H DG Corr Protection
H DG Corr Protection
H DG Corr Protection
Galvanizing
for
Corrosion
Protection
of Steel
Products
The material included in this publication has been developed to provide accurate, authoritative information regarding iron and steel products
hot-dip galvanized after fabrication and is based on recognized engineering principles and inspection practices. This material is for general
information only and is not intended as a substitute for competent professional examination and verification of accuracy, suitability and/or
applicability. The publication of the material contained herein is not intended as a representation or warranty on the part of the American
Galvanizers Association, Inc. Anyone making use of this information assumes all liability arising from such use.
Cover Photos: Port of Everett Public Access and Transient Moorage, Everett, Wash., a hot-dip galvanized wind turbine and the Black Sea Export
Terminal, Constanta, Romania.
CORROSION
ion current is carried. Electrolytes include water solu-
AND tions of acids, bases and salts.
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF
extremely important since barrier protection is depen-
dent upon coating integrity.
Eta
(100% Zn)
70 DPN Hardness
Zeta
(94% Zn 6% Fe)
179 DPN Hardness
Delta
(90% Zn 10% Fe)
244 DPN Hardness
Gamma
(75% Zn 25% Fe)
250 DPN Hardness
Base Steel
159 DPN Hardness
* Total weight loss for 4" x 6" (10cm x 15cm approx.) test specimens
Source: “Corrosiveness of Various Atmospheric Test Sites as Measured by Specimens of Steel and Zinc, Metal
Corrosion in the Atmosphere,” ASTM STP 435 (1968).
Note: The different compositions of the corrosion products have not been included
here since they are complex and dependent upon different compounds (i.e. salts) that
are present in all natural waters.
Hard water is much less corrosive than soft water. The National Bureau of Standards has conducted an
Under conditions of moderate or high water hardness, a extensive research program on the corrosion of metals in
natural scale of insoluble salts tends to form on the gal- soils. Some of its research on galvanized steel pipe dates
vanized surface. These combine with zinc to form a back to 1924. The results from the NBS study shown in
protective barrier of calcium carbonate and basic zinc Figure 14 are based on tests started in 1937 using 1 1/2"
carbonate. (38mm) steel pipe with a nominal 3 oz. per square foot
(5.3 mil) zinc coating. The table shows annual metal loss
CORROSION PERFORMANCE IN SEA in ounces per square foot in a number of soils tested. Data
WATER AND SALT SPRAY collected (but not displayed here) also show that the gal-
vanized coating will prevent pitting of steel in soil, just as
Galvanized coatings provide considerable protec- it does in atmospheric exposure. Even in instances where
tion to steel immersed in sea water and exposed to salt the zinc coating was completely consumed, the corrosion
spray. The factors that influence the corrosion of zinc in of the underlying steel was much less than that of bare
fresh water also apply to sea water. However, it is the dis- steel specimens exposed to identical conditions.
solved salts (primarily sulfides and chlorides) in sea
water that are the principal determinants of the corrosion Figure 14: Corrosion of galvanized steel pipe in contact
behavior of zinc immersed in sea water. Given the high with a variety of soils
level of chloride in sea water, a very high rate of zinc Nominal weight of coating - 3 oz/sq ft (915g/m2) of exposed area (a)
corrosion might be expected. However, the presence of
Soil Type Total Weight Loss (oz/ft) After Burial Period
magnesium and calcium ions in sea water has a strong 2.1 yrs 4.0 yrs 9.0 yrs 12.7 yrs
inhibiting effect on zinc corrosion in this type of environ- oz/ft2 oz/ft2 oz/ft2 oz/ft2
ment. Accelerated laboratory test results that sometimes Inorganic Oxidizing Acid Soils
use a simple sodium chloride (NaCl) solution to simulate Cecil clay loam 0.3 1.4 0.6 0.6
the effects of sea water exposure on galvanized steel Hagerstown loam 0.3 1.2 0.7 0.6
should be viewed skeptically. Real world results often Susquehanna clay 1.0 2.3 0.9 0.8
Inorganic Oxidizing Alkaline Soils
differ significantly from accelerated laboratory tests. (See
Chino silt loam 1.1 2.3 1.6 1.1
Figure 13 for comparison of zinc corrosion in different Mohave fine gravelly loam 1.6 3.3 1.1 1.1
types of water.) Inorganic Reducing Acid Soils
Sharkey clay 0.6 1.5 0.7 1.1
CORROSION PERFORMANCE IN SOILS Acadia clay 3.3 -- 4.8 --
Inorganic Reducing Alkaline Soils
More than 200 different types of soils have been Docas clay 3.2 1.6 1.6 1.6
identified and are categorized according to texture, color Merced silt loam 2.1 4.5 0.1 1.3
and natural drainage. Coarse and textured soils, such as Lake Charles clay 3.7 3.9 5.5 13.8
gravel and sand, permit free circulation of air, and the Organic Reducing Acid Soils
process of corrosion may closely resemble atmospheric Carlisle muck 1.2 3.4 3.0 3.4
Tidal marsh 1.2 2.1 2.0 4.8
corrosion. Clay and silt soils have a fine texture and hold
Muck 4.3 5.4 9.0 10.7
water, resulting in poor aeration and drainage. The corro- Rifle peat 4.3 7.2 19.6 19.5
sion process in such soils may resemble the corrosion Cinders
process in water. Cinders 6.7 5.4 5.6 11.9
(a) This is weight of coating on one side of the pipe. 1 oz sq ft (305 g/m ) is equiva-
2
800
• Galvanizing for Corrosion Protection: A Specifier’s
600 Guide to Reinforcing Steel
400
• Rebar: A Processing and Inspection Guide for
Quality Hot Dip Galvanized Reinforcing Steel
200
These publications are available from the AGA or
your local galvanizer.
