GE6075 PROFESSIONAL ETHICS IN

ENGINEERING
Unit 4
Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel
Professor and Head
Faculty of Information Technology
R M K College of Engineering and
Technology
 UNIT IVSAFETY, RESPONSIBILITIES AND
RIGHTS

Safety and Risk – Assessment of Safety and Risk –

Risk Benefit Analysis and Reducing Risk - Respect
for Authority – Collective Bargaining – Confidentiality
– Conflicts of Interest – Occupational Crime –
Professional Rights – Employee Rights – Intellectual
Property Rights (IPR) – Discrimination

2 Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016

 SAFETY AND RISK
 Safety was defined as the risk that is known and
judged as acceptable.
 But, risk is a potential that something unwanted and
harmful may occur.
 It is the result of an unsafe situation, sometimes
unanticipated, during its use.
 Probability of safety = 1 – Probability of risk
 Risk = Probability of occurrence × Consequence in
magnitude
3 Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016
 SAFETY AND RISK….
 Different methods are available to determine the risk (testing
for safety)
 Testing on the functions of the safety-system components.
1) Destructive testing: In this approach, testing is done till the
component fails. It is too expensive, but very realistic and
useful.
2) Prototype testing: In this approach, the testing is done on a
proportional scale model with all vital components fixed in
the system. Dimensional analysis could be used to project
the results at the actual conditions.
4
3) Simulation testing: With the help of computer, the
Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016
 SAFETY AND RISK….
Safety must be an integral part of any engineering design.
In other words of William W.Lawrence, A thing is safe if its
risks are justified to be acceptable”.
So a design or thing is said be safe, if for the person who
judges, the perceived risk is high. In short, safety means an
acceptable risk.
But, the drawbacks of definition of Lawrence are
Under estimation of risks
Over estimation of risks
No estimation of risks
5 Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016
 SAFETY AND RISK….
A modified version of Lawrence definition is
“A thing is safe if, were its risks fully known, those risks would be judged
acceptable in light of settled principles. More fully, a thing is safe (to a certain
degree) with respect to a given person or group at a given time if, were they
fully aware of its risks and expressing their most settled values, they would
judge those risks to be acceptable (to that certain degree)”
The difficulties in Lawrence definition are overcome by
Knowledge and Settled value principles – helps to rule out the irrelevant
judgments
Safety is frequently thought in terms of degrees and comparisons.
The degree to which a person or group, judging on the basis of their settled
values, would decide that the risks of something are more or less acceptable
in comparison with the risks of some other thing.
Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel
We interpret “things” to include products as well as services, institutional
6 10/24/2016
 RISK
When a thing or product is proved to be dangerous or hazardous then it
is unsafe.
A risk is a potential that something unwanted and harmful may occur”. A
risk the possibility of suffering harm or loss.
Risk is defined as the probability of a specified level of hazardous
consequence being realized. Risk (R) is thus a product of probability (P)
and consequence (C) which is given by the equation R = P X C.
On the basis of technology, risk includes the dangers of bodily harms or
economic laws or environmental degradation.
Good engineering practice has always been concerned with safety.
Whenever the society is more influenced by technology there is more
possibility of facing risks not only by the users but also by the producers.
7 Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016
It causes ecological imbalance. So safety demand will be higher in
 RISK…..
A risk may fall into one of the following categories
Low consequence, Low probability (can be ignored)
High consequence, High probability
Low consequence, High probability
High consequence, Low probability
Obviously we need to concentrate on the third and fourth categories of
risk. The third category of events, the so-called “learning incidents” is
precursor to high consequence of major events. The fourth category
comes under the major hazards control and requires special attention.
The risk analysis is mandatory for this category of “major events”.
A disaster = A serious continued event; A state of unpreparedness.
8 Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016
 Acceptability of risk
William D. Rowe says “A risk is acceptable when those affected
are generally no longer (or not) apprehensive about it.
Doubtfulness depends mainly on how the people take the risk
or how people perceive it. This perception of risk is mostly
influenced by the following factors.
I. Voluntarism and control
Though people know that their actions are unsafe, their
involvement of risk is called voluntary risk. They take up these
kinds of risky actions for thrill, amusement and fun

