Philosophy of physics & cosmology

Raymond Bates eight book on microvita. A comprehensive book on microvita theory of our universe with 32 drawings and introduction to Shrii Shrii Ánandamúrti’s theory of waveform gravity. The book describes how and why the universe is self-created from consciousness and maintains itself using microvita.

The development of the concept of space was an evolutionary process in early Greek history. Four major periods have been identified (historically and philosophically) by shifts in the way that the Greek Philosophers as a whole looked at the role of space in physical reality. Within each of these periods, the Mythopoeic, the Material, the Non-Definite and the Definite, those philosophers who made contributions to the overall development of the concept of space are discussed. The major themes discussed throughout this essay deal with defining and refining the concept of space and differentiating space from the concepts of time and matter, while keeping track of the influence of the concept of mathematical as opposed to physical spaces.

A new, consciousness-first scientific paradigm, incorporating Supreme Consciousness, Cosmic Mind and subtle sub-atomic cosmic intelligence agents called microvita, can replace the present materialist paradigm. The new paradigm can provide new insights into the origin and nature of living beings and the observed upward evolutionary trend of life in the universe. In the new paradigm, a Cosmic Cycle of Creation starts from unexpressed infinite Supreme Consciousness and creates a Cosmic Mind and within it the universe containing matter, individual living beings, and human beings with developed minds. Each human mind ultimately completes its Cosmic Cycle by finally merging with unexpressed infinite Supreme Consciousness to spiritually fulfill the goal of human life, according to spiritual guru Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar. According to P. R. Sarkar, life is the “ceaseless fight to restore an unstable equilibrium.” Prominent in different phases of the Cosmic Cycle are the actions of microvita—subtle sub-atomic living beings emanated from the Cosmic Mind, that act as evolutionary cosmic intelligence agents. They move the Cosmic Cycle forward at every step, starting within the formation of fundamental physical particles from microvita. Microvita produce the anti-entropic or upward evolutionary trend of the universe that is currently unexplained. This upward evolutionary trend continues inexorably despite the current laws of physics, especially the second law of thermodynamics, which predicts that the universe as a whole is continually moving from a lower to higher state of entropy or disorder. Microvita participate in upward evolutionary processes from the formation of subatomic particles and atoms, to producing complex biochemical molecules life and minds, to forming new species including human beings, causing and curing diseases, to helping human civilization to advance, and to composing Divine Grace that helps human beings complete their spiritual journey. Scientific research on microvita is urgently needed at all levels, to the discover the natural laws that describe all these actions of microvita, so that many urgent problems facing humanity today can be solved in ways that are beneficial to all.

The golden ring to which most physicists aspire is a unified field theory that incorporates all of modern and classical physics. Some scientists and others call this a TOE or ‘theory of everything’, but it is no more than false hubris to believe that humans could possibly know and explain everything about the universe at this time. Einstein chased this goal for the last three decades of his life, basing his theoretical research on his general theory of relativity. Meanwhile, the vast majority of scientists supporting the other major accomplishment of the Second Scientific Revolution were investing all of their time and efforts to advancing the quantum theory and their quest has been extremely successful. They originally had no interest in a unified field theory. After Einstein died in 1955, his efforts were all but abandoned because of his philosophical stance against the prevalent Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum theory even though he had been one of quantum theory’s founders. During the 1970s the tables started to turn and quantum theorists became interested in unifying physics, although not from the foundational principles of relativity theory. They claimed that quantum theory was more fundamental than relativity so they began the same quest from a totally different direction despite their claims to be continuing Einstein’s quest.  Throughout the development of the ensuing standard quantum model, superstring theory and many other theoretical schemes, quantum theorists have remained resolute in their conviction that the quantum and relativity are mutually incompatible so the quantum must completely do away with and replace relativity once and for all. However, the quantum theory and relativity are not actually incompatible and, in fact, say the some of the same things about the nature of physical reality. When the similarities are fully defined and studied and the basic assumptions behind each of the theories are altered to reflect the similarities instead of the incompatibilities, only then can the point of their compatibility be determined and act as a unifying principle resulting in a completed unified field theory of the type that Einstein once sought. The development of this physical model of reality is not without irony. Not only is the quantum theory incomplete as Einstein argued in EPR, but Einstein’s general relativity is also seriously incomplete and true unification cannot be rendered complete at any level of reality until all the theoretical models being unified are themselves complete.

Sudah ribuan tahun lamanya, banyak bangsa telah meneliti dan mengamati benda-benda langit beserta pergerakannya. Ribuan tahun lamanya juga banyak orang terkagum-kagum dengan keajaiban alam semesta yang penuh misteri dan teka-teki. Setiap malam ribuan bintang bertaburan di atas kepala mereka. 

Begitu banyak usaha dilakukan oleh manusia untuk mencoba memahami dan mengetahui alam semesta dan benda-benda yang bergantungan di atas langit. Sebagai contoh, bangsa Yunani pernah mengamati bahwa  di langit terdapat benda-benda yang kelihatan bergerak relatif terhadap bintang-bintang. Mereka pun menamai benda-benda langit tersebut sebagai planeten yang dapat diartikan sebagai pengelana. Di kemudian hari, ‘pengelana’ itu kita kenal sebagai planet-planet mulai dari Merkurius hingga Jupiter. 

Usaha manusia untuk memahami alam semesta pun dipengaruhi oleh berbagai macam latar belakang budaya, kemajuan teknologi, pengaruh pemikir-pemikir pada zamannya, serta ajaran dan dogma-dogma dari kepercayaan yang mereka anut. Maka, tidak heran pula jika ada masa-masa dimana usaha manusia untuk memahami alam semesta tersebut berbenturan dengan ajaran agama ataupun dogma-dogma yang telah ditetapkan oleh pihak otoritas pada zaman itu.

Dalam tulisan kali ini, penulis mencoba menjawab pertanyaan pokok yang berkaitan dengan topik tersebut, yaitu “Apakah Gereja Katolik selalu bertentangan dengan Kosmologi?” Ruang lingkup pembasahan dalam tulisan kali ini pun penulis batasi hanya pada dinamika dan perkembangan pasang surut kisah Galileo Galileo beserta tulisannya dengan otoritas Gereja Katolik.

