Theoretical and Particle Physics

The golden ring to which most physicists aspire is a unified field theory that incorporates all of modern and classical physics. Some scientists and others call this a TOE or ‘theory of everything’, but it is no more than false hubris to believe that humans could possibly know and explain everything about the universe at this time. Einstein chased this goal for the last three decades of his life, basing his theoretical research on his general theory of relativity. Meanwhile, the vast majority of scientists supporting the other major accomplishment of the Second Scientific Revolution were investing all of their time and efforts to advancing the quantum theory and their quest has been extremely successful. They originally had no interest in a unified field theory. After Einstein died in 1955, his efforts were all but abandoned because of his philosophical stance against the prevalent Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum theory even though he had been one of quantum theory’s founders. During the 1970s the tables started to turn and quantum theorists became interested in unifying physics, although not from the foundational principles of relativity theory. They claimed that quantum theory was more fundamental than relativity so they began the same quest from a totally different direction despite their claims to be continuing Einstein’s quest.  Throughout the development of the ensuing standard quantum model, superstring theory and many other theoretical schemes, quantum theorists have remained resolute in their conviction that the quantum and relativity are mutually incompatible so the quantum must completely do away with and replace relativity once and for all. However, the quantum theory and relativity are not actually incompatible and, in fact, say the some of the same things about the nature of physical reality. When the similarities are fully defined and studied and the basic assumptions behind each of the theories are altered to reflect the similarities instead of the incompatibilities, only then can the point of their compatibility be determined and act as a unifying principle resulting in a completed unified field theory of the type that Einstein once sought. The development of this physical model of reality is not without irony. Not only is the quantum theory incomplete as Einstein argued in EPR, but Einstein’s general relativity is also seriously incomplete and true unification cannot be rendered complete at any level of reality until all the theoretical models being unified are themselves complete.

This paper proposes an M-theory(MT)-derived special type of bijective particle (toy-)theory (BPT), in which each type geometric/topological entity (brane) is assigned one and only one type of physical particle and vice versa. BPT is essentially a topological/geometrical toy-theory (and mainly an exercise of imagination) which tries to explain gravity as a quantum field mediated by 3 types of scale-specific hypothetical massless, heavy and ultra-heavy gravitons: BPT may be thus considered a “trigravity” toy-theory and proposes a way to (at least partially) fill the “gap” between M-Theory (on which BPT is based) and the Standard model (SM) of particle physics. BPT also offers alternative geometrical explanations for rest mass and for electromagnetic charge. This paper continues (from alternative angles of view) the work of other past articles/preprints of the same author in physics (listed from the newest to the oldest).
#DONATIONS. Anyone can donate for dr. Dragoi’s independent research and original music at: https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=AQYGGDVDR7KH2

This paper proposes a simple "Mirrored" Universe (toy-)Model (MUM) based on a relative big G (Newtonian gravitational constant [G]), a variable quantum big G and a finite mass ambitus of our universe (OU), with far reaching implications leading to new paths beyond the Standard model (SM) of particle physics (PP) and Einstein’s General Relativity (EGR). MUM also (empirically) predicts (see the original [full] preprint of this paper): (1) the total mass of all possible known and unknown life forms (LFs) from our observable universe (ObU); (2) a very strong quantum gravitational field (QGF) acting inside elementary particles (EPs); (3) an average non-zero radii of all known EPs; (4) that a nucleon (proton/neutron) and generally an atomic nucleus can be regarded as a binary logarithmic "map" of OU AND OU can be considered a binary exponential map/expansion of a standard nucleon or atomic nucleus;
#DONATIONS. Anyone can donate for dr. Dragoi’s independent research and original music at: https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=AQYGGDVDR7KH2

This paper proposes a universal seesaw mechanism (SMEC) applicable to all elementary particles (EPs) (predicted to be actually quantum black holes), offering an alternative to supersymmetry (SUSY) and predicting a new type of aether theory (AT): this newly proposed universal SMEC is essentially based on an extended zero-energy hypothesis (eZEH) which predicts a general formula for all the rest energies of all EPs from Standard model (SM), also indicating an unexpected profound bijective connection between bosons and fermions and new types of EPs, including a 4 th generation of Majorana massless neutrinos (moving at the speed of light) that can be a plausible candidate for a superfluid aether/fermionic condensate. =================================================================== The short (halved) version of the original article (published in PSIJ) AND the original article are both available at these URLs : https://www.journalpsij.com/index.php/PSIJ/article/view/30218 AND https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346954896

#DONATIONS. Anyone can donate for dr. Dragoi’s independent research and original music at: https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=AQYGGDVDR7KH2

Science from History to Future CONTENTS 1. INERTIA 2. Form of Intensity of the Moving Charge Electric Field is Asymmetrical. 3. Form of the Interference Field is Non-Linear 4. CORRECTED Maswell's equations 5. Corrected Newton´s Laws of Motion 6. Kinetic energy of a charge moving at the velocity of v has two different values: Kinetic energy against direction of motion as wave Tkin ad = mc2 [ln |1+v/c|- (v/c)/(1+v/c)] Kinetic energy in direction of motion as particle Tkin id = mc2 [ln|1-v/c|+ (v/c)/(1-v/c)] 7. Physics is Easy 8. Particles, Waves and Trends in Physics 9. Physics is Beautiful 10. Great Table of Elementary Particles 11. Movement Principles of the Fast-Spinning Bodies 12. Nuclear Fusion

Matter engenders a Modified Newtonian Gravitational Potential (MNGP) that has a singularity at a two Normalized Spatial Unit (NSU) distance with a modified gravitational field constant in distance > 2 NSU region, and a saturated potential for distance < 2 NSU region. In Cartesian coordinates, a reference object (RO) resides at origin and a test object (TO) resides on the positive region of the X-axis, the interaction energy between the MNGP of the RO in the X>0 region and the X<0 region with the MNGP of the TO is different; This interaction energy imbalance results an E-space Inter-Domain Interaction (EIDI) potential (EIDIP), a scalar potential. Between two irrotational objects, the gradient of the scalar EIDIP produces a vector field, EIDIPd; whereas between two rotational objects, the angular EIDIP produces a different vector field, EIDIPr. The EIDIPd is the source of inter-nucleon nuclear force and inter-molecule covalent bonding force; whereas the EIDIPr vector fields engender the strong force in the inter-atomic range and is responsible for the galaxy rotational velocity anomaly at the interstellar distance. A list of null hypothesis testing node (NHTN), extracted from the EIDI application model empirical data comparison results, indicates that the EIDIP has 5+ sigma confidence level potential. The EIDIP function, along with the explanatory EIDI model, could be the missing blocks in completing the Unified theory.