INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: GEMMA M. TUAZON Name of Rater: DOMINGO T. LUZENTALES

Position: Teacher II Position: PRINCIPAL I
School / Division: Muladbucad Grande Elementary School Date of Review: October 27, 2018
Review Period: June 2018 - April 2019
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATOR Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Q E T Ave.
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied Knowledges of 7.5% Quality Showed knowledge of content Showed knowledge of content Showed knowledge of content Showed knowledge of content No acceptable evidence was
Education Knowledge content within and across and its integration within and and its integration within and and its integration within and and its integration within and shown
Services and Pedagogy curriculum teaching areas. across subject areas as show in across subject areas as show in across subject areas as show in across subject areas as show in
(40%) MOV1 with rating of 7 MOV1 with rating of 6 MOV1 with rating of 5 MOV1 with rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 lessons Submitted 3 lessons using MOV 1 Submitted 2 lessons using MOV 1 Submitted any 1 of the given Each part had no description of
using MOV 1 and supported by and supported by any one of the and supported by any 1 one of MOV what to do with example
any one of the other given MOV other given MOV the other given MOV

Timeliness

2. Used a range of 7.5% Quality Facilitated using different teaching Facilitated using different teaching Facilitated using different teaching Facilitated using different teaching No acceptable evidence was
teaching strategies that strategies that promote reading, strategies that promote reading, strategies that promote reading, strategies that promote reading, shown
enhance learner writing and/or numeracy skills as writing and/or numeracy skills as writing and/or numeracy skills as writing and/or numeracy skills as
achievement in literacy shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7 shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6 shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5 shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 4
and numeracy skills.

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 learner- Submitted 3 learner-centered Submitted 2 learner-centered Submitted 1 learner-centered No acceptable evidence was
centered lessons as evidently lessons as evidently shown in lessons as evidently shown in lessons as evidently shown in shown
shown in MOV 1 and supported MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of
by any 1 of the other MOV given the other MOV given the other MOV given the other MOV given

Timeliness

3. Applied a range of 7.5% Quality Used different teaching strategies Used different teaching strategies Used different teaching strategies Used different teaching strategies No acceptable evidence was 0.00
teaching strategies to that develop critical and creative that develop critical and creative that develop critical and creative that develop critical and creative shown
develop critical and thinking and/or other HOTS as thinking and/or other HOTS as thinking and/or other HOTS as thinking and/or other HOTS as
creative thinking, as well shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7 shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6 shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5 shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 4
as other higher-order
thinking skills.

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 lessons as Submitted 3 lessons as Submitted 2 lessons as Submitted 1 lessons as No acceptable evidence was
evidenced by MOV 1 and evidenced by MOV 1 and evidenced by MOV 1 and evidenced by MOV 1 and shown
supported by any 1 of the other supported by any 1 of the other supported by any 1 of the other supported by any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness

2. Learning 4.Managed classroom 7.5% Quality Used classroom management Used classroom management Used classroom management Used classroom management No acceptable evidence was
Environment structure to engage strategies that engage learners in strategies that engage learners in strategies that engage learners in strategies that engage learners in shown
and Diversity learners, individually or in activites/tasks as shown in MOV activites/tasks as shown in MOV activites/tasks as shown in MOV activites/tasks as shown in MOV
of Learners groups, in meaningful 1 with a rating of 7 1 with a rating of 6 1 with a rating of 5 1 with a rating of 4
exploration, discovery and
hands-on activities within a
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 lessons Submitted 3 lessons supported by Submitted 2 lessons supported by Submitted 1 lessons supported by No acceptable evidence was
range of physical learning
environments. supported by MOV 1 and any 1 of MOV 1 and any 1 of the other MOV 1 and any 1 of the other MOV 1 and any 1 of the other shown
the other acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness

5. Manage learner 7.5% Quality Used classroom management Used classroom management Used classroom management Used classroom management No acceptable evidence was
behavior constructively by strategies of learner behavior that strategies of learner behavior that strategies of learner behavior that strategies of learner behavior that shown
applying positive and non- promote positive and non-violent promote positive and non-violent promote positive and non-violent promote positive and non-violent
violent discipline to ensure discipline as shown in MOV discipline as shown in MOV discipline as shown in MOV discipline as shown in MOV
learning-focused submitted with a rating of 7 submitted with a rating of 6 submitted with a rating of 5 submitted with a rating of 4
environment.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 of the given Submitted at least 4 of the given Submitted at least 4 of the given Submitted at least 4 of the given No acceptable evidence was
strategies as observed in at least strategies as observed in 3 strategies as observed in 2 strategies as observed in 1 shown
4 lessons lessons lessons lessons

