International Journal of Mechanical and Production

Engineering Research and Development (IJMPERD)

ISSN(P): 2249-6890; ISSN(E): 2249-8001
Vol. 9, Issue 2, Apr 2019, 61-74
© TJPRC Pvt. Ltd.

OPTIMISATION OF FUEL CONSUMPTION BY TAGUCHI METHOD

IN LOGISTICS SYSTEMS

BENRAJESH. P1 & JOHN RAJAN. A2

1
Research Scholar, Department of Mechanical and Production Engineering,
Sathyabama University, Chennai, India
2
Professor, Department of Manufacturing Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering (SMEC),
Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India
ABSTRACT

Research studies on fuel consumption of logistics systems for developing countries is relatively less explored in
par with developed countries. Day by day, the consumption of fossil fuels is increasing due to dense traffic, heavy cargo
loads, evolving of e-retailing services, erratic drivers etc. This research work considers six key factors for analysis, with
an intent of reducing fuel consumption of Logistics Service Providers(LSP). The data collected from logistics service
providers, located in India through email; and then it is analysed using Taguchi Method, to find the high influencing
factor on fuel consumption to the greater levels. The identified six factors are dead weight of vehicle, mileage per litre,

Original Article
percentage of fuel spent in idle time, span of distance covered, payload of vehicle and average time spent in traffic.
The results are obtained based on the condition: smaller the better and it is validated by the LSP.

KEYWORDS: Fuel Consumption, Taguchi Method, Logistics Service Providers (LSP), Green Logistics & Sustainability

Received: Jan 08, 2019; Accepted: Jan 28, 2019; Published: Feb 05, 2019; Paper Id.: IJMPERDAPR20196

1. INTRODUCTION

Traditionally, logistics service selections have been impelled by minimizing cost, maximizing
profitability, or achieving customer service targets. As companies are including the sustainability dimension into
their business objectives, it provides a soaring interest in curtailing the social and environmental impact of their
product and operations. Since 2000, many Logistics Service Providers (LSP) are inching towards developing
mobility; which are sustainable and demands less fuel. This research article, did a detailed analysis on reducing the
fuel consumption of trucks; involved in transporting food grains from farmers to storehouses and then to the
Distribution shops. Six factors of Fuel consumption, are reckoned to optimize it by Taguchi Method.

During the early twentieth century, the global economy coined new terms such as: globalized marketing,
market liberalization, Technology outsourcing, Knowledge outsources and Process outsourcing. It increases the
dependency of every business activity on logistics. The key objective of logistics is to deliver goods to the
customers with high effectiveness and efficiency. Effectiveness (Liu Ping, 2009) is the process of merging logistic
process with the company’s objectives whereas efficiency is the process of evaluating the logistic performance
(Lijmatainen. H, et al, 2012) by various metrics.

Moreover, the depth of investigation of logistic activities, happened in developing countries such as India
and Asia Pacific is slightly lower than the developed countries namely: the US and Europe. Therefore, this article

www.tjprc.org SCOPUS Indexed Journal [email protected]

62 Benrajesh. P & John Rajan. A

investigated on a case study of a logistic activity happened in India.

The objective of this article is to: design an L27 orthogonal array; Measuring the deviation between experimental
value and calculated value (based on Taguchi method) for fuel consumption; Identifying the optimum parameter settings
for achieving low fuel consumption.

2. LITERATURE REVIEW

This section summarizes the functions of logistics service providers and the key aims of green logistics.
Moreover, it also provides a light on the effect of fuel consumption.

