Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
7 pages
1 file
Semantics of Ancient Hebrew Database 2021 – In Biblical Hebrew, the verb טוה means ‘to spin’. It designates the production of threads from fibres, especially wool and flax, but apparently also the plying together of two or more thin threads to form a stronger yarn. These activities were usually carried out by women with a ‘spindle’. For this and other lexicographical articles, see https://sahd-online.com/
ICYE Leiden 2019
At the start of Naqada II, a new material is being used all over Egypt. Linen textile, woven from flax, is used in most human burials (and a few animal burials) either as shrouds or as padding in an early form of mummification. The woven linen is also used for ritual purposes; to protect foundation deposits and as backing for plaster and paint in walls of ritual structures and artefacts. But when and how did this new material arrive, how was it produced, by whom and where? In Hierakonpolis, a large amount of textile tools for spinning are found in ritual contexts, making the question of whether textile for ritual use was also produced ritually relevant.
2012
Artifacts and products related to spinning became relatively abundant in the southern Levant during the latter half of the 5 th millennium BCE. Contrary to widespread scholarly opinions wool was not used for yarn production. Flax was the only fi bre used. All the sites with remains of textiles or evidence for intensifi cation of spinning are currently within the semi-arid zone, lacking the conditions favoured for fl ax cultivation or excess water for processing. A dramatic increase in spinning is attested by a profusion of lightweight, sherd spindle whorls used in the drop spinning technique at some of the semi-arid zone sites. In tandem with the pronounced rise in the frequency of whorls is the earliest known appearance of spinning bowls.
Two spindle whorls and one loomweight were discovered in scattered fills during the excavation of H. ‘Avot. They probably represent evidence for household textile production at the site, rather than a textile industry, possibly in more than one period.
Abstract: Artifacts and products related to spinning became relatively abundant in the southern Levant during the latter half of the 5th millennium BCE. Contrary to widespread scholarly opinions wool was not used for yarn production. Flax was the only fi bre used. All the sites with remains of textiles or evidence for intensifi cation of spinning are currently within the semi-arid zone, lacking the conditions favoured for fl ax cultivation or excess water for processing. A dramatic increase in spinning is attested by a profusion of lightweight, sherd spindle whorls used in the drop spinning technique at some of the semi-arid zone sites. In tandem with the pronounced rise in the frequency of whorls is the earliest known appearance of spinning bowls. Résumé : Au Levant sud, dans la seconde moitié du 5e millénaire av. notre ère, les artefacts et produits que l’on peut associer au fi lage deviennent relativement abondants. Contrairement à l’opinion généralement admise, la laine, à cette époque, ne sert pas à la fabrication du fi l, le lin constituant la seule matière utilisée. Les sites archéologiques ayant livré des restes de textiles ou ayant montré une intensifi cation du fi lage sont tous situés dans la zone aujourd’hui semi-aride ; celle-ci n’offre ni des conditions favorables à la culture du lin ni assez d’eau pour pouvoir le traiter. Toutefois, l’abondance de fusaïoles légères faites à partir de tessons, utilisées dans la technique du fi lage suspendu, témoignent du développement spectaculaire de cette technique. Parallèlement à l’augmentation prononcée du nombre de fusaïoles, on assiste à l’apparition des humidifi cateurs (mouilloirs). Keywords: Chalcolithic; Flax; Spindle whorl; Fibre wetting bowl. Mots-clés : Chalcolithique ; Lin ; Fusaïole ; Bol humidifi cateur (mouilloir).
