This document is an Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for a teacher evaluating their performance over the period of April 2018 to March 2019. It outlines 3 key result areas (KRAs) with objectives, performance indicators, and means of verification (MOV) to measure performance levels on a scale of 1 to 5. The teacher's performance is rated by their supervisor on Quality, Efficiency, and Timeliness for each KRA. The form is used to review performance and set goals for the next rating period.
This document is an Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for a teacher evaluating their performance over the period of April 2018 to March 2019. It outlines 3 key result areas (KRAs) with objectives, performance indicators, and means of verification (MOV) to measure performance levels on a scale of 1 to 5. The teacher's performance is rated by their supervisor on Quality, Efficiency, and Timeliness for each KRA. The form is used to review performance and set goals for the next rating period.
This document is an Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for a teacher evaluating their performance over the period of April 2018 to March 2019. It outlines 3 key result areas (KRAs) with objectives, performance indicators, and means of verification (MOV) to measure performance levels on a scale of 1 to 5. The teacher's performance is rated by their supervisor on Quality, Efficiency, and Timeliness for each KRA. The form is used to review performance and set goals for the next rating period.
This document is an Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for a teacher evaluating their performance over the period of April 2018 to March 2019. It outlines 3 key result areas (KRAs) with objectives, performance indicators, and means of verification (MOV) to measure performance levels on a scale of 1 to 5. The teacher's performance is rated by their supervisor on Quality, Efficiency, and Timeliness for each KRA. The form is used to review performance and set goals for the next rating period.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teachers I-III
Name of Employee : KRISTINE D. GALAC Name of Rater : JHONATHAN S. CADAVIDO
Position : TEACHER I Position : MASTER TEACHER II Bureau/Center/Service/Division : DepED QUEZON Date of Review : NOVEMBER 2018 Rating Period : APRIL 2018 – MARCH 2019 To be filled out during planning To be filled during evaluation
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATOR RATING
ACTUAL MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor SCORE QET (4) RESULTS Q E T Ave KRA (5) (3) (2) (1) Basic 1. Content 1. Applied Showed Showed Showed Showed No acceptable Education Knowledge knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of evidence was Service and content within and content and its content and its content and its content and its shown Pedagogy across curriculum integration within integration within integration within integration within Quality teaching areas. and across and across and across and across subject areas as subject areas as subject areas as subject areas as shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable 4 lessons using lessons using lessons using of the given MOV evidence was MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and shown Efficiency supported by any supported by any supported by any 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other given MOV given MOV given MOV Timeliness 2. Used a range of Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable teaching strategies different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was that enhance learner strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown achievement in promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, literacy and numeracy Quality writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or skills. numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 7 6 5 4 Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable 4 learner- learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered evidence was centered lessons lessons as lessons as lesson as show as evidently evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown Efficiency shown in MOV 1 in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in any of the and supported by supported by any supported by any given MOV any 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other MOV given MOV given MOV given Timeliness 3. Applied a range of Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable teaching strategies to teaching teaching teaching teaching evidence was develop critical and strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown creative thinking, as develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical Quality well as other higher and creative and creative and creative and creative order thinking skills thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
IPCRF for TEACHERS I-III 1
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATOR RATING ACTUAL MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor SCORE QET (4) RESULTS Q E T Ave KRA (5) (3) (2) (1) with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable 4 lessons as lessons as lessons as lesson as evidence was evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by shown Efficiency MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the supported by any supported by any supported by any given MOV 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other given MOV given MOV given MOV Timeliness Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable Education Environment structure to engage management management management management evidence was Service and Diversity of learners, individually strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown Learners or in groups, in engage learners engage learners engage learners engage learners Quality meaningful in activities/tasks in activities/tasks in activities/tasks in activities/tasks exploration, discovery as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV and hands-on 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of activities within a 7 6 5 4 range of physical Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable learning environments 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson supported evidence was supported by supported by supported by by any of the shown Efficiency MOV 1 and any 1 MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any 1 acceptable MOV of the other 1 of the other of the other acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV Timeliness 5. Managed learner Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable behavior management management management management evidence was constructively by strategies of strategies of strategies of strategies of shown applying positive and learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior non-violent discipline that promote that promote that promote that promote Quality to ensure learning positive and non- positive and non- positive and non- positive and non- focused environments. violent discipline violent discipline violent discipline violent discipline as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 Submitted at least Submitted at Submitted at least Submitted any 1 No acceptable 4 of the given least 4 of the 4 of the given of the given evidence was Efficiency strategies as given strategies strategies as strategies as shown observed in at as observed in 3 observed in 2 observed in only least 4 lessons lessons lessons 1 lesson Timeliness 6. Used differentiated, Applied Applied Applied Applied No acceptable developmentally differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence shown appropriate learning teaching teaching teaching teaching experiences to strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to Quality address learners’ address learner address learner address learner address learner gender, needs, diversity as diversity as diversity as diversity as strengths, interests shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 and experiences. with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable 4 differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was Efficiency teaching teaching teaching teaching strategy shown strategies in at strategies in at strategies in 2 in only 1 lesson least 2 lessons least 2 lessons lessons as as evidently