9 Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016

 Acceptability of risk…..
ii) Effect of information on risk assessments
The ways in which the information necessary for taking a decision has a
great influence on how risks are perceived. Many experiments have
proved that the manner in which information about a danger is
presented can lead to reverse preferences about how to deal with that
danger.
iii) Job - Related risks / Job – Related Pressures
It depends upon the nature of the job. In most of the cases of employees
in high risk jobs, don’t have any options but to undertake them merely
because of compulsion. They rarely use the available safety
equipments.
Ex: working in a steel plant or chemical plant.
10So,Drwhile designing
Gnanasekaran Thangavel and equaling the work stations, the engineers must
10/24/2016
 Acceptability of risk…..
iv) Magnitude and proximity
Our reaction to risk may be affected by the magnification or the personal
identification or relationship of victims. Misperceptions of numbers can
easily make us overlook losses that are far greater than the numbers reveal
by themselves.
Lessons for the engineers
Regarding the public conceptions for safety, engineers have to face two
problems. First one is the optimistic attitude.i.e the things or actions are
familiar to them, they never hurt them, and these actions can be controlled
by them and present no real risk. Second one is pessimistic attitude. This
attitude comes when the public feel that an accident kills may people,
affects their inmates, they consider those risks as high ones.
 The risk communication and the risk management efforts must be
Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016
11
structured as a two way process.
 Assessment of safety and risk
It is very difficult to attain hundred percent absolute safety. In an
engineering product, if there is any improvement in safety, it often goes with
an increase in the cost of the product. On the other side, the products
which are not safe always increase the secondary costs to the producer
such as warranty expenses, loss of customer’s good will and down time in
the production process etc.
An engineer must know the safety measures before assessing a risk of any
product. The factors may be like:
Does the engineer have the right data?
Is he satisfied with the present design?
How does he test the safety of a product? And
How does he measure and weigh the risks with benefits for a product?
A stress on high safety and low risks leads to high primary costs and low
12 Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016
secondary cost and vice-versa.
 Knowledge of risks

It is the data in designing a product. Though past experience

and historical data give better information about the safety of
products designing, it is still inadequate.
The reasons for the inadequacies are:
The information is not freely shared among industries and
There are also new applications of old technologies that
provide available data which are less useful.

13 Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016

 Uncertainties in design
 Risk in a product arises due to so many uncertainties faced by all kinds of engineers
such as the design engineer, the manufacturing engineer and also the sales and
application engineer. This is also the knowledge required to assess the risk of a
product. So, in order to minimize the risk involved in any product an engineer has to
investigate the following criteria:
 i) Purpose of designing
 The purpose of designing a product has lot of uncertainties in its design itself.
 ii) Application of the product
 Uncertainties may also be based on the type of loading on that design and the uses
of that design. In history, there is a best example to prove this. When Napoleon’s
army crossed a wooden bridge by marching in step, the bridge had collapsed. The
design of that bridge could not bear that heavy load.
 iii) Materials and the skill used for producing the product
 There are also uncertainties regarding the materials and the level of skills used in
14 designing and Thangavel
Dr Gnanasekaran producing the product. For example, changing economic conditions,
10/24/2016
types of materials and also unfamiliar environmental conditions can affect the design
 TESTING FOR SAFETY
Once a product is designed, both the prototypes and finished product must
be thoroughly checked and tested. This testing is to determine whether the
product meets out the specifications and also to see whether the products
are safe. The importance of proper testing can be explained by the disaster
of a Russian submarine named “Kursk”. It sank in August 2000 and
everyone in the ship was killed. The sinking had been caused by an
explosion in the “torpedo room” which made a large hole in the body of the
submarine. Many of the crew members survived the initial explosion, but
died because they were unable to escape from the submarine and no
efforts at the rescue by other ships were successful.
The Russian naval Engineers told the “Krusk” was equipped with a rescue
capsule that was designed to allow the crew members to float safely to the
surface in an emergency. But due to some reasons, this safety system was
15 never tested.Thangavel
Dr Gnanasekaran So, it is essential that in any engineering design, all 10/24/2016
the safety
 SAFETY AND RISK ANALYSIS
Recent occurrences of large scale accidents in which many lives
were lost or in which great damage was caused to the
environment has lead to more attention being paid to safety
within industrial plants or installations.
 As a result of this attention, risk analysis techniques have come
to play an ever-increasing role.
 Risk reduction can take place at different levels viz by
implementing the inherent safety provisions during the designing
stage, applying safety measures, preventing or limiting damage,
providing safety zones around industrial plants and by emergency
planning.
16Each of these
Dr Gnanasekaran applications demands a specific approach 10/24/2016
Thangavel for the
 RISK ANALYSIS

