INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: Merlie G. Morete Name of Rater: RICHARD A. TADLE

Position: Teacher 1 Position: Head Teacher 1
Bureau/Center/Service/DiviMarfil National High School Rosario 1 Date of Review: October 2018
Rating Period: SY. 2018-2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied Quality Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of No acceptable 4 4 4.000 0.300
Education Knowledge knowledge of content and its content and its content and its content and its evidence was
Services and content within and integration within and integration within and integration within and integration within and shown
Pedagogy across curriculum across subject areas as across subject areas as across subject areas as across subject areas as
teaching areas. shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4

7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable
lessons using MOV 1 using MOV 1 and using MOV 1 and given MOV evidence was
and supported by any 1 supported by any 1 of the supported by any 1 of the shown
of the other given MOV other given MOV other given MOV

Timeliness
Basic 2. Used a range of Quality Facilitated using different Facilitated using different Facilitated using different Facilitated using different No acceptable 3 3 3.000 0.225
Education teaching strategies teaching strategies that teaching strategies that teaching strategies that teaching strategies that evidence was
Services that enhance promote reading writing promote reading writing promote reading writing promote reading writing shown
learner and/or numeracy skills as and/or numeracy skills as and/or numeracy skills as and/or numeracy skills as
schievement in shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a
literacy and rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
numeracy skills

7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 learner- Submitted 2 learner- Submitted 1 learner- No acceptable
learner-centered lessons centered lessons as centered lessons as centered lessons as evidence was
as evidently shown in evidently shown in MOV evidently shown in MOV evidently shown in any of shown
MOV 1 and supported by 1 and supported by any 1 1 and supported by any 1 the other given MOV
any 1 of the other MOV of the other MOV given of the other MOV given
given

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 1. Content 3. Applied a range of Quality Used different teaching Used different teaching Used different teaching Used different teaching No acceptable 4 4 4.000 0.300
Education Knowledge teaching strategies strategies that develop strategies that develop strategies that develop strategies that develop evidence was
Services and to develop critical critical and creative thinking critical and creative thinking critical and creative thinking critical and creative thinking shown
Pedagogy and creative skills and/or other HOTS as skills and/or other HOTS as skills and/or other HOTS as skills and/or other HOTS as
thinking, as well as shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a
other higher order rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
thinking skills.
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons as Submitted 2 lessons as Submitted 1 lesson as No acceptable
lessons as evidenced by evidenced by MOV 1 and evidenced by MOV 1 and evidenced by any of the evidence was
MOV 1 and supported by supported by any 1 of the supported by any 1 of the other given MOV shown
any 1 of the other given other given MOV other given MOV
MOV

Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable 4 4 4.000 0.3
Education Environmen classroom structure management strategies management strategies management strategies management strategies evidence was
Services t and to engage learners, that engage learners in that engage learners in that engage learners in that engage learners in shown
Diversity of individually or in activities/tasks as shown in activities/tasks as shown in activities/tasks as shown in activities/tasks as shown in
Learners groups, in meanigful MOV 1 with a rating of 7 MOV 1 with a rating of 6 MOV 1 with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a rating of 4
exploration,
discovery and
hands-on activities 7.5% Efficiency Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
within a range of Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons supported by any of the evidence was
physical learning lessons supported by MOV supported by MOV 1 and supported by MOV 1 and acceptable MOV shown
environments. 1 and any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed learner Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable 4 3 3.500 0.262
Education behavior management strategies of management strategies of management strategies of management strategies of evidence was
Services constructively by learner behavior that learner behavior that learner behavior that learner behavior that shown
applying positive promote positive and non- promote positive and non- promote positive and non- promote positive and non-
and non-violent violent discipline as shown violent discipline as shown violent discipline as shown violent discipline as shown
discipline to ensure in MOV submitted with a in MOV submitted with a in MOV submitted with a in MOV submitted with a
learning-focused rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
environment 7.5%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 of the Submitted at least 4 of the Submitted at least 4 of the Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable
given strategies as given strategies as given strategies as given strategies as evidence was
observed in at least 4 observed in 3 lessons observed in 2 lessons observed in only 1 lesson shown
lessons