Since Einstein died in 1955, very few theoretical scientists have tried to complete his work because the pendulum of history has swung toward favoring field theories based on the quantum for the expected unification of physics. Nearly everyone now believes that the quantum (discrete point) and relativity (continuity) are incompatible and the quantum is more fundamental than relativity and continuity, so those who have sought unification have looked for new and unique quantum approaches to accomplish unification. However, the truth is that the quantum and relativity are not incompatible and the traditional differences between the two–discreteness and continuity, indeterminism and determinism–are just the outward appearances of an even deeper fundamental problem–geometric point and extension–that when solved renders relativity and the quantum completely compatible. This deeper problem is even more significant because Riemann knew of and failed to consider and even purposely ignored the problem of point-elements and based his differential geometry of surfaces on metric-elements alone. Therefore, expanding the Riemannian geometry to include point-elements, which can be interpreted as discrete points for the quantum, forms a fundamental enough foundation for developing a unified field theory.

This chapter addresses philosophical questions raised in contemporary work on cosmology. It provides an overview of the Standard Model for cosmology and argues that its deficiency in addressing theories regarding the very early universe can be resolved by introducing a dynamical phase of evolution that eliminates the need for a special initial state. The chapter also discusses recent hypotheses about dark matter and energy, issues that it relates to philosophical debates about underdetermination.

Draft version, please refer to final version published in Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Physics (ed. by R. Batterman).

Science has an irrational fear to deal with some "non materialistic" ("Philosophical") issues. However, many modern results suggest that it is rather a self-limitation of Science to overcome. This paper proposes to do it through a model of an Evolutionary, Self-Knowing Universe (ESKU) to describe how the Universe works at a global level. After a necessary previous reflection on the nature and limits of Science, the ESKU model is schematically presented following the axiomatic method. In order to show the widening that this approach provides, a brief mention of its strong consequences in four issues is included. Finally, the role of subjectivity and the implications it has on our role in cosmic development are analyzed. In addition, a glossary of terms is included. Validating-and even less developing-the model is an impossible goal for a single person, both for the huge work needed, and the variety of knowledge required. So, the aim of this paper is to draw attention of scientific community to it.

Many scientists believe that any true unification theory of physics must include a concept of consciousness as well as a model for the mind that interprets our three-dimensionally biased and limited sensations of the external physical/material world. And, that number is growing. The single field theory goes even further than that, in fact, well beyond the simple notion of mind and consciousness as mere human bound perceivers and interpreters of the external material/physical world by placing the physical origin of consciousness within every geometrical point in the universe itself. Although full blown consciousness itself is not everywhere in the three-dimensional universe–it is not a property of every bit of matter we observe or event that we detect–the universal will for consciousness to emerge in all forms of life is everywhere, point-by-point in the universe. This physical model of creation clearly demonstrates that the precursors to our experience of consciousness are fundamental elements and active participants in creating the physical world that we perceive and scientifically interpret through the evolution, revolution and application of physics and science.

Although the concept of absolute space was the product of Newton’s genius alone, it did have precursors in the philosophical concepts of space developed by Patrizi and Gassendi before him as well as a long history of changes, adaptations and challenges after him. The concept of space has always been controversial, no matter what its historical context. This essay traces the development of Newton’s concept of absolute space. The main theme revolves around the inherent problems with developing and advancing absolute space. These problems have historically followed two lines of development: theologically and physically oriented problems. The two lines have their beginnings in the spatial concepts of Patrizi (physical) and Gassendi (theological) and are combined in the Newtonian concept of absolute space which was only associated with God in Newton’s General Scholium to the Principia. Of the two categories, the physical problems are emphasized over the longer course of history since they have greater validity for the evolution of the concept of space. However, there is another inherent duality in the theoretical concept of space that cannot be ignored. Space can be interpreted as either a collection of infinite points, which can be neither measured nor detected, or as a group of three-dimensional extensions between and through bodies of matter that can be observed as well as precisely measured. Newton was the first person to make physical sense of these two geometrical interpretations of space and only related them to religious concepts and God when his physics was criticized by Leibniz and Berkeley. This essay has never been published as such, but its contents have been fully incorporated into the book “Phallacies of Fysics: Classical physics” and published therein.

An article by Sabine Hossenfelder and Stacey S. McGaugh, titled “Is Dark Matter Real?’, has just appeared in the August 2018 issue of Scientific American.  Every physicist, astronomer, astrophysicist and cosmologist as well as everyone interested in science needs to read this article because it portends one of the greatest scientific advances in several hundred years, the complete unification of physics and science in general. Due to new observational evidence in astronomy, they have concluded that “Astrophysicists have piled up observations that are difficult to explain with dark matter. It is time to consider that there may be more to gravity than Einstein taught us.” But they have understated the case.

In effect, the new observational data found by McGaugh and an international group of astronomers simply shows that specifically designated dark matter particles do not exist, so the supposed dark matter halos around spiral galaxies do not exist and the rotational speed discrepancies in galaxy orbiting stars and star systems that go unaccounted for by normal gravity are, in fact, due to a secondary effect of normal matter within the galaxy. This finding not only challenges the present theories of gravity (Newtonian and Einsteinian), which it demonstrates are incomplete, it also blows some big logical holes in the fundamentality of the quantum theory, the Standard Model of point-particles and quantum field theories in general that seem to rule the world of modern theoretical physics. Given other recent confirmations of Einstein’s general relativity, found mostly in the detection of gravitational waves that Einstein predicted a century ago, relativity theory seems on the ascendancy and quantum theory is falling behind. The time for a unified field theory that combines the best of both of these paradigms is at hand.