2.1 Functions of Logistic Service Providers (LSP)

Logistic service providers (Perotti. S, et al 2012) are said to be third-party logistics; wherein the LSP (Lieb. K. J,
Lieb.R.C.2010; Fleiscmann. M, et al, 2000) is dealing with freight forwarding, Transportation, cross-docking, storage,
preservation, and inventory. However, transportation (Anable et al 2012; Ceren Altumas et al, 2013; Geberit annual report,
2015) was the primary source for emission which includes 13 percent of greenhouse gas emissions and 24 percent Carbon
dioxide emissions across the world, in the year 2008. Therefore, logistic service providers are also recommended to
develop logistic centers of excellence (ITF, 2009) which incorporates strategies namely: developing green corridors for
transportation (Furtado, 2013), utilizing alternative modes of transport (like railways and ships) to reduce carbon dioxide
emission (Zhu.Q.J. et al, 2008; Maibach et al, 2008) and to establish shipping centers outside the city (Lindstad and
Sandars, 2014)

Figure 1: Functions of Logistic Service Providers

2.2 Key Aims of Green Logistics

Green logistics (Lee et al, 2008; Rodrigue. J.P et al., 2001; Sbihi & Eglese, 2007) is defined as a process of
aligning environmental performance (Ping. L, 2009) of suppliers with end-user demands. It is also a measure, to evaluate
the environmental impact (Irina Harris et al, 2018) of distribution strategies. The key green aims (Zhu & Sarkis, 2004) are
formulated to develop a better sustainable logistics such as: reduction of oil & fuel consumption (Figure 2), Energy
consumption reduction (Jackeline Rios-Torres et al, 2018); use of recyclable resources rather than depleting resources
(Zhang et al 2014); mitigating the usage of toxic chemicals, production process modification; reduction of operating cost
(Jan.H. Havenga et al, 2018); Greenhouse gas emission reduction (IEA-2010; Sebestian M.R. Dente et al, 2017)

Impact Factor (JCC): 7.6197 SCOPUS Indexed Journal NAAS Rating: 3.11
Optimisation of Fuel Consumption by Taguchi Method in Logistics Systems 63

Figure 2: Key Aims of Green Logistics

2.3 Fuel Consumption

Fuel consumption is defined as the product of length of distance covered by a vehicle and the amount of fuel
consumed per kilometer, and it will also be expressed in liters or in gallons. Fuel consumption in vehicles will be
influenced by a few parameters, namely: wind speed, Tire inflation (or) deflation, than the prescribed values, Half-released
brakes, frequently engaged clutches, Partial combustion of fuel during winter seasons, and idling time of engines such as
engine initiation/ warm-up moments during traffic signals, crowded roads and so on.

The gaps identified from the literature review are

• During the yesteryears, the huge volumes of work were done for reducing greenhouse gases in vehicle emission
and also to develop vehicles fuelled by the renewable resources.

• Moreover, three-fourth of the work done in the logistics domain is focused towards passenger cars and trucks used
in developing nations.

• The work on fuel consumption optimization in developing countries are less. Furthermore, the speed of trucks in a
growing economy (India) has less than 20 Kmph, whereas it reaches 50 Kmph in developed nations (Europe)

3. METHODOLOGY

Many methods are used for optimising fuel consumption, such as Response surface methodology, Taguchi
method, Multi Factor Analysis. Out of which, Taguchi method is used in this research as it reduces the number of
experiments and easy adaptability. Vincent. H & Udaya Kumar, (2012) have studied a single cylinder 5.2 KW diesel
engine and optimized using Taguchi design. Key parameters identified for their investigation are: Clearance volume, Valve
opening pressure, Nozzle-hole diameter, Static injection timing and load torque and the responses observed are Nitrous
oxide (NOx Emission) and brake specific fuel consumption. It is iterated in four levels. Moreover, an another group have
analyzed (Win.Z et al, 2005) the following parameters namely: Speed, load, injection timing, plunger diameter, nozzle hole
diameter, and nozzle tip protrusion by Taguchi method and the responses are: Engine noise and brake specific fuel
consumption. They identified a high performing key parameter which has major influence on the response by Taguchi
method. Using L9 orthogonal array, group of researchers have identified an influencing parameter from the basket of three
parameters namely: Exhaust gas rate, fuel injection timing and pressure which will provide a bias on the outcome
(Saravanan et al, 2010). The outcome of this project is Nitrous oxide emission from the Fuel engine. Taguchi method will
find three results for a problem, namely: Identifying a high performing key factor from the cluster of three key factors;
Optimizing the key parameter values to acquire the outcome at preferred condition (Smaller the better/larger the better.);

www.tjprc.org SCOPUS Indexed Journal [email protected]

64 Benrajesh. P & John Rajan. A

Estimating the response values and calculating the deviation from the experimental value.