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 2. Learning 6. Used Quality Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied differentiated No acceptable 4 4 4.000 0.3
Education Environme differentiated, teaching strategies to teaching strategies to teaching strategies to teaching strategies to evidence was
Services nt and developmentally address learner diversity address learner diversity address learner diversity address learner diversity shown
Diversity of appropriate as shown in MOV 1 with as shown in MOV 1 with as shown in MOV 1 with as shown in MOV 1 with
Learners learning a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 a rating of 4
experiences to
address learners’
gender, needs, Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
strengths, interests differentiated teaching differentiated teaching differentiated teaching differentiated teaching evidence was
and experiences. 7.5% strategies in at least 2 strategies in at least 2 strategies in 2 lessons strategy in only 1 lesson shown
lessons as evidenced by lessons as evidenced by as evidenced by MOV 1 as evidently shown in
MOV 1 and supported by MOV 1 and supported by and supported by any 1 any 1 of the acceptable
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other of the other acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic 3. 7. Planned, Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable 4 3 4.000 0.3
Education Curriculum managed and implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was
Services and implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown
Planning developmentally sequenced teaching and sequenced teaching and sequenced teaching and sequenced teaching and
sequenced learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as
teaching and shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a
learning processes rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
to meet curriculum
requirements and
varied teaching Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
contexts. 7.5%
developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was
sequenced teaching and sequenced teaching and sequenced teaching and sequenced teaching and shown
learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as
evidently shown in MOV evidently shown in MOV evidently shown in MOV evidently shown in any 1
1 and supported by any 1 1 and supported by any 1 1 and supported by any 1 of the given MOV
of the other given MOV of the other given MOV of the other given MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 3. 8. Participated in Quality Consistently participated in Frequently participated in Occasionally participated in Rarely participated in No acceptable 4 4 4.000 0.3
Education Curriculum collegial discussions LACs/FGDs/meetings to LACs/FGDs/meetings to LACs/FGDs/ meetings to LAC/FGD/ meeting to evidence was
Services and that use teacher and discuss teacher/learner discuss teacher/learner discuss teacher/learner discuss teacher/learner shown
Planning learner feedback to feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich
enrich teaching instruction as shown in the instruction as shown in the instruction as shown in the instruction as shown in the
practice. MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

7.5%

Efficiency Participated in at least 4 Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable

LACs/FGDs/meetings as LACs/FGDs/meetings as LACs/FGDs/meetings as LAC/FGD/meeting as evidence was
evidently shown in any 1 of evidently shown in any 1 of evidently shown in any 1 of evidently shown in any 1 of shown
the given MOV the given MOV the given MOV the given MOV

Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, Quality Developed and used varied Developed and used varied Developed and used varied Developed and used varied No acceptable 5 5 5.000 0.375
Education developed, teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning evidence was
Services organized and used resources, including ICT, to resources, including ICT, to resources, including ICT, to resources, including ICT, to shown
appropriate teaching address learning goals as address learning goals as address learning goals as address learning goals as
and learning shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a
resources, including rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
ICT, to address
learning goals.

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 varied Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any teaching No acceptable
7.5% teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning and learning resource, evidence was
resources, including ICT, resources, including ICT, resources, including ICT, including ICT, as evidently shown
as evidently shown in MOV as evidently shown in MOV as evidently shown in MOV shown in any of the
1 and supported by any 1 1 and supported by any 1 1 and supported by any 1 acceptable MOV
of the acceptable MOV of the acceptable MOV of the acceptable MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 4. 10. Designed, Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No acceptable 5 5 5 0.375
Education Assessme selected, organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used evidence was
Services nt and organized and diagnostic, formative and diagnostic, formative and diagnostic, formative and diagnostic, formative and shown
Reporting used diagnostic, summative assessment summative assessment summative assessment summative assessment
formative and strategies consistent with strategies consistent with strategies consistent with strategies consistent with
summative curriculum requirements curriculum requirements curriculum requirements curriculum requirements
assessment as shown in MOV 1 with as shown in MOV 1 with as shown in MOV 1 with as shown in MOV 1 with
strategies a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 a rating of 4
consistent with
curriculum 7.5%
requirements.

