Peer Evaluation of Teaching Form Lilyrobinson

PEER EVALUATION OF TEACHING
OBSERVATION WORKSHEET
Instructor ___________
Lily Robinson Topic____________________________________________
The development of the ADO-SQ model to predict 1-year mortality in patients with COPD
Date ____________________ Reviewer_____________________

Aug 18, 2022 Jennifer Guan
1 = Ineffective 2 = Poorly Effective 3 = Effective

4 = Very effective 5 = Outstanding NA =Not observed or not utilized
A. Clarity and Organization 1 2 3 4 5 NA

Clearly states purpose / objectives of the presentation 5
Presented overview of presentation 5
Relates lesson to previously covered material NA
Presents material in a logical sequence 5
Paces lesson appropriately 4
Summarizes major points of lesson 5
How did the instructor demonstrate organization of the subject matter?
Lily was very organized. She started with an overview of COPD then honed in on the focus of providing palliative
care to patients with COPD. This transitioned naturally to the journal review. The content of the material was on
the heavier side, and next time having fewer objectives and text on the slides would further improve clarity.
B. Effective Communication 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Projects voice clearly, with intonation; easily heard 5
Demonstrates and stimulates enthusiasm for subject 5
Varied explanations for complex and difficult
material, using examples to clarify points 5
Defines unfamiliar terms, concepts and principles 5+
Uses humor appropriately to maintain attention and
strengthen retention 5
Listens to students' questions and comments 5
What were the most and least helpful things the instructor did to communicate effectively?
There was a statistics review prior to interpreting the prognostic tool, which was an excellent way to ensure all
audience members were able to understand and appreciate how the tool can be used in different clinical
scenarios. Lily was enthusiastic and made the talk personable by sharing why she was interested in this topic.
C. Interaction with Participants 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Maintains participant attention 5
Responds to nonverbal cues of confusion, boredom,
and curiosity NA
Encourages student questions or discussion; asks
questions to monitor student progress 5
Listens to students' questions and comments 5+
Gives satisfactory answers to student questions,
restating questions and answers when needed 5
How did the instructor show interest in the students and their learning?
The session was on zoom. Lily encouraged interaction and questions by answering comments in the chat and
facilitating a lively discussion after her talk. Indeed, there were some difficult questions being asked and Lily both
moderated and answered questions, incorporating active listening and encouragement of further dialogue.
D. Instructional Materials and Environment 1 2 3 4 5 NA

Presentation follows handout NA
Present appropriate amount of material at
appropriate level of complexity; material up-to-date 4
Presents helpful audiovisual materials to support lesson
organization and major points 4
Presents helpful written materials to reinforce key points NA
To what extent did the instructor vary the instructional methods for the material presented?
What other methods might have been appropriate?
Lily used colours including a blue box to highlight key points on her slides, and used graphs and tables in her
presentation to display information in a varied manner. The instructional method felt very appropriate and was
effective in delivering the content material. Other methods may include using images, increasing white/empty
space, and audience interactive activities.
E. Small group 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Demonstrates advanced preparation for teaching session NA
Explains purpose, goals of the session NA
Explains how session is organized, or will be
conducted; student role is made clear NA
Keeps session well-paced & keeps group on target NA
Facilitates, rather than directs, discussion. Allows
learners to solve problems NA
Accommodates different learning styles NA
Answers questions / provides guidance when
necessary; demonstrates new tasks, procedures NA
Checks to see that information is understood NA
Provides effective feedback NA
Encourages group interaction; ensures participation
from all members of the group NA
Treats learners and colleagues, team members
Respectfully NA
Ensures summarization of content at end of session NA
OVERALL EVALUATION NA
5/5 Overall. Lily did an excellent job presenting a content heavy talk in a clear and approachable manner to a large group from a variety of clinical
backgrounds. Her presentation demonstrated her thorough preparation and understanding of the topic. She was engaging and facilitated a dynamic
audience Q and A session after her talk, where audience members were clearly comfortable and encouraged to participate. Great job, Lily!

Peer Evaluation of Teaching Form Lilyrobinson

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Peer Evaluation of Teaching Form Lilyrobinson

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Peer Evaluation of Teaching Form Lilyrobinson

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PEER EVALUATION OF TEACHING

Date Reviewer_

1 = Ineffective 2 = Poorly Effective 3 = Effective

A. Clarity and Organization 1 2 3 4 5 NA

D. Instructional Materials and Environment 1 2 3 4 5 NA

You might also like