IPCRF for TEACHERS I-III 2
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATOR RATING ACTUAL MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor SCORE QET (4) RESULTS Q E T Ave KRA (5) (3) (2) (1) as evidenced by as evidenced by evidenced by shown in any 1 of MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and the acceptable supported by any supported by any supported by any MOV 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV Timeliness Basic 3. Curriculum and 7. Planned, managed Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable Education Planning and implemented implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was Service developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown sequenced teaching sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced and learning Quality teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and processes to meet learning process learning process learning process learning process curriculum as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV requirements and 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of varied teaching 7 6 5 4 contexts. Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable 4 developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced shown sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and learning process learning process learning process Efficiency learning process as evidently as evidently as evidently as evidently shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in any 1 of shown in MOV 1 and supported by and supported by the given MOV and supported by any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other given MOV given MOV given MOV Timeliness 8. Participated in Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable collegial discussions participated in participated in participated in participated in evidence was that use teacher and LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/ shown learner feedback to meetings to meetings to meetings to meeting to enrich teaching discuss discuss discuss discuss Quality practice. teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner feedback to feedback to feedback to feedback to enrich instruction enrich instruction enrich instruction enrich instruction as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable least 4 LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/ evidence was LACs/FGDs/ meetings as meetings as meeting as shown Efficiency meetings as evidently shown evidently shown n evidently shown evidently shown in any 1 of the any 1 of the given in any 1 of the in any 1 of the given MOV MOV given MOV given MOV Timeliness 9. Selected, developed, Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable organized and used used varied used varied used varied used varied evidence was appropriate teaching teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and shown and learning learning learning learning learning Quality resources, including resources, resources, resources, resources, ICT, to address including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to learning goals. address learning address learning address learning address learning goals as shown in goals as shown goals as shown in goals as shown
IPCRF for TEACHERS I-III 3
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATOR RATING ACTUAL MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor SCORE QET (4) RESULTS Q E T Ave KRA (5) (3) (2) (1) MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any No acceptable 4 varied teaching varied teaching varied teaching teaching and evidence was and learning and learning and learning learning shown resources, resources, resources, resource, including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as Efficiency evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in any of the supported by any supported by any supported by any acceptable MOV 1 of the 1 of the 1 of the acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV Timeliness Basic 4. Assessment 10. Designed, selected, Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed, No acceptable Education and Reporting organized and used selected, selected, selected, selected, evidence was Service diagnostic, formative organized and organized and organized and organized and shown and used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, formative and formative and formative and formative and summative summative summative summative Quality assessment assessment assessment assessment strategies strategies strategies strategies consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable 4 varied varied varied assessment tool evidence was assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools as evidently shown Efficiency as evidently as evidently as evidently shown in any of shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of the acceptable the acceptable the acceptable the acceptable MOV MOV MOV MOV Timeliness 11. Monitored and Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored No acceptable evaluated learner monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated evidence was progress and evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress shown achievement using progress and progress and progress and and achievement learner attainment Quality achievement achievement achievement using learner data. using learner using learner using learner attainment data attainment data attainment data attainment data as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No acceptable combination of at combination of 3 combination of 2 acceptable MOV evidence was Efficiency least 4 of the of the acceptable of the acceptable shown acceptable MOV MOV MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable Timeliness were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown 12. Communicated Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable promptly and clearly Quality showed prompt showed prompt showed prompt prompt and clear evidence was the learners’ needs, and clear and clear and clear communication of shown
IPCRF for TEACHERS I-III 4
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATOR RATING ACTUAL MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor SCORE QET (4) RESULTS Q E T Ave KRA (5) (3) (2) (1) progress and communication of communication of communication of the learners’ achievement to key the learners’ the learners’ the learners’ needs, progress stakeholders, needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress and achievement including and achievement and achievement and achievement to key parents/guardians. to key to key to key stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, including parents/ including parents/ including parents/ including parents/ guardians as guardians as guardians as guardians as shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 No acceptable combination of at combination of 3 combination of 2 of the given MOV evidence was Efficiency least 4 of the of the acceptable of the acceptable shown acceptable MOV MOV MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable Timeliness were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable Education related works/activities performed various performed performed various various related evidence was Service that contribute to the related various related related work/activities shown work/activities work/activities work/activities that contribute to Quality that contribute to that contribute to that contribute to the teaching the teaching the teaching the teaching learning process learning process learning process learning process as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable 4 different kinds different kinds of different kinds of of the acceptable evidence was Efficiency of acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV shown MOV Timeliness
RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENT
Ratee: Rater: Approving Authority:
JHONATHAN S. CADAVIDO JHONATHAN S. CADAVIDO CARIDAD C. GRIMALDO, PhD
Teacher I Master Teacher II/SHS Coordinator School Principal III