The document discusses tax incidence, which is who ultimately pays the tax burden. It states that while taxes may legally be collected from businesses, the marketplace determines who really pays in the form of higher costs that get passed on. For example, a tax on employers will likely impact employees over time in the form of lower wages. The party with the least flexibility, or inelastic demand, tends to bear most of the tax burden. Whether the buyer or seller absorbs more of a tax depends on the elasticities of supply and demand - the more inelastic party absorbs more. For a competitive firm, the tax burden gets distributed among workers, investors, landowners, and customers depending on each group's elasticity.
The document discusses tax incidence, which is who ultimately pays the tax burden. It states that while taxes may legally be collected from businesses, the marketplace determines who really pays in the form of higher costs that get passed on. For example, a tax on employers will likely impact employees over time in the form of lower wages. The party with the least flexibility, or inelastic demand, tends to bear most of the tax burden. Whether the buyer or seller absorbs more of a tax depends on the elasticities of supply and demand - the more inelastic party absorbs more. For a competitive firm, the tax burden gets distributed among workers, investors, landowners, and customers depending on each group's elasticity.
The document discusses tax incidence, which is who ultimately pays the tax burden. It states that while taxes may legally be collected from businesses, the marketplace determines who really pays in the form of higher costs that get passed on. For example, a tax on employers will likely impact employees over time in the form of lower wages. The party with the least flexibility, or inelastic demand, tends to bear most of the tax burden. Whether the buyer or seller absorbs more of a tax depends on the elasticities of supply and demand - the more inelastic party absorbs more. For a competitive firm, the tax burden gets distributed among workers, investors, landowners, and customers depending on each group's elasticity.
The document discusses tax incidence, which is who ultimately pays the tax burden. It states that while taxes may legally be collected from businesses, the marketplace determines who really pays in the form of higher costs that get passed on. For example, a tax on employers will likely impact employees over time in the form of lower wages. The party with the least flexibility, or inelastic demand, tends to bear most of the tax burden. Whether the buyer or seller absorbs more of a tax depends on the elasticities of supply and demand - the more inelastic party absorbs more. For a competitive firm, the tax burden gets distributed among workers, investors, landowners, and customers depending on each group's elasticity.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1
Incidence[edit]
Main article: Tax incidence
See also: Effect of taxes and subsidies on price Law establishes from whom a tax is collected. In many countries, taxes are imposed on business (such as corporate taxes or portions of payroll taxes). However, who ultimately pays the tax (the tax "burden") is determined by the marketplace as taxes become embedded into production costs. Economic theory suggests that the economic effect of tax does not necessarily fall at the point where it is legally levied. For instance, a tax on employment paid by employers will impact on the employee, at least in the long run. The greatest share of the tax burden tends to fall on the most inelastic factor involved—the part of the transaction which is affected least by a change in price. So, for instance, a tax on wages in a town will (at least in the long run) affect property-owners in that area. Depending on how quantities supplied and demanded vary with price (the "elasticities" of supply and demand), a tax can be absorbed by the seller (in the form of lower pre-tax prices), or by the buyer (in the form of higher post-tax prices). If the elasticity of supply is low, more of the tax will be paid by the supplier. If the elasticity of demand is low, more will be paid by the customer; and, contrariwise for the cases where those elasticities are high. If the seller is a competitive firm, the tax burden is distributed over the factors of production depending on the elasticities thereof; this includes workers (in the form of lower wages), capital investors (in the form of loss to shareholders), landowners (in the form of lower rents), entrepreneurs (in the form of lower wages of superintendence) and customers (in the form of higher prices). To show this relationship, suppose that the market price of a product is $1.00, and that a $0.50 tax is imposed on the product that, by law, is to be collected from the seller. If the product has an elastic demand, a greater portion of the tax will be absorbed by the seller. This is because goods with elastic demand cause a large decline in quantity demanded for a small increase in price. Therefore, in order to stabilize sales, the seller absorbs more of the additional tax burden. For example, the seller might drop the price of the product to $0.70 so that, after adding in the tax, the buyer pays a total of $1.20, or $0.20 more than he did before the $0.50 tax was imposed. In this example, the buyer has paid $0.20 of the $0.50 tax (in the form of a post-tax price) and the seller has paid the remaining $0.30 (in the form of a lower pre-tax price).[49]