Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 89 views

    QMDM ANOVA1way

    Uploaded by

    chacha_420
    This document analyzes data from a study investigating whether higher priced automobiles have fewer defects than lower priced automobiles. Three automobile models, A, B, and C, were compared based on defect numbers. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to determine if the average number of defects differed between the three models. The ANOVA results showed the average number of defects was significantly different between at least two of the models, allowing the researchers to reject the null hypothesis that all three models had the same average number of defects.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    QMDM ANOVA1way

    Uploaded by

    chacha_420
    89 views25 pages
    This document analyzes data from a study investigating whether higher priced automobiles have fewer defects than lower priced automobiles. Three automobile models, A, B, and C, were compared based on defect numbers. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to determine if the average number of defects differed between the three models. The ANOVA results showed the average number of defects was significantly different between at least two of the models, allowing the researchers to reject the null hypothesis that all three models had the same average number of defects.

    Original Description:

    one way anova

    Original Title

    QMDM-ANOVA1way

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document analyzes data from a study investigating whether higher priced automobiles have fewer defects than lower priced automobiles. Three automobile models, A, B, and C, were compared based on defect numbers. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to determine if the average number of defects differed between the three models. The ANOVA results showed the average number of defects was significantly different between at least two of the models, allowing the researchers to reject the null hypothesis that all three models had the same average number of defects.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    89 views25 pages

    QMDM ANOVA1way

    Uploaded by

    chacha_420
    This document analyzes data from a study investigating whether higher priced automobiles have fewer defects than lower priced automobiles. Three automobile models, A, B, and C, were compared based on defect numbers. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to determine if the average number of defects differed between the three models. The ANOVA results showed the average number of defects was significantly different between at least two of the models, allowing the researchers to reject the null hypothesis that all three models had the same average number of defects.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 25

    r.

    Ak ht er
    ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

    QMDM

    by: Dr. Akhter

    Institute of Business Administration Spring 2013

    r.

    Ak ht er

    Analysis of Variance

    r.

    Ak ht er

    Process for comparing four population means

    Hypothesis for one way ANOVA

    r.

    Ak ht er

    r.

    Ak ht er

    r.

    Ak ht er

    r.

    Ak ht er

    r.

    Ak ht er

    Checking Assumptions of ANOVA

    Checking normality

    r.

    Ak ht er

    r.

    Ak ht er

    r.

    Ak ht er

    r.

    Ak ht er

    r.

    Ak ht er

    r.

    It is suspected that higher priced automobiles are assembled with greater care than lower-priced automobiles. To investigate whether there is any basis for this feeling, a large luxury model A, a medium sedan B and subcompact C were compared for defects when they arrived at the dealers showroom. All cars were manufactured by the same company. The number of defects for several of the three models are recorded in the following table

    Ak ht er

    Scenario

    r.

    Ak ht er
    Number of automobile defects A 4 7 6 6 B 5 1 3 5 3 4 C 8 6 8 9 5

    r.

    Check the assumption of homogeneity of variances Apply analysis of variance procedure to check the whether the average sale of all five brands are same or not If not check which means are same and which are significant

    Ak ht er

    Perform the followings

    Samples are selected independently from the populations Samples selected from populations which are normal Variances of population must be equal

    r.

    Ak ht er

    Assumptions of ANOVA

    Total

    r.

    Ak ht er
    Number of automobile defects A 4 7 6 6 B 5 1 3 5 3 4 C 8 6 8 9 5 23 21 36 80

    si2

    1.583

    2.3

    2.7

    Checking homogeneity

    As the ratio of two sample variances (highest and lowest) is less than 2 which indicates that the population variances are same and homogeneity exists

    r.


    2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4

    Ak ht er
    2 5

    Accept the hypothesis and conclude that variances of all three populations are equal No transformation is needed before using analysis of variance technique

    r.

    Ak ht er

    Decision

    H 0 : 1 2 3

    H1 : At least brandsare not Same

    r.

    Ak ht er

    Analysis of variance

    80 cf 426.66 15 2 2 2 SST 4 7 ... 5 cf 65.333


    2 2 2

    23 21 36 SSC cf 38.283 4 6 5 SSE 65.333 38.283 27.050

    r.

    Ak ht er
    Calculations
    2

    S.v SSC

    SSE
    SST

    r.

    Ak ht er
    ANOVA Table
    S.S. d.f. 2 M.S.S F-ratio 8.49 38.283 19.142

    12
    14

    27.050
    65.333

    2.254

    Reject Null Hypothesis and conclude that average number of defects for the three models is not the same

    r.

    Ak ht er
    f 0.05, 2,12 3.89

    Critical value and Decision

    r.
    The End

    Ak ht er

    You might also like