A Pre-Feasibility Study of Super Iwa Khola Small Hydropower Project
A Pre-Feasibility Study of Super Iwa Khola Small Hydropower Project
A Pre-Feasibility Study of Super Iwa Khola Small Hydropower Project
TABLE OF CONTENTS
COPYRIGHT ………………………………………………………………………………… I
PREFACE ……………………………………………………………………………………. II
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS …………………………………………………………………. III
ABSTRACT …………………………………………………………………………………. IV
SALIENT FEATURES ………………………………………………………………………. V
ABBREVIATIONS ………………………………………………………………………… VII
1. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................3
1.1 BACKGROUND.............................................................................................................3
1.2 OBJECTIVES OF STUDY.............................................................................................4
1.3 SCOPE OF PROJECT.....................................................................................................5
1.4 APPROACH METHODOLOGY....................................................................................6
1.4.1 DESK STUDY.......................................................................................................6
1.4.2 HYDROLOGICAL STUDY.................................................................................6
1.5 LITERATURE REVIEW/GUIDELINES.......................................................................6
2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT AREA............................................................................7
2.1 TYPE OF PROJECT.......................................................................................................7
2.2 LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE...................................................................................7
2.3 ACCESSIBILITY............................................................................................................8
2.4 TOPOGRAPHY AND BASIN PHYSIOGRAPHY........................................................8
2.5 CLIMATE CHARACTERISTICS..................................................................................8
2.6 AVAILABILITY OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL.................................................8
3. HYDROLOGICAL ANALYSIS..............................................................................................9
3.1 OBJECTIVES..................................................................................................................9
3.2 DRAINAGE AREA CHARACTERISTICS...................................................................9
3.3 HYDROLOGICAL AND METEOROLOGICAL DATA..............................................9
3.4 LONG TERM STREAM FLOW ANALYSIS..............................................................10
3.5 FLOOD FLOW ANALYSIS.........................................................................................10
4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND DESIGN...........................................................................15
4.1 PROJECT LAYOUT.....................................................................................................15
4.2 DESIGN OF HYDRAULIC STRUCTURES...............................................................15
4.2.1 HEADWORK......................................................................................................15
4.2.2 SETTLING BASIN.............................................................................................15
4.2.3 TUNNEL.............................................................................................................16
4.2.4 SURGE TANK AND PENSTOCK.....................................................................16
4.2.5 TURBINE............................................................................................................16
4.2.6 POWER HOUSE.................................................................................................16
5. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS.......................................................................................................17
6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................19
APPENDIX-A
APPENDIX-B
APPENDIX-C
2|Page
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
Nepal is endowed with precious water resources that accounts for an economical potential of
43000 MW (National Water Plan 2005), of which only less than 1.5% has been harnessed so
far. The perennial nature of rivers and steep gradients of country’s topography provide an ideal
condition for the development of hydroelectric projects. National Water Plan (2005), has
recognized that water is one of the principal physical resources that can play a major role in
enhancing the pace of overall development of Nepal. Nevertheless, despite serious efforts by
concerned agencies, development of such hydroelectric projects has not gained sufficient
speed, principally due to insufficient funds and basic infrastructure facilities. As a result, Nepal
is suffering from heavy load shedding and acute shortage of electricity which is badly affecting
people’s daily life in general, and country’s development activities and industrial growth in
particular. NEA’s latest peak load forecast for integrated national power system (INPS) for the
period 2004‐2020 shows that peak load demand in the system could grow by 8% every year
based on current GDP growth of 4%.
Electricity production from hydropower has been the first renewable source used to generate
electricity. Hydropower electricity is environment friendly - no pollution in air or in land, and,
is also the most efficient method of all. Hydropower is the major source of Electricity in Nepal.
World's 20% of electricity is by Hydropower. In contrary, 96% of electricity in Nepal is by
Hydropower. It shows that Nepal has a huge potential of hydropower. The hydropower
development has been seriously affected by the inefficiency, politicization and mismanagement
in state owned electricity utility (Nepal Electricity Corporation/NEA) as well as in its line
ministry.
Hydropower uses the power of water to produce energy. Flowing water has three types of
energy heads, namely- potential head, pressure head, and kinetic head. While flowing, one type
of energy head can be increased at the cost of others depending on conditions. The running
water with one or a combination of more than one types of energy heads causes spinning of a
turbine that runs generator, which produces electricity.
