SQA Assessment Coversheet - Submission: Please Attach These Pages To The Front of Your Assessment
SQA Assessment Coversheet - Submission: Please Attach These Pages To The Front of Your Assessment
SQA Assessment Coversheet - Submission: Please Attach These Pages To The Front of Your Assessment
Checklist
My answer explicitly addresses the assessment task
I have spell checked and proof read my submission
File saved as a Word (.doc) or rich text file (.rtf) with the filename including your student
number and the assessment number eg ‘01001234_assessment 1’
I have completed all required sections of the coversheet (see next page)
Word count is within allowance (where applicable)
The items below will not apply to all SQA assessments, ignore if not applicable:
Citations in the text use the Harvard referencing system
A bibliography is provided as per UHI Referencing Guide
All cited sources are listed alphabetically and in full in the bibliography
The University of the Highlands and Islands recognised that malpractice, where deliberately engaged in,
is unacceptable as is considered a serious academic offence. Examples of the way in which malpractice
can occur include:
Collusion with others when an assessment must be completed by individual candidates.
Copying from another candidate (including using ICT to do so) and/or working collaboratively
with other candidates on an individual task.
Offensive content — content in assessment materials that includes vulgarity and swearing that
is outwith the context of the assessment, or any material that is discriminatory in nature.
Breaching the security of assessment materials in a way which threatens the integrity of any
exam or assessment.
A full copy of the university’s Malpractice Policy and Procedure can be found here:
https://myuhi.sharepoint.com/Policies/Forms/Public%20view.aspx
Students are responsible for ensuring the work they submit is their own and complies with the ASQR
and Malpractice Policy. If you have any queries you should contact your unit lecturer or Personal
Academic Tutor (PAT) before submitting your assessment.
Please note that any case of suspected malpractice will be investigated according to current UHI
Academic Standards and Quality Regulations (ASQR).
In submitting this work, I confirm that I have read and understood UHI ASQR and
malpractice policy and am aware of the possible penalties.
If you have received feedforward from coursework or an assignment for this unit, state
the next steps
You can either cut and paste these from previous assignment / coursework feedback, or
pick some elements that you have decided you would like to work on
If you have received feedforward from coursework or an assignment for this unit, state
what you have done to address the next steps
• Where you are making direct reference to the work of an author you must
either quote or cite as appropriate.
SECTION 1: Introduction
1.1. Background to study/topic
Balance Banking PLC is a firm in the financial sector, which underwent a major
restructuring program, recently. Which resulted some changes to departments, teams throughout
the organization, including changed at management level. In addition, there is a low motivation
among staff, because a large number of staff were moved around and are now in new teams with
new managers. So, there is a stressed and demotivated atmosphere within the company and now
the organization has to regain confidence of its stakeholders, internal and external customers.
This report has been written to highlight the way how a manager can influence his team
and how to motivate them to do their work efficient, by using assertiveness, influencing and
negotiating techniques. Also, it was need to outline techniques that can help a manager to
manage her time, personal stress and methods of dealing with stress in others. In addition, it was
required to underline and suggest how a manager has to conduct team meetings and to enhance
her decision making skills.
SECTION 2: Findings
2.1. Jess’s role as manager of the customer engagement
Jess is a new manager in Balance Banking PLC company. She is a young manager that has
new ideas and objectives that aren’t accepted by all members of her team, which means there are
some misunderstandings among Jess and her 16 staff members.
Firstly, her and her team has to follow some strategic objectives of the organization and to
work as a team in order to achieve the goals. But, there are some members of the team that aren’t
performing very well and are very demotivated. For Jess to be able to achieve all goals and
objectives, she must to use different ways of managing her team and adapt to every member of
the team.
According to Henri Fayol, Jess as a manager has 5 activities: planning, organizing,
commanding, coordinating, control. So, Jess has to plan and develop strategic objectives within
her team, in order to ensure the achievement of future goals of entire firm. Also, she has to
implement a strategy to organize the workforce in an efficient manner and align the activities of
the organization, by training and educating in a right way people. Jess has to supervise
subordinates in their daily work and inspire them to achieve company goals. Her commanding
should always be consistent with company policies and she has to treat them in line with the
standard of the company. She must harmonize the procedures and activities, which means that
every staff member should complement and enrich the work of another. Jess has to observe if
there are some deviations from plans and correct potential deviations. Jess is trying so hard to
fulfill all those 5 activities, but she can’t perform all these activities, because her ideas were
thwarted and her drive wasn’t interpreted in a right way, that’s why in a stressful atmosphere she
isn’t able to perform her functions in a right way.
