Answers To Chapter Exercises
Answers To Chapter Exercises
Answers To Chapter Exercises
loses (gains) on an offsetting forward contract to buy. Hence bank choose to enter the market in currencies which are commonly traded so that they can easily offest long and short positions and find buyers and sellers for those contracts easily. 7 Why is risk neutrality relevant for the conclusion that forward exchange rates equal the markets expected future spot exchange rates? If the speculator is averse to risk, he or she will not buy or sell forward unless the expected return is sufficient for the systematic risk that is taken. This risk depends on the correlation of the exchange rate with the values of other assets and liabilities. To the extent that exchange rate risk is not diversifiable, there may be a risk premium in the forward rate. This can cause the forward rate to differ from the markets expected future spot rate. 8 Why is it necessary to assume zero spreads when concluding that forward exchange rates equal expected future spot rates?
purchase of the same currency? See Diagram in Book! 4 Why is a futures contract similar to a string of bets on the exchange rate, settled every day? The bets are settled on each day: futures traders are trying to guess what will happen tomorrow to the markets view of what the spot rate will be on the date of contract maturity. When the buyers account is adjusted up, the sellers account is adjusted down by the same amount. That is, what buyers gain, sellers lose and vice versa. The two sides are taking bets against each other in a zero sum game. The fee for playing the game is the brokerage charge. 5 Do you think that a limit on daily price movements for currency futures would make these contracts more or less risky or liquid? Would a limitation on price movement make the futures contracts difficult to sell during highly turbulent times? A limit on daily price movements for currency futures would make the contracts less risky because the probability of earning profits on the bid ask spread would reduce. Higher volatility leads to higher prices of futures contracts. 6 How could arbitrage take place between forward exchange contracts and currency futures? Would this arbitrage be unprofitable only if the futures and forward rates were exactly the same? The most straightforward type of arbitrage involves offsetting outright forwards and futures positions. If, for example the 3 month forward price for buying euros were $1.1210/e, an arbitrager could buy euros forward from a bank and sell futures on the CME. The arbitrager would make $0.0010/e, so that on each contract E125,000, he or she could make a profit of $125. Action to profit from this arbitrage opportunity would quickly bring the forward price up to the future price. Similarly, arbitrage would bring the futures price up to the forward price. However, we should remember that since the futures market requires daily maintenance, or marking to market, the arbitrage involves risk which can allow the futures and forward rates to differ a little. 7 Does the need to hold a margin make forward and futures deals less desirable than if there were no margin requirements? Does your answer depend on the interest paid on margins? No, margins reduce the default risk and hence allow for more secure transactions between sellers and buyers and hence make forward and future deals not any less desirable but may act as a facility of convenience in the market. However, in the case of futures contracts, the interest paid on the margins results in marking to market risk, which can make futures deals less desirable than forward deals in some cases. 8 How does a currency option differ from a forward contract? How does an option differ from a currency future?
A currency option is the right but not the obligation to buy or sell the underlying at a future date with a payment of option premium upfront to the writer of the currency option, while a forward contract is an obligation to buy or sell the underlying at a future date between two parties. A forward contract has default risk while a currency option has no default risk because it is an obligation. A currency option is the right but not the obligation to buy or sell the underlying at a future date with a payment of option premium upfront to the writer of the currency option, while a futures contract is an obligation to buy or sell the underlying at a future date between two parties, which is traded on the futures exchange. A currency future requires a margin payment called the maintainence margin and there is no default risk (cleariing house). 9 Suppose a bank sells a call option to a company making a takeover offer where the option is contingent on the offer being accepted. Suppose the bank reinsures the option on an options exchange by buying a call for the same amount of foreign currency. Consider the consequences of the following four outcomes or states: a The foreign currency increases in value, and the takeover offer is accepted. b The foreign currency increases in value, and the takeover offer is rejected. c The foreign currency decreases in value, and the takeover offer is accepted. d The foreign currency decreases in value, and the takeover offer is rejected. Consider who gains and who loses in each state, and the source of gain or loss. Satisfy yourself why a bank that reinsures on an options exchange might charge less for writing the takeover-contingent option than the bank itself pays for the call option on the exchange. Does this example help explain why a bank-based over-the-counter market coexists with a formal options exchange market? 11 What type of option(s) would speculators buy if they thought the euro would increase more than the market believed? Speculators would buy a call option on the euro currency. Or sell a put option on the euro currency.