3.1 Key Factors Identified

The potential key factors which can influence the fuel consumption of trucks are listed and classified, based on the
perspective of automobile experts. Key factors are plotted in Herringbone diagram and displayed.

Note: Response denotes an output (dependent) variable, whereas Factor denotes an independent variable
Figure 3: Herringbone Diagram

The extensive study of a book (Green logistics by McKinnom), leads to the development of a data tracking sheet
(Appendix: Section-A). This data sheet is designed to record the driving behaviour (Elisabet Bjorney and Gudmundur. F.
Ulfarsson, 2015), of a truck driver, which includes the amount of time spent in the traffic (Wardman. M., 2004), Mileage
gained by Vehicle for a litre (J.I. Huertas et al, 2017), Total fuel spent for a trip, Exhaust gas analysis of the Vehicle
(Harmful gas presence in the exhaust), Distances covered per day.

3.2 Problem Methodology

Figure 4: Problem Methodology

Impact Factor (JCC): 7.6197 SCOPUS Indexed Journal NAAS Rating: 3.11
Optimisation of Fuel Consumption by Taguchi Method in Logistics Systems 65

4. CASE STUDY
4.1 About Civil Food Supplies

The Civil food supplies department is a wing of the Government of India, which supports the poorest Indian
citizens with food grains and all essential items required for daily living by either free or in meager costs. It is executing
this activity in a highly systematic way. The entire activity is descending down into two halves namely, Primary phase and
secondary phase. Primary phase (Figure 5) includes: Procuring grains from direct farmers at affordable cost and then it will
be inspected and transferred to God owns for storing in conditioned temperature. Secondary Phase (Figure 6) includes:
PDS shops will raise a demand claim of food grains based on customers need and the God owns will respond to this
demand by supplying the needs of PDS (Public Distribution Shops). The third party logistics involved in both phases and
they are: Transferring food grains from farmers to God owns and then God owns to PDS shops.

Primary Phase

Figure 5: Primary Phase of Food Supplies

Secondary Phase

Figure 6: Secondary Phase of Food Supplies

The First phase of food grain collection will be happening during harvesting seasons, namely: March and May of
every year; whereas the second phase of distributing the food grains will be done throughout the year. The Primary focus
of this article is to capture the efficiency of logistic service providers, used in the food supply chain.

4.2 Data Collection

The parent table is then modified and interpreted in vernacular languages, to make it user-friendly. The table is
customized based on the inputs, received from academic and logistic experts. Moreover, suitable industries have to be
identified for collecting data. The identified are a logistic wing of Civil Food Supplies, Department of India; and also a
transportation department of an elementary school. These premises are located in a town in Southern India. The designed
table (Figure 7) is then sent for collecting data. The data arrived after a time span of eight months. It is processed and
analysed, by using Taguchi Method; and subsequently, the results are studied thoroughly.

www.tjprc.org SCOPUS Indexed Journal [email protected]

66 Benrajesh. P & John Rajan. A

Figure 7: DATA Collection Process-I

Similarly, another data set (Figure 8) is collected from an academic institution. It observes the moment of a school
van while it is picking the student until it drops them in their homes.

Figure 8: DATA Collection Process-II

Table 1: Technical Specifications of Trucks Used by LSP

SNO Description Vehicle-A Vehicle-B Vehicle-C
1 Dead Weight of Truck 6500 6700 7000
2 Payload of Truck 6000 -7500 Kg 13000- 14000 Kg 13000- 14000 Kg
3 Power of Truck 130 HP@2400 rpm 130 HP@2400 rpm 180 HP@2400 rpm
4 Torque of Truck 450 Nm, 1250-2200 rpm 450Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm 660 Nm@1200-1900 rpm
5 Transmission 6 Speed gear box 6 Speed gear box 6 Speed manual
6 Max. Speed 84 Kmph 95 Kmph 78 Kmph
7 Fuel Tank Capacity 208 litres 200 Litres 400 litres
8 Ground Clearance 260 mm 232 mm 260 mm
9 Engine Cylinders 4 4 6

The vehicle used and its configurations are tabulated in Table 1. Three configurations of vehicles are deployed in
day to day service to connect Store houses with the PDS shops. Usually the time of transit happens in the early morning
(0600 to 1100 AM) or in the post lunch session (0300 to 0600 PM.)

