3.1 Analyze Necessary Equipment and Measuring Tools.: Figure 3.1: Detail Drawing Sample 1
3.1 Analyze Necessary Equipment and Measuring Tools.: Figure 3.1: Detail Drawing Sample 1
3.1 Analyze Necessary Equipment and Measuring Tools.: Figure 3.1: Detail Drawing Sample 1
N136 T2 // khoan
N138 G56
N148 G0 Z100.
N152 G0 X17.5
N154 G0 Z5.
N210 G0 X26.
N212 G1 X20.
N214 G0 X35.
N216 G0 X21.
N218 G1 X15.
N220 G0 X35.
N222 G0 X16.
N224 G1 X10.
N226 G0 X35.
N228 G0 X11.
N230 G1 X6.
N232 G0 X31.
N234 G0 Z100.
N240 G0 X0.
N242 G0 Z0.2
N244 M05
N246 M30
%
O0003
N14 G0 Z20
N20 G0 Y14
3.2. Procedure
Panme:
Caliper:
- Perform measurement operations based on measurements diagram and record the measured
data into the record sheet.
No. Ra Rz
1 0.766 4.420
2 0.961 6.094
3 0.734 3.688
4 0.714 3.489
5 0.728 3.510
iii. Conclusion
- We compare with the requirement (Ra 0.8), we get the roughness of surface 1
(datumn A) meets the requirement.
Check the zero point of micrometers (measure the sample 25mm and 50mm) and
the vernier caliper (clamp and clean lower jaws as well as upper jaws).
Measure 5 different sections on the bushing by the micrometer and the vernier
caliper.
GD&T:
Flatness:
1. Using straight gauge
Set the ruler according to the edge, border of the part Figure 1 and use the scale to
determine the height of the gap between the ruler and the edge of the part.
Figure 3.5. Diagram for checking straightness and flatness by steel leaf gauge
Perpendicularity:
Measure the perpendicularity using triangle square and straight edge feeler gauge to
determine the gap ∆𝑚𝑖𝑛, ∆𝑚𝑎𝑥 (Figure 3). Making 3 measurements with L segments as
required (50mm) at different location then write the result in table below.
Figure 3.6. Check squareness by triangle square and steel leaf gauge
Parallelism:
- Put the surface datum B in place on the granite surface plate.
- Fix the dial indicator so that the tip is perpendicular to that surface.
- Move the bushing to get the value.
- The difference between the largest measured value ∆𝑚𝑎𝑥 and the smallest
measured value ∆𝑚𝑖𝑛 is the parallelism value. Take 5 different values at 5
measuring times.
Concentricity: By dial indicator
- Put the datumn A of the workspiece on the V-Block.
- Draw 3 sections parallel with the datumn B on the datumn A, each section is 3mm
away to each other.
- Use both internal and external dial indicator to indicate the datumn A and the face 4
at those sections in the same time then record the data.
Position:
- Cannot measure due to the lack of support equipment.
c. Data processing and comments
Dimension
Table 3.2 The dimensional data (mm)
Mearsure time
Dimension
1st 2nd 3rd Average
8.075
8.090 8.070 8.080 8.068
7.925
+0.075
∅ 8−0.075
18.027
17.980 17.970 17.980 17.976
+0.027
18.000
∅ 18 0
28.000
28.010 28.010 28.010 28.010
27.979
0
∅ 28−0.021
18
17.890 17.670 17.620 17.702
17.982
0
∅ 18−0.018
20.105
19.800 19.810 19.820 19.816
+0.105
19.895
20−0.105
23.958
7&10 24.120 24.100 24.130 24.118
35.050
35.090 35.030 34.990 35.052
34.950
+0.050
35−0.050
Evaluating:
- The measurement data that satisfy the requirement in drawing: ∅8, 24 (5&8).
- The measurement data that are not satisfy the requirement in drawing: ∅18, ∅28,
∅18, 20, 24 (6&9, 7&10), 35.
Conclusion:
From the table, we can get that only two dimensions requirement satisfy the
requirement. This is because of the machining process, preservation process and measuring
process.
GD&T:
Table 3.3. The geometric dimension and tolerance data (mm)
Measurement time
GD&T
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th Average
Straightness 0 0 0 0 0 0
Flatness (B)
0
Perpendicularity (B)
0 0 0 0 0 0
Parallelism (1)
0.060 0.100 0.100 0.080 0.070 0.082
Position
Unable to measure due to the lack of equipment
Concentricity (11)
Unable to measure due to the lack of equipment
Evaluating:
- The GD&T that meet the requirement of drawing: flatness, perpendicularity.
- The GD&T that do not meet the requirement of drawing: parallelism.
Conclusion:
- Although the flatness and perpendicularity satisfy the requirement, the result is not
reliable. The minimum value of the steel leaf gauge is 0.03 so any value that
smaller than that value is not recorded. For more reliable, they need to determine by
the modern machine ( if necessary).
- The parallelism does not meet the requirement due to the error in machining
process (cutting tool, chip, cooling liquid,…), measuring process (temperature,
cleaning condition,…) and preservation process.
- The position tolerance can not measure by the traditional tool, it needs something
more modern like CMM. Moreover, the concentricity can not measure because
there is a lack of internal indicator, we change the way to measure the
concentricity by the CMM.
Data:
Position
No. Surface Mearuring diameter Tolerance
x y z
3 419.809 229.760 -4.166 27.979
1 0.020
11 419.809 229.762 -4.164 18.101
3 419.809 229.760 -9.166 27.971
2 0.020
11 419.809 229.761 -9.157 18.097
Average value of concentricity tolerance 0.020
Position
First way
Tolerance
No.
