BTG Asia Policy Report Bangladesh
BTG Asia Policy Report Bangladesh
BTG Asia Policy Report Bangladesh
Bangladesh has made immense gains in female education, infant mortality, maternal mortality,
fertility, and access to credit but these have not translated into gains in terms of property rights,
inheritance, entry to business, access to financial services, government service, parliament, local
government, access to public space, law enforcement, legal profession, sports, violence against
women, reproductive autonomy, fertility preferences, divorce, parental authority, a gender-sensitive
budget, and more. It is government policy to maintain and enhance the pace of change in this area
through gender empowerment (Bangladesh Ministry of Planning 2020, page 16).
In 2019, the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP)
member states, including Bangladesh, conducted a national review of their implementation of the
Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action. According to the review, challenges in attaining progress
towards the SDGs and gender equality include insufficient sex-disaggregated data and limited
capacity to monitor progress towards existing laws or policies. (ESCAP 2019).
This report reviews the data available to support Bangladesh’s commitments on gender equality as it
works toward Vision 2041.
According to this plan, Bangladesh targets women and girls in many social security programs and
in the absence of concrete guidance and planning, improvements in gender equality were less than
their potential. Therefore, a Gender Policy was developed and approved by the Central Management
Committee (CMC) of National Social Security Programmes under the Chair of the Cabinet Secretary
in 2018. This Strategy and Action Plan is a step forward in realizing the objectives of the NSSS towards
reducing the gender gap (Bangladesh Planning Commission 2020, page xi).
§ 4.1.X6 Education inequality indicators: (a) Proportion of women with less than 4 or 6 years of
education; or (b) proportion of women with less than secondary education
§ 5.4.1 Proportion of time spent on unpaid domestic and care work, by sex, age, and location
§ 5.b.1 Proportion of individuals who own a mobile telephone, by sex
§ 8.3.1 Proportion of informal employment in total employment, by sector and sex
§ 8.5.1 Average hourly earnings of female and male employees, by occupation, age, and persons
with disabilities
§ 8.5.2 Unemployment rate, by sex, age and persons with disabilities
§ 8.5.X Labor force participation rate, by sex
§ 8.6.1 Proportion of youth (aged 15–24 years) not in education, employment or training
§ 8.7.1 Proportion and number of children aged 5–17 years engaged in child labor, by sex and age
§ 9.2.2 Manufacturing employment as a proportion of total employment
§ 17.8.1 Proportion of individuals using the Internet
Lacking sex disaggregation indicators:
§ 1.1.1 Proportion of population below the international poverty line, by sex, age, employment
status, and geographical location (urban/rural)
§ 1.2.1 Proportion of population living below the national poverty line, by sex and age
§ 1.3.1 Proportion of population covered by social protection floors/systems, by sex, distinguishing
children, unemployed persons, older persons, persons with disabilities, pregnant women,
newborns, work- injury victims, and the poor and the vulnerable
§ 8.10.2 Proportion of adults (15 years and older) with an account at a bank or other financial
institution or with a mobile-money-service provider
§ 9.5.2 Researchers (in full-time equivalent) per million inhabitants
§ 10.1.1 Growth rates of household expenditure or income per capita among the bottom 40 per
cent of the population and the total population
§ 10.2.1 Proportion of people living below 50 per cent of median income, by sex, age, and persons
with disabilities
Data not available
§ 1.2.2 Proportion of men, women, and children of all ages living in poverty in all its dimensions
according to national definitions
§ 1.4.2 Proportion of total adult population with secure tenure rights to land, (a) with legally
recognized documentation, and (b) who perceive their rights to land as secure, by sex and type of
tenure
§ 2.3.2 Average income of small-scale food producers, by sex and indigenous status
§ 5.a.1 (a) Proportion of total agricultural population with ownership or secure rights over
agricultural land, by sex; and (b) share of women among owners or rights-bearers of agricultural
land, by type of tenure
POLICY COMMITMENT 7: SUPPORT FOR WOMEN WITH DISABILITY, MINORITY, ETHNIC, AND
OTHER MARGINALIZED GROUPS
This commitment is to “ensure that persons with disability and from other marginalized groups are
assured of their basic rights and receive opportunities for development and leadership.”
