Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Hannah Arendt's Rahel Varnhagen

1984, in German Women in the Nineteenth Century, John Fout, ed. (New York: Holmes and Meier)

When female intellectuals become celebrities in America, much of their notoriety seems to derive from their sex. The female intellectual is packaged as a personality. Publicists and the public feel no shame in gossiping about such women's lives, condescendingly slighting their intellectual accomplishments. Hannah Arendt became such a celebrity in the United States in the second half of her life. But however fascinating her life story was, it was not at all easy to neglect her work. She was just too formidably serious. Taking her seriously was therefore hard work. To be sure, in part this was because her contributions could not be easily pigeonholed. Her writings created classificatory dilemmas for specialized scholars, if not for the general public. Had she been a philosopher? A historian? A political theorist? Her ideologies were as hard to pin down as was her intellectual discipline. Had she been a conservative? An anarchist? A Zionist? A "self-hating" Jew? A feminist?

´+DQQDK$UHQGW·V5DKHO9DUQKDJHQ´,Q*HUPDQ:RPHQLQWKH1LQHWHHQWK &HQWXU\$6RFLDO+LVWRU\ HGLWHGE\-RKQ)RXW1HZ<RUN/RQGRQ+ROPHV DQG0HLHU