Theme 2
Theme 2
Theme 2
T.W. Yee1
1
Technical Manager, TenCate Geosynthetics Asia, Shah Alam, Malaysia; Tel: +60-3 5191 2609; Fax: +60-3
5191 4761; Email: [email protected]
ABSTRACT
The hydrologic cycle is described. The mechanisms of erosion due to hydraulic action are discussed. A
summary of conventional erosion control techniques and systems is provided. This includes the use of vegetation
and timber products; rocks and stones; and concrete unit products. The functions of geosynthetic erosion control
products may be summarized as ground cover, turf reinforcement, material confinement and material
containment. In ground cover, the product minimizes the impact of rain droplets and prevent the detachment of
soil particles. In turf reinforcement, the product improves the erosion resistance of vegetation. In material
confinement, the product enhances erosion resistance of the soil that they help confine. In material containment,
the product when filled with the selected material becomes a structural unit to replace of rock or concrete units to
resist the forces of erosion, thereby protecting the base soil below. The application and design of geosynthetics
for erosion control in hydraulic environment are presented. Several case studies are described.
HYDROLOGIC CYCLE
119
GEOSYNTHETICS ASIA 2012
5th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics
13 to 15 December 2012 | Bangkok, Thailand
120
GEOSYNTHETICS ASIA 2012
5th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics
13 to 15 December 2012 | Bangkok, Thailand
Individual water particles move forward only which determines different ground vegetation cover
slightly, forming a vertically circular pattern. or the lack of it, impacts the rate of erosion.
When waves approach the shoreline, the orbiting The removal of surface vegetation which results
water particles are vertically restricted and this in the exposure of barren soil as in the case of
restriction causes elliptical and flattened orbits to construction site accelerates the rate of erosion (see
form near the bottom. This pattern change slows the Table 1). Grass can be an effective erosion control
affected wave, but more waves continue arriving measure when combined with a system of surface
from behind. The resultant effects are closer-spaced drains (GCO, 1984; Hengchaovanich, 1999; Truong,
waves, growing in height and steepness, with 1999). The techniques used for planting grass
sharper wave crests. As the crest of each wave rises, include hydroseeding, sprigging, turfing and
a point is reached when its height exceeds its vertical broadcast seeding (GCO, 1984).
stability and the wave falls into a characteristic
breaker, crashing onto the shore. When waves break Table 1 Erosion rates by land use in Malaysia
on the shore, they expend a large part of their energy (Sani, 1998)
to erode the land. Figure 5 shows the nature of
waves in the ocean and the changes in wave Land use Rate of
characteristics as it approaches the shoreline. erosion
(tonnes/
hectare/year)
Undisturbed lowland rainforest 0.19-3.12
Selective logging, lowland forest 0.2-16.5
Selective logging, steepland forest 11.2-28.5
Shifting cultivation 0.18-0.34
Logging roads 10-550
Temperate vegetables, highlands 2-10.5
Traditional pepper cultivation 80-85
Conversion of forest to oil palm 2.2-2.5
Construction site 400-500
Streams affected by construction 12-100
Fig. 5 Changes in wave characteristics as it activity
approaches the shoreline
A variety of woody materials, both live and dead,
The action of tides, currents, wind, waves and are used in bank protection all over the world
changing sea level produces a variety of erosional (Donat, 1992; Przedwojski et al, 1995; Polster,
and depositional landforms. Sea cliffs are erosional 2002). Live woody materials include water-tolerant
landforms formed by the undercutting action of the trees and shrubs. They act to impede hydraulic
waves. Beaches and mudflats are depositional action and their roots act as reinforcement of the
landforms. At any period of time, a shoreline may be base soil. However, they need regular trimming and
eroding or accreting, depending on changes in tides, maintenance to avoid a significant reduction in
currents, wind, waves and disruption to littoral channel capacity. Timber and other dead woody
process. materials are used in bank protection in the form of
poles, stakes, piles, beams, battens, logs, brush, etc.
