Reduced Economic Welfare

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Reduced inequality[edit]

Progressive taxation may reduce economic inequality. This effect occurs even when the tax revenue
isn't redistributed.[citation needed]

Reduced economic welfare[edit]


Most taxes (see below) have side effects that reduce economic welfare, either by mandating
unproductive labor (compliance costs) or by creating distortions to economic incentives (deadweight
loss and perverse incentives).[citation needed]
Cost of compliance[edit]
Although governments must spend money on tax collection activities, some of the costs, particularly
for keeping records and filling out forms, are borne by businesses and by private individuals. These
are collectively called costs of compliance. More complex tax systems tend to have higher
compliance costs. This fact can be used as the basis for practical or moral arguments in favor of tax
simplification (such as the FairTax or OneTax, and some flat tax proposals).
Deadweight costs[edit]

Diagram illustrating deadweight costs of taxes


In the absence of negative externalities, the introduction of taxes into a market reduces economic
efficiency by causing deadweight loss. In a competitive market the price of a particular economic
good adjusts to ensure that all trades which benefit both the buyer and the seller of a good occur.
The introduction of a tax causes the price received by the seller to be less than the cost to the buyer
by the amount of the tax. This causes fewer transactions to occur, which reduces economic welfare;
the individuals or businesses involved are less well off than before the tax. The tax burden and the
amount of deadweight cost is dependent on the elasticity of supply and demand for the good taxed.
Most taxes—including income tax and sales tax—can have significant deadweight costs. The only
way to avoid deadweight costs in an economy that is generally competitive is to refrain from taxes
that change economic incentives. Such taxes include the land value tax,[50] where the tax is on a
good in completely inelastic supply, a lump sum tax such as a poll tax (head tax) which is paid by all
adults regardless of their choices. Arguably a windfall profits tax which is entirely unanticipated can
also fall into this category.
Deadweight loss does not account for the effect taxes have in leveling the business playing field.
Businesses that have more money are better suited to fend off competition. It is common that an
industry with a small amount of very large corporations has a very high barrier of entry for new
entrants coming into the marketplace. This is due to the fact that the larger the corporation, the
better its position to negotiate with suppliers. Also, larger companies may be able to operate at low
or even negative profits for extended periods of time, thus pushing out competition. More
progressive taxation of profits, however, would reduce such barriers for new entrants, thereby
increasing competition and ultimately benefiting consumers. [51]

You might also like