A nagging problem has existed in the way we regard the local physical world around us and the non-local universe at large since the very beginning development of our philosophical and scientific attitudes toward the external world. That problem deals with the dualistic way in which we parse the physical world itself through geometry. Geometry can be based upon two different elements: the extension-or metric element of Riemann and the point-element. Riemannian geometry can be fixed by expanding it to include the point-element, but even that is not enough. A further physical advance can be made by adopting the idea of the 0-D point Void, first developed intuitively by Sperry Andrews, but understanding the physical role of the 0-D point Void can only be realized by expanding that notion by adopting the physical concept of a discrete geometrical point/twist. It is only when a discrete 0-D point/ twist Void replaces the simple point-element missing in the Riemannian system of differential geometry of surfaces that post-modern physics fulfills its promise. Understanding the concept of a point-element, of course, is necessary to understand how the Riemannian geometry has been used in general relativity as well as how it can be expanded to unify all of modern physics, including quantum theory, under a single geometrical paradigm. Whether a scientist is considering the discrete point-particles of the Standard Model or the existence of point singularities in relativity theory, the concerns are exactly the same, which forces the concept of an individual 0-D discrete point void to the center of the unification process. In either case, the human Mind and Consciousness are perceiving and interpreting the physical/material world that science is attempting to theoretically describe so the ultimate question of Consciousness and how it interacts with the Mind/brain as well as our commonly experienced physical reality also needs to be answered within the context of the 0-D point/twist. In other words, this is the point (no pun intended) where scientific logic and non-scientific intuition come together to give a complete theoretical structure of our commonly shared physical reality. Toward that end, the only logical scientific precedent to understand anything like the 0-D point/twist in all of the history of science is only found in the notion of a tesseract, which dates from the late nineteenth century attempts to 'realize' the concept of a hyperspace in the absence of being able to detect them through astronomical observations so that a hyperspace geometry could be used to explain nature. The end product of understanding these concepts is a greater insight into how the single field theory explains a much wider range of physical phenomena than any single previous paradigm of physics.

The proposal presents the selection, organization, and analysis of fundamental concepts of physics to expand the standard cosmological model by defining the minimum and maximum expansion states of the Universe as momentary linear resting states.

Many scientists have come to believe that any true unification model in physics must include a concept of consciousness as well as a model for the mind that interprets the external physical/material world. And, that number is growing. This particular physical model does just that. In fact it goes much further. Since Beichler's single field model includes a physical model of the neural net and explains how Mind and Consciousness can emerge from the physics of living organisms, it assimilates more intuitive models such as Andrews' 0-D point Void which witnesses and co-creates higher-dimensional Riemannian geometrical realities as well as other more generalized physical models of consciousness to form a truly synergistic model of reality. This synergistic model goes well beyond the notion of Mind and Consciousness as mere perceivers and interpreters of the external material/physical world. It clearly demonstrates that the precursors to our experience of Consciousness are fundamental elements and active participants in creating the physical world that we perceive and scientifically interpret through the application of physics. Andrews' intuitive approach to consciousness science It is well known that intuitives are often the very people who intimately experience first-hand knowledge of consciousness. Their views of consciousness and the inner workings of the world in general greatly differ from those of ordinary people and especially scientists. Even the word 'intuition' has been looked down upon in science as recently as a few decades ago. Scientists consider their own worldview above reproach, believing their insights are based upon acute observations of the external world around them. In general, scientists have historically looked down upon all types of intuitive knowledge and have obstinately refused to consider intuitive knowledge of consciousness and how it works in relation to the world as a whole. They view intuitive data with suspicion as no more than anecdotal evidence, without any scientific validity. Yet that evidence or data, anecdotal or not, can provide valid observations of consciousness and how consciousness works in the world at large. So to those few scientists willing to seriously consider information from intuitives, it can seem as though conservative scientists are wrong on this issue, as well as overly biased by acting completely in an unscientific manner within the broader meaning of science itself. Keeping this in mind, it is both interesting and informative to consider insights brought forward by Sperry Andrews whose undergraduate degree in science has been enhanced as a Near Death Experiencer (NDEr) from the age of four, nearly sixty years ago. Andrews has proposed a speculative bottom-up theory of everything in physics originating from nothing, including how top-down theories, such as general relativity and quantum mechanics, might approximate Jim Beichler's single field theory as well as theoretical models that posit a consciousness space or universe. Andrews asks if the solution to this question may be found in Bernhard Riemann's original conception of space curvature, whereby an n-dimensional space is embedded in an n+1 dimensional manifold: i.e., all 3-D points are united at

It is well known that soft iron owes its transformation into steel to the addition of carbon. Carbon is the hardest substance on Earth - diamond. Carbon is the mainstay of Life on Earth, since everything living on our planet is built from it. This all means: carbon is the mainstay of our world. But find out: it is also the stronghold of the entire Universe! The mythical metal orichalcum spoken of by Plato and Tolkien's mithril are carbon, structurally superior to diamond. The Moon is made from it by the hand of God. The UFO is made from it by the hand of the Other. // Общеизвестно, что своим превращением в сталь мягкое железо обязано добавке углерода. Углеродом есть самое твердое вещество Земли — алмаз. Углерод — оплот Жизни на Земле, ибо из него на ней построено живое. Все это означает: углерод в нашем мире есть главная твердь. Но узнайте: он есть и твердь Мира! Мифичный металл орихалк, о каком рек Платон, и мифрил Толкина — это углерод, структурно высший над алмазом. Из него рукою Бога сделана Луна. Из него рукой Иного сделан НЛО.

In this two Gabriele Ghisellini’s lectures (in Italian, hoping Google can allow translation in your app) there are all the elements for a step forward in understanding the universe. Which is already hard enough of a task, without need to recourse to further complex and elusive scenarios like multiverse, etc.

The particles are “interacting with themselves”.
There is no “duality” wave particles but one condition in “superposition” until with the measurement a “conscious observer” (not his nice dog/computer AIAIAI) determines the “collapse” of any possible state: position/trajectory, space/time, energy/mass.
What we call “decoherence” is precisely the effect of any such a previously mentioned “conscious measurement”.
The universe in its accelerated expansion should be “better” judged/understood (according to Heisenberg and Schröedinger) in quantum “superposition”: namely it is not possible ANTHROPOLOGICALLY to see/immagine/speculate its whole array of features, unless we considered “simultaneously” ALL the previous assumptions.
As concentric circles ⭕️ have the same number of points so does any spherical surface: it is henceforth possible to visualize a quantum universe In “dimensional” superposition with this duality mass energy in a stand still, eternal, space time build in, without recourse to any Big Bang.
Hence it is possible to "visualize-understand-measure-decouple" CONSCIOUSLY THROUGH THE AVAILABLE EVOLUTIONARY TECHNOLOGY "PREVIOUS" a quantum universe in "dimensional" superposition, with ALL these various dualities, MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE TO OUR ANTHROPOLOGICAL SCALE, the energy of mass and wave particle or position and momentum, spin and entanglement, in an immobile position in eternal space time, which integrates without recourse any initial or final Big Bang because in quantum mechanics the so-called time doesn’t make sense (Einstein).