4.2 Data Analysis: Taguchi Method

The steps involved in Taguchi Method are

• The collected data are sorted strategically, and then response variable and control parameters are selected from the
available data.

• Taguchi design is done, by identifying the optimum orthogonal array for the given inputs.

• The levels of each factor are found out, based on the available data.

• Experimental results are analysed and based on the result, the optimized values for each factor was listed.

Impact Factor (JCC): 7.6197 SCOPUS Indexed Journal NAAS Rating: 3.11
Optimisation of Fuel Consumption by Taguchi Method in Logistics Systems 67

• The obtained results are then compared with the experimental values.

In Taguchi method, the L27 (6 X 3) orthogonal array is selected for analysis. The inputs are: six factors; three
levels, 27 iterations are taken; Smaller the better have opted for the ranking method. Entire lot, of Taguchi calculation
(Table 6) is done by Minitab software tool.

Table 2: Selected Input Parameters at Three Levels

Sno Controlled Factors Level-1 Level-2 Level-3
1. A : Dead weight ofVehicle(Kg) 6500 6750 7000
2. B. Mileage per litre (Kmpl) 2.77 3.635 4.5
3. C: Percentage of fuel spent in idle time (%) 7.5 18.75 30
4. D: Span of distances covered (Km) 8 15 32
5. E: Payload of Vehicle (Kg) 6000 13500 14000
6. F: Average time spent in traffic (minutes) 5 15 20

The levels of a factor are defined as multi range of (finite) values, which can stimulate the response of an
experiment (Fuel consumption). In Table 2, each parameter is grouped with three labels, namely: Level-1, Level-2, and
Level-3. Taguchi will identify the balanced combination of all three values, to get the minimum response (i.e., lowered
Fuel combination– smaller the better)

Table 3: L27 Design Array of the Experiment

SNO A B C D E F
1 6500 2.77 7.5 8 6000 5
2 6500 2.77 7.5 8 13500 15
3 6500 2.77 7.5 8 14000 32
4 6500 3.635 18.75 15 6000 5
5 6500 3.635 18.75 15 13500 15
6 6500 3.635 18.75 15 14000 32
7 6500 4.5 30 32 6000 5
8 6500 4.5 30 32 13500 15
9 6500 4.5 30 32 14000 32
10 6750 2.77 18.75 32 6000 15
11 6750 2.77 18.75 32 13500 32
12 6750 2.77 18.75 32 14000 5
13 6750 3.635 30 8 6000 15
14 6750 3.635 30 8 13500 32
15 6750 3.635 30 8 14000 5
16 6750 4.5 7.5 15 6000 15
17 6750 4.5 7.5 15 13500 32
18 6750 4.5 7.5 15 14000 5
19 7000 2.77 30 15 6000 32
20 7000 2.77 30 15 13500 5
21 7000 2.77 30 15 14000 15
22 7000 3.635 7.5 32 6000 32
23 7000 3.635 7.5 32 13500 5
24 7000 3.635 7.5 32 14000 15
25 7000 4.5 18.75 8 6000 32
26 7000 4.5 18.75 8 13500 5
27 7000 4.5 18.75 8 14000 15

www.tjprc.org SCOPUS Indexed Journal [email protected]

68 Benrajesh. P & John Rajan. A

The values in table 3 are the iterative values for 27 iterations (L27) with six different factors. These values are
processed by Taguchi and then the optimum values are extracted.

Table 4: S/N Ratio Formulations

Sno S/N Ratio Configuration Formulae
1. The Smaller-The better S/N = -10 log (∑Y2/n)
2. The higher-The better S/N = -10 log (∑(1/Y2) /n)
3. The more nominal-the better S/N = -10 log (∑Y2/S2)

The formulae for calculating the Signal to Noise ratio values are given in the Table 4. This article follows the
condition Smaller the better. Hence, the formulae (S/N = -10 log (∑Y2/n)) is used in calculating those values.

