Bullet-Point Case.: Morgan Stanley
Bullet-Point Case.: Morgan Stanley
Bullet-Point Case.: Morgan Stanley
Please read the cases in the following order and be prepared to discuss the questions listed below (Please type out brief responses to the questions below to help you prepare & recall the pertinent info for discussion). 1) The Firmwide 360 Degree Performance Evaluation Process at Morgan Stanley Questions: a) Why did Morgan Stanley implement this evaluation process? Please be specific. b) What did the Morgan Stanley employees identify as the pros and cons of the system? 2) Rob Parson at Morgan Stanley (A) Questions: a) Should Parson be promoted? How do you support your position? b) What do you think Parsons colleagues and subordinates would say about whether to promote him? What would John Mack say? 3) Finally, using the data in the case, please complete the Evaluation and Development Summary form presented in Exhibit 3 of the Rob Parson at Morgan Stanley (A) case (as if you are Nasr). For this question, just write your responses by hand on the form itself.
Conducting a Performance Appraisal Interview Bullet point assignment. 1. What forces are competing with each other during the typical performance appraisal meeting? 2. What do you think of the suggested option of eliminating formal performance evaluations? 3. What do you think of the suggested option of separating the typical performance appraisal into two separate meetings/components? Why does the author think it is a good idea?
12 Angry Men: Bullet-point case. 1. Consider the section Four Ways Not To Persuade as described in the article entitled The Necessary Art of Persuasion. Which of the character(s) seems to exemplify what not to do. Which of the characters seemed to exemplify What to do. Please provide examples for each. Comment on why these four ways not to persuade dont work and why the opposite approach might work (consider Fondas style). 2. In your words, why was Henry Fondas (the architect) approach successful? a. How was Fondas style consistent with other attributes of effective persuasion outlined in the article?
Sealed Air Taiwan Bullet-point case. 1. Find Taiwan on the various dimensions of Hofstedes dimensions of national culture (see the article entitles Motivation, Leadership, and Organization: Do American Theories Apply Abroad?). In what ways does the USA differ from Taiwan? Based on this comparison what should a U.S. manager be prepared for in terms of managing people? 2. What other cross-cultural differences are apparent in this case? What does these differences mean for a U.S. manager working in Taiwan? What major lessons should Bob Keyser learn? What should he have known before going to Taiwan?