Use of Partially Defatted Peanut Flour in Breakfas
Use of Partially Defatted Peanut Flour in Breakfas
Use of Partially Defatted Peanut Flour in Breakfas
net/publication/242119562
CITATIONS READS
12 2,583
4 authors, including:
Mian Riaz
Texas A&M University
64 PUBLICATIONS 2,176 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Mian Riaz on 27 June 2016.
Extruded breakfast cereal flakes were made by replacing corn cones color, bowl life, water absorption, and water solubility indices were
with nonroasted partially defatted peanut flour (PDPF) and roasted significantly affected by the amount of PDPF and R-PDPF added in the
partially defatted peanut flour (R-PDPF) at various levels (10, 20, and formulation. A sensory panel found extruded toasted flakes made from
30%). The mixtures were extruded using a corotating twin-screw extruder corn cones and up to 20% R-PDPF were acceptable as control. Peanut
to produce collets. The collets were flaked and then toasted. The extruded flavor intensity was also evaluated. Surprisingly, peanut flavor intensity was
toasted flakes were analyzed for physical, physicochemical, and sensory the highest for flakes containing 30% PDPF, rather than those containing
characteristics. Moisture content, bulk density, hardness (force to break), 30%R-PDPF.
Extrusion is one of many techniques used for manufacturing flavor of partially defatted peanut flour and alter the physical
ready-to-eat (RTE) cereals (Harper 1981). Midden (1989) and Bailey properties of products in which it is incorporated. Therefore, the
(1991) produced breakfast cereal flakes using a twin-screw extruder. purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of partial replace-
The extrusion process reportedly has numerous processing conveni- ment of roasted and nonroasted peanut flours for corn cones to
ences over conventional processing methods, including faster pro- produce breakfast cereal cornflakes, and also to determine the maxi-
cessing, lower processing cost, and lower space cost. Four factors mum amount of peanut flour that can be substituted to produce
that should be monitored in extrusion processing are temperature, acceptable high-protein flakes.
cooking time, moisture, and shear (Miller 1994). Overly sheared
products absorb moisture quickly and become soggy. They can have MATERIALS AND METHODS
a slimy mouthfeel or odd flavors. Rokey (1995) stated that longer
cooking time, higher moisture, moderate temperature, and minimum Raw Materials
shear are the most important factors in cornflakes acceptability. Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L. cv Spanish) were obtained from
Generally, peanuts are considered as an oilseed crop grown pri- the Birdsong Peanut Corp. (Gorman, TX). Sunlite yellow corn cones
marily for oil production. A high-protein peanut press cake, which is (#S 40) were obtained from the J. R. Short Milling Co. (Kankakee,
normally used for animal feed, is a byproduct derived from the oil IL); the particle size specification is shown in Table I. Malt (Malto-
extraction process. Peanut press cake, however, can be used for line ER Light) was purchased from Crompton & Knowles Corp.
human food if it is processed from food-grade peanuts under hy- (Mahwah, NJ). Yellow corn meal (ConAgra Inc., Omaha, NE), white
gienic environments (Lusas 1979). Peanut flour has a relatively high sugar (Domino Sugar Corp., NY), and iodized salt (Morton Inter-
protein content, bland flavor, and light tan color which allow it to be national, Inc., Chicago, IL) were purchased from a local supermarket.
incorporated into a wide range of foods (Prinyawiwatkul et al 1995).
The use of peanut flour as a protein supplement in breakfast cereals Preparation of Roasted and Nonroasted Partially Defatted
has been extensively studied. Spadaro et al (1971) used rice grits Peanut Flours
mixed with defatted peanut flour to make products with higher protein Peanuts were blanched in batches of 2.3 kg for 30 sec using a
content and desirable cereal-like flavor. Harris et al (1972) devel- mini-dehuller (Nutana Machine, Saskatoon, Canada) to remove skins.
oped breakfast cereal flakes that compared favorably with com- Oil was removed using a dry extruder (InstaPro International, Des
mercial flakes by drum-rolling dough mixtures of defatted peanut, Moines, IA) and a continuous horizontal screw press (InstaPro 1500).
