Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 41 views

    Green Material For Sustainable Construction

    Uploaded by

    Sriram Kumaran
    This document discusses developing construction materials using green and sustainable materials. It aims to proportion various industrial byproducts and locally available resources to create blocks and bricks. The methodology involves literature reviews on previous studies, collecting samples, proportioning mixtures of materials like soil, copper sulfate, fly ash, and testing sample blocks. The goal is to create an affordable, environmentally friendly alternative to conventional bricks for construction using waste materials.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Green Material For Sustainable Construction

    Uploaded by

    Sriram Kumaran
    41 views25 pages
    This document discusses developing construction materials using green and sustainable materials. It aims to proportion various industrial byproducts and locally available resources to create blocks and bricks. The methodology involves literature reviews on previous studies, collecting samples, proportioning mixtures of materials like soil, copper sulfate, fly ash, and testing sample blocks. The goal is to create an affordable, environmentally friendly alternative to conventional bricks for construction using waste materials.

    Original Title

    DROJP.pptx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document discusses developing construction materials using green and sustainable materials. It aims to proportion various industrial byproducts and locally available resources to create blocks and bricks. The methodology involves literature reviews on previous studies, collecting samples, proportioning mixtures of materials like soil, copper sulfate, fly ash, and testing sample blocks. The goal is to create an affordable, environmentally friendly alternative to conventional bricks for construction using waste materials.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    41 views25 pages

    Green Material For Sustainable Construction

    Uploaded by

    Sriram Kumaran
    This document discusses developing construction materials using green and sustainable materials. It aims to proportion various industrial byproducts and locally available resources to create blocks and bricks. The methodology involves literature reviews on previous studies, collecting samples, proportioning mixtures of materials like soil, copper sulfate, fly ash, and testing sample blocks. The goal is to create an affordable, environmentally friendly alternative to conventional bricks for construction using waste materials.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    of 25

    Green Material For Sustainable Construction

    Guided by Presented by

    Dr. P. Oliver jayaprakash B. Vinothkumar(2016101146)


    K. Vijay kanna(2016101142)
    S. Vignesh(2016101140)
    ABSTARCT
    • This project aimed at preparation of construction material
    (Blocks/Bricks) using green materials. The popular green
    materials are coconut shell , copper sulphate, calcium carbide
    residue, banana, glass and jute waste (natural fibers), coal
    bottom ash, GGBS and etc.

    • The project focus on the proportioning of various green


    materials with natural subgrade available in the sourrounding
    area.
    Objective

    • To develop a green material using industrial by products and


    locally available resources for sustainable construction.
    Social Relevance

     Cost effective
     Environmental friendly
     Waste recycling
     Industrial waste utilisation
    Methodology
    Literature survey

    Sample collection

    Proportioning of Materials

    Casting of Sample

    Manufacturing the Blocks

    Testing of specimen blocks

    Results & discussion


    LITERATURE SURVEY
    • F.R. Arooz & R.U. Halwatura (2018) investigated in Mud-Concrete is a novel
    concept which employs a form of ‘Concrete’ produced using soil, cement and
    water. The initial concept of developing Mud-Concrete was to incorporate both
    the strength and durability of concrete into mud-based constructions to introduce
    a low-cost, load-bearing wall system with easy construction techniques which
    ensured indoor comfort while minimizing the impact on the environment. Here
    the fraction of soil is fulfilling the role of aggregate in the material and low
    quantities of cement will act as a stabilizer. Precisely the usable gravel range and
    the gravel percentage governs the compressive strength of the material. The
    considerable high-water amount is used for the hydration of cement and keep the
    flow of this material. This excessive water amount is enhancing its self-
    compacting quality, which is capable of self-consolidation, having the ability of
    passing, filling and being stable without the need of any external forces.
    Experimental test findings determined the mix proportions of Mud-Concrete
    block as 4% cement (minimum), fine≤10% (≤sieve size 0.425mm), sand 55–60%
    (sieve size 0.425mm≤sand≤4.75mm),gravel30–35%(sievesize4.75mm≤gravel≤
    20mm) and water 18% to 20% from the dry mix. Findings further confirmed that
    the durability of the Mud Concrete block satisfied the required durability
    standards recorded in SLS 1382.
    • P.Rajendra Kumar et al (2017) said about Expansive soil is one of the
    major soil deposits in India they exhibit high swelling and shrinkage when
    exposed to changes in moisture content and hence have been found to be
    most troublesome from engineering considerations. So there is a need to
    stabilize these soils when they are used for construction. In this regard, the
    expansive soil properties are found out. To this soil, as a first
    consideration, stabilized with copper slag adding at an interval of 5%
    reaching up to 30%. In second consideration, fly-ash is selected as a
    stabilizing agent to stabilize the expansive soil at an interval of 2%,
    reaching up to 10%. In the last consideration, sample of expansive soil
    with 30% copper slag is taken to be stabilized with fly-ash at an interval of
    2%reaching up to 10%. Finally regression analysis for these test results is
    carried out.
    •  
    • R C Gupta et al (2016) investigated about Industrialization
    extremely demands to the uplift of nation’s economy. However, it
    causes severe Environmental Pollution due to the generated waste
    materials. As the non-renewable raw materials for industrial
    production are dwindling day-by-day, efforts are to be made for
    conversion of these unwanted industrial wastes into utilizable raw
    materials, which in turn controls environmental pollution. Copper
    Slag is one of the waste byproduct produced by ‘Hindustan Copper
    limited’, Khetri, Rajasthan, India. The production of Copper Slag is
    120-130 lakh ton per annum. Expansive soils are a worldwide
    problem that creates challenges for Civil Engineers. They are
    considered as potential natural hazard, which can cause extensive
    damage to structures if not adequately treated. The disadvantages of
    clay can be overcome by stabilizing with suitable material. This
    research was done on the engineering behavior of Clay when
    stabilized with Copper Slag
    • Dinesh.A et al (2017) said about Black cotton soil which is one of the
    major soil deposits in India becomes highly problematic because of its
    property of higher degree of swelling and shrinkage. These soils are
    used in subgrade of pavement and also in construction of structures.
    Hence in order to improve the properties of such soils many methods
    are available like soil stabilization, soil replacement, moisture control,
    prewetting etc. In recent years, soil stabilization by using various
    minerals like quarry dust, saw dust, copper dust and fly ash were most
    commonly used. These solid wastes are day by day increasing in India,
    which is not environmental friendly hence they have to be recycled.
    Thus, a review is presented to make use of those wastes in soil
    stabilization. In this paper, the study mainly focuses on stabilization of
    soil using solid waste. To understand the performance of stabilized
    soil, its properties like Atterberg limits, compaction characteristics,
    swelling, shear strength, CBR value and other Index & Engineering
    properties were discussed.
    •  
    • Rakesh D R et al (2019) said about the indiscriminate infrastructural
    growth is leading to rapid environmental degradation. Sand, cement,
    coarse aggregate for manufacturing of bricks and used for large
    construction activities are energy intensive as well as causing
    environmental pollution during their entire life cycle. In order to
    quantify the energy and savings potential by applying best available
    technologies like Stabilized mud blocks for engineering applications.
    Even though the strength of SMB is less compared to cement blocks,
    we can use the SMB by stabilizing it by using cement, lime. But in
    this project we are trying stabilize the blocks by using waste
    materials like GGBS and Alccofines. In this study we are utilizing
    the behavior of Stabilized Mud Block with alccofines and GGBS by
    conducting various tests like the compressive, water absorption and
    weathering test. We can use the stabilized mud blocks for non-
    structural elements as it meets the strength requirements as per IS
    codes. And these blocks are purely eco-friendly as it is made up of
    waste materials.
    ENVINONMENTAL FRIENDLY