Slope Instability Successful establishment of vegetation on a
newly-formed slope is governed by several factors
Slope instability is not an erosion mechanism. related to the time of planting, steepness, soil type
However, slope instability can hasten the rate of and the selection of the replanting species (GCO,
erosion. Firstly, slides detach large soil masses from 1984; Barker, 1999). Durability under successive
otherwise stable conditions and move them closer to wetting and drying of the timber product is a key
sources of erosion. Secondly, detached soil masses consideration for the design life of the erosion
usually end up looser than the in-situ soil state. protection system.
121
GEOSYNTHETICS ASIA 2012
5th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics
13 to 15 December 2012 | Bangkok, Thailand
about 2 to 3 stones thick. Rock armour is more ECGMs function as ground cover to exposed
carefully selected rock of a narrow size range soil. They minimize the impact of rain droplets and
(D85/D15 ~ 1.25 – 1.7.5), which is carefully placed in resist detachment of soil particles. They also act as a
layers, usually two rock thick. Rubble, which is backing for turf roots to grow into resulting in a
usually rock or stone fragments, but may sometimes composite carpet of turf (instead of behaving as
include broken concrete, brick or asphalt, can be individual clumps), thereby enhancing the erosion
dumped to provide protection. resistance of grass.
Pitched stone revetments are common in some Three-dimensional mats are able to trap some
places where the increased stability afforded to topsoil that can help speed up the process of
relatively small rock by close packing has allowed revegetation. Biodegradable mats may provide
the use of local stone. Other techniques that allow nourishment to facilitate growth of vegetation but
smaller stones to be used with improved stability gradually loses its function as turf reinforcement as
include the use of steel wire gabion and mattress biodegradation progresses.
products, and the use of cement grout, bitumen and Hybrids (combination of biodegradable and non-
other materials to bind the stones. biodegradable components) can provide
nourishment while retaining the long-term turf
Concrete Product Revetments reinforcement function. Figures 7(a,b) show the use
of two-dimensional biodegradable mat and three-
A wide variety of precast concrete products are dimensional non-biodegradable mat respectively for
available for use to replace of rock as erosion control erosion protection of excavated slopes.
cover units (Przedwojski et al, 1995; McConnell,
1998; Pilarczyk, 2000). They either come in the
form of block or slab units. Concrete blocks or slabs
may be placed to form an armour layer for revetment
construction, often with a geotextile filter layer
placed between the concrete product or the granular
drainage layers and the base soil.
Simple blocks can be placed freely on the slope
relying on unit mass, friction with the under-layer
and inter-block friction to provide stability. For
some blocks, gravel may be placed in the joints to
increase friction and help transfer loads over a wider
area. Interlocking blocks can provide greater
stability than simple blocks. Blocks can also be (a)
connected by cables to form mats. Concrete slabs
(generally of plan area 2 m x 2 m or larger) which
may be either precast or cast in-situ are also used.
Geosynthetic Products
122
GEOSYNTHETICS ASIA 2012
5th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics
13 to 15 December 2012 | Bangkok, Thailand
Geosynthetic products with material confinement Geotextile containment products in the form of
function usually have honeycomb-like cells for in- bags, mattresses, tubes and other container shapes
filling with material. The product is made from have been used in erosion control applications
polymeric strips assembled and connected by a (Jakobson and Nielsen, 1970; Liu, 1974; Kortsmit
series of offset, full depth seams aligned and Tutuarima, 1993; Pilarczyk, 2000; Koerner,
perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the strips. 2005; Yee et al, 2007; Lawson, 2008) for more than
The product comes in a compact accordion-like form 50 years. The materials used to fill these geotextile
and when expanded or stretched out, will form a containment products include sand, aggregate,
network of flexible, three-dimensional, cellular cement grout and concrete.