corn, and wheat flour. Extrusion of peanut flour with corn and oats Peanut press cakes were divided into two lots. One lot of press
produced breakfast cereals with high protein content, but these cakes was roasted in a hot air oven (Despatch Ovens Co., Minne-
products absented peanut flavor (Ayres and Davenport 1977). Suknark apolis, MN) at 166°C for 8 min, and immediately cooled to room
et al (1997) recently investigated physical properties of directly ex- temperature. The other lot was not roasted. The roasted and non-
panded extrudates by blending partially defatted peanut flour with roasted press cakes were milled (Bauer Bros Co., Springfield, OH)
different types of starch using single-screw extruder at different con- and then sieved through a 60-mesh screen. The partially defatted
ditions. peanut flours were stored at 3°C until used for further product devel-
A peanut flour with very low fat content and strong roasted peanut opment and analyses.
flavor has only limited application in the food industry, especially
in breakfast cereal flakes. A definite need exists for a strongly flavored Flakes Formulation
partially defatted peanut flour for use in reduced-fat food products. The base formula used for making flakes is shown in Table II. The
In an attempt to produce peanut-flavored flakes, corn cones were control formula had only corn cones. In the test formula, corn
also mixed with roasted peanut flour. Roasting process may improve cones were replaced by PDPF and R-PDPF at levels of 10, 20, and
30% of the total mix. All blends contained 10% sugar, 3% malt, and
2% salt. To improve texture, mouthfeel, blistering, and appearance of
1 Graduate student, Dept. of Food Science & Technology, University of Nebraska- the final flakes, corn meal (8.5%) was added to the cornflakes formula
Lincoln, NE 68583-0919. as suggested by E. Sevatson (Wenger Mfg. Co., personal commun-
2 Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]. Phone: (402) 472- ication).
2912. Fax: (402) 472-1693.
3 Graduate Faculty, Food Protein R&D Center, Dept. of Soil & Crop Sciences, Texas The process used to produce flaked cereal is shown in Fig. 1.
A&M University. Each blend (13 kg) of dry ingredients was mixed in a dry vertical
4 Professor, Cereal Quality Laboratory, Dept. of Soil & Crop Sciences, Texas mixer (Hobart Mfg., Troy, OH) at low speed for 2 min. Liquid
A&M University. malt was added gradually to dry ingredients and mixed for 5 min at
5 Consultant, Problem Solvers Inc, (PSI) 3604 Old Oaks Dr., Bryan, TX 77802.
medium speed. Mixing continued at low speed for 20 min to ensure
Publication no. C-2002-0611-02R. homogeneity. All blends were held in tied plastic bags overnight at
© 2002 American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc. 3°C. Before extrusion, the mixes were brought to room temperature.
586 CEREAL CHEMISTRY
Extrusion Process Flaking and Toasting Process
A corotating, intermeshing, twin-screw extruder (TX-52, Wenger Flaking and toasting were conducted at the Wenger Mfg. pilot
Mfg. Co., Sabetha, KS) equipped with a 25.5:1 (nine heads) length-to- plant in Sabetha, KS. Collets were flaked using Wenger RS-90 faking
diameter ratio extruder barrel was used. A vent was used on the 7th rolls. The flaking rolls were operated at constant speed (1,135 ft/min).
head to depressurize steam to the atmosphere. Chilled water (9°C) The gap between the rolls was 0.43 mm. The flakes were toasted
was circulated in the barrel in zones 5 and 6 (8th and 9th heads) to in a Wenger 4800 drier/toaster at 170°C for 3 min. Dried flakes were
avoid puffing of the collets. The feeder, preconditioner, and main stored in plastic bags at room temperature for other measurements.
twin-screws were operated at 13, 96, and 165 rpm, respectively.