3|Page
Some half century ago, water resources expert Dr. Hari Man Shrestha conducted an
academic research for his Ph.D. degree in Russia, which revealed that theoretically Nepal could
generate 83,000 megawatts hydropower, of which 42,000 megawatts was economically and
technically feasible. However, a recent study conducted by the team of Institute of Engineering,
Tribhuvan University, Nepal led by Prof. Dr. Narendra Man Shakya has shown that Nepal has
a total potential to generate 53,000 megawatts of hydropower in Nepal. Despite the vast
amount of source, the development of hydropower that started some hundred years ago has not
been very encouraging, averaging about roughly 6 MW per year despite being touted of its
theoretical potential.
The annual peak power demand of Integrated Nepal Power System (INPS) was 946.10 MW in
2011. There is a power deficit in the country resulting in daily load shedding (the situation
improving in the wet season and becoming bad in the dry season).The electricity demand has
been increasing in Nepal by about 7-9% per year, and only about 40 % of population has access
to electricity through the grid and off grid system. Most of the power plants are run- of-river
type with energy available in excess of the in-country demand during the monsoon season and
deficit during the dry season. This imbalance clearly stresses the need for storage projects.
4|Page
objective of this project is not only to analyze and design the suitable hydropower project
effectively and efficiently but also to tackle the practical problems that arise according the field
conditions and to enhance the skill of the engineering.
The major objectives of offering Small Hydropower Project as project work for BE students in
the final year are:-
To identify the possible hydropower sites for development in the given river basin
catchments and find out the various alternatives sites for development.
To work out a comparison chart based on head, flow, length etc. for the various sites as
identified on the map.
To choose a viable site from comparison list and prepare detail scheme layouts and
estimates of the project on a feasibility level.
To analyze existing hydrological and meteorological data.
To prepare and ecological, environment and sociological impact report of the
project and to identify any harmful impacts of the project based on the desk study.
To prepare the layouts of the project at the feasibility level.
To gain the skill on the design of hydropower projects.
To familiarize the practical problems likely to face while designing and undertaking
such projects.
To be familiar with the designing methods of different components of a hydropower
projects.
To prepare a volume of comprehensive project report.
Due to contracted semester, it could not become possible to carry out the detailed surveying
work of the project work. There are two gauging stations in Taplejung district. This compelled
us to use various indirect methods for hydrological analysis. The detailing of the headwork site
i.e. topographic map, cross sections of the River, etc. are provided by our supervisor Assit.
Prof. Saraswati Thapa.
Attempts were made to design various components accurately but this may not fulfill all the
design criteria due to the lack of available time and resources.
5|Page
Hydropower is one of the much diversified natures of Civil Engineering projects. There is no
unified guideline. The designs were carried out referring several materials. Hence, the outputs
may not fulfill all the standards.
6|Page
As much as our practice, study, knowledge and findings, we describe about different
methods for hydrological analysis. To make the project economical, sustainable, and efficient
optimization of alternatives are essential. Books and guidelines, taken are represented in
references.
7|Page
Fig1: Catchment Area Showing Headworks
2.3 ACCESSIBILITY
The intake site is located in between Tharpu VDC, Panchthar and Sablankhu VDC, Taplejung.
Headworks is located in Sablankhu, Taplejung. No direct road linkage exists upto the
headworks. The proposed powerhouse also lies in Sablankhu.
The catchment area of Super Iwa Khola is elongated in North-south direction. The catchment
area of Super Iwa Khola at proposed headwork site is 58.93 sq.km as measured on the 1:25000
scale topographical maps published by Survey Department, GoN.
The upper reach of the basin is mainly covered by fairly dense mixed forest and dense mixed
forest. Very small portion is agriculture land.
8|Page
3. HYDROLOGICAL ANALYSIS
As Hydropower is the generation of electricity from water, there should be done a detailed
hydrological study. In prefeasibility study of any hydropower project, it is necessary to have
long term historical data of rainfall, flow data in the whole catchment. The longer the
hydrological record, the more reliable is the estimation of design parameter for the project. For
Super Iwa Khola Small Hydropower project, we have used the gauging stations which are
located in Eastern Nepal.
3.1 OBJECTIVES
Hydrological investigations performed for design of headworks of run-of-river hydropower
projects were aimed at achieving the following objectives:
1. Providing input for the selection of return period for inflow design flood,
construction diversion flood and low flows.
2. Developing flow duration curves mean monthly hydrographs, rating curves and water
surface profiles at the headworks.
3.2 DRAINAGE AREA CHARACTERISTICS
Iwa River is the boarder river of Panchthar and Talejung districts. Iwa River is the main
tributary of Kabeli River that originates from the base of Kanchanjunga Himalayan range.
It is a perennial river with snow basin. Its catchment is in hilly and mountainous region
thus has contribution of snow for its discharge pattern.