confinement system. For long term durability, the geotextile
The strips are usually solid or perforated polymer containment product may require product surface
straps but may also be made using geogrids or effect enhancement, establishment of long term
geotextiles. The strip width is varied according to vegetation cover or installation of a long term
design requirement. They may be in-filled with soil protective cover. Figures 9 a, b, c, d show the use
or stones and the confinement function effectively geotextile bag, sand filled geotextile mattress,
increases resistance of the soil or stone particles to micro-concrete filled geotextile mattress and
detachment and entrainment. geotextile tube respectively for erosion control
Figure 8(a) shows the application of soil filled applications.
cellular confinement product for excavated slope
erosion control. Here, the cells are carefully planted
with different types of grass and small flowering
plants that will result in an artistic motif. Figure 8(b)
shows the application of stone filled cellular
confinement product for riverbank erosion control.
(a)
(a)
(b)
(b)
123
GEOSYNTHETICS ASIA 2012
5th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics
13 to 15 December 2012 | Bangkok, Thailand
To a significantly lesser extent, geogrids and Rainfall simulators are useful tools for the study
geonets have also been used to fabricate containment of erosion of soils due to rainfall and runoff
products for erosion control applications. However, (Dimoyiannis et al, 2001; Wanielista and Chopra,
geotextile predominates as the material of choice for 2010). Rustom and Weggel (1993) performed
the fabrication of geosynthetic containment products laboratory soil erosion tests on a number of ECGMs
for erosion control applications because panels of using a rainfall simulator. Results are presented for
geotextile can be easily joined with high seam bare soil slopes and for soil slopes protected by 12
strength and efficiency, as well as contain material different ECGMs with different products showing
over a much wider range of particle sizes. varying degrees of reduction in erosion. Such tests
are very useful in quantifying reductions in erosion
between a specific product against non-use and
PERFORMANCE AND SELECTION OF against other products.
EROSION CONTROL GEOMAT Leong et al (2006) reported the use of rainfall
simulator for physical model testing in the
Vegetation Establishment Phases laboratory to determine the performance of selected
ECGMs. The large scale physical model testing
When ECGMs are used for erosion control there facility was developed in the Hydraulics Laboratory
is a time perspective involved when we talk about of the National University of Singapore. Figure 11
the functions needed and performance of the ECGM shows the testing setup.
(see Figure 10).
Broadly, we can differentiate three different The 2 m wide flume test setup essentially
phases; the unvegetated phase, the vegetating phase consists of three components; the rainfall simulator,
and the vegetated phase. During the unvegetated and the model soil slope and the eroded soil retention
124
GEOSYNTHETICS ASIA 2012
5th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics
13 to 15 December 2012 | Bangkok, Thailand
basin. The rainfall simulator consists of a 2 m long It should be noted that allowable flow velocities
pipe with 15 nozzles at every 100 mm intervals, is decrease with flow duration. Koerner (2005)
placed across the width of the flume and can move remarked that manufacturers of ECGMs often
along the length of the flume above where the model present the erosion resistance of their products in
soil slope is located. The eroded soil retention basin terms of maximum allowable flow velocity and that
is located beyond the toe of the model soil slope and though unstated, these flow limits are typically for
consists of a geotextile filter baffle across the flume very short duration and may not reflect the potential
located 4 m from the toe of the model slope. The for severe erosion damage that results from
geotextile baffle allows water to seep through but moderate flow velocities over a period of several
retains soil particles which can then be quantified. hours.
A series of tests was carried out to quantify the
erosion of the model slope in terms of soil collected Product Selection
in the retention basin under different simulated
rainfall intensity and duration. These were repeated If cost is not an issue, the ideal system would be
under the same conditions using 3 different grades one that provides maximum ground cover erosion
of ECGM. Table 2 shows the results. resistance, time-wise has the shortest vegetating
phase and provides the best performance in terms of
Table 2 Eroded soil concentration in terms of ppm turf reinforcement. The definition of system here
of runoff (Leong et al, 2006) would include the ECGM, the grass species and the
topsoil selection. A wide variety of product designs
Bare ECGM ECGM ECGM is available in the market to cater for these
Slope preparation Slope 1 2 3 engineering objectives. However, cost is always a
ECGM unit mass N.A. 270 400 320 consideration. Therefore the first question to answer
Time Intensity Eroded soil concentration in the product selection process is whether turf
(min) (mm/hr) (ppm) reinforcement is required in design. Generally,
15 300 3048 610 - - ECGMs with long term turf reinforcement capability
15 500 2743 571 80 183
30 300 2667 486 - -
tend to be more costly.