Гласник Српског археолошког друштва Journal of Serbian Archaeological Society, 2020
Аbstract: Bone spinning implements have traditionally been a neglected part of Roman material culture, due to a general lack of interest for topics outside of the so-called "male domain". The consequence of such a situation is that hand distaffs often remained unidentified , in manners that contributed to the persistence of stereotypes about women in the Ro-man world. The predominant occurrence of these artefacts in sepulchral contexts, as well as their supposed fragility and miniature dimensions, led some scholars to the conclusion that they had a symbolic and ritual role. On the other hand, most of bone spinning implements possess some undoubtedly functional elements. This article presents an attempt to systematize all available data on bone spinning equipment, with particular focus on the collection of distaffs and spindles from ancient Viminacium. At the current stage of research, it can be concluded that there is no compelling evidence for the use of bone spinning tools in everyday wool working in Viminacium. Кeywords: Roman wool spinning, bone distaffs, bone spindles, Viminacium Wool had a special significance in the Roman world. The Latin word for it-lana was simultaneously used to name clothes in general (Larsson Lovén 1998, 85). Garments worn by priests of the traditional Roman religion were exclusively made out of wool. It was also used for bands that were tied around the heads of sacrificial animals, sacred trees, altars, temple columns, etc. Wool symbolizes the correct relationship with nature because, unlike leather, it comes from an animal that continues to live (Sebesta 2001, 47). A very important step in the process of making a finished product from the raw material was the spinning of the yarn. Equipment used for this task consisted of three implements: a distaff-colus, a spindle-fusus, and a basket for storing tools as well as rovings of unspun wool and balls of yarn-calathus (Facsády 2008, 166). A roving of wool would have been attached to a distaff held in the left hand, and from it, fibres would be extracted with two fingers. The spindle was in the right hand, and on it, there was some yarn already spun, the
Clothing and Nudity in the Hebrew Bible, 2019
The Hebrew Bible (HB) 1 describes the relationship between God and the Israelite nation throughout the Iron Age. In other words, its primary goal is "spiritual culture. " Without "material culture, " however, spiritual culture cannot survive. In order to complete the HB's picture, this chapter will describe the material textile aspects, which both complement and support the spiritual ones. The HB is not a systematic source of information about historical material culture. This means that the omission of certain data from the biblical corpus does not indicate its nonexistence during the biblical period. Therefore, in some instances where there are no relevant biblical references or detailed descriptions are lacking, supplemental information may be gleaned from and enriched by external sources, including literary, pictorial, and archaeological evidence from the Levant, Mesopotamia, and Egypt 2the Fertile Crescent. 3 Indeed, various topics within this category of textile material culture, including production and use, appear in the HB in different contexts. 1 English Bible translations are based on New Jewish Publication Society translation of the Jewish Bible (NJPS) and/or New Revised Standard Version (NRSV), with certain alterations made by the author. 2 Inferences regarding biblical material culture drawn from comparisons to ancient textile production in other lands or cultures must be approached with great care. Although textile production in general is similar in many different and dispersed cultures (this phenomenon has been referred to as industrial zeitgeist), some of the finer details may vary. Here are three examples: (1) Spindles all over the world are essentially the same, varying only in the shape, material, and position of the whorl. (2) The use of a distaff or not and if so, which method of usage-freestanding, handheld, or tucked into the belt. (3) Twist direction in spinning, either "S" (Egypt) or "Z" (southern Levant and Europe). See Bender, Textiles , 13, for the cultural aspects of these phenomena. 3 Postbiblical literary sources from the southern Levant include the Mishnah, Midrashim, Targumim, and Talmud and span the period of 70-500 CE. These texts contain a much wider selection of material culture topics and details. We do not claim that information originating in these sources necessarily reflects the Iron Age biblical period. However, it does raise the possibility that a more ancient, albeit undocumented, local tradition existed.
2013
The technology of textiles revolves around the preparation of fibres to produce thread suitable for loom weaving. During the Neolithic period in South China, a simple device called the hand spindle was developed for this purpose. Comprised of a weight (whorl) and a shaft (rod) designed to keep the weight vertical, the hand spindle twists fibres mechanically to extend their length before being woven on looms. While the length of plant fibres can also be extended manually through hand twisting or knotting, the hand spindle twists fibres much faster and more efficiently. Spinning also increases the tensile strength of fibres ensuring that woven threads neither break nor unravel. For these reasons, the invention of the hand spindle in many parts of the world has been heralded as a Neolithic revolution in textile technology.
Kazi Sonuçlari Toplantisi, 2018
Science and Public Policy
ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts
Cuban Journal of Public and Business Administration, 2024
Kwartalnik Neofilologiczny
NTT Journal forTheology and the Study of Religion, 2021
Investigaciones y ensayos, 2019
Scientific Journal of Mathematics, Natural and Applied Science , 2021
Revista Iberoamericana de Educación
International Journal of Economic Plants
Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics, 2018
Forensic Toxicology, 2016
American Journal of Otolaryngology, 2004