Img 20151011 0002
Img 20151011 0002
Img 20151011 0002
Midterm Evaluation
Bsw X
Name
orrntern
MSw Foundation
lftqna
rJ
.\ ,fA
tr
MSW Foundation
II
Date
fnstructionsfor Rating Interns on the 10 Competencies in the First Part of the Evaluation:
The standard by which an intern is to be compared is that of a foundation level social worker. The 10
competencies that are specified in this evaluation form are those established by our national accrediting
organization (the Council on Social Work Education). Under each competency statement are several
items that we ask you to rate according to the following criteria.
5
4
3
2
1
Comments may be made under any competency statement, if desired. Please be sure to indicate those
areas in which you think the intern is particularly strong and those areas that need improvement.
Comments may be made under any competency statement. Please be sure to indicate those areas in which
you think the intern is particularly strong and those areas that need improvement. Please give examples
for any area in which the student received a rating of 1 or 2.
Evaluation should be a shared process with an opporhrnity for the student and agency field instructor to
discuss similarities and differences in perception. Although the agency field instructor is responsible for
completing the evaluation, it is the responsibility of the faculty field director to assign a grade. The
student's overall grade for the course will be determined by the faculty field director and based on the
overall evaluation of the student's performance in placement in conjunction with the agency field
instructor's evaluation, classroom participation, and course assignments.
This evaluation is intended to give the intern feedback about her or his performance.
NOTE: lf you prefer to use another evaluation system in addition to this form to evaluate a student's
performance, please discuss this with the faculty field director.
Competence
#1:
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
t.6
2
2
2
2
2
I
1
4
4
s)
E(
JI
4
4
4
4
Competence
#2:
Intern applies social work ethical principles to guide his or her professional
2.1
2.2
2.4
of
the profession
Tolerates well ambizuiW in resolvine ethical conflicts
Is able to apply strategies of ethical reasoning to arrive at principled
decisions
5')
2
2
4
4
sl
)f
Comments:
Competence
3.1
3.2
5.J
professional
'f\
'
U
a
J
a
J
\t-j
colleagues
Comments:
Com
#42
Intern
4.t
4.2
.sJ
and power
4.3
4.4
!")
'41
J{)
Comments:
Comnetence
#5:
9\
5.1
a
J
5.2
discrimination
Is skilled at advocating for human rights and social and economic
5.3
iustice
Is skilled at engaging in practices that advance social and economic
iustice
Comments:
Competence
research.
6.1
6.2
#6:
I
I
2
2
practice-informed
J
J
'4)
3?
Comments:
Comnetence
#7:
Intern
7.1
!)
7.2
a_)
environments.
Comments:
Competence
8.1
8.2
#8:
Intern engages in policy practice to advance social and economic well-being and
to deliver effective social work services.
a
J
4l
#92
Co
9.t
Intern
to contexts that
9.2
4\
services
Comments:
Competence
10.1
10.2
10.3
r0.4
I0.5
10.6
ta.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
l0.l
10.t2
10.13
#10: Intern
critically.
14')
:4)
:4)
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
4l
(A
(4)
(4\
2
2
2
2
{4
J
J
1
1
I
1
5
5
(j
5
5
Comments:
Overall Evaluation at
Please check one of the follow
The intern has excelled
Signature
e,
Agency
or&,1.^-*" .'ff]?'&r,rrlC
Jc.
s -Sou*[ Wr* Date t ct/Al t S
(-
My agency supervisor and faculty supervisor have discussed this evaluation with me, and I have received
a copy. My agreement or disagreement follows:
I agree with the evaluation
I do not aeree with evaluation
Intern's Signature
tr
D",.
Id-6-[5
If the intern disagrees with the evaluation shelhe should state that disagreement in writing and
submit a copy to both the agency field instructor and the faculty field director. A meeting
between the student, agency instructor, and faculty field director should then be held to discuss
the disagreement.