Principles of Error Correction in Speech and Writing: Consider The Situation

Principles of Error Correction in Speech and Writing
1. 1
Consider the situation.
Is the language situation an informal situation or formal

one? Is the student speaking extemporaneously or writing a
first draft, or has she had time to plan and reflect? Who are the
participants in the situationother students or the larger
community, for example? All of these considerations matter in
deciding if its appropriate or not to correct student error. Even
native speakers, actually, sometimes make mistakes like
subject/verb agreement errors when engaged in spontaneous
speech in an informal situation. Its just that nobody really
notices their errors. We tend to be more attuned to the errors
students and nonnative speakers make as were looking for
them; we assume native speakers know better and wont
make errors.
2.2
Focus on language as communication.
What is the purpose of language: to show how correct and

elegant we can be in our production, or is it to
communicate a specific message? Unless you are a poet,
for example, whose business is the beauty of language, and
for whom the main purpose might be its beauty, the ultimate
goal of language is most cases is to get across a specific
message. If the student has achieved that, his production is
probably good enough, in most cases.
3.3
Focus on purpose of correction.
Why do we correct student error? Is it to show our expertise,

to show the student her errors so shell learn from them? To
demonstrate our editing skills? To show we know more than
our students? In most cases, of course, the purpose of
correction is to help the student revise her writing or improve
her fluency and accent. In order to do this, correction should
be limited and focused on specific points for improvement: for
example, verb tenses or intonation patterns. If every error is
noted, it becomes too overwhelming for the student to begin to
know where to improve.
4.4
Focus on larger, or global, errors.
Which errors should be corrected? Should all student

errors be marked? If they are mistakes, the instructor should
point them out, shouldnt she? Again, we should go back here
to the purpose of correction. If the purpose is to help students
improve production, then correction should be limited to one
or two areas for students to focus on which are important to
overall comprehensibility: the students pattern of run-on
sentences, for example, or stress patterns, not a single
misspelling or mispronunciation. Isolated issues of
misspelling and mispronunciation usually do not detract from
overall comprehensibility (if this were the case, most native
speakers of English would on occasion lapse into
incoherence); rather, the instructor should look for the global
problemsproblems in verb tense switch, for example,
usually effect overall comprehensibility of a message.
5.5
Focus on patterns of errors.
In addition to considering the seriousness of an error, the

instructor should consider the frequency of the error. If
the student has a concern with almost always omitting articles
(a, an, and the), this is a problem that should be
addressed because omitted articles are distracting from the
overall message and can affect overall comprehensibility of
the writing.
6.6
Cost-Benefit
Are all errors even worth the time and trouble to

correct? For example, prepositions in English, especially the
more abstract ones that dont refer to a literal place, are very
difficult to teach as they are idiomatic and dialectal: for
example, in American English I come around to see a friend;
in British English I come round. Is it go down the street or
go up the street? They mean the same thing. And if a
nonnative speaker mixed up these expressions, I probably
wouldnt notice, much less be confused. So considering the
difficulty in learning prepositions, and the overall unimportance
of them, it probably is not worth the time investment to learn
them. This also goes for trying to correct specific nonnative
English speech sounds, like the non-English trilled r. It is all
right in most cases, unless the student is training to be a spy,
to retain some nonnative accent in both speech and writing.
7.7
Teach students how to self-correct.
Finally, its usually not enough for the instructor to just

show where the errors are. The student also must know how
to correct them, so the instructor should demonstrate for the
student how to do thishow to check that the verbs agree with
the subject, for examplerather than just making the
correction herself, from which the student learns nothing. It is,
of course, ultimately the goal for the student to use English
independently, which means monitoring and correcting his
own language production.
8.8
Consider student affect.
Last but really not least, student affect, emotional

response, has to be taken into consideration. A paper that
comes back covered in red ink accompanied by the instructors
biting comments at the endweve all probably experienced
something like this at some pointmay very well result in the
student giving up, which is, of course, not the goal. The goal is
for students to move forward, improving from the place they
are. This involves carefully weighing what comments and
marks on papers will mean to students how they will be
affected by them. Do they know what subject-verb agreement
means? Have I taught that yet? Do they know how to correct
it? What are the positive aspects of the students speech and
language production that I can mention and which they can
build on while working on their weaker spots? Marking papers
and giving feedback does really involve addressing many
aspects of student need.
Correcting student error is a sensitive issue that most instructors
would probably rather not do. However, through considering such
issues as overall comprehensibility and goals of correction, the
instructor can turn the potentially negative exercise of giving
corrective feedback into a positive learning experience.
What do you think about correcting
student errors?
What are some methods you use?
P.S. If you enjoyed this article, please help spread it by clicking one
of those sharing buttons below. And if you are interested in more, you
should follow our Facebook page where we share more about
creative, non-boring ways to teach English.
POPULAR ARTICLES:
8 Great Ways to Use Dictation with ESL Students
10 Puzzle Stories for your Language Class
6 Lessons Using Smartphone Cameras

RELATED CATEGORIES
Correcting Mistakes
Teaching Ideas
GET

Principles of Error Correction in Speech and Writing: Consider The Situation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Principles of Error Correction in Speech and Writing: Consider The Situation

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Principles of Error Correction in Speech and Writing: Consider The Situation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Principles of Error Correction in Speech and Writing

Consider the situation.

Is the language situation an informal situation or formal

Focus on language as communication.

What is the purpose of language: to show how correct and

Focus on purpose of correction.

Why do we correct student error? Is it to show our expertise,

Focus on larger, or global, errors.

Which errors should be corrected? Should all student

Focus on patterns of errors.

In addition to considering the seriousness of an error, the

Are all errors even worth the time and trouble to

Teach students how to self-correct.

Finally, its usually not enough for the instructor to just

Consider student affect.

Last but really not least, student affect, emotional

8 Great Ways to Use Dictation with ESL Students

10 Puzzle Stories for your Language Class

6 Lessons Using Smartphone Cameras

You might also like