As a footnote I’ll add this Quora’s answer by Cini, on the subject of spherical object not emitting waves “unless” squashed:

See if does not sound like Abbott’s Flatland transdimentional (geometric) metaphor, that the sphere does not make a wave or even a gravitational particle since it can be nothing more than a "subdimensional" illusion, that is, exclusively due to the relative movements of the three-dimensional condensed masses that cross our bidibebsinake dimension ...

Answer to What is the meaning of the term "quadrupole of mass varying in time"?  Studying gravitational waves, I cannot understand this term.  by Michele Cini

Quora’s answer by Michele Cini

What is the meaning of the term "time-varying mass quadrupole"?  Studying gravitational waves, I cannot understand this term.

The quadrupole tensor formula is found for example here

https://it.abcdef.wiki/wiki/Quadrupole

but from the qualitative point of view the speech is quite simple.  A spherically symmetrical mass does not emit gravitational waves, even if it moves, for example, by pulsing.  If it retains spherical symmetry.  radiates zero.  Since there are no negative masses, there is no possibility of a mass distribution with a positive and a negative extremity - which instead exists in the case of electric charges, which radiate from dipoles.

However, if a spherical star is deformed to look like an egg or is flattened as if it were being squashed, in both cases a quadrupole moment arises which is capable of emitting waves.  Therefore the most important contribution to gravitational waves comes from the quadrupole.  The frequency of the waves is the same as the quadrupolar oscillations, so the deformation must depend on the time for the waves to form.

https://youtu.be/Envccx4G1_Y

https://youtu.be/s2Csxir-9z8.

In queste due lezioni di Gabriele Ghisellini (in italiano, sperando che Google possa consentire la traduzione nella tua app) ci sono tutti gli elementi per un passo avanti nella comprensione dell'universo.  Che è già un compito abbastanza difficile, senza bisogno di ricorrere a ulteriori scenari complessi e sfuggenti come il multiverso, ecc.

Le particelle "interagiscono con se stesse"
Non esiste la “dualità” onda/particella ma una condizione in “sovrapposizione” fino a quando con la misura un “osservatore cosciente” (non il suo simpatico cane/computer AIAIAI) determina il “collasso” di ogni possibile stato: posizione/traiettoria, spazio/tempo, energia/massa.
Ciò che chiamiamo "decoerenza" è precisamente l'effetto di una tale "misurazione cosciente" precedentemente menzionata.
L’universo nella sua espansione accelerata dovrebbe essere “meglio” giudicato/compreso (secondo Heisenberg e Schröedinger) nella “sovrapposizione” quantistica: cioè non è possibile ANTROPOLOGICAMENTE vedere/immaginare/speculare tutta la sua gamma di caratteristiche, a meno che non si consideri “simultaneamente  TUTTE le ipotesi precedenti.
I cerchi concentrici ⭕️ hanno lo stesso numero di punti, così qualsiasi superficie sferica.
Quindi è possibile “visualizzare-capire-misurare-decoerenziare” COSCIENTE-mente, TRAMITE LA DISPONIBILE TECNOLOGIA EVOLUTIVA “PRESENTE”, un universo quantistico in sovrapposizione "dimensionale" con TUTTE queste varie dualità, RECIPROCAMENTE ESCLUSIVE ALLA NOSTRA SCALA ANTROPOLOGICA, l'energia di massa e onda particella o posizione e quantità di moto, spin ed entanglement, in una posizione immobile nello spazio tempo eterno che si integra, senza ricorrere a nessun Big Bang iniziale o finale perché in meccanica quantistica il cd tempo non ha senso (Einstein).

In nota aggiungo questa risposta di Cini su Quora circa l’impossibilità di emettere onde gravitazionali dei corpi sferici, salvo non siano appiattiti:

Vedi se non ricorda la metafora (geometrica) “transdimensionale” della Flatlandia dì Abbott, che la sfera non fa un'onda e nemmeno una particella gravitazionale potendo essere nulla più che un’ illusione "subdimensionale”, cioè  esclusivaMente dovuta ai movimenti relativi delle masse condensate tridimensionali che attraversano la nostra dimensione bidimensionale  ...

Risposta a Qual è il significato del termine "quadrupolo di massa variabile nel tempo"  ?  Studiando le onde gravitazionali, non riesco a capire questo termine.  di Michele Cini

La risposta di Quora di Michele Cini

Qual è il significato del termine "quadrupolo di massa variabile nel tempo"?  Studiando le onde gravitazionali, non riesco a capire questo termine.

La formula del tensore del quadrupolo si trova ad esempio qui

https://it.abcdef.wiki/wiki/Quadrupole

ma dal punto di vista qualitativo il discorso è abbastanza semplice.  Una massa sfericamente simmetrica non emette onde gravitazionali, anche se si muove, ad esempio, pulsando.  Se mantiene la simmetria sferica.  irradia zero.  Non essendoci masse negative, non c'è possibilità di una distribuzione di massa con un'estremità positiva e una negativa - che invece esiste nel caso delle cariche elettriche, che si irradiano dai dipoli.

Tuttavia, se una stella sferica è deformata per assomigliare a un uovo o è appiattita come se fosse schiacciata, in entrambi i casi si ha un momento di quadrupolo in grado di emettere onde.  Pertanto il contributo più importante alle onde gravitazionali viene dal quadrupolo.  La frequenza delle onde è la stessa delle oscillazioni quadrupolari, quindi la deformazione deve dipendere dal tempo di formazione delle onde.

Remote entanglement of quantum objects has been a point of contention for most of the last century. The most convincing evidence for the prevailing interpretation of such effects is believed to be that provided by a series of increasingly sophisticated experiments performed with photon pairs generated with entangled linear polarizations. These experiments are shown here to have been failures, but a form of “group-think” has led to the wide acceptance of their validity. Even worse, this has stimulated the excited pursuit of a number of far-fetched applications such as instant teleportation of information or influences over arbitrary distances. We show that these past “loop-hole” free photon entanglement experiments generated statistical results that cannot be distinguished from results that would be produced with the same apparatus and non-entangled photons. Thus, these entanglement experiments have proven nothing at all, and the wide-eyed applications pursued for this “spooky action at a distance” are doomed to failure.

