Session 18 Case - Rob Parson at Morgan Stanley (A)
Session 18 Case - Rob Parson at Morgan Stanley (A)
Session 18 Case - Rob Parson at Morgan Stanley (A)
STANLEY (A)
Qus 1. What is your assessment of Rob Parsons
performance? Should he be promoted? Support
your answer with clear rationale.
Qus 2. Using the data in the case, please complete
the Evaluation and Development Summary
presented in Exhibit 3 of the case.
Qus 3. If you were Paul Nasr, how would you plan
to conduct the performance appraisal
conversation? What would your goals be? What
issues would you raise and why, and how would
you raise them?
Qus 4. If you were Rob Parson, how would you conduct
yourself in the performance evaluation meeting? What
are your goals? How would you try to influence the
process?
Qus 5. Is 360 feedback the right method to appraise an
employees performance in such scenario? Support your
answer with the clear advantages and disadvantages of
this method.
What is Performance Appraisal?
According to:
Employee Organization
To correct any deficiency
To decide base pay, promotion
To reinforce employees
and retention
strengths.
To ensure performance
To review career growth
management
Communicate expectations
To assess training needs
Aims at:
mutual goals of the employees &
Personal development
work satisfaction the organization are met
involvement in the growth & development
organization. increase harmony & enhance
effectiveness
Process
Setting
Performance
Taking Corrective Standards Communicating
Measures
Standards
Discussing Measuring
Results Performance
Comparing
Standards &
Performance
What is 360 Degree Feedback?
Copyright - ManagementStudyGuide.com
360-degree feedback is an appraisal or assessment
process used to improve managerial effectiveness by
providing the manager with a more complete
assessment of the employees effectiveness, his
performance and development needs.
Managing and
Personal Commercial
Leading
Brand Awareness
Change
Coaching and
Building Strategic
Developing
Relationships Thinking
Others
Advantages Disadvantages
Multiple sources of information Frank and honest opinion may not
be received
Perceived more valid and objective Stress might be put on individuals
for giving feedback