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 assessment No acceptable
varied assessment tools assessment tools as assessment tools as tool as evidently shown evidence was
as evidently shown in evidently shown in any 1 evidently shown in any 1 in any of the acceptable shown
any 1 of the acceptable of the acceptable MOV of the acceptable MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored and Quality Consistently monitored Frequently monitored Occasionally monitored Rarely monitored and No acceptable 4 4 4.000 0.300
Education evaluated learner and evaluated learner and evaluated learner and evaluated learner evaluated learner evidence was
Services progress and progress and progress and progress and progress and shown
achievement using achievement using achievement using achievement using achievement using
learner attainment learner attainment data learner attainment data learner attainment data learner attainment data
data. as shown in the MOV as shown in the MOV as shown in the MOV as shown in the MOV
submitted submitted submitted submitted

7.5%
Efficiency Submitted a combination Submitted a combination Submitted 1 acceptable No acceptable
of at least 4 of the of 2 of the acceptable MOV evidence was
acceptable MOV Submitted a combination MOV shown
of 3 of the acceptable
MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV was No acceptable
distributed across 4 distributed across 3 distributed across 2 completed in only 1 evidence was
quarters quarters quarters quarter shown
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 4. 12.Communica ted Quality Consistently showed Frequently showed prompt Occasionally showed Rarely showed prompt and No acceptable 5 4 4.5 0.337
Education Assessment promptly and clearly prompt and clear and clear communication prompt and clear clear communication of the evidence was
Services and the learners’ needs, communication of the of the learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, progress shown
Reporting progress and learners’ needs, progress progress and achievement learners’ needs, progress and achievement to key
achievement to key and achievement to key to key stakeholders, and achievement to key stakeholders, including
stakeholders, stakeholders, including including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ guardians as
including parents/ parents/ guardians as guardians as shown in the parents/ guardians as shown in the MOV
guardians. shown in the MOV MOV submitted shown in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted
7.5%

Efficiency Submitted a combination of Submitted a combination of Submitted a combination of Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable
at least 4 of the acceptable 3 of the acceptable MOV 2 of the acceptable MOV given MOV evidence was
MOV shown

Timeliness Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV was No acceptable
distributed across 4 distributed across 3 distributed across 2 completed in only 1 quarter evidence was
quarters quarters quarters shown
Basic 5. Plus 13. Performed Quality Consistently performed Frequently performed Occasionally performed Rarely performed various No acceptable 5 5 5.000 0.500
Education Factor various related various related various related various related related work/activities that evidence was
Services works/activities that work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that contribute to the teaching shown
contribute to the contribute to the teaching contribute to the teaching contribute to the teaching learning process as shown
teaching-learning learning process as shown learning process as shown learning process as shown in the MOV submitted
process. in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted
10%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 different kinds Submitted 2 different kinds Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable
different kinds of of acceptable MOV of acceptable MOV acceptable MOV evidence was
acceptable MOV shown
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
ACCOMPLISHMENTS Very Satisfactory 4.174

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory Ratee Rater Approving Authority
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory MERLIE G. MORETE RICHARD A .TADLE RICHARD A. TADLE
below 1.499 Poor Teacher 1 Head Teacher 1 Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SH
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: MERLIE G. MORETE Name of Rater:

Position: SST-1 Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: MARFIL NHS ROSARIO 1 Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Weight per Weight per Numerical Ratings

