Ijett V14P211 PDF
Ijett V14P211 PDF
Ijett V14P211 PDF
Abstract. The abundance and increase of waste tyre the conventional bitumen needs to be improved. There are
disposal is a serious problem that leads to environmental many modification processes and additives that are currently
pollution. Crumb rubber obtained from shredding of those used in bitumen modifications such as styrene butadiene
scrap tires has been proven to enhance the properties of styrene (SBS), styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR), ethylene vinyl
plain bitumen since the 1840s. It can be used as a cheap acetate (EVA) and crumb rubber modifier (CRM).
and environmentally friendly modification process to Crumb rubber is the term usually applied to recycled
minimize the damage of pavement due to increase in rubber from automotive and truck scrap tires. During the
service traffic density, axle loading and low maintenance recycling process steel and fluff is removed leaving tire rubber
services which has deteriorated and subjected road with a granular consistency. Continued processing with a
structures to failure more rapidly.Use of crumb rubber granulator and/or cracker mill, possibly with the aid
leads to excellent pavement life, driving comfort and low of cryogenics or mechanical means, reduces the size of
maintenance. The rheology of CRMB depends on internal the particles. From physical and chemical interaction of crumb
factors such as crumb rubber quantity, type, particle size, rubber with conventional bitumen Crumb Rubber Modified
source and pure bitumen composition, and external Bitumen (CRMB) is made. Its advantages are: Lower
factors such as the mixing time, temperature, and also the susceptibility to daily & seasonal temperature variations,
mixing process (dry process or wet process). The present higher resistance to deformation at elevated pavement
study aims in investigating the experimental performance temperature, better age resistance properties, higher fatigue
of the bitumen modified with 15% by weight of crumb life of mixes, Better adhesion between aggregate & binder,
rubber varying its sizes. Four different categories of size of Prevention of cracking & reflective cracking, and Overall
crumb rubber will be used, which are coarse (1mm - improved performance in extreme climatic conditions & under
600m); medium size (600m - 300m); fine (300m- heavy traffic condition.
150m); and superfine (150m - 75m). Common
laboratory tests will be performed on the modified 2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE
bitumen using various sizes of crumb rubber and thus
A detailed review of research works carried out related to
analyzed. Marshall Stability method is adopted for mix
the present study are described as below.
design. Finally a comparative study is made among the
The penetration is a measure of hardness or softness of
modified bitumen samples using the various sizes of
bitumen binder which shows an effect by adding crumb
Crumb Rubber particles and the best size is suggested for
rubber to bitumen binder; it decreases as rubber content is
the modification to obtain best results
increased. The penetration shows lower values as rubber
content increases at different mix conditions of rubberized
Keywords Bitumen, CRMB, Crumb Rubber, Marshall bitumen binder, indicating that the binder becomes stiff and
Stability Test and Pavement more viscous (Mashaan et al, 2011a).
Mahrez (1999) investigated the properties of rubberized
bitumen prepared by physical blending of bitumen 80 / 100
1. INTRODUCTION penetration grade with different crumb rubber content and
various aging phases. The results of penetration values
India has a road network of over 4,689,842 kilometres in decreased over the aging as well as before aging by increasing
2013 [1][2] , the second largest road network in the world. It has the rubber content in the mix. Also, the modified binders have
primarily flexible pavement design which constitutes more lower penetration values than unmodified binders.
than 98% of the total road network. India being a very vast The softening point refers to the temperature at which the
country has widely varying climates, terrains, construction bitumen attains a particular degree of softening. The use of
materials and mixed traffic conditions both in terms of loads crumb rubber in bitumen modification leads to an increase in
and volumes. Increased traffic factors such as heavier loads, the softening point and viscosity as rubber crumb content
higher traffic volume and higher tyre pressure demand higher increases (Mahrez, 1999; MAshaan et al , 20011a). Mahrez
performance pavements. So to minimize the damage of and Rehan (2003) claimed that there is a consistent
pavement surface and increase durability of flexible pavement,
Where;
A= Weight in grams of the specimen in air.
B= Weight in grams, surface dry.
C= Weight in grams, in air.
b. Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) = A /
Fig 3: Loose mix(uncompacted) for air voids calculation (A + D E)
c. % Air Voids (Va )= 100 [ 1-( Gmb / Gmm ) ] TABLE 1: Penetration Results for CRMB of different crumb
Sample No.1:(1mm-600)m
Where; Crumb rubber
Gmb = Bulk specific gravity Sample No.2:(600-300)m Crumb
Gmm = Theoretical maximum specific rubber
gravit Sample No.3:(300 -150)m
Crumb rubber
d. Voids in mineral aggregate (VMA) = 100 [ 1 Sample No.4:(150 -75)m Crumb
((Gmb ( 1- Pb)) / Gsb )] rubber
Test
Propert Sample Sample Sample
Where; y Sample No.1 No.2 No.3 No.4
Gmb = Bulk Specific Gravity of compacted
mix. Tempe
Ball Ball Ball Ball Ball Ball Ball Ball
Gsb = Bulk Specific Gravity of total rature
(C) No.1 No.2 No.1 No.2 No.1 No.2 No.1 No.2
aggregate.
Pb = Percent of bitumen by weight. 57.1 56.5 57.4 58.7 60.6 61.1 63.3 64.1
Mean
Softeni
e. Voids Filled With Bitumen (VFB) = 1- (Va/VMA) ng
point 56.8C 58.05C 60.85C 63.7C
Where; rubber sizes
Va = % Air voids
VMA = Voids in mineral aggregate
TABLE 2: Softening Point test results for CRMB of different
crumb rubber sizes
penetration
(mm) 43.33 41.17 38.33 36.17
Air Voids, %
5.5
% %
5
4 2.35 1219.18 2.59 6.36 17.06 62.74 4.5
4.5 2.41 1290.53 3.15 5.52 16.84 67.21 4
3.5
5 2.38 1370.41 3.57 4.47 16.74 73.31
3 5.3
5.5 2.35 1211.33 4.16 3.87 17.89 78.38 4 4.5 5% 5.5 6
6 2.34 993.60 5.21 3.95 18.86 79.03 Bitumen Content, %
1300
2.41
1200 2.4
1100 2.39
1000 Unit Wt. 2.38
2.37
900 2.36
4 4.5 5 5.5 6
2.35
Bitumen Content, % 2.34
Fig 6: Bitumen Content vs. Stability 4 4.5 5 5.5 6
Bitumen Content, %
4.5 18.5
4
18
VMA, %
3.5
3 17.5
2.5
17
2
4 4.5 5 5.5 6 16.5
Bitumen Content, % 4 4.5 5 5.5 6
Bitumen Content, %
Fig 7: Bitumen content vs. Flow
Fig 10:Bitumen content vs. VMA