Material flow rate was held at 64 kg/hr. In the preconditioner, steam Experimental Design
was added at a rate of 0.3 kg/min, and water at a rate of 0.112 kg/min. The research design included seven trials, one control, peanut flour
Retention time in the preconditioner was 240 sec. The exiting tem- and corn cones at ratios of 10:90, 20:80, and 30:70, and two types
perature of product from the preconditioner was 91°C. Temperatures (roasted and nonroasted) of partially defatted peanut flour. Each
of zones 1 through 6 of the extruder barrel were held constantly at trial was performed in triplicate. The run order of all blends was ran-
60, 100, 100, 90, 60 and 60°C, respectively. The head pressure was domized. Twenty-one extrusion trials were completed in one day.
425 PSI. Steam was injected into the extruder barrel at a rate of
Measurement of Physicochemical Properties
0.08 kg/min. No water was added at the extruder barrel. A die with
The raw material and extruded flakes were ground in the CRC
four inserts (6-mm round holes) was used. The temperature of collets
micromill (The Chemical Rubber Co., Cleveland, OH) to pass through
exiting from the extruder was 98°C.
a 60-mesh sieve for analyses. Proximate analyses were performed
Extrusion was allowed to reach the steady state for at least 5 min
using official procedures (AOAC 1993), with the exception of protein
between trials, and then collets were collected. The round-shaped
analysis. Crude protein was determined by the Kjeldahl method
collets were later cooled in trays at room temperature. Collet size from
(AOAC 1990).
each trials was similar at 36 beads/100 gm. An effort was made
Bulk density was analyzed for all extruded toasted flakes in tripli-
to collect these collets in one layer to keep them separated. Collets
cate using the Winchester bushel meter (Seedburo Equipment Co.,
were held in air-tight plastic bags for two days at cold storage (3°C) to
Chicago, IL). Samples were filled to overflowing in the measuring
allow moisture equilibration. Then they were delivered for flaking.
cylinder (35.24 L) without tapping, then leveled off with a straight-
edge, and weighed (calculated wt. of sample/unit volume [g/L]).
Hardness (force-to-break) was determined on 10 extruded toasted
flakes from each extrusion run using the texture analyzer (TA.XT2,
Texture Technologies Corp., Scarsdale, NY) with the small probe
(TA-52). The compression test mode was used. The parameters were
pretest speed 5 mm/sec, test speed 1 mm/sec, and distance 5 .0 mm.
Color difference measurements (L, a, and b) were made in tripli-
cate on the extruded toasted flakes using Hunterlab tristimulus colori-
meter (Reston, VA). Flakes (7 g) were broken into small pieces and
arranged to cover the bottom of a sample cup.
Water absorption (WAI) and water solubility (WSI) indices were
determined in triplicate followed the procedure of Anderson et al
(1969). WAI is the weight of the gel obtained per gram of dry sample.
WSI is the amount of solids recovered by evaporating the super-
natant from the water absorption tests, expressed as percentages of
dry solids in the sample.
The time (min) for crispness to disappear was recorded as the
“bowl life”. The disappearance of crispness was determined subjec-
tively by soaking 10 g of samples in cold milk (10°C) and chewing
flakes at 1-min intervals until crispness disappeared (Celis et al 1996).
The measurements were evaluated in triplicate. Three different (A, B,
and C) commercial cornflake products were purchased from local
stores and also tested. Commercial cornflakes A and B are processed
TABLE I
Typical Particle Size Specification of Corn Conesa
Granulation Specification
2Q861R6LHYH P 0
6LHYH P 2% max.
6LHYH P 95% min.
Thru 80 4% max.
a Data provided by J.R. Short Milling Co., Kankakee, IL.
TABLE II
Breakfast Cereal Flakes Formulationa
Ingredients Percent
Corn cones 76.50
Corn meal 8.50
White sugar 9.96
Malt 3.08
Salt 1.96
a Excludes roasted and nonroasted partially defatted peanut flour variables.
Fig. 1. Processing scheme for extruded breakfast cereal flakes.
