Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2K views

    Evaluation Sheet SIM

    Uploaded by

    Yu Calong
    The document describes the evaluation of a strategic intervention material on mitosis and meiosis. An evaluator was asked to rate various aspects of the material on criteria such as whether the title was catchy, the activities were appropriately designed, and the assessments measured the objectives. The evaluator strongly agreed with all of the criteria, finding the material to have a good title, clear directions, well-designed activities and assessments, and relevant information. The material was found to be an effective tool for teaching students about mitosis and meiosis.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Evaluation Sheet SIM

    Uploaded by

    Yu Calong
    2K views3 pages
    The document describes the evaluation of a strategic intervention material on mitosis and meiosis. An evaluator was asked to rate various aspects of the material on criteria such as whether the title was catchy, the activities were appropriately designed, and the assessments measured the objectives. The evaluator strongly agreed with all of the criteria, finding the material to have a good title, clear directions, well-designed activities and assessments, and relevant information. The material was found to be an effective tool for teaching students about mitosis and meiosis.

    Original Description:

    an evaluation sheet for SIM

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document describes the evaluation of a strategic intervention material on mitosis and meiosis. An evaluator was asked to rate various aspects of the material on criteria such as whether the title was catchy, the activities were appropriately designed, and the assessments measured the objectives. The evaluator strongly agreed with all of the criteria, finding the material to have a good title, clear directions, well-designed activities and assessments, and relevant information. The material was found to be an effective tool for teaching students about mitosis and meiosis.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    2K views3 pages

    Evaluation Sheet SIM

    Uploaded by

    Yu Calong
    The document describes the evaluation of a strategic intervention material on mitosis and meiosis. An evaluator was asked to rate various aspects of the material on criteria such as whether the title was catchy, the activities were appropriately designed, and the assessments measured the objectives. The evaluator strongly agreed with all of the criteria, finding the material to have a good title, clear directions, well-designed activities and assessments, and relevant information. The material was found to be an effective tool for teaching students about mitosis and meiosis.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    A STRATEGIC INTERVENTION MATERIAL ON MITOSIS AND MEIOSIS

    Direction: Please evaluate this Strategic Intervention Material Entitled MITOSIS AND
    MEIOSIS honestly. Rest assured that your answers will be kept confidential by the
    researcher. Write also for your comments and suggestions for more improvement of this
    SIM.
    Please indicate your answers by putting check () the following responses for
    every category:

    4 Strongly Agree
    3 Agree
    2 Disagree
    1 Strongly Disagree

    CRITERIA 4 3 2 1
    Title Card
    The title was short and catchy.
    Attractive and appealing to the eye of the students.
    Title was enticing to the students to use it.
    Title was significantly related to the competency being
    measured.
    Guide Card
    Attracts the reader significantly.
    Words used were simple and easily be understood.
    Sentences were grammatically correct.
    Guide title and statements were enticing to the students.
    Least learned competency is clearly stated.
    Activity Cards
    Activities were appropriately designed to the level of the
    students.
    Activities were paralleled to the least learned competency
    and sub-tasks.
    Activities were designed to measure to its truest objectives.
    Directions were clearly stated and understandable to the
    students.
    Assessment Cards
    Assessments were appropriately designed to the level of the
    students.
    Assessments were paralleled to the least learned
    competency and sub-tasks.
    Assessments were designed to measure to its truest
    objectives.
    Directions were clearly stated and understandable to the
    students.
    Enrichment Cards
    Enrichments were appropriately designed to the level of the
    students.
    Enrichments were paralleled to the least learned competency
    and sub-tasks.
    Enrichments were designed to measure to its truest
    objectives.
    Directions were clearly stated and understandable to the
    students.
    Reference Card
    Needed and important details were fully discussed.
    Language used were simple and easily be understood by the
    students.
    Information were mainly content the subject and very relevant
    to the competency being measured.
    Answer's key was stipulated for quick reference of the
    students for the correcting their answers.

    Comments and Suggestions:


    ______________________________________________________________________
    ______________________________________________________________________
    ______________________________________________________________________
    ______________________________________________________________________
    ______________________________________________________________________
    __________________________________________
    ______________________________________________________________________
    ______________________________________________________________________
    ______________________________________________________________________
    ______________________________________________________________________
    ______________________________________________________________________
    __________________________________________
    ______________________________________________________________________
    ______________________________________________________________________
    ______________________________________________________________________
    ______________________________________________________________________
    ______________________________________________________________________
    __________________________________________

    ________________________________
    Evaluators Signature Over Printed Name
    RESULT OF THE EVALUATION AND VALIDATION OF THE MITOSIS AND
    MEIOSIS (A STRATEGIC INTERVENTION MATERIAL)
    IN TEACHING MITOSIS AND MEIOSIS

    CRITERIA Mean Interpretation


    Title Card
    The title was short and catchy. 4.0 Strongly Agree
    Attractive and appealing to the eye of the students. 3.8 Strongly Agree
    Title was enticing to the students to use it. 3.8 Strongly Agree
    Title was significantly related to the competency being measured. 4.0 Strongly Agree
    Guide Card
    Attracts the reader significantly. 4.0 Strongly Agree
    Words used were simple and easily be understood. 4.0 Strongly Agree
    Sentences were grammatically correct. 4.0 Strongly Agree
    Least learned competency is clearly stated. 4.0 Strongly Agree
    Activity Cards
    Activities were appropriately designed to the level of the students. 4.0 Strongly Agree
    Activities were paralleled to the least learned competency and sub-
    tasks. 4.0 Strongly Agree
    Activities were designed to measure to its truest objectives. 4.0 Strongly Agree
    Directions were clearly stated and understandable to the students. 4.0 Strongly Agree
    Assessment Cards
    Assessments were appropriately designed to the level of the
    students. 4.0 Strongly Agree
    Assessments were paralleled to the least learned competency and
    sub-tasks. 4.0 Strongly Agree
    Assessments were designed to measure to its truest objectives. 4.0 Strongly Agree
    Directions were clearly stated and understandable to the students. 4.0 Strongly Agree
    Enrichment Cards
    Enrichments were appropriately designed to the level of the
    students. 4.0 Strongly Agree
    Enrichments were paralleled to the least learned competency and
    sub-tasks. 4.0 Strongly Agree
    Enrichments were designed to measure to its truest objectives. 4.0 Strongly Agree
    Directions were clearly stated and understandable to the students. 4.0 Strongly Agree
    Reference Card
    Needed and important details were fully discussed. 4.0 Strongly Agree
    Language used were simple and easily be understood by the
    students. 4.0 Strongly Agree
    Information were mainly content the subject and very relevant to
    the competency being measured. 4.0 Strongly Agree
    Answer's key was stipulated for quick reference of the students for
    the correcting their answers. 4.0 Strongly Agree

    Legend:

    INTERPRETATION SCALE
    3.1 4.0 Strongly Agree 1.1 2.0 Disagree
    2.1 3.0 Agree 0.1 1.0 Strongly Disagree

    You might also like