Timeliness

6. Used differentiated, 7.5% Quality Applied differentiated teaching Applied differentiated teaching Applied differentiated teaching Applied differentiated teaching No acceptable evidence was
developmentally strategies to address learner strategies to address learner strategies to address learner strategies to address learner shown
appropriate learning diversity as shown in MOV 1 with diversity as shown in MOV 1 with diversity as shown in MOV 1 with diversity as shown in MOV 1 with
experiences to address a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 a rating of 4
learners' gender, needs,
strengths, interests and
experiences. Efficiency Submitted at least 4 differentiated Submitted 3 differentiated Submitted 2 differentiated Submitted 1 differentiated No acceptable evidence was
teaching strategies in at least 2 teaching strategies in at least 2 teaching strategies in at least 2 teaching strategies in at least 2 shown
lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 lessons as evidenced by MOV 1
and supported by any 1 of the and supported by any 1 of the and supported by any 1 of the and supported by any 1 of the
other acceptable MOV other acceptable MOV other acceptable MOV other acceptable MOV

Timeliness

3. Curriculum 7. Planned, managed and 7.5% Quality Planned and implemented Planned and implemented Planned and implemented Planned and implemented No acceptable evidence was
and Planning implemented developmentally sequenced developmentally sequenced developmentally sequenced developmentally sequenced shown
developmentally teaching and learning process as teaching and learning process as teaching and learning process as teaching and learning process as
sequenced teaching and shown in MOV 1 with rating of 7 shown in MOV 1 with rating of 6 shown in MOV 1 with rating of 5 shown in MOV 1 with rating of 4
learning processes to meet
curriculum requirements
and varied teaching
contexts. Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 developmentally Submitted 2 developmentally Submitted 1 developmentally No acceptable evidence was
developmentally sequenced sequenced teaching and learning sequenced teaching and learning sequenced teaching and learning shown
teaching and learning process as process as evidently shown in process as evidently shown in process as evidently shown in
evidently shown in MOV 1 of the MOV 1 of the other given MOV MOV 1 of the other given MOV MOV 1 of the other given MOV
other given MOV

Timeliness

8. Participated in collegial 7.5% Quality Consistently participated in Frequently participated in LACs / Occasionally participated in Rarely participated in LACs / No acceptable evidence was
discussions that use LACs / FGDs / meetings to FGDs / meetings to discuss LACs / FGDs / meetings to FGDs / meetings to discuss shown
teacher and learner discuss teacher/learner feedback teacher/learner feedback to discuss teacher/learner feedback teacher/learner feedback to
feedback to enrich to enrich instruction as shown in enrich instruction as shown in the to enrich instruction as shown in enrich instruction as shown in the
teaching practice the MOV submitted MOV submitted the MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Participated in at least 4 LACs / Participated in 3 LACs / FGDs / Participated in 2 LACs / FGDs / Participated in 1 LACs / FGDs / No acceptable evidence was
FGDs / meetings as evidently meetings as evidently shown in meetings as evidently shown in meetings as evidently shown in shown
shown in any 1 of the given MOV any 1 of the given MOV any 1 of the given MOV any 1 of the given MOV

Timeliness

9. Selected developed, 7.5% Quality Developed and used varied Developed and used varied Developed and used varied Developed and used varied No acceptable evidence was
organized and used teaching and learning resources, teaching and learning resources, teaching and learning resources, teaching and learning resources, shown
appropriate teaching and including ICT, to address learning including ICT, to address learning including ICT, to address learning including ICT, to address learning
learning resources, goals as shown in MOV 1 with a goals as shown in MOV 1 with a goals as shown in MOV 1 with a goals as shown in MOV 1 with a
including ICT, to address rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
learning goals.

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 varried Submitted 3 varried teaching and Submitted 2 varried teaching and Submitted 1 varried teaching and No acceptable evidence was
teaching and learning resources, learning resources, including ICT, learning resources, including ICT, learning resources, including ICT, shown
including ICT, as evidently shown as evidently shown in MOV 1 and as evidently shown in MOV 1 and as evidently shown in MOV 1 and
in MOV 1 and supported by any 1 supported by any 1 of the supported by any 1 of the supported by any 1 of the
of the acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness

4. Assessment 10. Designed, selected, 7.5% Quality Designed, selected, organized Designed, selected, organized Designed, selected, organized Designed, selected, organized No acceptable evidence was
and Reporting organized aans used and used diagnostic, formative and used diagnostic, formative and used diagnostic, formative and used diagnostic, formative shown
diagnostic, formative and and summative assessment and summative assessment and summative assessment and summative assessment
summative assessment strategies consistent with strategies consistent with strategies consistent with strategies consistent with
strategies consistent with curriculum requirements as curriculum requirements as curriculum requirements as curriculum requirements as
curriculum requirements. shown in MOV with the rating of 7 shown in MOV with the rating of 6 shown in MOV with the rating of 5 shown in MOV with the rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 varied Submitted 3 varied assessment Submitted 2 varied assessment Submitted 1 varied assessment No acceptable evidence was
assessment tools as evidently tools as evidently shown in any 1 tools as evidently shown in any 1 tools as evidently shown in any 1 shown
shown in any 1 of the acceptable of the acceptable MOV of the acceptable MOV of the acceptable MOV
MOV