KRA Objectives
KRA Objective Q E T
Objective 1 7.5% 4 4
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 3 3
Objective 3 7.5% 4 4
Objective 4 7.5% 4 4
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 4 3
Objective 6 7.5% 4 4
Objective 7 7.5% 4 3
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 4 4
Objective 9 7.5% 5 5
Objective 10 7.5% 5 5
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 4 4 0
Objective 12 7.5% 5 4 0
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 5 5
Final Rating
Adjectival Rating

MERLIE G. MORETE RICHARD A. TADLE

Ratee Rater
M (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET

RICHARD A. TADLE
SCHOOL HEAD
18-Oct

erical Ratings
Score
Ave
4.000 0.300
3.000 0.225
4.000 0.300
4.000 0.300
3.500 0.262
4.000 0.300
4.000 0.300
4.000 0.300
5.000 0.375
5.000 0.375
4.000 0.300
4.500 0.337
5.000 0.500
Final Rating Very Satisfactory
Adjectival Rating 4.174

RICHARD A. TADLE
Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) fo

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Modeled effective Quality
Services Knowledge and applications of content Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective
Pedagogy knowledge within and applications of applications of applications of
across curriculum content knowledge content knowledge content knowledge
teaching areas. within and across within and across within and across
curriculum teaching curriculum teaching curriculum teaching
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 8 of 7 of 6
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
lessons as lessons as lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV
1 and supported by 1 from colleagues 1 from colleagues
any 1 of the other and supported by and supported by
MOV given any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
MOV given MOV given
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Collaborated with Quality Conducted, Conducted and Conducted action
Services colleagues in the completed and completed action research with
conduct and application disseminated action research with colleagues
of research to enrich research with colleagues
knowledge of content colleagues
and pedagogy.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 of Submitted any 2
7.5%
of the given MOV the acceptable MOV
MOV
Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the
research report research report research report
within the rating within the rating within the rating
period period period

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Developed and Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated
Services Knowledge and applied effective effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching
Pedagogy teaching strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to
promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as well creative thinking, as creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
as other higher-order well as other higher- well as other higher- well as other higher-
thinking skills. order thinking skills order thinking skills order thinking skills
as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6
7.5%
 7.5%
Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3 Submitted 2
more lessons as lessons as evidently lessons as evidently
evidently shown in shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
MOV 1 and and supported by and supported by
supported by any 1 any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
of the other MOV MOV given MOV given
given
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Worked with Quality
Services Environment and colleagues to model and Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and
Diversity of share effective shared effective shared effective shared effective
Learners techniques in the classroom classroom classroom
management of management management management
classroom structure to strategies that strategies that strategies that
engage learners, engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
individually or in groups, activities/ tasks activities/ tasks activities/ tasks
in meaningful done in different done in different done in different
exploration, discovery physical learning physical learning physical learning
7.5%
and hands-on activities environments as environments as environments as
within a range of shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
physical learning with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6
environments.environme Efficiency
nts. Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported
by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 2. Learning 5. Exhibited effective Quality Exhibited effective Exhibited effective Exhibited effective
Services Environment and and constructive and constructive and constructive and constructive
Diversity of behavior management behavior behavior behavior
Learners skills by applying management skills management skills management skills
positive and non-violent by applying positive by applying positive by applying positive
discipline to ensure and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
learning-focused discipline to ensure discipline to ensure discipline to ensure
environments. learning-focused learning-focused learning-focused
environments environments environments
7.5% shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6