30 500 2286 446 51 114 It is desirable to ensure a quick establishment of
vegetation, as a good vegetation cover is the key to
The percentage area cover of the ECGM seems long-term protection of barren soil. However,
to affect the loss of soil prior to establishment of ECGMs that have excellent ground cover erosion
vegetation. A high percentage area cover is more resistance tend to have low light penetration
effective in controlling erosion of the barren soil. capability which may slow down the vegetating
However, if the percentage area cover is too high it process. Ultimately, the product selection is best
may slow down the process of revegetation. based on a balance between the relevant design
objectives and cost.
Turf Reinforcement Performance
ECGM Product Specification
Erosion control revegetation mats (ECRMs) and
turf reinforcing mats (TRMs) are ECGMs that have The specification process for ECGMs usually
the function of turf reinforcement. Figure 12 shows covers a variety of product properties and test
the long term design velocities versus storm flow methods. They generally fall under the category of
durations (Theisen, 1992). index or performance. Some of them are properties
that rely on established test methods e.g. tensile
strength, mass per unit area, water permeability, etc.
Others are properties that rely on developing test
methods e.g. light transmission, smoulder resistance,
porosity, water absorption, protection against
evaporation, etc. (Smith and Bhatiar, 2006; Nemeth
et al, 2012). Smith et al (2005) indicated that
percentage area cover and water holding capacity
play important roles in the long term vegetation
establishment of ECGMs.
As there are no numerical analytical methods
available for design, the usual way to specify is
based on past practice and experience. A target type
Fig. 12 Recommended maximum design velocities or range of product is first identified, based on past
for various classes of erosion control successes and the manufacturer’s published data
materials (Theisen, 1992) then forms a basis to specify on properties.
125
GEOSYNTHETICS ASIA 2012
5th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics
13 to 15 December 2012 | Bangkok, Thailand
ܖ܉ܜD
[ൌ (1)
ටSࡴ࢙ Ȁࢀ
126
GEOSYNTHETICS ASIA 2012
5th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics
13 to 15 December 2012 | Bangkok, Thailand
ࡴ࢙ Ǥૠ
(6)
The buoyant relative density of the structural ࢤࡰࢋ ඥ[
where,
Geotextile mattresses
Uf = density of fill material [kg/m3];
Uw = density of water [kg/m3]. The stability criterion of mattress revetment under
wave attack is given as follows (Pilarczyk et al,
An initial estimation of the buoyant relative 1998; McConnell, 1998; CUR 217, 2006):
density of the structural unit, ', for design is shown
in Table 3 where the density of water, Uw, is assumed ࡴ࢙ ࡿ
(8)
as 1000 kg/m3. ࢤࡰࢋ [Ȁ
127
GEOSYNTHETICS ASIA 2012
5th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics
13 to 15 December 2012 | Bangkok, Thailand
where: where,
' = buoyant relative density of structural unit [-]; h = water depth [m];
De = effective thickness of revetment [m]; kr = equivalent roughness according to Nikuradse
) = stability parameter [-]; [m].
< = Shields parameter [-];
KT = turbulence factor [-]; The value of kr depends on the type of revetment.