TABLE III
Proximate Composition (%) of Raw Materials Used for Breakfast Cereal Flakesa
Samples Moisture Proteinb Oil Ash Fiberc Carbohydrated
Corn cones 13.71 ± 0.08 6.34 ± 0.03 1.09 ± 0.09 0.33 ± 0.03 0.55 ± 0.07 77.98 ± 0.11
Corn meal 13.21 ± 0.12 7.03 ± 0.02 1.63 ± 0.07 0.64 ± 0.04 0.85 ± 0.07 76.64 ± 0.22
PDPFe 6.13 ± 0.14 43.93 ± 0.06 7.28 ± 0.17 4.04 ± 0.03 3.45 ± 0.07 35.17 ± 0.07
R-PDPFf 4.06 ± 0.34 44.88 ± 0.06 7.46 ± 0.16 4.12 ± 0.05 3.57 ± 0.06 35.91 ± 0.53
a Values are means ± standard deviation of triplicate determinations (% as is basis).
b N 6.25 (corn), N 5.46 (peanut).
c Crude fiber, determined by Mid-Continent Laboratories, Memphis, TN.
d Determined by difference.
e Nonroasted partially defatted peanut flour.
f Roasted partially defatted peanut flour.
TABLE IV
Physical and Physicochemical Properties of Raw Materials Used for Preparation of Flakesa
Colorb
Samples WAIc (g/g) WSId (g/100 g) L a b
Corn cones 2.19 ± 0.02h 2.10 ± 0.02h 81.6 ± 0.1f 2.1 ± 0.1g 34.2 ± 0.2f
PDPFe 2.33 ± 0.06g 43.10 ± 0.45f 76.0 ± 0.3g 1.2 ± 0.1h 13.0 ± 0.1h
R-PDPFf 2.59 ± 0.09f 38.30 ± 0.80g 74.5 ± 0.3h 2.3 ± 0.1f 17.1 ± 0.2g
a Values are means ± standard deviations of triplicate runs. Values followed by the same letter in the same column are not significantly different (P < 0.05)
using Duncan’s multiple range test.
b L = brightness (0 = black, 100 = white); +a = red, –a = green; +b = yellow, –b = blue.
c Water absorption index is the weight of the gel obtained per gram of dry sample.
d Water solubility index is the amount of solids recovered by evaporating supernatant from water absorption tests, expressed as % of dry solids in sample.
e Nonroasted partially defatted peanut flour blended by weight with corn cones.
f Roasted partially defatted peanut flour blended by weight with corn cones.
TABLE VI
Moisture Content (%) of Extruded Flakes at Different Stages of Processinga
Processing Stage
Material Before Preconditioning Entering Extruder Exiting Extruder Final Products
Corn cones only 11.8 ± 0.1 25.6 ± 0.1 19.8 ± 0.3 3.6 ± 0.1
10% PDPFb 11.3 ± 0.3 25.2 ± 0.6 19.5 ± 0.2 3.5 ± 0.1
20% PDPF 10.8 ± 0.1 24.9 ± 0.3 19.4 ± 0.3 3.3 ± 0.2
30% PDPF 10.3 ± 0.5 24.6 ± 0.4 19.1 ± 0.2 3.1 ± 0.1
10% R-PDPFc 11.0 ± 0.3 24.8 ± 0.3 18.8 ± 0.4 3.4 ± 0.1
20% R-PDPF 10.1 ± 0.1 24.4 ± 0.3 18.6 ± 0.2 3.2 ± 0.1
30% R-PDPF 9.3 ± 0.1 24.2 ± 0.2 18.3 ± 0.1 3.0 ± 0.1
a Values are means ± standard deviations from triplicate runs.
b Nonroasted partially defatted peanut flour blended by weight with corn cones.
c Roasted partially defatted peanut flour blended by weight with corn cones.