Efficiency Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of

the given strategies the given strategies the given strategies
as observed in at as observed in 3 as observed in 2
least 4 lessons lessons lessons
Timeliness
Basic Education 6. Worked with Quality Worked with Worked with Worked with
Services colleagues to share colleagues at least colleagues in the colleagues but no
differentiated, in the department or evidence of sharing
developmentally district/cluster level grade level to share with others
appropriate to share lesson lesson
opportunities to address
Efficiency Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1
learners’ differences in 7.5%
lesson as evidently lesson as evidently lesson as evidently
gender, needs,
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
strengths, interests and
and supported by and supported by and supported by
experiences.
any acceptable any acceptable any acceptable
 Efficiency Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1
learners’ differences in 7.5%
lesson as evidently lesson as evidently lesson as evidently
gender, needs,
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
strengths, interests and
and supported by and supported by and supported by
experiences.
any acceptable any acceptable any acceptable
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 7. Developed and Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and
Services Planning applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective
strategies in the strategies showing strategies showing strategies showing
planning and developmentally- developmentally- developmentally-
management of sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching
developmentally and learning and learning and learning
sequenced teaching and process as shown process as shown process as shown
learning processes to in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
meet curriculum rating of 8 rating of 7 rating of 6
requirements and varied 7.5%
teaching contexts. Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 2-3 Submitted 1 lesson
lessons as lessons as as evidenced by
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV shown in MOV 1
1 and 2 and 1 and 2 and and/or 2 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other of the other of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 8. Reviewed with Quality Consistently Frequently led Occasionally led
Services Planning colleagues, teacher and participated in collaborative collaborative
learner feedback to plan, LACs/FGDs/meetin reviews of teacher reviews of teacher
facilitate and enrich gs to discuss and learner and learner
teaching practice. teacher/learner feedback as feedback as
feedback to enrich evidenced by the evidenced by the
instruction as MOV submitted MOV submitted
shown in the MOV
submitted

7.5% Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2

collaborative collaborative collaborative
reviews of teacher reviews of teacher reviews of teacher
and learner and learner and learner
feedback as feedback as feedback as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Advised and guided Quality Consistently Frequently advised Occasionally
Services colleagues in the advised colleagues colleagues in the advised colleagues
selection, organization, in the selection, selection, in the selection,
development and use of organization, organization, organization,
appropriate teaching development and development and development and
and learning resources, appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of
including ICT, to teaching and teaching and teaching and
address specific learning learning resources learning resources learning resources
goals. as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
7.5% MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2

teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning resources learning resources learning resources
as evidenced by at as evidenced by at as evidenced by at
least 1 of the least 1 of the least 1 of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Worked Quality Consistently Frequently reviewed Occasionally
Services and Reporting collaboratively with reviewed collaboratively reviewed
colleagues to review the collaboratively assessment tools collaboratively
design, selection, assessment tools with colleagues as assessment tools
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Worked Quality Consistently Frequently reviewed Occasionally
Services and Reporting collaboratively with reviewed collaboratively reviewed
colleagues to review the collaboratively assessment tools collaboratively
design, selection, assessment tools with colleagues as assessment tools
organization and use of with colleagues as shown in the MOV with colleagues as
a range of effective shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV
diagnostic, formative 7.5% submitted submitted
and summative
assessment strategies Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
consistent with assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools
curriculum requirements. as evidently shown as evidently shown as evidently shown
in any of the in any of the in any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 4. Assessment 11. Interpreted Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Services and Reporting collaboratively collaborated with collaborated with collaborated with
monitoring and colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the
evaluation strategies of interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of
attainment data to assessment data as assessment data as assessment data as
support learner progress shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
7.5%
and achievement. submitted submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2
different types of of the same kind of of the same kind of
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 12. Applied skills in the Quality Consistently applied Frequently applied Occasionally
Services effective communication skills in the effective skills in the effective applied skills in the
of learner needs, communication of communication of effective
progress and learner needs and learner needs and communication of
achievement to key progress to parents/ progress to parents/ learner needs and
stakeholders, including guardians as shown guardians as shown progress to parents/
parents/guardians. in the MOV in the MOV guardians as shown
7.5% submitted submitted in the MOV
submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2

of the acceptable MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Services related works/activities performed special performed special performed special
that contribute to the tasks and/or tasks and/or tasks and/or
teaching-learning assignments as assignments as assignments as
process. shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
10% submitted submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted only 3 Submitted only 2
different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory NAME OF THE TEACHER NAME OF T
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Ra
NT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