Timeliness

11. Monitored and 7.5% Quality Consistently monitored and Frequently monitored and Occasionally monitored and Rarely monitored and evaluated No acceptable evidence was
evaluated learner progress evaluated learners progress and evaluated learners progress and evaluated learners progress and learners progress and shown
and achievement using achievement using learner achievement using learner achievement using learner achievement using learner
learner attainment data. attainment data as shown in the attainment data as shown in the attainment data as shown in the attainment data as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted a combination of at Submitted a combination of 3 of Submitted a combination of 2 of Submitted a combination of 1 of No acceptable evidence was
least 4 of the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV shown
Timeliness Submitted MOV were distributed Submitted MOV were distributed Submitted MOV were distributed Submitted MOV were distributed No acceptable evidence was
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters across 1 quarters shown

12. Communicated 7.5% Quality Consistenly showed prompt and Frequently showed prompt and Occasionally showed prompt and Rarely showed prompt and clear No acceptable evidence was
promptly and clearly the clear communication of the clear communication of the clear communication of the communication of the learners' shown
learners' needs, progress learners' needs, progress and learners' needs, progress and learners' needs, progress and needs, progress and achievement
and achievement to key achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, to key stakeholders, including
stakeholders, including including parents / guardians as including parents / guardians as including parents / guardians as parents / guardians as shownin
parents / guardians. shownin the MOV submitted shownin the MOV submitted shownin the MOV submitted the MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted a combination of at Submitted a combination of at Submitted a combination of at Submitted a combination of at No acceptable evidence was
least 4 of the acceptable MOV least 3 of the acceptable MOV least 2 of the acceptable MOV least 1 of the acceptable MOV shown

Timeliness Submitted MOV were distributed Submitted MOV were distributed Submitted MOV were distributed Submitted MOV were distributed No acceptable evidence was
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters across 1 quarters shown

5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various 10.0% Quality Consistently performed various Frequently performed various Occasionally performed various Rarely performed various related No acceptable evidence was
related work/activities that related work / activities that related work / activities that related work / activities that work / activities that contribute to shown
contribute to the teaching- contribute to the teaching contribute to the teaching contribute to the teaching the teaching learning process as
learning process. learning process as shown in the learning process as shown in the learning process as shown in the shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 different Submitted 3 different kinds of Submitted 2 different kinds of Submitted 1 different kinds of No acceptable evidence was
kinds of acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV shown

Timeliness

* Toget the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned FINAL RATING

ADJECTIVAL RATING

GEMMA M. TUAZON Recommending Approval:

Teacher II DOMINGO T. LUZENTALES Approved:
Ratee PRINCIPAL I Nanet B. Kapitbahay
Rater Public Schools District Supervisor FATIMA D. BUEN
Asst.Schools Division Superintendent

DEPED RPMS form – For Teachers I 1

 PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance Results Rating

Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives 0.00

Employee-Superior Agreement
The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed to the contents of the performance as captured in this form.

Name of Employee: GEMMA M. TUAZON Name of Superior: DOMINGO T. LUZENTALES

Signature: Signature:
Date: October 27, 2018 Date: OCTOBER 27,2018

PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs Timeline Resources Needed
(Recommended Developmental Intervention)

* Demonstrate a flexible and speedy approach to Quadlateral Movement and

Strength and Power Flexibilty and Speed work to attain goals and desired outcomes. S.Y. 2019-2020 Advance Stretches

Conforme:

GEMMA M. TUAZON
Teacher II Rater & Reviewed by: Recommending Approval:
Ratee Approved:
DOMINGO T. LUZENTALES Nanet B. Kapitbahay
PRINCIPAL I OIC- Assistant Schools Division Superintendent FATIMA D. BUEN
OIC-Schools Division Superintendent
 POSITION AND COMPETENCY PROFILE PCP No. _________ Revision Code: 00

Department of Education
Name GEMMA M. TUAZON Salary Grade 11
Postion Title Teacher II Effectivity Date November 10, 2009
Office Unit Ventinilla High School Page/s
Reports to PRINCIPAL I
Position Supervised
JOB SUMMARY

QUALIFICATION STANDARDS
A. CSC Prescribed Qualifications
Education BSED - English / MAED - Academic Requirements
Experience 4 years and 4 months
Eligibility LET Passer
Trainings School Action Learning Cell
B. Preferred Qualifications
Education BSED - English / MAED - Academic Requirements
Experience 4 years and 4 months
Eligibility LET Passer
Trainings School Action Learning Cell
 FINAL RATING Descriptive Rating
0 - 1.499 Poor
1.5 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
2.5 - 3.499 Satisfactory
3.5 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
4.5 - 5 Outstanding