Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 231 views

    Gage R&R

    Uploaded by

    shobhit2310
    This document presents the results of a gage repeatability and reproducibility (GR&R) analysis conducted to evaluate the measurement system used to measure the height of an assembly pipe. The analysis assessed three platten locations, measured 10 parts with 3 trials each, and calculated the percent of total variation accounted for by repeatability, reproducibility, and part variation. The results showed that 97.23% of the total variation was from repeatability, indicating the measurement system is acceptable for analyzing the process. However, because 0% of the part-trial average values fell outside the control limits, the system is not adequate to detect actual part variation.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Gage R&R

    Uploaded by

    shobhit2310
    231 views1 page
    This document presents the results of a gage repeatability and reproducibility (GR&R) analysis conducted to evaluate the measurement system used to measure the height of an assembly pipe. The analysis assessed three platten locations, measured 10 parts with 3 trials each, and calculated the percent of total variation accounted for by repeatability, reproducibility, and part variation. The results showed that 97.23% of the total variation was from repeatability, indicating the measurement system is acceptable for analyzing the process. However, because 0% of the part-trial average values fell outside the control limits, the system is not adequate to detect actual part variation.

    Original Description:

    Gage R&R (XBar&R Motorola Version)

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document presents the results of a gage repeatability and reproducibility (GR&R) analysis conducted to evaluate the measurement system used to measure the height of an assembly pipe. The analysis assessed three platten locations, measured 10 parts with 3 trials each, and calculated the percent of total variation accounted for by repeatability, reproducibility, and part variation. The results showed that 97.23% of the total variation was from repeatability, indicating the measurement system is acceptable for analyzing the process. However, because 0% of the part-trial average values fell outside the control limits, the system is not adequate to detect actual part variation.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    231 views1 page

    Gage R&R

    Uploaded by

    shobhit2310
    This document presents the results of a gage repeatability and reproducibility (GR&R) analysis conducted to evaluate the measurement system used to measure the height of an assembly pipe. The analysis assessed three platten locations, measured 10 parts with 3 trials each, and calculated the percent of total variation accounted for by repeatability, reproducibility, and part variation. The results showed that 97.23% of the total variation was from repeatability, indicating the measurement system is acceptable for analyzing the process. However, because 0% of the part-trial average values fell outside the control limits, the system is not adequate to detect actual part variation.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Gage Repeatability and Reproducibility Analysis

    Average and Range Method

    Num. of Platten Locations = 3 Gage: Height Gauge Date: 16.08.12 Number of Parts = 10 Part: Assy. Pipe Performed By: Manish Number of Trials = 3 Tolerance = 0.5 Leave blank for one-sided spec. Enter data and Information in open cells . Leave cell blank if data is missing. *If Range Check displays "FLAG", check data for errors or rerun trial(s)
    Version: 17JUL96
    Platten Location Parts

    A
    Average Trials

    80.358

    1 2 3

    Range Range Check*

    1 80.36 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.34 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.36 80.36 80.36 0 80.353

    2 80.36 80.36 80.36 0 80.36 80.38 80.38 0.02 80.36 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.362

    3 80.34 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.34 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.36 80.38 80.38 0.02 80.356

    4 80.36 80.38 80.38 0.02 80.36 80.36 80.36 0 80.36 80.36 80.36 0 80.364

    5 80.36 80.36 80.36 0 80.34 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.36 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.353

    6 80.36 80.36 80.38 0.02 80.36 80.36 80.36 0 80.34 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.358

    7 80.36 80.38 80.36 0.02 80.36 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.36 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.358

    8 80.34 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.34 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.36 80.38 80.38 0.02 80.356 5.15

    9 80.36 80.36 80.36 0 80.36 80.38 80.38 0.02 80.36 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.362

    10 80.34 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.36 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.36 80.38 80.38 0.02 80.358

    B
    Average Trials

    80.356

    1 2 3

    Range Range Check*

    C
    Average Trials

    80.36

    1 2 3

    Range Range Check* Part Averages

    Enter Process Distribution Width in Sigma's (Typically 5.15 or 6.00) =


    SOURCE OF VARIATION Repeatability (EV - Equipment Var) Reproducibility (AV - Appraiser Var) Repeatability & Reproducibility (R&R) Part Variation (PV) Total Process Variation (TV) SIGMA VARIATION

    PERCENT OF TOTAL VARIATION

    PERCENT OF TOLERANCE

    0.009056901 0.001285144 0.009147625 0.001759061 0.009315221

    0.04664304 0.006618494 0.047110271 0.009059162 0.047973389

    97.23% 13.80% 98.20% 18.88%

    9.33% 1.32%

    9.42%
    1.81% 9.59%

    Note: Percentages will not add to 100%.

    "The final acceptance of a measurement system should not come down to a single set of indices. The performance of the measurement system should also be reviewed using graphical analyses." For measurement systems whose purpose is to analyze a process, general rules of thumb are: Acceptability Criteria for %R&R (% of Total Variation and % of Tolerance) Under 10% - acceptable system - Under 5% preferred 10% to 30% - may be acceptable depending on importance of the application, cost of the system, cost of repair, etc Over 30% - considered not acceptable - every effort should be made to improve the system Based on the AIAG Measurement Systems Analysis Reference Manual -- Call 810-358-3570 to order.
    Spreadsheet created by Ken Kortge, Motorola, AIEG

    R&R Plot - by Parts


    80.39 80.38

    Remember, variation between parts is expected


    80.37

    The solid black lines connect the trial averages The dotted red lines represent the part averages Each horizontal line represents the range of trial values

    80.36

    80.35

    This plot will help identify systematic appraiser bias -each set of black lines should have roughly the same shape

    80.34

    80.33

    80.32
    A B C 1 1 1 A B C 2 2 2 A B C 3 3 3 A B C 4 4 4 A B C 5 5 5 A B C 6 6 6 A B C 7 7 7 A B C 8 8 8 A B C 9 9 9 A B C 0 0 0

    R&R Plot - by Appraisers


    80.39

    80.38

    80.37

    80.36

    80.35

    80.34

    80.33

    80.32
    A 1 A 2 A 3 A 4 A 5 A 6 A 7 A 8 A 9 A 0 B 1 B 2 B 3 B 4 B 5 B 6 B 7 B 8 B 9 B 0 C 1 C 2 C 3 C 4 C 5 C 6 C 7 C 8 C 9 C 0

    Part - Appraiser Average Chart


    Averages with Control Limits
    80.38 80.375 80.37 80.365
    80.36

    This chart is used to determine if enough part-to-part variation has been observed to estimate Part Variation To be an acceptable measure of Part Variation, 50% of the trial averages should fall outside the control limits This line is identical to the solid black line in the above chart If too few of the averages fall outside the control limits the parts selected here are too similar. Rerun analysis with different, more heterogeneous, parts

    80.355 80.35 80.345 80.34 80.335 80.33 80.325


    A 1 A 2 A 3 A 4 A 5 A 6 A 7 A 8 A 9 A 0 B 1 B 2 B 3 B 4 B 5 B 6 B 7 B 8 B 9 B 0 C 1 C 2 C 3 C 4 C 5 C 6 C 7 C 8 C 9 C 0

    For an adequate measurement system, at least 50% of averages should fall outside control limits. Because 0% of averages are outside control limits, the system is NOT adequate to detect part variation.

    Part by Appraiser Plot


    80.38 80.375 80.37 80.365 Average 80.36

    80.355 80.35 80.345 80.34 80.335 80.33

    5 PART
    A B

    10

    You might also like