Kh = depth parameter [-]; For geobag revetment, the value of kr can be taken
Ks = slope parameter [-]; as equal to Dn. For mattress revetment, the value of
ucr = critical flow velocity [m/s]; kr can be taken as equal to De.
g = gravitational acceleration [m/s2]. The slope factor, Ks, is a function of the
influence of the angle of shearing resistance between
Table 5 shows the values of ) to adopt in design. the structural unit and the subsoil, and is given as
Table 6 shows the values of < to adopt in design. follows (Pilarczyk, 1990; CUR 217, 2006):
Table 7 shows the values of KT to adopt in design. For units not anchored at the top of the slope,
where,
Revetment type Shields parameter, <
Geobag revetment 0.05 D = slope angle of revetment [deg];
Mattress revetment 0.07 G = friction angle between structural unit and the
subsoil [deg].
Table 7 Turbulence factor
Sand Tightness Criteria
Hydraulic situation Turbulence
factor, KT There is a need to check for sand tightness of
Normal turbulence in rivers 1.0 sand filled geobag and goetextile mattress units.
Higher turbulence: river bends 1.5 Table 8 shows the recommended design criteria for
Strong turbulence: hydraulic jumps, 2.0 sand tightness requirement (CUR 217, 2006). There
sharp bends, local disruptions are two approaches to fulfilling the sand tightness
Turbulence as the result of propeller 3.0 to 4.0 requirement.
jets and other water jets If the sand fill source and particle distribution is
known, the pore size of the geobag or geotextile
By introducing the depth factor, Kh, the depth- mattress can then be specified for the contract
averaged flow velocity is translated into a flow documents. Alternatively, if the pore size of the
velocity just above the revetment. The depth factor, geobag or geotextile mattress is known, the particle
Kh, is given as follows (Pilarczyk, 2000; CUR 217, distribution of the sand fill can then be specified for
2006): the contract documents.
For developed current profile, Table 8 Recommended design criteria for sand
tightness requirement
ࡷࢎ ൌ (10)
ࢎ Hydraulic load Requirement 1 Requirement 2
ቆܗܔቀ ቁቇ
࢘
Stationary load ࡻૢ ൏ ࡰ ඥ࢛ ࡻૢ ൏ ࡰૢ
(current)
For undeveloped current profile, Dynamic load ࡻૢ ൏ Ǥ ࡰ ඥ࢛ ࡻૢ ൏ ࡰૢ
(wave)
ࢎ ିǤ O90 = pore size of geobag or geotextile mattress;
ࡷࢎ ൌ ቀ ቁ (11)
࢘ D10 = sieve size through which 10% fraction of the sand
material passes;
For a very rough current, D60 = sieve size through which 60% fraction of the sand
material passes;
ࡷࢎ ൌ Ǥ (12) D90 = sieve size through which 90% fraction of the sand
material passes;
Cu = uniformity coefficient (=D60 / D10)
128
GEOSYNTHETICS ASIA 2012
5th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics
13 to 15 December 2012 | Bangkok, Thailand
Mechanical Strength Requirement erosion protection of the back face may need to be
provided for.
The mechanical strength requirement is usually
dictated by stresses experienced during handling, Termination details
installation and in-service. They should be strong
and robust enough to prevent rupture during filling Appropriate termination details should be
and placement. adopted at the ends of the structure to prevent
undermining at the end of the structure. Such details
Durability Requirement are usually very much site-specific. The termination
details may involve butting against a solid structure;
The durability of the structural units should e.g. concrete walls, wing walls of culvert openings,
outlast the design life of the revetment. This includes concrete discharge drains along the bank slopes, etc.
resistance to abrasion, UV attack, debris impact, or involve the revetment curving back in plan into
vandalism, etc. the bank slopes.
Information on the geotechnical properties of the This relates to dimensions of the unfilled product
slope and foundation materials should be known or to enable the ultimate filled product to conform to
determined to enable an assessment of the specific engineering requirements.
geotechnical stability. The materials may include
naturally occurring subsoil or imported fill material. Mechanical properties
The relevant properties include particle size, shear
strength, permeability and others. Relevant mechanical properties include tensile
strength, seam strength, puncture resistance, etc.
