Republic of the Philippines

CEBU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

DUMANJUG EXTENSION CAMPUS
BITOON, DUMANJUG, CEBU PHILIPPINES 6035
url: http://www.ctu.edu.ph email: [email protected]
Telefax. No. (032) 470-9298 / (032) 471-8312 / 0915 - 3229654

COURSE SYLLABUS INS Form 1

in November 2015
ED 319 Revision: 1
(Subject Code) PAGE 1 of 6

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING 1

(Descriptive Title)
1ST Semester, AY 2017 – 2018

Department/Area : Education
Curriculum : Bachelor in Elementary Education - CE / Bachelor in Secondary Education - TLE
Curriculum Year : Third Year
No. of Hours/Sem. : 54 hours
Credit Unit(s) : 3 Units
Prerequisite(s) : Basic Mathematics

Vision of the University

A premier multi- disciplinary TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY.

.
Mission of the University :

The University shall primarily provide advanced professional and technical instruction for special purposes, advanced studies in industrial trade,
agricultural, fishery, forestry, aeronautics, and land based programs, arts and sciences, health sciences, information technology, and other relevant
fields of study. It shall also undertake research and extension services and provides progressive leadership in its areas of specialization
(Sec. 2 of RA 9744).

Goals of the College :

The University shall produce scientifically and technologically- oriented human capital equipped with appropriate knowledge, skills and attitudes. It
shall likewise pursue relevant research, strengthen linkages with the industry, community and other instructions and maintain sustainable technology for
preservation of the environment.
Outcomes :

1. Relevant, effective and quality education for sustainable growth.

2. Access to quality education for the underprivileged students.
3. Relevant research for economic, environmental and sustainable development.
4. Expanded community engagement.
5. Effective and efficient management of resources.

Course Description :

This course focuses on the development and utilization of assessment tools to improve teaching- learning process. It emphasizes the testing
for measuring knowledge, comprehension and other thinking skills. It allows students to go through the standard steps in test construction for quality
assessment.

COURSE CONTENT
TEACHING-
LEARNING TIME
INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOME ASSESSMENT LEARNING CONTENT REFERENCES REMARK
RESOURCES ALLOCATION
ACTIVITY
1. Relate course to the mission, vision
Observation
and goals of the University; VISION, MISSION AND
2. Orient with the school policies, GOALS OF CEBU PowerPoint
Talking to Discussion CTU Manual 3
course requirements and grading TECHNOLOGICAL presentation
Learners/
system UNIVERSITY
Conferencing
(Week 1)

Calderon, Jose F.,

Ed. D. (2007)
1. Differentiate measurement, Books
I. BASIC CONCEPTS IN Measurement
evaluation and assessment; Written Interactive
ASSESSING and Evaluation.
2. Discuss the characteristics of Work lectures Researched notes
STUDENTS’ Manila, Philippines:
different concepts in assessment of
LEARNING National Bookstore
learning; Essay Comparative Visual Aid 9
3. Distinguish measurement, table
A. Measuring Calmorin,
evaluation and assessment in given Open-Ended construction Modules
B. Evaluation Laaurentina P.
varied classroom settings. Question
C. Assessment (1998).
(Week 2-4) PowerPoint
Educational
Presentation
Research,
Measurement
 and Evaluation .
2nd Edition.
Manila, Philippines:
National Bookstore
Small Group
Discussion Books Garcia, Carlito D.,
1. Identify important purpose of II. ROLES OF
Ed. D. (2008).
classroom assessment; ASSESSMENT IN
Feed backing Researched notes Measuring and
2. Cite differences between INSTRUCTIONAL
Oral Test Evaluating
standardized testing and classroom DECISIONS
Quiz Interactive Visual Aid Learning 6
assessment;
Discussion Outcomes.
3. Characterized assessment that will A. Placement
Modules Mandaluyong City,
influence instructional decisions. B. Diagnostic
Collection of Philippines: Atbp.
(Week 4-5) C. Formative
Sample Test PowerPoint Publishing Corp.
Papers Presentation
Calderon, Jose F.,
Ed. D. (2007)
III. PRINCIPLES OF
Measurement
HIGH QUALITY
and Evaluation.
Small Group ASSESSMENT
Manila, Philippines:
1. Compare the principles of high Discussion Books
National Bookstore
quality assessment between A. Teacher- made Tests
teacher- made tests and Think-Pair- Feed backing 1. Clarity of Learning Researched notes
standardized test; Share Targets
Calmorin,
2. Distinguish the different non- tests Interactive 2. Qualities of Good Test Visual Aid 9
Laaurentina P.
instruments; Simulation Discussion Instruments
(1998).
3. Demonstrate cooperation in Activities Modules
Educational
working with a group; Collection of B. Non- Test Instruments
Research,
(Week 6-8) Sample Test 1. Anecdotal record PowerPoint
Measurement
Papers 2. Checklist Presentation
and Evaluation .
3. Rating Scale
2nd Edition.
4. Observation Report
Manila, Philippines:
National Bookstore
1. Evaluate Students’ Learning Written MIDTERM
1
(Week 9) Examination EXAMINATION
1. Point out the parts of a Table of Written Critical IV. DEVELOPMENT OF Santos, Rosita De
Specifications (TOS); Work Reading CLASS ASSESSMENT Books Guzman, Ph. D. 12
2. Construct a TOS for the subject TOOLS FOR (2007).
 assigned to be tested; Constructed Interactive MEASURING Researched notes Assessment of
TOS Discussion LEARNING Learning 1.
3. Clarify the different types of Constructed OUTCOMES Visual Aid Manila, Philippines:
teacher- made tests according to self- made Lorimar Publishing
their nature and use; tests A. Test Planning: Table of Modules Inc.
4. Construct a self- made test based Specifications
on the TOS made; 1. Guidelines PowerPoint Villaflor, Editha. Ph.
(Week 10-13) 2. Preparation Presentation D. (2007).
3. Step in Construction Assessment
Models for
B. Types of Test Quality
1. Constructed- Education, Manila,
response Philippines: Khanser
2. Selected- response Publishing House.