0
1 3 12 1 3 12 1 3 12
Months of Curing
Source: University
of California Black Galvanized
ENVIRONMENT
ATMOSPHERIC IMMERSED
METAL IN CONTACT RURAL INDUSTRIAL/ MARINE FRESH SEA
URBAN WATER WATER
Aluminum and aluminum alloys 0 0 to 1 0 to 1 1 1 to 2
Aluminum bronzes and silicon bronzes 0 to 1 1 1 to 2 1 to 2 2 to 3
Brasses including high tensile (HT) brass 0 to 1 1 0 to 2 1 to 2 2 to 3
(manganese bronze)
Cadmium 0 0 0 0 0
Cast irons 0 to 1 1 1 to 2 1 to 2 2 to 3
Cast iron (austenitic) 0 to 1 1 1 to 2 1 to 2 1 to 3
Chromium 0 to 1 1 to 2 1 to 2 1 to 2 2 to 3
Copper 0 to 1 1 to 2 1 to 2 1 to 2 2 to 3
Cupro-nickels 0 to 1 0 to 1 1 to 2 1 to 2 2 to 3
Gold (0 to 1) (1 to 2) (1 to 2) (1 to 2) (2 to 3)
Gunmetals, phosphor bronzes and tin bronzes 0 to 1 1 1 to 2 1 to 2 2 to 3
Lead 0 0 to 1 0 to 1 0 to 2 (0 to 2)
Magnesium and magnesium alloys 0 0 0 0 0
Nickel 0 to 1 1 1 to 2 1 to 2 2 to 3
Nickel copper alloys 0 to 1 1 1 to 2 1 to 2 2 to 3
Nickel-chromium-iron alloys (0 to 1) (1) (1 to 2) (1 to 2) (1 to 3)
Nickel-chromium-molybdenum alloys (0 to 1) (1) (1 to 2) (1 to 2) (1 to 3)
Nickel silvers 0 to 1 1 1 to 2 1 to 2 1 to 3
Platinum (0 to 1) (1 to 2) (1 to 2) (1 to 2) (2 to 3)
Rhodium (0 to 1) (1 to 2) (1 to 2) (1 to 2) (2 to 3)
Silver (0 to 1) (1 to 2) (1 to 2) (1 to 2) (2 to 3)
Solders hard 0 to 1 1 1 to 2 1 to 2 2 to 3
Solders soft 0 0 0 0 0
Stainless steel (austenitic and other grades
containing approximately 18% chromium) 0 to 1 0 to 1 0 to 1 0 to 2 1 to 2
Stainless steel (martensitic grades
containing approximately 13% chromium) 0 to 1 0 to 1 0 to 1 0 to 2 1 to 2
Steels (carbon and low alloy) 0 to 1 1 1 to 2 1 to 2 1 to 2
Tin 0 0 to 1 1 1 1 to 2
Titanium and titanium alloys (0 to 1) (1) (1 to 2) (0 to 2) (1 to 3)
Key 0 Zinc and galvanized steel will suffer either no additional corrosion, or at the most only very slight additional
corrosion, usually tolerable in service.
1 Zinc and galvanized steel will suffer slight or moderate additional corrosion which may be tolerable in some cir-
cumstances.
2 Zinc and galvanized steel may suffer fairly severe additional corrosion and protective measures usually will be
necessary.
3 Zinc and galvanized steel may suffer severe additional corrosion. Contact should be avoided.
General notes: Ratings in brackets are based on very limited evidence and are less certain than other values shown. The
table is in terms of additional corrosion and the symbol 0 should not be taken to imply that the metals in contact need no
protection under all conditions of exposure.
Source: British Standards institution pp. 6484:1979 Table 23