Chapter 2 PDF
Chapter 2 PDF
Chapter 2 PDF
2. CONCRETE DAMS
2.1.1. Forces Acting & Load combination on dams
Loads can be classified in terms of applicability or relative importance as primary loads,
secondary loads, & Exceptional loads.
i)
ii)
iii)
Hydrostatic distribution of pressure with horizontal resultant force P1 (Note also a vertical
component exists in the case of an u/s batter, and equivalent tail water may operate in the
d/s face)
Pwh w
Z12
KN / m
2
acting at
Z1
3
2-1
WRIE - 32171
Where crest gates & other ancillary structures of considerable weight exist they must also
be considered in determining Pm & their appropriate position of line of action.
iii. Seepage & uplift load:
Equilibrium seepage patterns will establish within & under a dam e.g. with resultant
forces identified as P3 & P4.
Pu = Ah (Uw ,avg)
Z Z2
. Ah . w 1
if no drain functioning.
2
is area reduction factor
Ah nominal plane area at a section considered.
If no drains functioning
Pu acts at Y1
T 2 Z 2 1 Z 1
3 Z 2 Z1
In modern dams internal uplift is controlled by the provision of vertical relief drains close
behind the u/s face. Mean effective head @ the line of drains, Zd can be expressed as
Zd = Z2+Kd (Z1-Z2) m
Kd is function of drain geometry (i.e. diameter, special & relative
Location with u/s face.)
Kd = 0.33
(USBR)
Kd = 0.25
Tennessee valley Authority
Kd= 0.25-0.5 appropriate to the site by the U.S crops of Engs
The standard provision of deep grout curtain below the u/s face intended to limit seepage
also serves to inhibit pressure within the foundation. However, less certain than efficient
draw system & its effect is commonly disregarded in uplift reduction.
b. Secondary loads
i. Sediment load: (Refer fig. 1.8, 3.1 page 6)
Accumulated silt etc, generates a horizontal thrust, Ps. Tthe magnitude additional to
Pwh is a function of sediment depth, Z3, submerged unit weight s & active lateral
pressure coefficient. Ka:
Water Resources & Irrigation Engineering Department
2-2
WRIE - 32171
Ps K a
s1.Z32
&
acting @ Z3/3 above plane
2
s = s-w where s is sediment saturated unit weight.
Ka
1 Sin s
1 Ain s
Hs
2-3
WRIE - 32171
iii)
Wind load: when the dam is full, wind acts only on the d/s side thus
contribute to stability. When empty the wind can act on the u/s face but in
significant compared to hydrostatic load. For buttress dams load on the
exposed surface has to be considered.
iv)
Ice load: Not a problem in Ethiopia. It can be significant where ice sheets
form to appreciable thickness & persist for lengthy periods.
Pice =145 KN/m2 for ice > 0.6m thick, other wise neglected
v)
h
for horizontal
v = 0.5h for vertical
For more extreme circumstances eg. h=0.4 has been employed for dams in high risk
region in Japan, h =0.5 & h =0.6-0.8 damaged Koyna gravity dam, India ( 1967) &
Pacima arch dam USA (1971) respectively.
Water Resources & Irrigation Engineering Department
2-4
WRIE - 32171
Pemh = h Pm
Vertical
Pemv = v Pm
Ratio z/z1
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Eeff
600T
HZ
or
HZ ( Eeff 14GN / m2 )
hh
0.012h
As an example, the natural frequency of vibration of monolithic gravity profiles with
nominal height of 20m & 50m are 15-25 & 6-9 HZ respectively ( if major seismic
Fn
2-5
WRIE - 32171
shock frequency of 1-10 HZ). Thus it is only of concern for large dams & vulnerable
portion of the dam.
Load combinations
Different design authorities have differing load combinations. A concrete dam should
be designed with regard to the most rigorous groupings or combination of loads
which have a reasonable probability of simultaneous occurrence.
Three nominated load combinations are sufficient for almost all circumstances. In
ascending order of severity we can have normal, unusual & extreme load combination
(NLC, ULC, ELE respectively) (see table)
With probability of simultaneous occurrence of load combination decreases, factor of
safety should also decrease.
Load Source
PRIMARY
Water
Tail water
Self weight
Uplift
SECONDARY
Silt
Ice
Concrete
Temperature
EXCEPTIONAL
Seismic
Qualification
DFL
NML
TWL
Minimum
------Drains functioning
Drains inoperative
Discretionary
Minimum normal
Min. @ time of event
CME (control max.
EQ)
Load Combination
NLC
ULC
ELC
2-6
WRIE - 32171
2-7
WRIE - 32171
H V o &
M o
Assessed in relation to all probable conditions of loading, including reservoir empty
conditions the profile must have sufficient safety factor w.r.t:
a) Rotation & overturning.
b) Translation & sliding and
c) Overstress & material failure.
Over turning
Sliding
X
Stres
s
a) Overturning stability
Factor of safety against overturning, Fo, in terms of moment about the d/s toe of the dam
Fo
M
M
ve
ve
ve
2-8
WRIE - 32171
b) sliding stability
Factor of safety against sliding, Fs, estimated using one of the three definitions:
1) Sliding factor, FSS;
2) Shear friction factor, FSF or
3) Limit equilibrium factor, FLE.