C. Guidelines in Test
Construction
Interactive V. UTILIZATION OF
discussion ASSESSMENT DATA Calderon, Jose F.,
A. Scoring Ed. D. (2007)
1. Describe the differences between
Collection of 1. Norm- referenced Measurement
norm- referenced and criterion-
sample interpretation and Evaluation.
referenced interpretation of
grading 2. Criterion- referenced Manila, Philippines:
assessment in terms of how scores
systems interpretation Books National Bookstore
are reported;
2. Identify grade- descriptors used in
Oral Test Computation B. Grading System Researched notes Calderon, Jose F.,
public and private schools;
of mean, 1. DepEd Grading Ed. D. (2000)
3. Explain the meaning of values of
Quiz median, mode System Visual Aid Statistics for 12
mean, median and mode in the
from scores 2. Other Grading Education
distribution of scores;
Paper works collected Systems Modules Research
4. Compute for the values of central
Simplified. 1st
tendency;
Ranking of C. Interpreting Test Results PowerPoint Edition. United
5. Find out the difficulty of an item;
collected 1. Measures of Central Presentation Nation Avenue,
6. Check the validity and reliability of
scores Tendency Ermita, Manila,
the test.
2. Grouped Data Philippines:
(Week 14-17)
Computation 3. Ungrouped Data Educational
of the index of 4. Item Analysis Publishing House
difficulty 5. Validation
1. Evaluate Students’ Learning Written
FINAL EXAMINATION 1
(Week 18) Examination
COURSE REQUIREMENTS:

1. Regular Attendance
2) Recitation/ Oral Participation
3) Quizzes
4) Seat works/ Exercises
5) Project
6) Assignment
7) Major Exams (Prelim, Midterm, Semi- Finals, Finals)

EVALUATION PROCEDURE (Approved Grading System Applicable to the Course/ Program)

Quizzes 30 %
Term Exam 40 %
Graded Oral Participation 20%
Projects/ Assignments/ Reports 10%

Total = 100%

REFERENCES:

1. Calderon, Jose F., Ed. D. (2007) Measurement and Evaluation. Manila, Philippines: National Bookstore
2. Calderon, Jose F., Ed. D. (2000) Statistics for Education Research Simplified. 1st Edition. United Nation Avenue, Ermita, Manila, Philippines: Educational
Publishing House
3. Calmorin, Laaurentina P. (1998). Educational Research, Measurement and Evaluation . 2nd Edition. Manila, Philippines: National Bookstore
4. Garcia, Carlito D., Ed. D. (2008). Measuring and Evaluating Learning Outcomes. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Atbp. Publishing Corp.
5. Santos, Rosita De Guzman, Ph. D. (2007). Assessment of Learning 1. Manila, Philippines: Lorimar Publishing Inc.
6. Villaflor, Editha. Ph. D. (2007). Assessment Models for Quality Education, Manila, Philippines: Khanser Publishing House.
Prepared by:

SAMUEL C. VILLA JR., LPT, M.A.V.Ed.

Instructor 1

Upon Recommendation of the Curriculum Committee:

GLORY BOQUECOSA- ALEO, LPT, M. Ed. CATHERINE C. GABIA., LPT, M. Ed.

Member Member

Approved:

ROMEO C. LEPITEN, ECE, D. M.

Campus Director