Predicting Heat Transfer Behaviour in Tube Sections With High Viscous Fluids Using Numerical Simulation
Predicting Heat Transfer Behaviour in Tube Sections With High Viscous Fluids Using Numerical Simulation
Predicting Heat Transfer Behaviour in Tube Sections With High Viscous Fluids Using Numerical Simulation
DOI: 10.31838/ecb/2023.12.s1.130
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Fig 1. Geometry modeling of various ellipsoidal dimple angles = 00, 450, 900, and
cross-combined, respectively.
Table 2. Highly viscous fluids with experimentally measured rheological properties.
Fig 2. Computational domain in the current study with its Boundary assumptions
Fig 3. Number of elements vs. Wall Y+ value along the tube wall
Fig 5. Meshing of a cross combined ellipsoidal dimple tube in the current study
Fig 6. shows a comparison between the current study's analytical findings and those
from Toygun Statistical findings for a smooth tube
The purpose of this test is to ensure that this grid structure was calculated to be
the numerical solution obtained from the approximately 1.1269 as shown in Fig.3.
simulation is independent of the grid or In a straightforward manner, the
mesh resolution. The results of grid numerical simulations conducted in the
independence verification are shown in present study were compared to Toygun
Table 3, where different grid structures [1] is depicted in Fig.6. The graph
with varying numbers of cells were illustrates the relationship between the
utilized. The grid structure employed for number of elements variable and. the
this study consisted of approximately 1.8 simulations revealed that both the Nu
million cells, and it was observed in and f varied between the two cases. It
Fig.4 & 5. The study found that changes is observed that beyond a certain point,
in the grid structure had minimal Simply increasing the number of elements results
put, how it affects the Nu and f, which in a marginal change of 5 to 10%, in
remained relatively. Briefly stated, the the magnitude of the Nu and f values.
Nusselt number remains roughly constant which then remain relatively constant.
at around 0.2, and the friction factor Thus, the addition of extra parts has
remains around 2.0. Furthermore, the little impact on the Nu and f.
average y+ value along the tube wall for
(a) (b)
Fig 7. Li et al. [4] and Toygun [1]'s validation of the numerical study Re vs. f and
Nu for Improved Tube Flow
The analysis of the numerical simulation combined tube with dimples as shown
results in comparison with experimental in Fig. 7 indicates that the simulation
data, depicted in Fig. 7, indicated that approach employed in the study is
the largest disparities in Nu and f were accurate. This suggests that the numerical
9.7% and 4.87%, respectively. These model effectively represents the physical
differences were found to be well below problem and can be relied upon for
the acceptable threshold of 20%. Thus, subsequent analysis and optimization
a validation analysis of the single tasks.
ellipsoidal tube as well as the cross-
Fig 8. Axial Temperature Contours for Dimple Angle (0, 45, 90, Cross) of Ethylene
Glycol, Pitch Length = 10 mm at Reynolds Number of 8000
Fig 9. Axial Temperature Contours for Dimple Angle (0, 45, 90, Cross) of Pummelo
Juice, Pitch Length = 10 mm at Reynolds Number of 8000
.
Fig 10 shows the cross-sectional temperature contours for a combined dimple of
ethylene glycol and pummelo juice (labelled as a and b, respectively), with a PL of
10 mm and an 8000 Re.
(a) (b)
Fig 11. compares the Nu and Re for ethylene glycol and pummelo juice with a
dimple angle of 900 and a PL of 10 mm (a, b, respectively)
Fig 12. Velocity contours for dimple angles (0, 45, 90, cross) of Ethylene glycol, PL
of 10 mm at a Re of 3000
Fig 13. Velocity contours for dimple angles (0, 45, 90, cross) of Pummelo Juice, PL
of 10 mm at a Re of 3000
Fig 14. Cross-sectional Velocity Contours for the Cross-Combined Dimple of Ethylene
Glycol and Pummelo Juice (a, b, respectively), PL of 10 mm at Re of 3000.
(a) (b)
Fig 15. f versus Re for a cross-combined dimple with a pitch length of 10 mm of
ethylene glycol and pummelo juice (a, b, respectively)
The results of the friction factor mm, 20 mm, and 30 mm), and an 8
investigation for various ellipsoidal mm dimple diameter are presented in
angles (0°, 45°, 90°, and cross- Fig. 15. As the ellipsoidal angle
combined), lengths of the pitches (10 increases, the f substantially rises. At a
Reynolds number of 3000, the lowest for ethylene glycol, and at the same
friction factor is 0.04695, which occurs conditions, the value of the friction
when the cross-combined pitch length is factor is 0.04056 for pummelo juice.
10 mm and the dimple width is 8 mm
Fig 16. Pressure Distribution for Dimple Angles of 0°, 45°, and 90°, Cross-Combined
Dimples at p = 30 mm, Re = 5000
The data presented in Fig. 16 shows that increased surface area, compared to a
the maximum pressure drop occurs in a tube that is smooth, encourages more
cross-combined dimpled tube effective heat transfer. Moreover, the
configuration, specifically at a PL of 10 data also shows that a shorter pitch
mm and a Re of 8000. The measured length (10 mm in this case) leads to a
pressure drop is 105538.4 pascal for higher pressure drop. Pressure drop is
ethylene glycol and 107210.1 pascals for the resistance encountered by the fluid
pummelo juice. The relationship between as it flows through a conduit or channel.
surface area and Nusselt number implies In this case, a shorter pitch length means
that incorporating dimples on the tube that the dimples are closer together,
surface, which increases the surface area, which increases the obstruction to the
can lead to an enhancement in the flow and results in a higher pressure
Nusselt number, leading to higher drop. This indicates that a decrease in
Nusselt numbers. A higher Nusselt pitch length leads to increased flow
number indicates more effective resistance, requiring higher pressure to
convective heat transfer. Technically, it overcome the hindrance posed by the
is possible that adding dimples to the dimples.