The view that there must be an Unmoved Prime Mover (UPM) is at the core of Aristotle’s cosmology. Theophrastus was the first to object to this theory. He paved the way for the objections addressed by Pseudo-Justin, who devoted a whole treatise to undermining some of the basic tenets of Aristotle’s cosmology (Confutatio dogmatum quorundam aristotelicorum). The focus of this paper is on Pseudo-Justin’s critical analysis of Aristotle’s UPM thesis. After providing the bulk of Pseudo-Justin’s criticism, I argue that at least part of his most important objections is reasonable, inasmuch as they are based on Aristotelian assumptions. My main concern is with the argumentative and conceptual framework within which the Pseudo-Justin’s discussion of Aristotle takes place: I hold that Pseudo-Justin engages philosophically with Aristotle. On the other hand, Pseudo-Justin is not always charitable when citing passages from Aristotle. I claim, though, that he does so within reasonable limits and as it would be done by any philosopher interested in making a critical analysis of what another one says.

The founders of Greek scientific thought believed justice in terms of equality. Cosmic equality, in fact, was conceived as the guaranty of cosmic justice: the order of nature is maintained because it is an order of equals. That the main components of the universe are equal was an old tradition in popular cosmology. In Hesiod earth and sky are declared equal (Theog. 126); and the distance between sky and earth is equal to that between earth and Tartarus (ibid. 719-25). Anaximander’s own cosmology is designed with just such a sense of aesthetic symmetry, with equality as the main motif: the intervals between each of the infinite worlds are equal; the intervals between earth, fixed stars, moon, and sun are also equal; earth and sun are equal. This is exactly the sense in which equality figures in the whole development of early cosmological theory from Anaximander to Empedocles: powers are equal if they can hold another in check, in a way that no one of them is more powerful than any ot...

This book builds on the work of psychiatrist Carl Jung and physicist Wolfgang Pauli on their ideas about mind and matter as being manifestations of a deeper archetypal reality. It builds on their ideas about numbers, ideas expanded by Marie-Louise von Franz, a collaborator of Jung. Of course, numbers are quantities that allow to count but there is more to the story! Numbers are not "posited" only by an act of consciousness. They are pre-existing in nature, they constitute dynamic structures that I try to highlight and address in this book.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vcjWqC8i_4&t=1412s

The theoretical prediction of Higgs boson was arguably one of the most important contributions in particle physics in the 20th century, with significant implications for modern cosmology. Its reported discovery in 2012 was celebrated as one of the most significant scientific achievements of all times. The fierce public discourse that followed was at large ignited by the media-hyped nickname “God particle” attributed to Higgs boson. The debate regarding the science-religion relation reinvigorated once again and plenty theologically informed views were expressed. In this paper, I take into consideration the authoritative views expressed by the Catholic Church and the Greek-Orthodox Church and I discuss them in comparison with each other, as well as in juxtaposition with other views expressed in the public discussion on the issue, in an attempt to draw philosophically interesting inferences.

Why there's No velocity higher than Light Velocity C =300000 km/sec? Because • The Matter is created from light beams coherence (according to Young Experiment-The Main Hypothesis) • The Time is created as the Matter Changing measurement • Our body (matter) is produced by the same method, from this light beams coherence • Our bodies are connected with specific Light velocity and specific time rate because our bodies are produced by specific Light Beams coherence

The life to Earth came from the Universe: the part is alive due to the Entire, this world is alive thanks to the Whole. The first tribe of our Earth w ere Scythians, people from the Moon; their selenic language was the root to earthly languages — the heart of human language. // Жизнь на Землю пришла из Вселенной: часть Целым жива, мир сей — Всем. Племя первое нашей Земли — Скифы, люди с Луны; их язык, корневой земным — лунная молвь, сердце речи людской.

This paper, written in 1977, presents a brief overview of modern physical cosmology which shows how some of its concepts parallel those of Eastern mysticism and mystical thought in general. The subject is treated within a historical context simply because that is a convenient way to break down the various ideas in an orderly manner to show how they are interrelated. This paper is definitely neither complete nor exhaustive and, in fact, leaves out many cosmological ideas, both philosophical and experimental, such as Olber’s paradox, quasars, pulsars, galaxy and star system formation and so on. It is only meant to give a brief summary of the more important and immediate aspects of the foundations of modern cosmology as they relate to mysticism and eastern philosophical thought.

“Whatever we can think of and whatever we cannot think of in this vast universe, whatever we know and whatever we do not know of this vast creation, are all within the Macrocosmic mind. For Him there is nothing external – everything is being created, maintained and dissolved within His Cosmic Mind,” explains Shrii Shrii Anandamurti. “Whatever the endeavor of the microcosmic mind, it can never go beyond the periphery of the Macrocosmic mind.” Shrii Shrii Ánandamúrti (1921-1990) was a Tantric guru in the tradition of Shiva and Krishna. He introduced the empowered universal spiritual mantra “Baba Nam Kevalam”, composed a collection of 5018 spiritual songs called Prabháta Saḿgiita, and founded the socio-spiritual movement Ananda Marga (“the Path of Bliss”).  –  Richard Gauthier, Department of Chemistry and Physics, Santa Rosa Junior College, Santa Rosa, California, USA, October 17, 2021.

1. The Main Hypothesis: The Matter Is Created From The Light 
2. The produced matter is created in motion, that means the solar planets are created in motions (regardless the motion reason)   
3. The solar group are a group of motions conveyors, So the motions of all solar planets are depended on each other
4. The solar group motions aim to create a difference in motion velocity = C between 2 points in the group.
5. i.e. The Solar Planets work as gears or conveyors group, transfer the motion from point to another point, aiming to create a difference in motion velocity = C velocity. And that's happening where the solar group motions create a difference in velocities between the Earth and Sun motions = C velocity (for that reason the sun is our source of light)
6. The solar group is A Dipole System has 2 heads (the sun and the Earth)
7. The light Production by the planets motions (i.e. by transferring of the mechanical waves into light waves), the original source of light beams energy, from which the solar planets were created, will be conserved. 
8. Because there's a difference in velocity = C between 2 points in the solar group (the sun and the Earth), we may conclude easily that, there's more than one frame in the solar group. 
9. To create a difference of velocity = C, all solar planets should revolve around the dipole line (The Sun-Earth Line) in the same direction, enabling the velocities addition process to gather all motions in the same point…
10. The Produced Solar Planets should have relationships between their Geometrical structures (if they were created from the light), so the planets are not created independent but related to each other geometrically.