Toe protection
Hydraulic properties
Toe protection will provide some sliding
resistance to the revetment and help to prevent The key property here is pore size of the
failure of the revetment from scour. Typical forms of geotextile used in the manufacture of the
toe protection are: containment product. A minimum permeability is
(a) buried toe – the revetment cover layer is also often specified although this is seldom a critical
extended beneath the bed level to beyond issue given that geotextiles are often permeable
the predicted scour depth; enough.
(b) sheet piling – this may be used alone or
with a concrete toe beam; Durability properties
(c) toe retaining structure – this may be in the
form of a gabion toe, precast concrete mini- Relevant durability tests include abrasion test
wall or geotextile tube dyke unit; that simulate site conditions, UV resistance test, etc.
(d) extension of cover layer along bed – the
cover layer may be extended along the bed Fill Material Specification
in front of the structure; if scour occurs,
then this extra length of revetment will drop Specification for sand fill
into the scour hole providing protection
(this should not be used where severe scour Specification of sand to be used as fill material is
may occur as some undermining or loss of usually based on a gradation that conforms to the
sub-layer material may occur). sand tightness requirement. The sand generally
should not contain any unwanted material such as:
Trenching and anchoring details (a) material susceptible to volume change,
including marine mud, swelling clays and
The top of sand filled and concrete filled collapsible soils,
geotextile mattresses are generally anchored in a (b) peat, vegetation, timber, organic, soluble or
trench. The trenching and anchoring details may perishable material,
differ from case to case, depending on the product, (c) dangerous or toxic material or material
the revetment geometry and the anchoring resistance susceptible to combustion, and
force required. When there is a possibility of (d) metal, rubber or other unsuitable material.
significant overtopping or overflow of the structure,
129
GEOSYNTHETICS ASIA 2012
5th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics
13 to 15 December 2012 | Bangkok, Thailand
CASE STUDIES
130
GEOSYNTHETICS ASIA 2012
5th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics
13 to 15 December 2012 | Bangkok, Thailand
131
GEOSYNTHETICS ASIA 2012
5th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics
13 to 15 December 2012 | Bangkok, Thailand
bank of Kampar River that is subject to tidal bore of safety of 1.28 was achieved. Analysis was carried
effect which can create waves of up to 4 m traveling out with Bishop’s method using Slope/W program.
upriver. The subsoil profile from two boreholes, The exterior face of the geotextile tube structure
BH1 and BH2, is shown in Figure 19 and generally was profiled to a slope angle of 50O to the horizontal
consist of a top stratum of a mixture of sand and before a concrete filled geotextile mattress
round wood underlain by soft clay that is interrupted revetment structure was constructed. The concrete
with thin sand layers or lenses. The soft clay mattress was extended downwards by 1 m and
generally increases in shear strength with depth. outwards by another 1 m to protect against toe scour
effects. The concrete mattress was anchored by
sandwiching between the geotextile tube structure
and two layers of geotextile bags placed above.
Figure 21(a) shows the installation of the
geotextile tube at site. Figure 21(b) shows the
completed concrete filled geotextile mattress
revetment constructed at high tide conditions. This
innovative construction allowed the wharf to be
constructed under tidal conditions. During the tidal
bore event, the geotextile tube was stable enough to
resist the waves as well.
Fig. 19 Subsoil profile (Suhendra et al, 2011)
(a)
(a)
(b)
(b)
Fig. 20 River wharf at Pulau Muda (a) layout plan
Fig. 21 River wharf construction at Pulau Muda (a)
(b) typical cross section through river wharf
installation of geotextile tube (b) concrete
(Suhendra et al, 2011)
filled geotextile mattress over installed
geotextile tube (Suhendra et al, 2011)
Geotextile tubes were used to form the dyke
structure to improve the global stability. This
improvement in global stability is achieved by the
CONCLUSIONS
forcing of the critical slip plane behind the geotextile
tube structure to cut deeper down to the layers of
This paper described the mechanisms and
higher shear strength. By this way a minimum factor
processes of erosion in hydraulic environment. The
132
GEOSYNTHETICS ASIA 2012
5th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics
13 to 15 December 2012 | Bangkok, Thailand
application of geosynthetics for erosion control was Kam, S. (2006). The Malaysian experience of
discussed. The process for the selection of erosion erosion control using geosynthetics and bio-
control geomats and the process for the design of engineering in streambank, swale, and hillslope
geotextile containment products were presented. applications. Proc. 8th Intl. Conference on
Finally, several case studies involving the Geosynthetics, Yokohama, Japan. Milpress,
application of geosynthetics for erosion control were Rotterdam, :709-712.
presented. Knighton, D. (1984). Fluvial Form and Processes.
Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd., London.
Koerner, R.M. (2005). Designing with
REFERENCES Geosynthetics. Pearson Prentice Hall, New
Jersey, 796p.
Barker, D.H. (1999). The introduction of ground and Kortsmit, L.L.J. and Tutuarima, W.H. (1993).
water bioengineering techniques to the humid Geotextile mattresses filled with sand for bank
tropics. Proc. 1st Asia-Pacific Conference on protection Niger River, Nigeria. Proc.
Ground and Water Bioengineering for Erosion Geosynthetics Case Histories, ISSMFE TC9.
Control and Slope Stabilization, Manila, BiTech Publishers, British Columbia, :84-85.
Philippines. IECA: 3-17. Lawson, C.R. (2008). Geotextile containment for
Christopherson, R.W. (2000). Geosystems – An hydraulic and environmental engineering.
Introduction to Physical Geography. 4th Ed., Geosynthetics International, 15(6): 384-427.
Prentice Hall, New Jersey, U.S.A. Leong, K.W., Chew, S.H. and Lim, L.K.A. (2006).
Cunningham, W.P. and Saigo, B.W. (1997). Erosion control for sustainable highway and
Environmental Science – A Global Concern. urban constructions in Southeast Asia. Proc. 8th
WCB-Times Mirror: Dubuque, IA, U.S.A. Int. Conference on Geosynthetics, Yokohama,
Dimoyiannis, D.G., Valmis, S. and Vyrlas, P. Japan. Milpress, Rotterdam, :697-700.
(2001). A rainfall simulation study of erosion of Lipidus, D.F. (1990). Collins Dictionary of Geology.
some calcareous soils. Global Nest: The Intl. J., Collins, Glasgow, 565p.
3(3): 179-183. Liu, G.S. (1974). Mortar Sausage Unit for Coastal
CUR 217 (2006). Ontwerpen met geotextiele Defense. M. Sc. Thesis, University of Western
zandelementen (in Dutch), CUR, Rijkwaterstaat, Australia.
NGO, CUR, Gouda, Netherlands. McConnell, K. (1998). Revetment Systems Against
Donat, M. (1995). Bioengineering Techniques for Wave Attack – A Design Manual. HR
Streambank Restoration – A Review of Central Wallingford, Thomas Telford, London, U.K.
European Practices. Watershed Restoration Nemeth, E., Boker, J., Zanzinger, H., Marzini, K.
and Eppel, J. (2012). Evaluation of erosion
Project Report No.2, British Columbia, Canada.
control products on steep slopes by using
GCO (1984). Geotechnical Manual for Slopes. performance and index tests. Proc. Intl.
Geotechnical Control Office, Engineering Symposium on Sustainable Geosynthetics and
Development Department, Hong Kong, 295. Green Technology for Climate Change,
Heibum, M., Fourie, A., Girard, H., Karunaratne, Bangkok, Thailand, :375-382.
G.P., Lafleur, J. and Palmeira, E.M. (2010). Pidwirny, M. (1999). Fundamentals of Physical
Hydraulic applications of geosynthetics. Proc. Geography. Chapter 10: Introduction to the
8th Intl. Conference on Geosynthetics, Lithosphere, (w) Erosion and Deposition.
Yokohama, Japan. Milpress, Rotterdam,:79-120. Physical Geography.Net
Hengchaovanich, D. (1999). 15 years of Pilarczyk, and K.W. (1998). Stability criteria for
bioengineering in the wet tropics from A (Acacia geosystems – An overview. Proc. 6th Intl.
auriculifomis) to V (Vertiveria zizanioides). Geosynthetics Conference, Atlanta, U.S.A.