A: Dead weight of Lorry (Kg)

B. Mileage per litre (Kmpl)

C: Percentage of Diesel spent (%)

D: Span of distances covered (Km)

E: Payload of Lorry (Kg)

F: Average time spent in traffic (minutes)

Table 5: Analysis of Variance for S/N Ratio

S.No FACTOR Seq SS (S) DOF (f) Adj MS (v) F Contribution (%)
1. A : Dead weight of Vehicle (Kg) 4.3597 2 2.1798 0.64 6.80
2. B. Mileage per litre (Kmpl) 0.3159 2 0.1579 0.05 0.492
3. C: Percentage of Fuel spent in idle time 9.3645 2 4.6822 1.37 14.607
4. D: Span of distances covered (Km) 0.8101 2 0.4050 0.12 1.26
5. E: Payload of Vehicle (Kg) 0.2737 2 0.1369 0.04 0.4269
6. F: Average time spent in traffic (minutes) 1.1317 2 0.5659 0.17 1.765
7. Residual Error 47. 8516 14 3.4180
8. Total 64.1071 26

Based on the contribution percentage of Table 5, the factors are ranked. The Contribution percentage is defined as
the ratio of the Sequential Sum of squares to the Total Sum. Factor-C records highest contribution (14.607 %), Dead
weight of the Vehicle succeeds the former one and the third ranked factor is the average time spent in traffic. The above
three factors are having more influence on the response. To control the response, these three factors have to be kept in
optimized position.

Table 6: Response Table for Signal to Noise Ratios (Smaller is better)

Span of Average Time
Dead Weight Mileage per Percent of Fuel Spent Payload of
Level Distances Spent in
of Vehicle (A) Litre (B) in Idle Time (C) Vehicle (E)
Covered (D) Traffic (F)
1 -18.06 -17.55 -18.29 -17.27 -17.60 -17.37
2 -17.36 -17.62 -16.87 -17.66 -17.37 -17.37
3. -17.12 -17.37 -17.38 -17.61 -17.57 -17.80
Delta 0.95 0.26 1.42 0.39 0.23 0.44
Rank 2 5 1 4 6 3

Impact Factor (JCC): 7.6197 SCOPUS Indexed Journal NAAS Rating: 3.11
Optimisation of Fuel Consumption by Taguchi Method in Logistics Systems 69

The response values of each parameter are calculated by the formula: S/N = -10 log (∑Y2/n) based on the
condition: Smaller the better. Based on the highest scalar value of Delta, the ranking is done. Table 5 ranks the parameters
based on the contribution percentage whereas the Table 6 ranks based on the Delta value. In both tabular values,
Parameter-C, A, F occupies the first, second and third ranks respectively.

4.4 Data Validation

Validation of data for Taguchi method (Table 7) is done by comparing the parallel process values computed from
the Taguchi method and experimental runs

Table 7: Experimental Values and Predicted S/N Ratios for the Fuel Consumption
Fuel Consumption (LITRES)
Experiment Predicted Change
SNO
al Values Optimum Signal (%)
(E) to Noise ratio (P)
1 18.6697 18.575 0.51
2 18.6393 18.3533 1.53
3 18.5986 18.9794 2.05
4 18.5782 17.6149 5.19
5 17.2426 17.3932 0.87
6 17.2068 18.0194 4.72
7 17.1587 17.8205 3.86
8 17.1346 17.5988 2.71
9 19.351 18.225 5.82
10 19.2758 16.7941 12.87
11 15.6781 16.997 8.41
12 15.5919 16.7546 7.46
13 13.9794 17.0417 21.91
14 18.6697 17.2446 7.63
15 18.6393 17.0022 8.78
16 18.5986 18.0854 2.76
17 18.5782 18.2882 1.56
18 17.2426 18.0458 4.66
19 17.2068 17.5433 1.96
20 17.1587 16.8776 1.64
21 17.1346 17.0792 0.32
22 19.351 18.4782 4.51
23 19.2758 17.8125 7.59
24 15.6781 18.0141 14.90
25 15.5919 16.4569 5.55
26 13.9794 15.7913 12.96
27 18.6697 15.9929 14.34