NG TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Modeled effective evidence was
applications of shown
content knowledge
within and across
curriculum teaching
areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating
of 5
Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
as evidenced by evidence was
MOV 1 from shown
colleagues and
supported by any 1
of the other MOV
given

Proposedaction No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

research with evidence was
colleagues shown

Submitted any 1 No acceptable

MOV evidence was
shown
Proposed the No acceptable
research report evidence was
within the rating shown
period

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Demonstrated No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
effective teaching evidence was
strategies to shown
promote critical and
creative thinking, as
well as other higher-
order thinking skills
as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 5
 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
as evidently shown evidence was
in MOV 1 and shown
supported by any of
the other MOV
given

No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Modeled and evidence was
shared effective shown
classroom
management
strategies that
engage learners in
activities/ tasks
done in different
physical learning
environments as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 5
Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
supported by any of evidence was
the acceptable shown
MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Exhibited effective No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
and constructive evidence was
behavior shown
management skills
by applying positive
and non-violent
discipline to ensure
learning-focused
environments
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 5

Applied any of the No acceptable

given strategies as evidence was
observed in only 1 shown
lesson

Worked with No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

colleagues but no evidence was
evidence of sharing shown
with others

Submitted at least 1 No acceptable

lesson, as evidence was
evidenced by either shown
MOV 2 or 3 but no
evidence of sharing
 Submitted at least 1 No acceptable
lesson, as evidence was
evidenced by either shown
MOV 2 or 3 but no
evidence of sharing
with others

Developed and No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

applied effective evidence was
strategies showing shown
developmentally-
sequenced teaching
and learning
process as shown
in MOV 1 with a
rating of 5

Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable

as evidenced by evidence was
any 1 of the shown
acceptable MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Rarely led No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
collaborative evidence was
reviews of teacher shown
and learner
feedback as
evidenced by the
MOV submitted

Submitted 1 No acceptable
collaborative review evidence was
of teacher and shown
learner feedback as
evidently shown in
any of the
acceptable MOV

Rarely advised No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

colleagues in the evidence was
selection, shown
organization,
development and
appropriate use of
teaching and
learning resources
as shown in the
MOV submitted

Submitted 1 No acceptable
teaching and evidence was
learning resource shown
as evidenced by
any of the
acceptable MOV

Rarely reviewed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

collaboratively evidence was
assessment tools shown
with colleagues as
 Rarely reviewed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
collaboratively evidence was
assessment tools shown
with colleagues as
shown in the MOV
submitted

Submitted 1 No acceptable
assessment tool as evidence was
evidently shown in shown
any of the
acceptable MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Rarely collaborated No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
with colleagues in evidence was
the interpretation of shown
assessment data as
shown in the MOV
submitted

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

the MOV evidence was
shown

Rarely applied skills No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

in the effective evidence was
communication of shown
learner needs and
progress to parents/
guardians as shown
in the MOV
submitted

Submitted any 1
MOV

Rarely performed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

special tasks and/or evidence was
assignments as shown
shown in the MOV
submitted

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

the acceptable evidence was
MOV shown

RATING FOR OVER-ALL

#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

NAME OF THE RATER NAME OF THE APPROVING AUTHORITY

Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (I
Master Teacher I-IV (Highly Proficient Teach

Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period:

Weight per Weight per Numeri

KRA Objectives
KRA Objective Q
Objective 1 7.5% 0
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 0
Objective 3 7.5% 0
Objective 4 7.5% 0
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 0
Objective 6 7.5% 0
Objective 7 7.5% 0
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 0
Objective 9 7.5% 0
Objective 10 7.5% 0
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 0
Objective 12 7.5% 0
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 0

NAME OF THE RATEE NAME OF RATER

Ratee Rater
EVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
y Proficient Teacher)

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

Numerical Ratings
Score
E T Ave
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Final Rating #DIV/0!
Adjectival Rating #DIV/0!

NAME OF RATER NAME OF APPROVING AUTHORITY

Rater Approving Authority