According to Mintzberg, Jess has to perform managerial activities that include:
interpersonal roles, information processing roles and decision roles. Jess has to serve as an
exemplary role model for her team and create and motivate staff by creating a positive work
environment. Unfortunately, Jess can’t motivate enough her staff, because there are a lot of
people that don’t accept new operational system. Jess is good at gathering all internal and
external information that is relevant to the organization and her team. She is a good disseminator,
because she transmits factual information to her subordinates and to other people within the
organization, like HR department. Also, Jess is a good entrepreneur, as she initiates changes and
strategies and she responds fast to operational breakdowns, and ensures that all activities can be
well-executed within the organization. Jess is a bad negotiator, as she doesn’t have good
relations with a part of her team.
2.3. Sources of conflict, the effects of conflicts and techniques to manage them
Personality conflicts make work rough. When you’re not in the office, you get to choose
who you hang out with, but during the work day, the cast of characters is chosen for you. If an
organization is looking to hire people that fit with the company culture, then chances are good
you’ll get along with most of them! However, it’s likely that there will be at least one coworker
that you don’t get along with 100 percent.
Organizational sources of conflict are those events or factors that cause goals to differ.
Personality conflicts, irritating as they may be, don’t actually qualify as an organizational source
of conflict. They may be the most aggravating part of your day and, certainly, they’re something
organizations need to watch for if it interferes with daily work, but these organizational sources
produce much bigger problems.
Sources of conflict within Jess team are: Specializations and Authority Relationships.
Specialization - employees tend to become either experts at a particular job task or to
obtain a general knowledge of many tasks. When the majority of employees in an organization
are specialists, effects of stress that may appear are conflicts, because workers have little
knowledge of one another's job responsibilities.
Authority Relationships - often, there is underlying tension between managers and
employees. This is because most people do not like being told what to do. So the effects are that
managers who are overly strict are frequently in conflict with their employees – hence, the
growing popularity of team approaches and empowerment strategies.
In order to manage conflicts at work place, Jess has to try to eliminate all the sources of
conflicts. So, in order to avoid conflicts that are there because of specialization, she has to use
‘’collaborate with the other party’’ strategy, which means she has to prove to Jack and Russell
that she is a high qualified staff and deserves a chance to prove that her methods and enthusiasm
will bring the company to a new level. Inviting the other party to collaborate offers her an olive
branch, showing that she is open to their needs, is willing to listen. And let us not forget that they
may actually deliver some actionable insight on how to best communicate with them, and overall
approach team conflict resolution. Also, she has to ‘’forget about winning or being right’’. This
strategy marks that the only victory when it comes to dealing with conflict at work is a mutual
one, that results in de-escalation, new common ground, and resolved conflict. Viewing the team
on the other side of a conflict as your opponent will doom both parties to remain adversaries, and
undermines the following conflict resolution techniques that increase the possibility of a
mutually beneficial outcome.
For avoiding conflicts that are there because of authority relationship, Jess has to use
‘’don’t look for a person to blame’’ and ‘’keep your conversational goal-oriented’’ strategies.
Jess has to focus on the process instead of chewing someone out helps prevent mistakes in
future, and can leave your team confident that you have their back when things go awry. So, she
doesn’t have to demonstrate and try to show to everyone that she is the new team manager, she
has to focus on the work of her team and implement the best ways in order to achieve goals.
Also, no matter what misunderstandings and situation that might arise, she has to be more open
to discussion and goals focused. For example, “I want to find more collaborate ways for our
teams to flag issues early in the process,” or “I want to take a look at our process so we can catch
this next time,” or the more empathetic “I want to know what I can do better next time” all
establish a two-way street. This is essential when dealing with conflict in the workplace.