5&8 6&9 7&10
1 0.2456 0.1757 0.2635
2 0.1516 0.3018 0.1209
Maximum 0.2456 0.3018 0.2635
From the table, we got these results. The position tolerance is 0.05 and those for
5&8, 6&9, 7&10 do not satisfy the condition.
Figure 3.10. The hexagonal surface of sample 2 measured by CMM
Sample 2:
Using the CMM method, we determined a diameter of ϕ=27.971 from the surface
being measured to surface A at approximately 5 mm distance, differing from the
specified diameter in the drawing which is ϕ=28 mm, with an error of 0.029 (mm).
Diameter ϕ=27.973 from the surface being measured to surface A at approximately 10
mm distance, differing from the specified diameter in the drawing which is ϕ=28 mm,
with an error of 0.027 (mm).
Diameter ϕ=17.933 from the surface being measured to surface A at approximately 30
mm distance, differing from the specified diameter in the drawing which is ϕ=18 mm,
with an error of 0.067 (mm).
Diameter ϕ=17.934 from the surface being measured to surface A at approximately 33
mm distance, differing from the specified diameter in the drawing which is ϕ=18 mm,
with an error of 0.066 (mm).
The concentricity between the first and third circles, or relative to the standard surface
A is 0.145 mm.
The measured distance from the standard surface to the hexagonal surface obtained by
the machine is 28.017 (mm), with an error compared to the drawing of 0.017 (mm).
Sample 2 Second Round:
Diameter ϕ=27.979 from the surface being measured to standard surface B at
approximately 4 mm distance, differing from the specified diameter in the drawing
which is ϕ=28 mm, with an error of 0.021 (mm).
Diameter ϕ=27.971 from the surface being measured to standard surface B at
approximately 9 mm distance, differing from the specified diameter in the drawing
which is ϕ=28 mm, with an error of 0.029 (mm).
Diameter ϕ=18.101 from the surface being measured to standard surface B at
approximately 4 mm distance, differing from the specified diameter in the drawing
which is ϕ=18 mm, with an error of 0.101 (mm).
Diameter ϕ=18.097 from the surface being measured to standard surface B at
approximately 4 mm distance, differing from the specified diameter in the drawing
which is ϕ=18 mm, with an error of 0.097 (mm).
c. Comment on the obtained values compared to the requirements from the drawings
Concentricity
From the result above, we conclude:
- The machining process and preservation process are excellent. The temperature at
the measuring room is suitable.
- The preservation process including lubrication and covering makes the surface
roughness suitable for measuring.
Position
From the result above, we conclude the reason for the failure:
- Due to poor cleaning of the cutter, uneven oiling leads to chips remaining on the
cutter, affecting the milling process.
- Due to the old measuring tool is not suitable for measuring the exact size.
- Effect of cutting speed.
- Effect of Knife Running Amount.
- Effect of Cutting Depth.
- The machining process and preservation process are excellent. The temperature at
the measuring room is suitable.
- The preservation process including lubrication and covering makes the surface
roughness suitable for measuring.
3.3. Analyze and evaluate the results of measurement and inspection operations
- 4. Conclusion
There is a difference between the dimensions measured at the factory and the
dimensions measured at the laboratory. The cause of the above difference may come
from:
+ Effect of temperature on the size of the workpiece: aluminum is a material with high
thermal expansion. After the turning operation, the workpiece receives heat generated by
the machining process, so it expands, causing the measured size to be larger than the
size measured in the laboratory.
% N136 T3// Drill big hole N176 G00 Z150. N216 G00 X26.
O01111 N138 G59 N178 T4// Exterior N218 G01 X20.
N100 G99 G97 G90 G21 N140 S700 M03 surface finishing N220 G00 X31.
N102 T1// Rough N142 G00 X0 N180 G58 N222 G00 X21.
machining of the outer N144 G00 Z5. N182 S1100 M03 N224 G01 X15.
surface N146 G83 Z-18. R5. Q5. N184 G00 X31. N226 G00 X35.
N104 G55 F0.1 N186 G00 Z0. N228 G00 X16.
N106 S1100 M03 N148 G00 Z50. N188 G01 X17. Z0. F0.1 N230 G01 X10.
N108 G00 X31. Z2. N150 T3// Fine N190 G01 X28. Z0. N232 G00 X31.
N110 G71 U0.2 R1. machining of holes N192 G01 X28. Z-40. N234 G00 X11.
N112 G71 P114 Q118 N152 G57 N194 G1 X27. Z0. N236 G01 X6.
U0.1 W0.1 F0.2 N154 G97 S1500 M03 N196 G1 X28. Z-0.5 N238 G00 X31.
N114 G01 X17. Z0. N156 G00 X17.3 N198 G00 X31. N240 G00 Z50.
N116 G01 X28. Z0. N158 Z2. N200 G00 Z200. N242 T2
N118 G01 X28. Z-40. N160 Z1. N202 T2 // Cut off work N244 G54
N120 G00 Z150. N162 G71 U0.1 R0.1 piece N246 G00 X0.
N122 T3 // Drilling N164 G71 P166 Q168 U0 N204 G54 N248 G00 Z2.
N124 G56 W0. F0.1 N206 S850 M03 N250 M05
N126 S1400 M03 N166 G01 X18. N208 G00 X31. N252 M30
N128 G00 X0. Z5. N168 G01 Z-18. N210 G00 Z-39. %
N130 G83 Z-40. R5. Q5. N170 G1 X19. Z0 N212 G01 X25. F0.01
F0.2 N172 G1 X18. Z-0.5 N214 G00 X31.
N132 G00 Z5. N174 G1 Z1.
N134 G00 Z50.