Philosophy of Education
Philosophy of Education
Philosophy of Education
Graduate Studies
PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION
1. Is Disciplinism and Naturalism the same in context and application? Why or why
not? Give example.
Answer: No. They are opposite in each other because Disciplinism asserted that
the mind is made up of certain faculties such as memory, reason, will, judgment,
etc. and an act of which needs special activities for its training and development.
This theory maintained that the power developed in any faculty by the study of a
school subject can be used equally well in other subjects or to meet any other
experience in life while Naturalism believes that education should be according to
the nature of child. It advocates creation of natural conditions in which natural
development of child can take place.
In Disciplinism for example the teacher is considered to guide the
children to meet their qualifications, and they believe them not knowing anything,
just like the blank-slate theory. This philosophy is based on reason, will and
judgement since children would be guided with reason and the will to learn and
use new ideas.
On the other hand, Naturalism is that the teacher is always behind the
screen. He is a spectator or an observer. Teacher plays his role behind the scene.
He does not interfere in students' activities. Teacher acts as a facilitator, a setter of
the stage, and as a supplier of materials and opportunities.
Answer:
5. What is the Philosophy behind K-12 Education? What is its goal and objectives?
What are the challenges that the teacher is facing in its implementation?
environment.
Teaching philosophy is like a map, it gives direction to move ahead.
One may feel lost without it, in the same manner you are going to be missed while
teaching a specific path is not decided. The K-12 Education was anchored on the
following philosophies: Constructivism, Progressivism and Reconstructionism.
Constructivism is philosophy of learning founded on the premise that, by
reflecting on our experiences, we construct our own understanding of the world
we live in.
Progressivism believes that education should focus on the child, neither on the
content to be taught nor the teacher. Reconstructionism emphasizes the addressing
of social question on a quest to create a better society.
The sudden implementation of the K–12 in the Philippines left teachers
in confusion with their roles in the new educational system, specifically the
development of their roles throughout the process, the appropriateness of the new
curriculum and the real classroom situation, and the difference in the internal
communication of different education stakeholders. The teachers were discovered
to struggle in delivering the content of class materials and possess poor teaching
strategies/skills. Due to the lack of professional development opportunities,
teachers were unprepared to teach the content based on the assigned schedule and
have a more diversified teaching methodology. It is necessary that teachers
themselves must be well-equipped with proper teaching strategies that maximize
teacher-student participation and there is a persisting shortage in school and
classrooms, particularly senior high school; lack of textbook, learning facilities,
and other needs of students. Teachers were also left to shoulder the expenses on
their own.