TABLE VIII
Physical and Physicochemical Properties of Extruded Breakfast Cereal Flakesa
Colorb
Flakes Bulk Density (g/L) Hardness (N) WAIc (g/g) WSId (g/100 g) L a b
Corn cones only 265e 3.07e 5.78 ± 0.20f 14.19 ± 0.18g 56.8 ± 0.2e 9.7 ± 0.1g 29.4 ± 0.1e
10% PDPFe 256f 2.76f 5.85 ± 0.12f 15.00 ± 0.48f 52.2 ± 0.8f 10.8 ± 0.4f 25.4 ± 0.4f
20% PDPF 248f,g 2.41g 5.93 ± 0.10e,f 15.61 ± 0.24e,f 49.1 ± 0.7g 11.2 ± 0.2e 22.7 ± 0.2g
30% PDPF 241g,h 2.05h 6.11 ± 0.08e 16.08 ± 0.54e 47.8 ± 0.2h 11.4 ± 0.1e 21.0 ± 0.1h
10% R-PDPFf 254f 2.65f,g 5.90 ± 0.11f 14.81 ± 0.53f 51.6 ± 0.5f 10.7 ± 0.3f 25.0 ± 0.4f
20% R-PDPF 245f,g 2.32g 5.95 ± 0.07e,f 15.52 ± 0.18e,f 48.4 ± 0.5g,h 11.5 ± 0.2e 22.7 ± 0.3g
30% R-PDPF 236h 1.99h 6.14 ± 0.08e 15.89 ± 0.38e 46.6 ± 0.6i 11.6 ± 0.1e 21.1 ± 0.5h
a Values are means ± standard deviations of triplicate runs. Values followed by the same letter in the same column are not significantly different (P < 0.05)
using Duncan’s multiple range test.
b L = brightness (0 = black, 100 = white); +a = red, –a = green; +b = yellow, –b = blue.
c Water absorption index is the weight of the gel obtained per gram of dry sample.
d Water solubility index is the amount of solids recovered by evaporating supernatant from water absorption tests, expressed as % of dry solids in sample.
e Nonroasted partially defatted peanut flour blended by weight with corn cones.
f Roasted partially defatted peanut flour blended by weight with corn cones.
Because much of the flavor is in the oil, defatted peanuts are less AOCS. 1993. Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the
flavor-intensive (Woodroof 1983). Additionally, extrusion tends to American Oil Chemists Society, 4th Ed. Method Ba 2a-38, Ba 3-38,
reduce flavors of products because of chemical degradation due to Ba 5a-49, Ba 6-84. The Society: Champaign, IL.
oxidation, hydrolysis, and other reactions. Much of the flavor is Ayres, J. L., and Davenport, B. L. 1977. Peanut protein: A versatile food
ingredient. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 54:109A-111A.
normally lost to the atmosphere as the extrudate exiting at the die Bailey, L. N., Hauck, B. W., Sevatson, E. S., and Singer R. E. 1991.
(Maga 1989). Spadaro et al (1971) reported that the use of 15% Systems for manufacture of ready-to-eat breakfast cereals using twin-
full-fat roasted peanuts produced an extruded product with peanut screw extrusion. Cereal Foods World 36:863-869.
aroma; however, this aroma dissipated as the product cooled after Baker, J., and Hin, Y. S. 1984. High-protein rice-soya breakfast cereal. J.
extrusion. Prinyawiwatkul (1993) also found that peanut aroma is not Food Proc. Pres. 8:163- 174.
evident in cooled extruded products made with corn starch and Bhatnagar, S., and Hanna, M. A. 1997. Modification of microstructure of
peanut flour. starch extruded with selected lipids. Starch 49:12-20.
R-PDPF did not improve peanut flavor in the flakes. This is Bhattacharya, M., Hanna, M. A., and Kaufman, R. E. 1986. Textural
properties of extruded plant protein blends. J. Food Sci. 51:988-993.
probably because pyrazine compounds, the major flavor precursors of
Bookwalter, G. N., Warner, K., Anderson, R. A., and Bagley, E. B. 1978.
roasted flavor, are heat sensitive and rapidly vanished during the Cornmeal/peanut flour blends and their characteristics. J. Food Sci.
extrusion process, resulting in the mild flavor of extruded toasted 43:1116-1120.
flakes made with R-PDPF. In addition, flavor compounds are bound to Camire, M. E. 1989. The effects of protein-polysaccharide interactions
macromolecules such as starch and protein in the reactor zone of on the quality of extruded foods. MS thesis. Texas Woman’s Uni-
the extruder (Camire and Belbez 1996). versity: Denton, TX.
Camire, M. E., and Belbez, E. O. 1996. Flavor formation during
CONCLUSIONS extrusion cooking. Cereal Foods World 41:734-736.