tube's exterior can boost heat
transmission from the surface to the
fluid, resulting in improved convective 3.2.2 Influence of Dimple Pitch Length
heat transfer. This is because of the link on Outcomes
between surface area and Nusselt The frequency of disrupted flow zones
number. This is because the dimples' rises as the pitch length is reduced,
leading Simply put, adding more dimples angle. The findings show that the friction
along the length of a tube can improve factor rises with increasing ellipsoidal
its heat transfer performance. The angles and decreasing pitch lengths.
increased number of dimples provides When the dimple diameter is 8 mm, the
additional surface area, leading to more ellipsoidal angle is cross-combined, the
efficient convective heat transfer PL is 10 mm, and the Re is 3000,
compared to a tube with fewer dimples. representing the maximum flow
as reflected in the increase in the resistance, the friction factor reaches its
average Nu. The connection between PL highest value.
and Nu vs Re for the ellipsoidal angle
and dimple pitch length is shown in Fig.
11. Thus, modifying the pitch length of 4. Conclusions
a tube can significantly impact the In conclusion, the research findings show
efficiency of heat transmission and flow that having dimples on the tube greatly
characteristics. When examining affects how temperature is distributed
temperature contours using the radial across the tube's cross-section. The
cross-section in Figs. 8 and 9, four dimple section exhibits a larger
distinct zones can be distinguished. temperature gradient compared to the
Beyond the dimple section, the smooth section. This suggests that adding
temperature gradient reduces toward the dimples can increase a heat exchanger's
centre of the cross-section, but it available surface area for heat
drastically alters closer to the wall. transmission, therefore improving heat
Moreover, as the fluid changes from transfer efficiency. Furthermore, the use
laminar flow to turbulence, the of cross-combined dimple tubes has been
temperature gradient is somewhat higher demonstrated to considerably enhance
at z = 0 mm than at z = 1000 mm. heat transfer efficiency, with an average
Simply put, the smooth sections of the enhancement of 25.6% and a range of
tube are located at the entrance and exit improvement between 12.2% and 36.38%
extensions, while the dimple section when compared to traditional single
exhibits periodic variation along the ellipsoidal dimple tubes. Specifically, the
tube's length. The change in Nusselt highest Nusselt number was achieved
number (Nu) is relatively small in the with a tube of 8 mm diameter ratio, a
smooth sections but significant in the twist angle of 90°, and a PL of 10 mm
dimple sections. The three sections' at a Re of 8000. Additionally, the lowest
average Nu values are 69.73, 82.95, and friction factor (f) was observed for a
139.278, respectively. In conclusion, the tube with a Dd of 8 mm, cross-combined
performance of heat transfer is with a PL of 10, and a Re of 3000 for
significantly improved by the presence both working fluids. These findings
of dimples on the tube surface. The highlight the potential of cross-combined
friction factor results for various dimple tubes as an effective means to
ellipsoidal angles, pitch lengths, and an enhance heat transfer performance in
8 mm dimple diameter demonstrate a various applications.
significant increase in friction factor with
Author contributions
increasing ellipsoidal angle. As the pitch
length decreases, the average pressure M. Gangadhar Rao: Conceptualization,
drop along a tube increases because Supervision
dimples have a more substantial effect R. Ramakrishna: Approach and
on flow blockage. The friction factor Analysis
distribution is shown in Fig. 15 as a
B Nitish Kumar: Design and
function of the Re, PL, and ellipsoidal
Methodology
Nanofluid in the Turbulent Tube tubes, dimpled tubes, and wire coils
Flow Applied Thermal Engineering 35
[22] Poonam Mishra Dipankar Das, (2012) 196–201
Dipangkar Das, and Arun Kumar
Gupta Drying of Citrus Grandis
(Pomelo) Fruit Juice Using Block
Freeze Concentration and Spray
Drying Department of Food
Engineering and Technology, Tezpur
University, Assam 784028, India
[23] N.L. Chin a, S.M. Chan a, Y.A.
Yusof a, T.G. Chuah b, and R.A.
Talib modelling of the rheological
behaviour of pummelo juice
concentrates using a master curve.
Journal of Food Engineering 93
(2009): 134–140
[24] Mikail a. Magerramov1, aziz i.
Abdulagatov2, ilmutdin m.
Abdulagatov4 and nazim d. Azizov3.
Thermal conductivity of peach,
raspberry, cherry, and plum juices as
a function of temperature and
concentration.
[25] Norazlin Abdullah, Nyuk Ling Chin,
Yus Aniza Yusof, and Rosnita A.
Talib modelling of the rheological
behaviour of guava, pomelo, and
soursop juice concentrates via shear
rate-temperature-concentration
superposition. Association of Food
Scientists and Technologists (India)
2018.
[26] Palash Goya1, Nitin Kushwaha2,
Rahul Dabi3. CFD Analysis of a
Helical Coil Heat Exchanger 2018
IJRTI | Volume 3, Issue 7 | ISSN:
2456-3315
[27] Saman Rashidi a, Faramarz Hormozi
b, Bengt Sundén c, Omid Mahian.
Energy saving in thermal energy
systems using dimpled surface
technology –A review on
mechanisms and applications.
Applied Energy 250 (2019) 1491–
1547.
[28] Garca a, J.P. Solano a, P.G. Vicente
b, and A. Viedma The influence of
artificial roughness shape on heat
transfer enhancement: corrugated