Maintenance: Ircle
Maintenance: Ircle
Maintenance: Ircle
Maintenance circle
NEWSLETTER FOR MAINTENANCE COMMUNITY
With increased competition & reducing profit margins, organizations are finding new and innovative ways to reduce
cost of producing its goods. In this scenario, any cost reduction initiative will usually gain immediate acceptance by
management for faster implementation to reduce production cost. However, cost reduction activity should not be done
for immediate gain in production output / reduced quality rejections / personal recognition but with long term
sustainability in mind. Concerned business unit, machinery, personnel or customer satisfaction should not be
compromised for short term gains. This initiative should not compromise or alter the desired result from an equipment
or system.
Some cost reduction initiatives can be done without additional investments or major technological changes. Switching
off machines during long idle times and idle time, reducing output from utility equipment like compressor during lean
periods, reducing under utilized running of captive generating sets are some of the initiatives which can be done
without any additional investment.
Changing old brushed DC motors to state-of-the art brushless AC servo motors, replacing old AC motors with latest
energy efficient motors, replacing fluorescent lamps with CFL bulbs and many more are some of cost reduction
initiatives that require additional investment, what ever that investment is. Once an investment proposal is made, it is
very important to calculate the payback period, technically called as Return On Investment – ROI – which indicates
how soon the organization can recover investment made & begin making profits. According to accounting practices,
there are many methods of calculating this payback period. But, in this edition let us concentrate on simple method of
finding out ROI with minimum and basic information.
Let us study a very simple investment proposal. A manufacturing unit is having 500 tungsten bulbs, each of 40 Watt
rating, spread over its garden, parking lot, roads, cafeteria and utility area. A decision has been taken to replace all
these bulbs with Compact Florescent Lamps – CFL for short – which is expected to consume minimum 60% less
power. The meaning of reduced power consumption is to be understood indirectly. It means that a less wattage CFL
gives SAME amount of light intensity (measured in Lux / Lumens). Two benefits were seen from the proposed
replacement. One, reduced power consumption and second, increased life of CFLs which eliminates frequent
replacements.
In this case, even though the benefit looks very obvious and straightforward, replacement decision should only be
taken after making a study on ROI. Following steps elaborate list of details that should be gathered to complete this
exercise. The bulbs are expected to be on for ten hours per day, 365 days an year. A simple calculator should be
sufficient to complete this task.
1. Present power consumption: Tungsten bulbs consume 100% power when they are switched on.
2. From utility room records, it is observed that during the above mentioned ten hour time, there is a 15%
power outage and the manufacturing unit runs completely on DG set.
This document contains information for reference only. We assume no responsibility for its implication.
MaintenanceCircleTeam Page 2 December 19, 2008
3. Total power cost for tungsten bulbs per year can now be calculated
At this stage, we have to obtain some information on the CFL bulbs. From market, best price of Rs.80 per bulb was
obtained. Since the CFL bulb can be fitted into same tungsten bulb holder, no other cost is involved. Two bulbs were
purchased and it was kept ON for “practically” calculating the actual power consumption instead of relying on the
manufacturer’s claim. (A simple energy meter or current meter can be used to measure the power). From this small
study, 60% reduction in power consumption was observed and hence actual wattage of equivalent CFL bulb is 16
watts only. So, now let us calculate the new investment required.
4. Total investment = Number of Bulbs to be replaced (500) x Cost per bulb (Rs.80) = Rs.40000
5. Based on the test conducted, let us now calculate the energy saving per year with CFLs compared to
Tungsten bulbs.
6. Total power cost for CFL per year can now be calculated, keeping other details same as for tungsten
bulb.
7. Now subtracting cost of list item 6 from list item 3, we will get the achievable saving from CFLs.
a. Rs.419750 – Rs.167900 = Rs.251850 is the nett saving that can be obtained from this proposal.
Dividing Rs.251850 by 12 months will give us monthly saving amount, which is Rs.20987.50. Dividing the initial
investment, Rs.40000 by this amount, gives us Return On Investment which in this case is slightly less than two
months. Hence, a decision can be taken to replace all the bulbs immediately.
Even though many large & major investments involve complex calculations, it is very essential to understand the
basics of ROI before proceeding further. Ask yourself few following questions before proposing a replacement /
upgrade for calculating the ROI. A” thumb rule” has helped us to have ROI less than 12 months in most of the cases.
This document contains information for reference only. We assume no responsibility for its implication.