Celis, L. P., Rooney, L. W., and McDonough C. M. 1996. A ready-to-eat
breakfast cereal from food-grade sorghum. Cereal Chem. 73:108-114.
This study showed that breakfast cereal flakes could be made
Hagan, R. C., Dahl, S. R., and Villota, R. 1986. Texturization of co-pre-
from combinations of corn cones blended with partially defatted cipitated soybean and peanut proteins by twin-screw extrusion. J. Food
peanut flour (PDPF) or roasted partially defatted peanut flour (R- Sci. 51:367-370.
PDPF) at different levels up to 30% using twin-screw extrusion. Sup- Harper, J. M. 1981. Extrusion of Foods, Vol. 1. CRC Press: Boca Raton,
plementation with peanut flours improved the nutritional charac- FL.
teristics of corn cones breakfast flakes. However, protein and fat Harris, H., Davis, E. Y., Van de Mark, M. S., Rymal, K. S., and Spadaro,
content in peanut flours also affected the density of those extruded J. J. 1972. Development and use of defatted peanut flours, meals, and
flakes, resulting in shorter bowl life. An addition of extruded grits. Auburn Univ. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 431:1-71.
toasted flakes with 20% R-PDPF were considered as acceptable Johri, T. S., Agrawal, R., and Sadagopan, V. R. 1988. Available lysine and
methionine contents of some proteinous feedstuffs. Ind. J. Anim. Nutr.
as those without peanut flour. The peanut flavor intensity score of
5:228-229.
extruded toasted flakes with 30% PDPF was rated as strongest. An Lusas, E. W. 1979. Food uses of peanut protein. J. Am. Oil. Chem. Soc.
effort to enhance peanut flavor intensity using R-PDPF was imprac- 56:425-430.
tical because flavor compounds were lost or bound to macro- Maga, J. A. 1989. Flavor formation and retention during extrusion. Pages
molecules during extrusion. The use of PDPF as protein supplement 387-398 in: Extrusion Cooking. C. Mercier, P. Linko, and J. M. Harper,
incorporated with corn meal or some other types of starch to produce eds. Am. Assoc. Cereal Chem.: St.Paul, MN.
other RTE breakfast cereals or snacks should be further studied. Midden, T. M. 1989. Twin screw extrusion of cornflakes. Cereal Foods
World 34:942-943.
Miller, R. C. 1994. Breakfast cereal extrusion technology. Page 73-109
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
in: The Technology of Extrusion Cooking. N. D. Frame, ed. Blackie
Academic & Professional: New York.
We acknowledge financial support for this research from the Texas
Mohamed, S. 1990. Factors affecting extrusion characteristics of
Advanced Technology Program under the Grant No. 999903-251. Special
expanded starch-based products. J. Food Process. Preserv. 14:437-452.
thanks go to Insta Pro International, Wenger Manufacturing Co., for use
Phillips, R. D., and Falcone, R. G. 1988. Extrusion of sorghum and
of their extruders and providing technical assistance, and Birdsong
sorghum peanut mixtures: Effect of barrel temperature and feed
Peanuts Co. for donating peanuts for this research project.
moisture on physical-textural characteristics. J. Text. Stud. 19:185-197.
Prinyawiwatkul, W., Beuchat, L. R., Phillips, L. D., and Resurreccion, A.
LITERATURE CITED V. A. 1995. Modelling the effects of peanut flour, feed moisture
content, and extrusion temperature on physical properties of an
Anderson, R. A., Conway, H. F., Pfeifer, V. F., and Griffin, E. L., Jr. 1969. extruded snack product. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 30:37-44.
Gelatinization of corn grits by roll- and extrusion-cooking. Cereal Sci. Rokey, G. J. 1995. RTE breakfast cereal flake extrusion. Cereal Foods
Today 14:4-7, 11-12. World 40:422-425.
AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th Ed. Association of Singh, B., and Singh, U. 1991. Functional properties of sorghum-peanut
Official Analytical Chemists: Washington, DC. composition flour. Cereal Chem. 68:461-463.