The resistance to sliding or shearing which can be mobilized across a plane is
expressed through parameters C & tan.
1) Sliding factor, Fss
FSS
H
V
Fss
H tan
V
H
tan .
1
V
Fss should not permitted to exceed 0.75, but under ELC up to 0.9 is acceptable.
2) Shear friction factor, FSF.
: is the ratio of total resistance to shear & sliding which can be mobilized on a plane to
the total horizontal load.
Fsf
CAh
V tan( ) KN / m.
cos (1 tan tan )kN / m
forhoriontalplane ( 0)
s cAh V tan .
Fsf
CS h V tan
H.
2-9
WRIE - 32171
In some cases it may be appropriate to include d/s passive wedge resistance, pp, as a
further component of the resistance to sliding which can be mobilized.
s pe
H
Where
pp
CAas
Ww tan(
cos (1 tan tan )
In the presence of horizon with low shear resistance it may be advisable to make S=0.
2-10
WRIE - 32171
Extreme
>1.0
1.3
FLE
CAh
H cos V sin .
Note for = 0
FLE =FSF.
2-11
WRIE - 32171
V M
Ah
* 1
Where, v- resultant vertical load above the plane considered exclusive of uplift.
M* - summation of moments expressed w.r.t the centroid of the plane.
y - distance from the centroid to point of considerations.
I - second moment of area of the plane w.r.t centroid.
For 2-D plane section of unit width Parallel to the dam axis, & with thickness T normal to
the axis:
V
vey1
z
12 3
T
T
v 6e
z 1
T
T
and at y=T/2
M *
V
For e> T/6, at u/s face ve stress is developed, i.e. tensile stress. In design, tensile stress
has to be prohibited, but difficult to totally eliminate low tensile stress in gravity dam.
Total vertical stresses at either face are obtained by the addition of external hydrostatic
pressure.
2-12
WRIE - 32171
u Pw zu tan u
&
d zd t tan d
The variation b/n u/s & d/s stress is parabolic, & depend on rate of change of variation of
normal stress
yu Pw zu Pw tan 2u
yd zd tan 2 d
2-13
WRIE - 32171
4. Principal stresses
1 & 3 may be determined from knowledge of z & y & construction of Mohrs circle
diagram to represent stress conditions at a point, or by application of the equation given
below.
z y
max
Major Principal Stress 1
2
y
Minor principal stress 3 z
max
2
z y
2
Where max
2
The boundary values, 1 & 3 are determined by:
For upstream face
1u= zu (1+ tan2u)-Pw tan 2u
3u=Pw
For downstream face assuming no tail water
1d=zd (1+tan 2d)
3d=0
Permissible stresses & cracking
The following table gives permissible compression stresses factor of safety for gravity
dam body & rock foundations. (USBR 1976)
load combination
2-14
WRIE - 32171
When the uplift is introduced & the uplift pressure @ the U/s face is < A1, the final stress
may be computed by the above formula. If the uplift pressure @ the upstream face is
greater than A1. i.e. less than permissible tension stress. Revise as follows.
1. A horizontal crack is assumed to exist & extend from the u/s face toward the d/s face
to a point where the vertical stress of adjusted diagram is equal to the uplift pressure @
the u/s face.
2. Taking moments about center of gravity & check whether the section is adequate for
over turning, sliding & material failure.
M
V A3.T
T
T1 3 e1
2
2V A3.T
B5
A3
T1
e1
2-15
WRIE - 32171
2-16
WRIE - 32171
Design of small dams associated with provision of standard trianngular profile of u/s
vertical face & d/s slope of 0.75 horizontal to 1.0 vertical.
In the case of large dams a unique profile should be determined to match the specific
conditions applicable. Two approaches are possible; the multi stage & single stage.
Single stage: is based on definition on a suitable & uniform d/s slope. The apex of the
triangular profile is set @ or just above DFL & initial base thickness T is determined for
each loading combination in terms of F0. The critical value of T is then checked for
sliding stability & modified if necessary before checking heel & toe stress @ base level.
For no tension @ u/s vertical face
tan d
1
c
Take =1.0
2-17
WRIE - 32171
The multistage approach defines a profile where the slopes are altered at suitable
intervals.
Design commences from crest level, & descends downwards through profile stages
corresponding to pre determined elevations. Each stage is proportioned to as to maintain
stress level within acceptable limits. E.g. no tension under any condition of loading. The
resulting profile allows marginal economics on concrete, but more expensive to construct
than the single stage. Multi-stage profiles are now seldom employed, even on large
dams.
M M KN / m
ve
ve
y2
2-18
WRIE - 32171
FSF H CAh
V
tan
The pre-stressing tendons are typically located @ 3 to 7m centers to centers along the
crest. The pre-stress load required for each, PT (kN) is the appropriate multiple of Pps .
Pre-stressing also useful for heightening of the dam.
Sliding
Pps
Downstream shoulder
Coeff. Ko
0.2 0.3
0.45 0.55
1.0 2.0
> 2.0
2-19