable
MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Designed, Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No acceptable 4 5 4.5 0.337
Services and Reporting selected, organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used evidence was
organized and diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, shown
used diagnostic, formative and formative and formative and formative and
formative and summative summative summative summative
summative assessment assessment assessment assessment
assessment strategies strategies strategies strategies
strategies consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
consistent with curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
curriculum requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
requirements. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5%
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No acceptable

varied assessment assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was
tools as evidently as evidently shown as evidently shown evidently shown in shown
shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the in any 1 of the any of the
the acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 11. Monitored and Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored No acceptable 4 5 5 4.667 0.350
Services evaluated learner monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated evidence was
progress and evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress shown
achievement progress and progress and progress and and achievement
using learner achievement using achievement using achievement using using learner
attainment data. learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment attainment data as
data as shown in data as shown in data as shown in shown in the MOV
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted submitted
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No acceptable
combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of acceptable MOV evidence was
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable shown
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 12.Communica Quality Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable 4 4 4 4 0.3
Services and Reporting ted promptly and showed prompt and prompt and clear showed prompt and prompt and clear evidence was
clearly the clear communication of clear communication of shown
learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs,
progress and the learners’ needs, progress and the learners’ needs, progress and
achievement to progress and achievement to key progress and achievement to key
key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders,
including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/
guardians. including parents/ guardians as shown including parents/ guardians as shown
guardians as shown in the MOV guardians as shown in the MOV
7.5% in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of the given MOV evidence was
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable shown
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable 5 4 4.500 0.450
Services various related performed various performed various performed various various related evidence was
works/activities related related related work/activities that shown
that contribute to work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that contribute to the
the teaching- contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the teaching learning
learning process. teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning process as shown
process as shown process as shown process as shown in the MOV
10% in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable evidence was
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV shown
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
Very Satisfactory 4.098
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory JOEL F. GAUT LINA O. DIAZ EDNA Q. CARTALLA
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) S
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)
Name of Employee: ABEGAIL A. MORENO Name of Rater:
Position: TEACHER I Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Date of Review:
Rating Period: S.Y.2018-2019

Weight per Weight per Numerical Rating

KRA Objectives
KRA Objective Q E T
Objective 1 7.5% 5 5
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 4 5
Objective 3 7.5% 5 3
Objective 4 7.5% 5 3
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 4 4
Objective 6 7.5% 4 4
Objective 7 7.5% 5 4
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 1 1
Objective 9 7.5% 5 4
Objective 10 7.5% 4 5
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 4 5 5
Objective 12 7.5% 4 4 4
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 5 4
F
Adjec

ABEGAIL A. MORENO LEA P. BOLIC

Ratee Rater
NT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
roficient Teacher)
LEA P. BOLIC
MASTER TEACHER I
15-Apr-19

Numerical Ratings
Score
Ave
5.000 0.375
4.500 0.337
4.000 0.300
4.000 0.300
4.000 0.300
4.000 0.300
4.500 0.337
1.000 0.075
4.500 0.337
4.500 0.337
4.667 0.350
4.000 0.300
4.500 0.450
Final Rating Very Satisfactory
Adjectival Rating 4.098

LOIS ABIGAIL B. PARADO

Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) fo

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Modeled effective Quality
Services Knowledge and applications of content Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective
Pedagogy knowledge within and applications of applications of applications of
across curriculum content knowledge content knowledge content knowledge
teaching areas. within and across within and across within and across
curriculum teaching curriculum teaching curriculum teaching
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 8 of 7 of 6
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
lessons as lessons as lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV
1 and supported by 1 from colleagues 1 from colleagues
any 1 of the other and supported by and supported by
MOV given any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
MOV given MOV given
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Collaborated with Quality Conducted, Conducted and Conducted action
Services colleagues in the completed and completed action research with
conduct and application disseminated action research with colleagues
of research to enrich research with colleagues
knowledge of content colleagues
and pedagogy.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 of Submitted any 2
7.5%
of the given MOV the acceptable MOV
MOV
Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the
research report research report research report
within the rating within the rating within the rating
period period period