Proc. 1st Asia-Pacific Conference on Ground and Pilarczyk, K.W. (2000). Geosynthetics and
Water Bioengineering for Erosion Control and Geosystems in Hydraulic and Coastal
Slope Stabilization, Manila, Philippines. Engineering. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 913 pgs.
IECA, :54-63. Polster, D.F. (2002). Soil bioengineering techniques
Hornsey, W.P., Carley, J.T., Coghlan, I.R. and Cox, for riparian restoration. Proc. 26th Annual British
R.J. (2011). Geotextile sand container shoreline Columbia Mine Reclamation Symposium,
protection systems: Design and application. Dawson Creek, Canada, :230-239.
Geotextiles and Geomembranes 29 (2011): 425- Przedwojski, B., Blazejewski, R. and Pilarczyk,
439. K.W. (1995) Specification of Materials and
Jakobson, P.R. and Nielson, A.H. (1970). Some Elements of Structures. Chapter 7: River
experiments with sand-filled flexible tubes. Proc. Training Techniques – Fundamentals, Design
12th Conference on Coastal Engineering, :1513- and Applications. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, :
1521. 487-516.
133
GEOSYNTHETICS ASIA 2012
5th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics
13 to 15 December 2012 | Bangkok, Thailand
Rustom, R. and Weggel, J.R. (1993). A study of Suzana, R., Wardah, T. and Sahol Hamid, A.B.
erosion control systems: Experimental results. (2011). Radar hydrology: New Z/R relationships
Proc. Intl. Erosion Control Association, for Klang River Basin Malaysia based on rainfall
Indianapolis, U.S.A. classification. J. World Academy of Science,
Sani, S. (1998). The Environment. Volume 1: The Engineering and Technology 59 (2011): 1994-
Encyclopedia of Malaysia. Archipelago Press, 1998.
Singapore, 144p. Theisen, M.S. (1992). The role of geosynthetics in
Smith, J.L., Bryz-Gornia, C.J., Bhatia, S.K. and erosion and sediment control: An overview.
Walowsky, D. (2005). A comparative study of Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 11(4-6): 199-
RECP’s: lab testing and field performance. Proc. 214.
Geofrontiers 2005, Texas, U.S.A. Truong, P.N.V. (1999). Vertiver grass technology
Smith, J.L. and Bhatia, S.K. (2006). The use of for land stabilisation, erosion and sediment
index and bench-scale test for the control. Proc. 1st Asia-Pacific Conference on
characterization of RECPs. Proc. 8th Intl. Ground and Water Bioengineering for Erosion
Conference on Geosynthetics, Yokohama, Japan. Control and Slope Stabilization, Manila,
Milpress, Rotterdam, :741-744. Philippines. IECA :72-84.
Sprague, C.J. and Koutsourais, M.M. (1992). Fabric Wanielista, M. and Chopra, M. (2010). State of
Formed Concrete Revetment Systems. Chapter Florida Manuals for Erosion and Sediment
from Koerner, R.M. Geosynthetics in Filtration, Control and the Rainfall Runoff Simulator at the
Drainage and Erosion Control. Elsevier Stormwater Management Academy. Final Report
Advanced Technology. FDOT Project BD521-04, Orlando, Florida, :306
Suhendra, A., Saputra, G and Kodrat, E.R. (2011). Yee, T.W. (2006). Geosynthetics for erosion control
Application of Geotube as Alternative applications. Proc. Intl. Conference on Maritime
Construction for Erosion Control Resulting from Engineering, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, CD Vol.
Tidal Bore. (In Indonesian). Yee, T.W., Zengerink, E., and Choi, J.C. (2007).
Geotextile tube application for Incheon Bridge
Project. Proc. Conference on CEDA Dredging
Days 2007, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, CD
Vol.
134