Data validation (Table 7) of Experimental runs value is compared with PSNR (Predicted Signal Noise ratio) and
the percentage of deviation is mentioned in the last column. The percentage of Change is calculated by the formulae:
{(E-P)/E} where E is the experimental values and P is the predicted signal noise ratio.

www.tjprc.org SCOPUS Indexed Journal [email protected]

70 Benrajesh. P & John Rajan. A

Table 8: Optimum Parameter Settings for Low Fuel Consumption

S.No Controlled Parameters Fuel Consumption
1. A : Dead weight of Vehicle (Kg) 7000
2. B. Mileage per litre (Kmpl) 4.5
3. C: Percentage of Fuel spent in idle time 18.75
4. D: Span of distances covered (Km) 8
5. E: Payload of Vehicle (Kg) 13500
6. F: Average time spent in traffic (minutes) 5
Predicted optimum value 15.7913 litre
Experimental value 13.9794 litre
Change in deviation 12.96 %

The optimum parameter values for low Fuel consumption are captured in the Table 7. The values of this table
(Table 8) are extracted from the graph (figure 9). The graph (figure 9) was processed with the response condition: smaller
the better. To get the lower response from the graph (figure 9), all the factors selected are to be in higher values. In this
case, the optimum parameter settings based on the above said principle is: A3-B3-C2-D1-E2-F1. These parameter values
are optimized experimental values which are captured in the 26th iteration of Table-3 & Table 7. The experimental value
attained is the smallest value of all the 27 iterations. The optimum parameters achieved (based on the principle: Smaller the
better) are: A3 (7000) - B3 (4.5) - C2 (18.75)-D1 (8)-E2 (13500) - F1 (5) value. The predicted Optimum Signal to noise
ratio and Experimental value are extracted from the table-7 (26th Iteration).

Figure 9: Main Effect Plot for Signal to Noise Ratio Figure 10: Residual Plot for Signal to Noise Ratio
(Taguchi Method- Smaller the better) (Taguchi Method- Smaller the better)

NOTE: Notations of A1, B1, C1, A2, B2, C2 are given in Appendix Section-B

5. RESULTS

Graphs plotted, in figure-IX are based on the level values of each factor, recorded in table 6. If a line is horizontal,
then the main effect of that factor is very low. In the figure 9, factor-f (average time spent in traffic) has a less direct
influence on the outcome (i.e., the interaction of this factor with the adjacent factor is high.) If a line is vertical, then it’s
the main effect has more influence on the outcome. In the plot for SN ratio (figure 9), level-2 of factor-C (Percentage of
Fuel spent) has the peak point.

The first micrograph (normal probability plot of Figure 10) checks the prediction that all the data are normally
distributed or not. As most of the points are populated around the straight line, then it predicts that the data obtained are
normally distributed. The second micrograph (Residual versus fits plot of Figure 10) investigates that the model developed

Impact Factor (JCC): 7.6197 SCOPUS Indexed Journal NAAS Rating: 3.11
Optimisation of Fuel Consumption by Taguchi Method in Logistics Systems 71

is satisfying the assumptions made. The three checkpoints includes: Uneven spreading data; Points populated away from
zero; Points located away from other points in X-axis. But the graph attained (Residual versus fits plot) is contradicting to
the three checklists and hence it satisfies all the assumption made.

The third micrograph (Histogram of residuals of Figure 10) has to align with checklists includes: whether it has a
long tail in one direction and each bar is far away from other bars which signify high skewness of data and includes the
outliers respectively. But it contradicts the two checklists with the ground reality that it has even tails across the data and
each bar is evenly placed which concludes that data is not either highly skewed or no outliers are included. The fourth
micrograph (Residuals versus order plot of Figure 10) is to identify that the residuals are independent or not. If the data
plotted are not having trends, then the residual points are identified as independent. But the graph plotted shows that it
follows the trend and it is correlated and hence the factors are not independent.