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Developed and Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated
Services Knowledge and applied effective effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching
Pedagogy teaching strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to
promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as well creative thinking, as creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
as other higher-order well as other higher- well as other higher- well as other higher-
thinking skills. order thinking skills order thinking skills order thinking skills
as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6
7.5%
 7.5%
Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3 Submitted 2
more lessons as lessons as evidently lessons as evidently
evidently shown in shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
MOV 1 and and supported by and supported by
supported by any 1 any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
of the other MOV MOV given MOV given
given
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Worked with Quality
Services Environment and colleagues to model and Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and
Diversity of share effective shared effective shared effective shared effective
Learners techniques in the classroom classroom classroom
management of management management management
classroom structure to strategies that strategies that strategies that
engage learners, engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
individually or in groups, activities/ tasks activities/ tasks activities/ tasks
in meaningful done in different done in different done in different
exploration, discovery physical learning physical learning physical learning
7.5%
and hands-on activities environments as environments as environments as
within a range of shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
physical learning with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6
environments.environme Efficiency
nts. Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported
by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 2. Learning 5. Exhibited effective Quality Exhibited effective Exhibited effective Exhibited effective
Services Environment and and constructive and constructive and constructive and constructive
Diversity of behavior management behavior behavior behavior
Learners skills by applying management skills management skills management skills
positive and non-violent by applying positive by applying positive by applying positive
discipline to ensure and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
learning-focused discipline to ensure discipline to ensure discipline to ensure
environments. learning-focused learning-focused learning-focused
environments environments environments
7.5% shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6

Efficiency Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of

the given strategies the given strategies the given strategies
as observed in at as observed in 3 as observed in 2
least 4 lessons lessons lessons
Timeliness
Basic Education 6. Worked with Quality Worked with Worked with Worked with
Services colleagues to share colleagues at least colleagues in the colleagues but no
differentiated, in the department or evidence of sharing
developmentally district/cluster level grade level to share with others
appropriate to share lesson lesson
opportunities to address
Efficiency Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1
learners’ differences in 7.5%
lesson as evidently lesson as evidently lesson as evidently
gender, needs,
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
strengths, interests and
and supported by and supported by and supported by
experiences.
any acceptable any acceptable any acceptable
 Efficiency Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1
learners’ differences in 7.5%
lesson as evidently lesson as evidently lesson as evidently
gender, needs,
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
strengths, interests and
and supported by and supported by and supported by
experiences.
any acceptable any acceptable any acceptable
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 7. Developed and Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and
Services Planning applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective
strategies in the strategies showing strategies showing strategies showing
planning and developmentally- developmentally- developmentally-
management of sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching
developmentally and learning and learning and learning
sequenced teaching and process as shown process as shown process as shown
learning processes to in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
meet curriculum rating of 8 rating of 7 rating of 6
requirements and varied 7.5%
teaching contexts. Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 2-3 Submitted 1 lesson
lessons as lessons as as evidenced by
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV shown in MOV 1
1 and 2 and 1 and 2 and and/or 2 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other of the other of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 8. Reviewed with Quality Consistently Frequently led Occasionally led
Services Planning colleagues, teacher and participated in collaborative collaborative
learner feedback to plan, LACs/FGDs/meetin reviews of teacher reviews of teacher
facilitate and enrich gs to discuss and learner and learner
teaching practice. teacher/learner feedback as feedback as
feedback to enrich evidenced by the evidenced by the
instruction as MOV submitted MOV submitted
shown in the MOV
submitted

7.5% Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2

collaborative collaborative collaborative
reviews of teacher reviews of teacher reviews of teacher
and learner and learner and learner
feedback as feedback as feedback as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Advised and guided Quality Consistently Frequently advised Occasionally
Services colleagues in the advised colleagues colleagues in the advised colleagues
selection, organization, in the selection, selection, in the selection,
development and use of organization, organization, organization,
appropriate teaching development and development and development and
and learning resources, appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of
including ICT, to teaching and teaching and teaching and
address specific learning learning resources learning resources learning resources
goals. as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
7.5% MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2

teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning resources learning resources learning resources
as evidenced by at as evidenced by at as evidenced by at
least 1 of the least 1 of the least 1 of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Worked Quality Consistently Frequently reviewed Occasionally
Services and Reporting collaboratively with reviewed collaboratively reviewed
colleagues to review the collaboratively assessment tools collaboratively
design, selection, assessment tools with colleagues as assessment tools
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Worked Quality Consistently Frequently reviewed Occasionally
Services and Reporting collaboratively with reviewed collaboratively reviewed
colleagues to review the collaboratively assessment tools collaboratively
design, selection, assessment tools with colleagues as assessment tools
organization and use of with colleagues as shown in the MOV with colleagues as
a range of effective shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV
diagnostic, formative 7.5% submitted submitted
and summative
assessment strategies Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
consistent with assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools
curriculum requirements. as evidently shown as evidently shown as evidently shown
in any of the in any of the in any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 4. Assessment 11. Interpreted Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Services and Reporting collaboratively collaborated with collaborated with collaborated with
monitoring and colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the
evaluation strategies of interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of
attainment data to assessment data as assessment data as assessment data as
support learner progress shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
7.5%
and achievement. submitted submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2
different types of of the same kind of of the same kind of
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 12. Applied skills in the Quality Consistently applied Frequently applied Occasionally
Services effective communication skills in the effective skills in the effective applied skills in the
of learner needs, communication of communication of effective
progress and learner needs and learner needs and communication of
achievement to key progress to parents/ progress to parents/ learner needs and
stakeholders, including guardians as shown guardians as shown progress to parents/
parents/guardians. in the MOV in the MOV guardians as shown
7.5% submitted submitted in the MOV
submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2