The catchment area of Super Iwa Khola is elongated in North-south direction. The
catchment area of Super Iwa Khola at proposed headwork site is 58.93 sq.km as measured on
the 1:25000 scale topographical maps published by Survey Department, GoN.
Information on the physiographic characteristics of the drainage area, such as the latitude,
altitude, area and shape of the basin, length of main channel, gradient of channel and basin,
etc., were derived from topographic maps 1:25,000.These data were used in the calculation of
various hydrological parameters.
3.3 HYDROLOGICAL AND METEOROLOGICAL DATA
Hydro-meteorological data from the hydrological and meteorological stations existing in and
around the river basin were obtained from publications of the Department of Hydrology and
Meteorology (DHM), GoN.
9|Page
3.4 LONG TERM STREAM FLOW ANALYSIS
The long term flow analysis is carried out to obtain the average discharge that will be
available for us in the river for the useful life of the project .This analysis provides us with
the average monthly discharge and then these values can be used to obtain the flow
duration curve and design discharge of the project.
There are various methods of flood analysis. We generally classify them into two broad
groups namely:
A. For Ungauged Basin:
10 | P a g e
The various method for flood analysis for ungauged basin are as follows:
a. WECS/DHM
b. Rational Method
c. Snyder’s Method
d. B. D. Richard’s Method
e. Modified Dicken’s Method
f. Fuller’s Method
B. For Gauged Basin:
The various method for flood analysis for gauged basin are as follows:
a. Gumbel’s Method
b. Log Pearson Type III
c. Exponential distribution (Poisson type)
A. For Ungauged basins
Ungauged basins are the basin which do not consists of any measuring instruments in it and
flood flow analysis is done by empirical method based on catchment area, topography,
geological conditions, etc. Following are some of the methods used:
Regional method:
Following are the regional method commonly adopted in Nepal:
a. WECS/DHM method (Water and Energy Commission Secretariats)
The WECS/DHM method (WECS/DHM, 1990) may be used for flood prediction for
small hydropower project located in ungauged basins of Nepal. Using this method, 2-
year (medium flood) and 100-year floods for maximum daily and maximum
instantaneous flood peaks shall be computed from regression equations of the form:
Qaby= α(A3000 + 1)β
α = 1.8767 for 2 years
= 14.63 for 100 years
β = 0.8783 for 2 years
= 0.7342 for 100 years
2
A3000 = Basin area km below 3000 m elevation
11 | P a g e
σ = ln ( Q100
Q2 )
/2.32
Empirical Methods
Empirical formulae shall be used only when a more accurate method for flood
prediction cannot be applied because of lack of data. For flood prediction in ungauged
basins of Nepal, the empirical formulae discussed in the following sections may be
used with great caution and proper justification.
Below are some of the empirical methods used for the computation of flood flow:
b. Modified Dicken’s Method
3
Using Dicken’s method, the T year Flood discharge QT in m /s shall be determined as
0.7
QT =CA
12 | P a g e
Where;
2
A is the total basin area in km and CT the modified Dicken‟s constant proposed by the
Irrigation Research Institute, Roorkee, India, based on frequency studies on Himalayan
rivers.
c. Fuller’s Method
Although developed for basins in the United States of America, Fuller’s may be
used to estimate food discharges in the ungauged basins of Nepal for comparisons
purposes.
3
Using this method, the maximum instantaneous flood discharge Qmax in m /s shall be
estimated as:
−0.3
A
Qmax = QT[1 + 2
2.59( ) ]
3
Where QT is the maximum 24 hour flood with frequency once in T years in m /s and A
is the basin area in sq. km. QT shall be given by
QT = Qav
3
In which Qav is the yearly average 24 hour flood over a number of years, in m /s, given
by
0.8
Qav=CfA
Where Cf is Fuller’s coefficient varying between 0.18 to 1.88. For Nepal, Cf may be
taken as the average of those values, i.e. equal to 1.03.
N ∑ (z− ź )3
Coefficient of skewness of variate Z : C s=
( N−1 ) ( N −2)σ z3
For Z- Series, for any recurrence interval T,
ZT = ź + Kzσ z
Kz = Frequency Factor which depends upon recurrence interval and coefficient of
skewness Cs.
XT = antilog(ZT) , is the peak flood for return period T years.
14 | P a g e
4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND DESIGN
4.2.1 HEADWORK
There are two proposed weir in this project; small weir in small river and large weir in Iwa
Khola river. The small weir is vertical drop weir of length 10 m. with a top width and bottom
width of crest about 0.1 m and 0.6 m. The weir has maximum floor thickness of 0.7m at d/s
side. The depth of u/s pile is 2.58m from river bed level with u/s and d/s cutoff of 1 and 1.5m.