There are a handful of Bridging the Gap indicators that recommend disaggregation by disability
status. These include: 8.5.2 (Unemployment rate) and 16.7.2 (Proportion of population who believe
decision-making is inclusive and responsive). Indicators 8.5.2 and 16.7.2 are already mapped to the
second and sixth policy commitments.
The indicators that are already listed can showcase where women with disabilities or women from
marginalized ethnic, religious, or income groups, for example, are disproportionately affected. The
key distinction is whether the underlying data sources adequately collect data on women based on
disability status, ethnic backgrounds, income backgrounds, and so forth.
Aside from the aforementioned indicators, the following SDG indicator could be of relevance, which
is available as a conforming indicator with sex disaggregation:
§ 10.3.1 Proportion of population reporting having personally felt discriminated against or
harassed in the previous 12 months on the basis of a ground of discrimination prohibited under
international human rights law
Are gender indicators different in their availability than non-gender indicators? The Open Data
Inventory (ODIN) provides a broad assessment of the coverage and openness of national statistics
In 2020, Bangladesh had an overall ODIN score of 36.4, ranking eighth among the nine middle-
income Southern Asian countries (ODW 2020). Globally, the country was ranked 147th out of 187
countries and 32nd out of 43 lower-middle-income countries. Bangladesh scores better on the
measure of data openness (38.3) than on the coverage of its official statistics (34.5). Weaknesses in
Bangladesh’s statistical offerings were found in measures of population and vital statistics, education
facilities, health facilities and outcomes, food security and nutrition, gender statistics, crime and
justice, national accounts, labor, price indexes, pollution, and the built environment. Its strongest
categories were in the government finance, money and banking, balance of payments, agriculture,
and energy. While Bangladesh generally scores well on the availability of indicators at the national
level, it does not provide data for sub-national administrative units.
ODIN includes ten categories of statistics that are of particular relevance to monitoring the health
and wellbeing of women and children. Taken together, this subset of the overall ODIN index identifies
strengths or weaknesses in the production and dissemination of gender statistics. As shown in figure
6, the overall score for non-gender data categories is about five points higher than for gender data
categories. The difference is much larger when we consider data coverage, which accounts for the
availability of disaggregated data, subnational data, and the number of observations available from
the preceding ten years. These results confirm our finding of gaps in Bangladesh’s gender indicators
and a shortage of time series data needed to measure trends. In contrast, the openness score—which
measures whether data are available in machine-readable formats that can be readily downloaded
by users with adequate documentation accompanied by an open license—is higher for gender data
categories.
Overall score
Openness score
Coverage score
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Bangladesh Ministry of Planning. 2020. Perspective Plan of Bangladesh 2021-2041 (Vision 2041).
Bangladesh. http://oldweb.lged.gov.bd/UploadedDocument/UnitPublication/1/1049/
vision%202021-2041.pdf
Bangladesh Planning Commission. 2020. Gender Diagnostics, Policy, Strategy and Action Plan.
Bangladesh. http://socialprotection.gov.bd/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Gender-
Diagnostics-Policy-Strategy-and-Action-Plan-for-NSSS.pdf
ESCAP (Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific). 2019. Comprehensive National
Review Report, for Beijing + 25 Implementation of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for
Action 1995. https://asiapacificgender.org/sites/default/files/documents/Bangladesh%20
(English).pdf
ODW (Open Data Watch). 2020. Open Data Inventory. “Country Profiles: Bangladesh. https://odin.
opendatawatch.com/Report/countryProfileUpdated/BGD?year=2020
UN Women. 2018. Turning promises into action: Gender equality in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable
Development. https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2018/2/gender-
equality-in-the-2030-agenda-for-sustainable-development-2018#view