The founders of Greek scientific thought believed justice in terms of equality. Cosmic equality, in fact, was conceived as the guaranty of cosmic justice: the order of nature is maintained because it is an order of equals. That the main components of the universe are equal was an old tradition in popular cosmology. In Hesiod earth and sky are declared equal (Theog. 126); and the distance between sky and earth is equal to that between earth and Tartarus (ibid. 719-25). Anaximander's own cosmology is designed with just such a sense of aesthetic symmetry, with equality as the main motif: the intervals between each of the infinite worlds are equal; the intervals between earth, fixed stars, moon, and sun are also equal; earth and sun are equal. This is exactly the sense in which equality figures in the whole development of early cosmological theory from Anaximander to Empedocles: powers are equal if they can hold another in check, in a way that no one of them is more powerful than an...

This book is a completion of the thought that came to my mind recently about the changing the mathematical derivations by using it respect to the mass (M) instead of radius() and time() :
I began with these equations which represent a universe of 2D :
U= c2r2GM-112e c2r2GMsinh c3t4GM
V= c2r2GM-112e c2r2GMcosh c3t4GM
And I get the main equation:
U-V2=- c4r22G2M3ec2rGM
The result carries most of Ali’s theory features like: De Sitter space, exponential energy patterns, strange momentum, symmetry breaking and emerging of dimensions and masses, and Ali’s law for space symmetry, and a top of that, the second power of the U-V and the minus sign that represents a multiplying of imaginary number (i). Until now I don’t know the usefulness of these different results except the relation between this equation with recognized equations that uses imaginary numbers like Schrodinger’s and Dirac and else other, but I will know because I followed my steps that I did for time and radius.
Here in this book I had dealt with mass which is causes time dilation, so I expected we will meet a freak factor when I deal with momentum as like the previous books. So there is something of this factor:
PM,  '=mc*r2c532G3M5/2
PM,  '=mc*factor
factor=r2c532G3M5/2=mass1/2*timedistance2
And here, first of all, I found that the space and its dimensions act as a freak field that has mass term, that mass term is the causes of the interactions with other objects’ masses (see the units of the above equation), so Special Relativity, GTR, Quantum Mechanics, and all observations that detect the interactions between space and matter originate from this term. Besides, this term has reciprocal proportion with (M) on the equation so within high field of large masses we can expect what is going on Black Holes’ Event of Horizon, and I did some predictions(). Also this term leads us to get some recognition about the concept of Ether because as I said our field has some kind of mass so that means Newtonian Ether could sniffed here.
In this book I used the comparison between the two other books (25th, 26th) as I sad and during that I reached to conclusion that there is not one de sitter space specific to time dimension despite of the huge agreements with experiments and observations, but there are two other space: one specialized to radius and the other to the mass (M). These three components of de sitter spaces represent the asymmetry on radius and mass due to interactions between de sitter space and Einstein’s space to define our universe.
I am sure in future there will be many explorations and discoveries that agreed with the results of this book.
#Ali_Yousif_Hassan_Edriss

What was there first in the beginning of Birth of Universe.

Let’s imagine complete Emptiness that was just that, and nothing in it. Emptiness which spared for ever and ever, called an Infinite Space in real terms. No Particles, Energy and Matter or any known form of those to us so far. But is that really true? Theoretically yes, it is true, and that is how it was in the beginning of Birth of Universe. That is what Infinity or Infinite Space really is. A never-ending emptiness. Nothing in it, no “God” either. Complete Darkness everywhere. And it was really Cold as still is, in waste spread (never-ending) Infinite Space, beyond Universe or Multiverses/other. Why do I say Never-ending empty space? Because that is what it really is in reality. There is no Brick wall anywhere in the Universe that says OK everything Stops right here, NO! There is something always behind any Wall or a Brick Wall, always. That is an Infinite Space or Infinity or some Space Form!!!

That was all we had, in early Birth of Universe!

And We must accept this as a Fact.

The Moon as the only black hole in the Space. // Луна как единственная черная дыра Вселенной.
_____________________

Теории  нашей безбожной науки — намеки на Истину, сокрытую за ними. На Истину, которую сама она не зрит. Такова есть теория дивных уму черных дыр. Человечество, не знакомое ни с одним их реальным образчиком, с тем лишь настырно глаголет о них, что единственная реальная черная дыра Вселенной зияет в шаге от Земли: то — Луна, Мать людей и врата в мир Иной.

Всё сказанное наукой касательно черных дыр относится к ней и ни к чему другому. Но как черная дыра, Луна не такова, как мнят нынче. Вот то, в чем отличие этой дыры НАСТОЯЩЕЙ от ложных, примысленных дыр.

In the framework of a cosmological model of the Universe filled with a nonrelativistic particle soup, we easily reproduce inflation due to the quantum potential. The lightest particles in the soup serve as a driving force of this simple, natural and promising mechanism. It is explicitly demonstrated that the appropriate choice of their mass and fraction leads to reasonable numbers of e-folds. Thus, the direct introduction of the quantum potential into cosmology of the earliest Universe gives ample opportunities of successful reconsideration of the modern inflationary theory.

Nearly three decades ago, a physical anomaly was discovered that
should have shaken physics to its very foundations. That anomaly,
called the galaxy rotation problem, resulted from the difference
between the expected velocities of material objects in the disk
portion of galaxies and their observed velocities. To explain this
anomaly, the concept of Cold Dark Matter (CDM) was invoked.
Alternative explanations such as MOdified Newtonian Dynamics
(MOND) have been proposed, but altering the basis of Newtonian
physics by adding a fudge factor to the laws of motion is
aesthetically displeasing as well as completely unnecessary. The
dark matter halo that surrounds spiral galaxies can be easily
explained if scientists are willing to accept the physical reality of a
fourth dimension of space, which amounts to a fifth dimension of
space-time. This solution may seem radical, but there is ample
evidence in other areas of physics to support the existence of a
fourth spatial dimension. What is commonly called dark matter is no
more nor less than space-time curvature that is not associated with
local matter, but is due instead to the total or global curvature of the
universe as a whole.

This work examines a question of a true place of Moon in the whole Universe. Meanwhile the contemporary atheistic per se science considers it as a lifeless Earth adjunct it is actually an axis of the Universe and the throne of God. Being thought as a corpse the Moon is the Life itself. 