of the acceptable MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Services related works/activities performed special performed special performed special
that contribute to the tasks and/or tasks and/or tasks and/or
teaching-learning assignments as assignments as assignments as
process. shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
10% submitted submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted only 3 Submitted only 2
different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory 0 0
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Ra
NT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

NG TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Modeled effective evidence was
applications of shown
content knowledge
within and across
curriculum teaching
areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating
of 5
Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
as evidenced by evidence was
MOV 1 from shown
colleagues and
supported by any 1
of the other MOV
given

Proposedaction No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

research with evidence was
colleagues shown

Submitted any 1 No acceptable

MOV evidence was
shown
Proposed the No acceptable
research report evidence was
within the rating shown
period

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Demonstrated No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
effective teaching evidence was
strategies to shown
promote critical and
creative thinking, as
well as other higher-
order thinking skills
as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 5
 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
as evidently shown evidence was
in MOV 1 and shown
supported by any of
the other MOV
given

No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Modeled and evidence was
shared effective shown
classroom
management
strategies that
engage learners in
activities/ tasks
done in different
physical learning
environments as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 5
Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
supported by any of evidence was
the acceptable shown
MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Exhibited effective No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
and constructive evidence was
behavior shown
management skills
by applying positive
and non-violent
discipline to ensure
learning-focused
environments
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 5

Applied any of the No acceptable

given strategies as evidence was
observed in only 1 shown
lesson

Worked with No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

colleagues but no evidence was
evidence of sharing shown
with others

Submitted at least 1 No acceptable

lesson, as evidence was
evidenced by either shown
MOV 2 or 3 but no
evidence of sharing
 Submitted at least 1 No acceptable
lesson, as evidence was
evidenced by either shown
MOV 2 or 3 but no
evidence of sharing
with others

Developed and No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

applied effective evidence was
strategies showing shown
developmentally-
sequenced teaching
and learning
process as shown
in MOV 1 with a
rating of 5

Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable

as evidenced by evidence was
any 1 of the shown
acceptable MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Rarely led No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
collaborative evidence was
reviews of teacher shown
and learner
feedback as
evidenced by the
MOV submitted

Submitted 1 No acceptable
collaborative review evidence was
of teacher and shown
learner feedback as
evidently shown in
any of the
acceptable MOV

Rarely advised No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

colleagues in the evidence was
selection, shown
organization,
development and
appropriate use of
teaching and
learning resources
as shown in the
MOV submitted

Submitted 1 No acceptable
teaching and evidence was
learning resource shown
as evidenced by
any of the
acceptable MOV

Rarely reviewed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

collaboratively evidence was
assessment tools shown
with colleagues as
 Rarely reviewed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
collaboratively evidence was
assessment tools shown
with colleagues as
shown in the MOV
submitted

Submitted 1 No acceptable
assessment tool as evidence was
evidently shown in shown
any of the
acceptable MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Rarely collaborated No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
with colleagues in evidence was
the interpretation of shown
assessment data as
shown in the MOV
submitted

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

the MOV evidence was
shown

Rarely applied skills No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

in the effective evidence was
communication of shown
learner needs and
progress to parents/
guardians as shown
in the MOV
submitted

Submitted any 1
MOV

Rarely performed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

special tasks and/or evidence was
assignments as shown
shown in the MOV
submitted

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

the acceptable evidence was
MOV shown

RATING FOR OVER-ALL

#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

0 Approving Authority
Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (I
Master Teacher I-IV (Highly Proficient Teach

Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period:

Weight per Weight per Numeri

KRA Objectives
KRA Objective Q
Objective 1 7.5% 0
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 0
Objective 3 7.5% 0
Objective 4 7.5% 0
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 0
Objective 6 7.5% 0
Objective 7 7.5% 0
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 0
Objective 9 7.5% 0
Objective 10 7.5% 0
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 0
Objective 12 7.5% 0
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 0

0 0
Ratee Rater
EVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
y Proficient Teacher)

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

Numerical Ratings
Score
E T Ave
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Final Rating #DIV/0!
Adjectival Rating #DIV/0!

0 NAME OF APPROVING AUTHORITY

Rater Approving Authority