Risk analysis is used for the assessment of the hazards

associated with an industrial or commercial activity and can be
summarized by 3 questions given below:
What can go wrong? – Hazard Identification
What are the effects and consequences?- consequence
Analysis
How often it will happen? - Probability estimation

17 Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016

 Analytical Methods
Several analytical methods are adopted in testing for safety of
a product/project.
1. Scenario Analysis :This is the most common method of
analysis. Starting from an event, different consequences are
studied. This is more a qualitative method.
2. Failure mode and effect analysis : In this method various parts
and components of the system and their modes of failure are
studied.

18 Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016

 SAFE EXIT
In the study of safety, the ‘safe exit’ principles are
recommended. The conditions referred to as ‘safe exit’ are:
1 The product, when it fails, should fail safely
2 The product, when it fails, can be abandoned safely (it does
not harm others by explosion or radiation)
3 The user can safely escape the product (e.g., ships need
sufficient number of life boats for all passengers and crew;
multi-storied buildings need usable fire escapes)

19 Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016

 RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
Risk- benefit analysis is a method that helps the engineers to analyze
the risk in a project and to determine whether a project should be
implemented or not. It is very much closer to cost-benefit analysis.
Risk – benefit analysis is being conducted for finding out answers for the
following questions:
I. Is the product worth applying the risk-benefit analysis?
II. What are the benefits?
III. Do they over weigh the risks?
The major reasons for the analysis of the risk benefit are:
1. To know risks and benefits and weigh them each
2. To decide on designs, advisability of product/project
3. To suggest and modify the design so that the risks are eliminated or
Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel
20
reduced 10/24/2016
 THREE-MILE ISLAND CASE STUDY

21 Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016

 CHERNOBYL CASE STUDY

22 Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016

 Bhopal Gas Tragedy CASE STUDY

23 Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016

 Respect for Authority
Decisions can be taken by a few people, but putting into action
requires larger participation from different groups of people,
such as operation, purchase, sales, accounts, maintenance,
finance etc.
In effectively-and efficiently-transferring decisions to actions,
the authority comes into play a great role. Otherwise the
individual discretions may ruin the activities.
Further the authority fixes the personal responsibility and
accountability uniquely on each person. This is necessary to
ensure progress in action.

24 Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016

 Institutional
It is the authority Authority
exercised within the organization. It is the right
given to the employees to exercise power, to complete the task
and force them to achieve their goals.
Duties such as resource allocation, policy dissemination,
recommendation, supervision, issue orders (empower) or
directions on subordinates are vested to institutional authority,
e.g., Line Managers and Project Managers have the
institutional duty to make sure that the products/projects are
completed successfully.
The characteristics features of institutional authority are that
they allocate money and other resources and have liberty in
execution.
25 Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016
 Expert Authority
On the other hand, the Expert Authority is
(a) the possession of special knowledge, skills and competence
to perform a job thoroughly (expertise),
(b) the advice on jobs, and
(c) is a staff function.
It is also known as ‘authority of leadership’.
These experts direct others in effective manner, e.g., advisers,
experts, and consultants are engaged in an organization for a
specific term.
26 Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016
 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
It is the bargain by the trade union for improving the
economic interests of the worker members.
The process includes negotiation, threatening verbally, and
declaration of ‘strike’.
It is impossible to endorse fully the collective bargaining of
unions or to condemn.
There exist always conflicting views between the
professionalism and unionism.