Conceptual footholds of the Theory

1. The Subject of the Unified Field Theory is the World (Universe), God’s Creation. It is a Womb of all living, their Wide and the Way to God.
2. God is the Love, Strength of strength; World is this Power as Fetus.
3. The World is Omnes, Absoluteness; this world is relativeness: the clay as the shadow of this Fire, Eternity.
4. The Einstein’s mistake in the attempt to create World Theory is that he created the theory of this world, shadow without the Fire as a moonless darkness.
5. Unity of this world and Other world is given to us by their bracing, the Moon as a face of Creator in this world. The visible world is a wheel on the Axis, Moon; the Axis of the whole World is God.
6. People of the World are intelligent by God Anthropes of this world and Other world as their series, united by the Мoon; the human of the Earth is its part.
7. The World without the God is acephality as viewable by contemporary science; the whole World is the Mystery now. Only the Word, the vessel of both, will reveal it to us. The Cognition is the Love: Word of words, Catcher of souls; the human is lives by it.

*  *  *

СОЗДАНЬЕ ЕДИНОЙ ТЕОРИИ ПОЛЯ — ВОЗВРАТ ДВУХ ЗАБЫТЫХ ЛЮДЬМИ И НАУКОЮ ИХ: ДУШАМ — БОГА, ОЧАМ НАШИМ БРЕННЫМ — ЛУНЫ. В ТОМ РАБОТА МОЯ.

Речь в книге — об истинном месте Луны во Вселенной. В то время как нынешней, Бога не чтящей науке Луна мертвый пленник Земли, людям древним она — мира Ось и Господний престол; трупом мнима, на деле Луна — Жизнь сама.

Проблема созданья Теории Мира, Всего — дух мирской, царь умов в наши дни: зло — не Благо, не Знанье — невежество. Скверный побег не дает добрый плод, лживый рот не щедр Истиной. То — мир сей ныне. Бог, Мира Творец, чтим им праздным глаголом; наука ж его, млат прогресса, не зрит Бога вовсе.

Слуг Розни с моралью двойной звал Христос «ф|АРИС|еи». Науки бессутней творец АРИС|тотель — злой ÁРЕС, АРÉС|т душ — был им: чтивший Бога в речах, он отсек Главу эту от глаз, взяв опорой Всему зримый мир — часть без Целого, бренье без Вечности. Сущая на сем фундаменте как пустоте, дуб без Корня, наука мертва, с тем — бессильна явить Мир нам, чье Колесо в розни с Осью, Творцом, не вертúтся — и, мертвое, тайно для нас. Тайной было оно с тем Эйнштейну: прозреть Абсолютность — Мир Вечность — не смог он, зря лишь относительность: бренный сей мир, Мира тень.

Зная то, Миру я возвращаю Творца: Колесу — Ось его. То — возврат очей от Сатаны, Розни, к Богу, Единому, от Аристотеля — к корню без порчи, Платону, целящий в очах горний ток — реку Знанья разъятую. Столп ее цельной — Луна, Ось очей и трон Бога. Мнясь мертвым придатком Земли, в очах горних она — Мать ее: САТ|еллит как SAT, Истина (санскр.), сущих Жизнь. Бренных глаз дыра, в вечных Луна — Огнь-Любовь, главный нам, точка сборки Всего: в небе — Центр его, в оке — зрачок. Знать Луну, Корень, нам — ведать всё.

Жизнь — Вселенная, Мир: Божье Целое как Состав наш, Корень древ сущих, капль Океан. В своем «Логико-философском трактате» Людвиг Витгенштейн говорит о Вселенной и языке людей, данном им Богом к Познанью, как паре единых, в которой логическая структура языка тождественна онтологической структуре Мира. С тем, Речь — видность Мира и Мир сам: от Бога, Истока, Река, Суть РЕКУ|щих; из Мира составлены, Речью составлены мы. О том сказано: «Смерть и жизнь — во власти языка, и любящие его вкусят от плодов его» (Прит. 18:21).

В речи — Мир, Предмет главный наш; речь — и есть Мир. С тем, попытки созданья Единой теории Поля — Вселенной, Простора очей и Стези душ к Творцу — тщетны в физике, знании т|РУП|ном: Природе, безглавой трудом Аристотеля, форме (санскр. РУП|а) бессутней. Теории сей Оплот — Речь: Мир в устах, Полнота.

Опорные пункты Теории

1. Единой теории Поля Предмет — Мир (Вселенная), Бога Дитя: Лоно сущих, Простор их и к Богу Стезя.
2. Бог — Любовь, Сила сил сущих; Мир — Сила эта как Плод.
3. Мир есть Всё, Абсолютность; мир сей — относительность:  бренье как Вечности — Мира, Огня — тень.
4. Ошибка Эйнштейна: Теорию Мира взыскуя, явил он труд мира сего: без Огня тени как тьмы безлунной.
5. Единство Сего и Того, Мир, дано нам их скрепой, Луною как ликом Творца в мире сем. Зримый мир — колесо на Оси, Луне; Ось Мира полного — Бог.
6. Люди Мира — разумные Богом Антропы Сего и Того как ряд их, Луной цельный; Земли человек — часть его.
7. Мир без Бога, науки дней новых кумир — безголов; цельный Мир — ныне Тайна. Лишь Слово, сосуд Всего, явит его нам. Познанье — Любовь: С|ЛОВ|о слов, душ LOV|E’ц, коим жив че’LOVE’к.

While the confirmed existence of Dark Matter (DM) and Dark Energy (DE) forms a serious and indeed revolutionary problem for physics, they are actually easy to explain if the reality of a fourth macroscopically extended spatial dimension is assumed. The four dimensionality of space is best portrayed in the case of galactic formation in the early universe, where the DM halo that surrounds spiral galaxies can be modeled. DM is nothing more than spatial curvature in the higher fourth dimension that is not associated with local matter (matter inside the spiral galaxy itself), but is instead the result of an interaction between local matter and the overall curvature of the universe. This model yields a definition of DE that also depends on curvature in the fourth dimension in that it predicts the increasing expansion rate of the universe.
The model is strictly geometrical and it does not readily reduce to a simple algebraic formula. Yet the geometry does lead to testable predictions rendering the model falsifiable and a classical algebraic formula that adequately describes the gravitational source of the DM in the geometry of the fourth dimension does emerge upon further consideration of how galaxies evolve by the accretion of material bodies gravitating toward the central core. This formula can also be quantized and relativized and thus leads to a complete unification of physics that once again establish the fundamental nature of relativity.