6. DISCUSSION OF OUTCOMES

The Analysis of data collected from mass cargo transporters done by an optimizing tool (Taguchi method),
recommends that: parameters Percentage of fuel spent in idle time, Dead weight of the Vehicle and Average time spent in
traffic are the top three key parameters which can bias the response to the greater extent. Percentage of Fuel spent in idle
time can be mitigated by switch off the running engines during lengthy time span signals, and in lower time signals, try to
disengage the gears and avoid pressing clutches. Dead weight of the vehicle is reckoned as the second influencing factor in
response. Logistic service providers (LSP) have to investigate on the quantity of cargo to be transported, before signing the
business contract. Based on the enquiry, the Vehicle size and transit frequency can be decided. Half truck load has to be
eliminated, by purchasing the truck space from other LSP’s who are transporting the cargo on the same routes, as prior one.
Average time spent in idle time can be mitigated by: diverting the travel route to less dense traffic roads, opting out the
night trips instead of day trips, utilizing the bye-pass roads instead of city roads, or by having a lesser distance gap between
source and distances. Truck drivers have to be given with training in the time frequency of every six months. LSP’s have to
introduce incentive measures and promotion policies to motivate the drivers who consumes less fuel to cover longer
distances. In the recent days, even the vehicles are incorporated with air chillers which can run on green energy.

7. CONCLUSIONS

This work provides a consumption analysis report, in the context of the Indian road scenario. Data is collected by
the survey method, and then analysing is done with Taguchi design and the plotting is done by a tool Minitab (Taguchi
Method) for acquiring results. The experiment results are then validated with simulated results. The results attained are
shared with the mass cargo transporter of Civil Food Supplies Department, for the betterment of future society. This work
can be further proceeded with dedicated cargo, specific truck driver and on different time slots and various terrains to
understand the driver and vehicle efficiency.

REFERENCES

1. Enable. J, Brand. C., Tran.M., Eyre.N. (2012), “Modelling transport energy demand: a socio technical approach”, Energy
policy 41:125-138

2. Alexis Frappier, CatherimeMorency, NartubTrepanier (2018), “Measuring the quality and diversity of transit alternatives”;
Transport Policy, Vol.61, pp.51-59, 2018.

www.tjprc.org SCOPUS Indexed Journal [email protected]

72 Benrajesh. P & John Rajan. A

3. CerenAltunas, Okan Tuna, Greening Logistic centers: The evolution of Industrial buying criteria towards Green, The Asian
journal of shipping and logistics, Vol. 29, No.1, April 2013, pp.059-080

4. ElisabetBjorney and Gudmundur. F. Ulfarsson (2015), “Effect of Driving Behavior and Vehicle characteristics on Energy
consumption of road vehicles running on alternate energy sources”, International Journal of Sustainable transportation, Vol.9
: 2015, pp.592-601; DOI:10.1080/15568318.2013.843737

5. Fleiscmann. M et al (2000),A characterisation of logistics networks for product recovery, The International Journal of
Management science Vol.28, No. 6, pp:653-666, Omega Publishers

6. Furtado, F.M.B.A., (2013), U.S. and European freight railways: the differences that matter, Journal of the. Transportation
Research Forum, 52 (2), 65–84.

7. Geberit Annual report 2015, Procurement & logistics: Sustainability strategy. Online available at:
http://www.geberit.com/files/publikationen/2015/nachhaltigkeit/sust-strategy-procurement- 1450106.pdf

8. J.I. Huertas et al (2017), “Eco driving by replicating best driving practices”,International Journal of Sustainable
Transportation. 0 (0): pp.1-10

9. Irina Harris etal (2018); “The impact of alternative routing and package scenarios on carbon and sulphate emissions in
international wine distribution”, Transportation Research Part-D 58 (2018), 261-279

10. Jackeline Rios-Torres (2018); “Fuel consumption for various driving styles in conventional and hybrid electric vehicles:
Integrating driving cycles predictions with fuel consumption optimization”, -International Journal of Sustainable
transportation : 0(0):1-15

11. Lieb. K.J, Lieb. R.C. (2010), Environmental sustainablity in the 3P logistics (3PL) industry- International Journal of physical
distribution and logistics management : 40 (7):524-533

12. Lijmatainen.H., etal (2012), Energy efficiency practices among road freight haulers, Energy policy 50:833-842

13. Lindstad, H., Sandaas, S(2014) Emission and fuel reduction for offshore support vessels through hybrid technology. In
Conference Proceedings at Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers (SNAME) Annual Convention, 20–25 October
2014, Houston, USA.