27 Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016

 CONFIDENTIALITY
 Confidentiality means keeping the information on the employer and
clients, as secrets. It is one of the important aspects of team work.
Justification for Confidentiality
 Confidentiality can be justified by various ethical theories. According to
Rights-based theory, rights of the stakeholders, right to the intellectual
property of the company are protected by this practice. Based on Duty
theory, employees and employers have duty to keep up mutual trust.
The Utilitarian theory holds good, only when confidentiality produce
most good to most people. Act utilitarian theory focuses on each
situation, when the employer decides on some matters as confidential.
 Further, the following moral principles also justify the concept of
‘confidentiality’:
28 Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016
 CONFIDENTIALITY……
1. Respect for Autonomy
 It means respecting the freedom and self-determination of
individuals and organizations to identify their legitimate control over
the personal information of themselves. In the absence of this, they
cannot keep their privacy and protect their self-interest.
2. Respect for Promises
3. Trustworthiness
4. Respect for Public welfare.
 Types of confidential information 1. Privileged information
2.Proprietary information

29 Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016

 Conflict of Interests

A conflict of interest (COI) is a situation in which a person

or organization is involved in multiple interests, financial or
otherwise, one of which could possibly corrupt the
motivation or decision-making of that individual or
organization.

30 Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016

 OCCUPATIONAL CRIME
 An occupational crime may be committed by
 (1) wrong actions of a person through one’s lawful employment or
 (2) crime by an employee to promote ones own or employer’s interest or
 (3) theft or
 (4) Pilferage of employee or
 (5) Damage to properties or an employees own organization
 Tease are also called white collared crimes
 Occupational Health and Safety Assessment Series, OHAS-18001
Certification has been adopted in many Indian Industries. As per the Annual
report of RIL10, an initiative called Project CASH, Change Agent for Safety
and Health, had been formed to bring about a positive change and
continual improvement in occupational health practices at the work place,
besides attitudinal and behavior changes.
 This is claimed to have prevented work-related diseases, injuries, reduced
absenteeism, and ultimately increased the productivity level.
31 Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016
 HUMAN RIGHTS
 Human rights are defined as moral entitlements that place obligations
on other people to treat one with dignity and respect.
 Organizations and engineers are to be familiar with the minimum
provisions under the human rights, so that the engineers and
organizations for a firm base for understanding and productivity.
Provisions under ‘human rights’ are as follows:
1. Right to pursue legitimate personal interest
2. Right to make a living
3. Right to privacy
4. Right to property
5. Right of non-discrimination
6. NoDrsexual
32
harassment
Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016
 Professional
Under professional rights, Rights
the following provisions are
protected:
1. Right to form and express professional judgment:
2. Right to refuse to participate in unethical activities:
3. Right to fair recognition and to receive remuneration for
professional services:
4. Right to Due Process from Employer
5. Right to Equal Opportunity—Non-discrimination
6. Right to Equal Opportunity—Sexual Harassment in the
Workplace
7. Right to Equal Opportunity—Affirmative Action or
Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel
33
Preferential Treatment 10/24/2016
 Intellectual property rights (IPRs)
 Intellectual property rights (IPRs) are the protections granted to the creators
of IP, and include trademarks, copyright, patents, industrial design rights, and
in some jurisdictions trade secrets.
 IP permits people to have fully independent ownership for their innovation
and creativity, like that of own physical property.
 This encourages the IP owners towards innovation and benefit to the society.
It is an asset that can be bought or sold, licensed, and exchanged. It is
intangible i.e., it cannot be identified by specific parameters.
 The agreements with World Trade Organisation (WTO) and Trade-Related
aspects of Intellectual Property System (TRIPS) have been adopted effective
from January 2005.
 The global IPR system strengthens protection, increases the incentives for
innovation, and raises returns on international technology transfer.
 However, it could raise the costs of acquiring new technology and products,
shifting the global terms of trade in favor of technology producers.
Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel
34 10/24/2016
 Need for Protection of IP
 IP plays an essential role to stabilize and develop the economy of a nation. This
protection actually stimulates creativity, research, and innovation by ensuring
freedom to individuals and organizations to benefit from their creative intellectual
investments. The IP serves many purposes, namely
(a) it prevents others using it,
(b) prevent using it for financial gain,
(c) prevent plagiarism
(d) fulfill obligation to funding agency. ICICI Bank has advanced loan against IP as
security to Shopper’s Stoppe, New Delhi, and
(e) provides a strategy to generate steady income.
 Some of the challenges in the acquisition of IP are:
(a) Shortage of manpower in the industry. Educational institutions can play a vital role
in providing the same.
(b) High cost of patenting and lengthy procedure. This was being considered by the
Government and a simpler and faster procedure is expected, and
(c) Lack
35 of strongThangavel
Dr Gnanasekaran enforcement mechanism. 10/24/2016
 Types and Norms
1. Patents
Patent is a contract between the individual (inventor) and the
society (all others). Patents protect legally the specific
products from being manufactured or sold by others, without
permission of the patent holder. Patent holder has the legally-
protected monopoly power as one’s own property. The validity
is 20 years from the date filing the application for the patent. It
is a territorial right and needs registration. The Patent
(Amendment) Act 2002 guarantees such provisions.