    • These blocks are affordable for all at very low cost than
    conventional bricks .
    • These block are manufacture In-situ with the soil available in
    the site and the waste materials .
    • Our motive is to make aware of these block mainly in villages.
    TABLE3.1 SIEVE ANALYSIS FOR FINE AGGREGATE

    SNO Sieve size Empty Retained wt. Retained wt. Cumulative wt. Cumulative % % finer
    wt. of of sieve of soil (gms) retained (gms) retained (gms)
    sieve (gms)
    (gms)

    1 4.75mm 368 379 11 11 1.1 98.9


     
    2 2.36mm 346 427 81 92 9.2 90.8

    3 1.18mm 362 710 348 440 44 56

    4 600 304 350 46 591 59.1 40.9


    Micron

    5 300 319 484 165 756 75.6 24.4


    Micron

    6 150 300 504 201 957 95.7 4.3


    Micron

    7 pan 307 343 43 1000 100 0


    SIEVE ANALYSIS
    SNO Sieve Empty Retained Retained Cumulat Cumulat % finer
    size wt. of wt. of wt. of ive wt. ive %
    sieve sieve soil retained retained
    (gms) (gms) (gms) (gms) (gms)
    1 4.75mm 368 610 245 245 24.5 75.5
    2 2.36mm 346 441 90 338 33.8 66.2
    3 1.18mm 362 692 330 668 66.8 33.2
    4 1mm 346 411 57 725 72.5 27.5
    5 600 304 356 54 779 77.9 22.1
    Micron
    6 300 307 453 147 926 92.6 7.4
    Micron
    7 150 307 366 58 984 98.4 1.6
    Micron
    8 pan 297 316 16 1000 100 0
    PLASTC LIMIT

    W1 = 20
    W2 = 70
    W3 = 67

    W = (W2-W3)/(W3-W1) * 100

    = (70-67)/(67-20) * 100

    = 6.38
    MIX PROPORTION

    SOIL (%) COPPERSULPHATE FLYASH(%)


    (%)
    100 0 0
    80 20 0
    75 25 0
    65 35 0
    60 40 0
    95 0 5
    90 0 10
    80 0 20
    60 30 10
    55 30 15
    50 30 20
    40 30 30
    BLOCK CAST FOR S-50% C-30% F-20%
    BLOCK CAST FOR S-60% C-30% F-10%
    BLOCK CAST FOR S-% C-25% F-0%
    BLOCK CAST FOR S-65% C-35% F-0%
    BLOCK CAST FOR S-100% C-0% F-0%
    BLOCK CAST FOR S-95% C-0% F-5%
    BLOCK CAST FOR S-90% C-0% F-10%
    FUTURE WORK

    • ALMOST 8 BLOCKS ARE CASTED IN BLACK COTTON SOIL AND


    RED SOIL FURTHER BLOCKS WANT TO BE CAST.
    • COMPRESSION TEST FOR CAST BLOCK
    • RESULT AND CONCLUSION
    References
    1. PeterDonkor and EstherObonyo (2015)
    2. Philbert Nshimiyimana, AdamahMessan,Zengfeng
    Zhao,LucCourard.,2019
    3. HumphreyDansoabD. BrettMartinsonaMuhammadAliaJohn B.Williams,,
    2015
    4. RafaelAlavéz-RamírezabPedroMontes-GarcíaaJacoboMartínez-
    PeterDonkor and EstherObonyo (2015)
    5. ReyescDelia CristinaAltamirano-JuárezadYadiraGochi-Ponce,2012 ,
    Thank you

    You might also like