14. Liu Ping, Strategy of Green Logistics and Sustainable Development, Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on
Information Management, Innovational Management and Industrial Engineering-Volume 01, PP 339-342, Dec-2009

15. Maibach, M., Schereyer, C., Sutter, D., Van Essen, H.P., Boon, B.H., Smokers, R., Schroten, A., Doll, C., Pawlowska, B., Back,
M., (2008) Handbook on Estimation of External Costs in the Transport Sector. CE Delft.

16. Perotti.et al(2012), Green Supply chainpractices & Company performance: The case of 3PL’s in Italy- International Journal
of Physical distribution and logistics management 42(7):640-672

17. Rajesh, S., Kulkarni, B. M., & Shanmukhappa, S. (2014). Investigations on fuel properties of ternary mixture of ethanol, bio
diesel from acid oil and petroleum diesel to evaluate alternate fuel for diesel engine. International Journal of Research in
Engineering and Technology, 2(6), 181-188.

18. Ping.L. (2009), “Strategies of green logistics & sustainable development in : Information management, Innovation
Management & Industrial Engineering”: 2009, International conference on Vol.1, IEEE, pp.339-342

19. Rodrigue.J.P et al (2001), ‘The paradoxes of green logistics’, Topic-B3, Proceedings of 9th world conference on transport
research, Seoul, South Korea

Impact Factor (JCC): 7.6197 SCOPUS Indexed Journal NAAS Rating: 3.11
Optimisation of Fuel Consumption by Taguchi Method in Logistics Systems 73

20. Sarvanan.S et al (2010), “Multi response optimisation of NOx emission of a stationary Diesel engine”, Fuel, Vol-89,
Vol pp.3235-
3240

21. Sbihi&Eglese (2007):, “Combinatorial optimization and green logistics”, 4OR-A

4OR quaterely
rely Journal of Operation research
Vol.5, Issue-2, pp:99-116.

22. UNEP, (2015); Eradicating Poverty through an Inclusive Green Economy. UNEP, Post 2015.

23. Vincent. H and UdayaKumar (2009), “Optimization of Diesel Engine parameters using Taguchi method and Design of
Evolution”; Journal of the Brazing society of Mechanical Science and Engineering; Vol.34, Issue-4,
Issue pp: 423-428

24. Wardman. M., (2004) “Public Transport Values of time” Transport

Tran policy vol.11, pp.363-377
377

25. Win. Z. etal (2005), “ Investigation of diesel engine operating and Injection system parameters for low noise, emissions and
fuel consumption using Taguchi Methods”, Proceedings of the Institute of mechanical engineers Vol.219,
Vol.2 Part-D: Journal of
automobile engineering.

26. Umesh, K. S., Pravin, V. K., & Rajagopal, K. (2014). Experimental Investigation and CFD Analysis of a Multi-Cylinder
Multi Four
Stroke SI Engine Exhaust Manifold for Optimal Geometry to Reduce Backpressure and to Improve
Im Fuel
Efficiency. International Journal of Automobile Engineering Research and Development,
Development 4,, 13-20.
13

27. Zhang, Thompson, Bao& Jiang (2014); “Analyzing the promoting factors for adopting green logistics practices: A case study
of road freight industry in Nanjing, China:” Procedia social behavioral sciences:125:432-444
sciences:125:432 444

28. Zhu &Sarkis (2004), Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green suppyl
chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprise, Journal off operation management 22(3):265-289

29. Zhu.Q.J. et al (2008), Firm Level correlates of emergent green supply chain management practices in the Chinese context,
Omega: The international Journal of management science:
science 36(4):577-591

APPENDIX SECTION
SECTION-A:

Data Sheet to capture driving behavior

www.tjprc.org SCOPUS Indexed Journal [email protected]