36 Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016

 Types and Norms…….
2. Copyright
The copyright is a specific and exclusive right, describing rights given to
creators for their literary and artistic works.
This protects literary material, aesthetic material, music, film, sound
recording, broadcasting, software, multimedia, paintings, sculptures, and
drawings including maps, diagrams, engravings or photographs.
There is no need for registration and no need to seek lawyer’s help for
settlement. The life of the copyright protection is the life of the inventor or
author plus 50 years. Copyright gives protection to particular expression
and not for the idea.
 Copyright is effective in (a) preventing others from copying or reproducing
or storing the work, (b) publishing and selling the copies, (c) performing the
work in public, commercially (d) to make film (e) to make translation of the
37 work, and (f)Thangavel
Dr Gnanasekaran to make any adaptation of the work. Copying the idea 10/24/2016
is called
‘plagiarism’ and it is dealt with separately.
 Types and Norms…….
3. Trademark
 Trademark is a wide identity of specific good and services, permitting
differences to be made among different trades. It is a territorial right, which
needs registration. Registration is valid initially for 10 years, and renewable.
The trademark or service mark may be registered in the form of a device, a
heading, a label, a ticket, a letter, a word or words, a numeral or any
combination of these, logos, designs, sounds, and symbols. Trademark
should not be mistaken for a design, e.g., the shape of a bottle in which a
product is marketed, can not be registered as a trademark. Trademarks Act
1999 made in compliance with TRIPS agreement, provides further details.
There are three functions of trademark:
1. Just as we are identified by our names, good are identified by their
trademarks. For example, the customer goes to the shop and asks for Lux
soap. The word ‘Lux’ is a trade mark. In other words it shows the origin or
source of the goods.
2. TheDrtrademark
38 carries with it an inherent indication or impression on10/24/2016
Gnanasekaran Thangavel the
 Types and Norms…….

3. Trade secret
A trade secret is a formula, practice, process, design,
instrument, pattern, commercial method, or compilation of
information not generally known or reasonably ascertainable
by others by which a business can obtain an economic
advantage over competitors or customers.

39 Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016

 Discrimination

Discrimination means morally unjustified treatment of people

on arbitrary or irrelevant grounds.
Discrimination because of caste, sex, religion, creed, and
language are regressive actions.
Discrimination which means a morally unjust treatment of
people in the workplace is damaging to the human dignity.

40 Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016

 References
1. https://sites.google.com/site/drtgnanasekaran/course-materials
2. Mike W. Martin and Roland Schinzinger, “Ethics in Engineering”, Tata McGraw Hill, New
Delhi, 2003.
3. Govindarajan M, Natarajan S, Senthil Kumar V. S, “Engineering Ethics”, Prentice Hall of
India, New Delhi, 2004.
4. Charles B. Fleddermann, “Engineering Ethics”, Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey,
2004.
5. Charles E. Harris, Michael S. Pritchard and Michael J. Rabins, “Engineering Ethics –
Concepts and Cases”, Cengage Learning, 2009
6. John R Boatright, “Ethics and the Conduct of Business”, Pearson Education, New Delhi,
2003
7. 4. Edmund G Seebauer and Robert L Barry, “Fundametals of Ethics for Scientists and
Engineers”,Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001
8. Laura P. Hartman and Joe Desjardins, “Business Ethics: Decision Making for Personal
41 Integrity and Social
Dr Gnanasekaran Responsibility” Mc Graw Hill education, India Pvt. Ltd.,New 10/24/2016
Thangavel Delhi
 Other presentations
http://www.slideshare.net/drgst/presentations

42 Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016

 Thank You

Questions and Comments?

43 Dr Gnanasekaran Thangavel 10/24/2016