Its calculation is shown in Appendix-B. The Undersluice portion for small river has a length of
3m with depth of u/s pile 1.8m and u/s and d/s cutoff of 1m and 1.5m. Its thickness of d/s floor
is about 1m. Its calculation is shown in Appendix-B. The design of small intake is given in
Appendix-B.
Similarly, the large weir in Iwa Khola is sloping glacis weir of length 15m and undersluce of
length 4m. Its detailed calculation is shown in Appendix-B. and Appendix B. The height of
weir is adopted as 1m and crest shutter of 0.5m with gate opening of 0.13m. The detail design
is presented in Appendix-B.
4.2.3 TUNNEL
About 1572 m long of diameter 2 meter passes through the Right Bank Hill of Iwa River at a
uniform slope of 1 in 750and connects to the surge tank. The optimization of tunnel is shown in
Appendix-B.
4.2.5 TURBINE
The turbine was selected on the basis of head and discharge graph provided in Appendix-B.
Two units of pelton turbine are provided. The overall efficiency of the pelton turbine provided
is 85 %. The details of the calculations are illustrated in Appendix B.
16 | P a g e
5. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
The economic analysis forms a criterion for the selection of alternatives. For making the
decision of either constructing or not of the alternative, economic viability is one of the
major criteria. The revenue earned from the project has to be assessed based on the Project’s
available energy and the anticipated rate of sales of power. These are equated against the
recurring costs, which consists mainly of the interest on investment, depreciation of plant
and equipment, operation and maintenance expenses, to arrive at the income surpluses. A
rate of Rs 4.8 per KWhr and Rs 8.4 per KWhr as suggested by Nepal
Electricity Authority (NEA) has been utilized to perform the economic analysis in the
report.
Economic analyses rely on four types of tests, all of which employ the cash flow discounting
technique. The discounting of the cost and benefit flows of a project is the only way to give
proper recognition to the time value of money. The technique can briefly be summarized as
the calculation of the present value of future costs and benefits at a given discount (interest)
rate.
(i) The economic Internal Rate of Return (EIRR) i.e. the interest rate which equalizes
the present values of the benefits and cost streams of over the life of the project.
(ii) The Benefit Cost ratio (B/C ratio) a comparison of the present value of benefits to
the costs based on an assumed test rate of discount and
(iii) The Net Present Value (NPV) or the difference in present value of benefits and
costs, also based on an assumed discount rate.
(iv) The Payback Period method i.e. the time for which the project finally meets the
breakeven point and starts making profit for the rest of the design life.
The interest rate which equalizes the present values of benefits and cost streams over
17 | P a g e
the life of the project. The IRR value is calculated as 34.14%, i.e. the interest rate of
the project should be greater than MARR which is taken as 12 % for the project to be
feasible.
It is the ratio of benefit to cost in present value of future cost or future value of
present cost or in annuity. B/C ratio of Super Iwa Khola Hydropower project is 1.62.
The net present value calculated is 284596457, which is greater than zero. Since
this is greater than zero, it means the project is in benefit.
It is the time for return of capital investment. The payback period of the project 9
years.
The detail computations of costing, estimating and economic analysis is done in Appendix- C.
18 | P a g e
6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Super Iwa Khola Hydropower Project, as indicated by present level of study, is attractive
project from technical, economic and environmental aspects. Even though construction
works seem to be difficult due to the remoteness of site, the location of headwork site,
powerhouse site and alignment of water conveyance system is favorable from geological
point of view. Being a high head and low discharge plant, the project will be cheap in
construction.
With negligible impact on physical, biological and aquatic life and limited interference of
human life, the project is environment friendly. With the Benefit/Cost ratio of 1.62, and
internal rate of return on equity of 34.14%, the project is financially very attractive.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the above conclusion, it is recommended that the project should be implemented
for the development of energy sector in Nepal. However, before the project is taken up for
constructions, following additional works are recommended to be performed to avoid any
unexpected cost and time overrun. To strengthen the hydrological parameters, data collection
and processing should be continued. The geological/geotechnical investigation was mainly
limited to surface geological exploration. Environment Impact Assessment will be needed to
prepare mitigation measures in project affected area.
An access road to the Project is of immediate importance for the overall implementation of
the Project. Therefore, necessary steps must be undertaken to advance the access road
studies to a detailed design level. Further, the concerned agencies should start the
implementation of the access road at the earliest such that it shall be ready at the time of
initiation of civil construction works of the main hydroelectric project.
Once the Power Purchase Agreement is made, financial arrangement could be made with
local finance companies to complete this project in time.
19 | P a g e
20 | P a g e