Mid Term Evaluation
Mid Term Evaluation
Mid Term Evaluation
Midterm Evaluation
BSW {
Name
MSW Foundation
orrntern Col\,[q,n
Instructions
Sl^
tr
[f l"-.
MSW Foundation
II
tr
Date l0-tl-15
The standard by which an intern is to be compared is that of a foundation level social worker. The l0
competencies that are specified in this evaluation form are those established by our national accrediting
organization (the Council on Social Work Education). Under each competency statement are several
items that we ask you to rate according to the following criteria.
5
4
a
2
I
areas
Comments may be made under any competency statement. Please be sure to indicate those areas in which
you think the intern is particularly strong and those areas that need improvement. Please give examples
for any area in which the student received a rating of I or 2.
Evaluation should be a shared process with an opportunity for the student and agency field instructor to
discuss similarities and differences in perception. Although the agency field instructor is responsible for
completing the evaluation, it is the responsibility of the faculty field director to assign a grade. The
student's overall grade for the course will be determined by the faculty field director and based on the
overall evaluation of the student's performance in placement in conjunction with the agency field
instructor's evaluation, classroom participation, and course assignments.
This evaluation is intended to give the intern feedback about her or his performance.
NOTE: If you prefer to use another evaluation system in addition to this form to evaluate a student's
performance,
discuss this with the facultv field director.
Competence
#1:
l.l
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
n\
2
2
,,
4
4
a
J
4
4
4
4)
5
5
5
Competence
#2:
Intern applies social work ethical principles to guide his or her professional
ractice.
2.1
2.2
2.5
2.4
/?)
r7
.L 3)
a
4
4
I
I
Comments:
Competence
professional
nts.
3.1
3.2
3.3
wisdom
Is skilled atanalyzingmodels of assessment, prevention,
intervention. and evaluation
Demonstrates effective oral and written communication in working
with individuals, families, groups, organizations, communities, and
,9
1r
colleagues
Comments: { I
4.1
we
v1t
t
J
?
2\
a
J
?)
and power
4.2
4.3
4.4
l^G..rr'n'
#5:
Competence
5.1
5.2
discrimination
Is skilled at advocating for human rights and social and economic
5.3
iustice
'rl
3
t( ,!
/a\
a
J
a
J
iustice
Comments:
Competence
research.
6.1
6.2
#6:
H
U
practice-informed
J
a
4
4
5
5
Comments:
Competence
7.1
7.2
#7:
2t\
a
J
environments.
Comments:
Competence
#8:
Intern engages in policy practice to advance social and economic well-being and
to deliver effective social work services.
Comments:
Com
#92
Intern
to contexts that
Comments:
Competence
0.l
t0.2
10.3
10.4
l0.s
r
0.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
0.10
0.1 I
0.12
10.13
#10: Intern
criticallv.
Comments:
'e)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
J
4
4
2-
3)
?)
a
J
4
4
?/
4
4
4
5
5
5
,/2
a
J
I
I
I
a
J
a
J
J
J
a
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
,/
The intern has not met the expectations and there is not much hope that the intern will meet
expectations in the near future
\-l.S
b'7
Agency
1{
My agency supervisor and faculty supervisor have discussed this evaluation with me, and I have received
copy. My agreement or disagreement follows:
Intern's Signature C
:' Pf _ ,a
If the intern
Darc
1 UoL
LOLa
disagrees with the evaluation she/he should state that disagreement in writing and
submit a copy to both the agency field instructor and the faculty field director. A meeting
between the student, agency instructor, and faculty field director should then be held to discuss
the disagreement.