Progressive taxation can reduce economic inequality even when tax revenue is not redistributed. However, most taxes reduce economic welfare by requiring unproductive labor for tax compliance or creating distortions to economic incentives. Compliance costs refer to the costs borne by businesses and individuals for keeping tax records and filling out forms. More complex tax systems have higher compliance costs. Deadweight loss occurs when taxes reduce the number of economic transactions that benefit both buyers and sellers, reducing overall economic welfare. While deadweight loss does not consider the effect of leveling the business playing field, more progressive taxation of profits could increase competition by reducing barriers to entry for new businesses.
Progressive taxation can reduce economic inequality even when tax revenue is not redistributed. However, most taxes reduce economic welfare by requiring unproductive labor for tax compliance or creating distortions to economic incentives. Compliance costs refer to the costs borne by businesses and individuals for keeping tax records and filling out forms. More complex tax systems have higher compliance costs. Deadweight loss occurs when taxes reduce the number of economic transactions that benefit both buyers and sellers, reducing overall economic welfare. While deadweight loss does not consider the effect of leveling the business playing field, more progressive taxation of profits could increase competition by reducing barriers to entry for new businesses.
Progressive taxation can reduce economic inequality even when tax revenue is not redistributed. However, most taxes reduce economic welfare by requiring unproductive labor for tax compliance or creating distortions to economic incentives. Compliance costs refer to the costs borne by businesses and individuals for keeping tax records and filling out forms. More complex tax systems have higher compliance costs. Deadweight loss occurs when taxes reduce the number of economic transactions that benefit both buyers and sellers, reducing overall economic welfare. While deadweight loss does not consider the effect of leveling the business playing field, more progressive taxation of profits could increase competition by reducing barriers to entry for new businesses.
Progressive taxation can reduce economic inequality even when tax revenue is not redistributed. However, most taxes reduce economic welfare by requiring unproductive labor for tax compliance or creating distortions to economic incentives. Compliance costs refer to the costs borne by businesses and individuals for keeping tax records and filling out forms. More complex tax systems have higher compliance costs. Deadweight loss occurs when taxes reduce the number of economic transactions that benefit both buyers and sellers, reducing overall economic welfare. While deadweight loss does not consider the effect of leveling the business playing field, more progressive taxation of profits could increase competition by reducing barriers to entry for new businesses.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
Reduced inequality[edit]
Progressive taxation may reduce economic inequality. This effect occurs even when the tax revenue isn't redistributed.[citation needed]
Reduced economic welfare[edit]
Most taxes (see below) have side effects that reduce economic welfare, either by mandating unproductive labor (compliance costs) or by creating distortions to economic incentives (deadweight loss and perverse incentives).[citation needed] Cost of compliance[edit] Although governments must spend money on tax collection activities, some of the costs, particularly for keeping records and filling out forms, are borne by businesses and by private individuals. These are collectively called costs of compliance. More complex tax systems tend to have higher compliance costs. This fact can be used as the basis for practical or moral arguments in favor of tax simplification (such as the FairTax or OneTax, and some flat tax proposals). Deadweight costs[edit]
Diagram illustrating deadweight costs of taxes
In the absence of negative externalities, the introduction of taxes into a market reduces economic efficiency by causing deadweight loss. In a competitive market the price of a particular economic good adjusts to ensure that all trades which benefit both the buyer and the seller of a good occur. The introduction of a tax causes the price received by the seller to be less than the cost to the buyer by the amount of the tax. This causes fewer transactions to occur, which reduces economic welfare; the individuals or businesses involved are less well off than before the tax. The tax burden and the amount of deadweight cost is dependent on the elasticity of supply and demand for the good taxed. Most taxes—including income tax and sales tax—can have significant deadweight costs. The only way to avoid deadweight costs in an economy that is generally competitive is to refrain from taxes that change economic incentives. Such taxes include the land value tax,[50] where the tax is on a good in completely inelastic supply, a lump sum tax such as a poll tax (head tax) which is paid by all adults regardless of their choices. Arguably a windfall profits tax which is entirely unanticipated can also fall into this category. Deadweight loss does not account for the effect taxes have in leveling the business playing field. Businesses that have more money are better suited to fend off competition. It is common that an industry with a small amount of very large corporations has a very high barrier of entry for new entrants coming into the marketplace. This is due to the fact that the larger the corporation, the better its position to negotiate with suppliers. Also, larger companies may be able to operate at low or even negative profits for extended periods of time, thus pushing out competition. More progressive taxation of profits, however, would reduce such barriers for new entrants, thereby increasing competition and ultimately benefiting consumers. [51]