Keywords: galactic rotation problem, halo, Dark Matter, CDM, HDM, Dark Energy, General Relativity, Kaluza, Klein, five-dimensional, fourth dimension, space-time, Einstein, positive curvature, extrinsic curvature

Neste trabalho analisamos atividades desenvolvidas durante um curso de história da cosmologia, cujo objetivo foi discutir relações entre ciência e religião na formação inicial de professores de ciências. Após terem estudado sobre a controvérsia acerca da origem do universo entre a teoria do Big Bang e a teoria do Estado Estacionário, ocorrida na primeira metade do século XX, licenciandos em ciências refletiram sobre objetivos e métodos da ciência e da religião. A análise dos resultados nos mostrou que as atividades permitiram discutir aspectos da natureza da ciência, mostrando diferenças entre a metodologia científica idealizada apresentada nos livros didáticos e uma interpretação mais realista da atividade científica que não deixa de considerar influências de erros, tensões, influências políticas, econômicas e socioculturais.

We are taught to think that the description of relativistic phenomena requires distorted time and distance. The message of this essay is that, in a holistic perspective, time and distance are universal coordinate quantities, and relativity is a direct consequence of the conservation of energy. Instead of the kinematics/metrics-based approach of the theory of relativity, the dynamic universe (DU) approach starts from the dynamics of space as a whole and expresses relativity in terms of locally available energy instead of locally distorted time and distance. In such an approach, e.g., the frequency of atomic clocks at different states of motion and gravitation is obtained from the quantum mechanical solution of the characteristic frequencies, and the unique status of the velocity of light becomes understood via its linkage to the rest of space. In the kinematic/metrics-based theory of relativity, we postulate the principle of relativity, Lorentz covariance, the equivalence principle, the constancy of the speed of light, and the rest energy of mass objects. The conservation of momentum and energy is honored in local frames of reference, and time and distance are parameters in frame-to-frame observations. In the dynamics-based DU, the whole space is studied as a closed energy system and the energy in local structures is derived conserving the overall energy balance. Any local state of motion and gravitation in space is related, through a system of nested energy frames, to the state of rest in hypothetical homogeneous space, which serves as the universal frame of reference. Relativity of observations appears as a direct consequence of the overall energy balance and the linkage of local to the whole-with time and distance as universal coordinate quantities. DU postulates spherically closed space and zero-energy balance of motion and gravitation. DU does not need the relativity principle or any other postulates of the theory of relativity. Primarily, the theory of relativity is an empirically driven mathematical description of observations, with postulates formulated to support the mathematics. DU relies on mathematics built on the conservation of an overall zero-energy balance as the primary law of nature, which makes DU more like a metaphysically driven theory. Both approaches produce precise predictions. The choice is philosophical-nature is not dependent on the way we describe it. V

This book as a participation of Ali’s theory for the controversial debates that run recently to figure out if we could get information from the Black Holes (BHs) or not. There are two cohorts in that: the first calls for conservation of information inside BH like Dr. Leonard Susskind and others by which we can get information from BHs, and the second calls for non-conservation like Dr. Stephen hawking and others, by which information is losing by radiation. Conservation of information in BH, first I thought it is useless, I mean it has no physical meaning, but after watching some conferences about, I decided to participate in some sense of curiosity satisfaction, after that and when I moved deep it get me to perform interpretations of the question: why Sun’s Corona is hotter than interior and in that I found it relates to Exo-surface entropy in which the entropy becomes bigger than the inner layers. Also I came up to the reason of high evaporation of micro BHs, all that I did through my theory (thank God). After that I made a comparison between my results and recent theory called “Replica trick” for giving interpretation to conservation of information for falling particle into BHs, I found many agreements with it, for example the behavior of Entanglement Entropy that it getting bigger gradually and then falling gradually, also the behavior of radiated information and it matching with this entropy that high at the beginning and then loses its matching soon, despite of the net of the information getting increase because of the existence of surface and corona’s information that radiated intensively for any falling particle which called “Firewall of BHs”.
Return to our debate my theory agreed with Susskind at low mass density M/r (not just mass) BHs and agreed with Hawking at large one. In case of Falling particles deep far from surface, my theory agreed totally with Hawking because the dimensions will compressed according to BH’s radius making large evaporation for the falling particle so the entanglement between the inner particle and outer will vanish, then the information will totally lost inside BH.
I hope this article benefits mankind and participates on human knowledge racing.
Finally I would like to thank the Center of Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics- Jordan (CTPA) for recognizing this issue.

It´s very interesting to follow the many scientific astrophysical and cosmological branches and their different approaches which don´t compute. It is no sense to smash atoms to *foggy clouds* as seen on this image below, from which NO real scientific conclusions can be made. The best what can be said about CERN is the WWW Net. The rest is *particle-nonsense* and misuse of mind powers, energy and money.

ACADEMIC PROOF OF THE CREATOR  VISUAL/INTERACTIVE BOOK
-New Perspectives from the Treatise of Nature-
(An imaginary and mental journey of discovery in the depths of divine technology)
Providing academic proof of the truth of the Belief in Allah on an intellectual and scientific basis.
Risale-i Nur (Treatise of Light) Training Program
We are inviting you for an utterly different experience, an interactive book full of incredible discoveries, where you will come to an impressive visual journey.
READING THE BOOK OF UNIVERSE AND RISALE-I NUR HAS NEVER BEEN SO PLEASANT.
In total, there are 446 visuals and 45 videos utilized (rate of visuality is 50%)  in this enormous study, which is a first attempt in its area worldwide, providing academic proof of the truth of the Belief in Allah on an intellectual and scientific basis.
You can download our book in word or pdf format from the following web addresses: goo.gl/hNIUou or yadi.sk/d/09r41tL9ecYUA You can download the text of our book and its visual/interactive versions from the folder of “New Perspectives from The Treatise of Nature” in “English Books” section in this address. Besides, you can view or download the files of all of our books, and videos, texts and PowerPoint presentations of our seminars altogether or one by one, from these storage spaces where all of our work on Risale-i Nur (Treatise of Light) are uploaded.
Google Books: (The whole book can be previewed and downloaded in Pdf format)
https://books.google.com.tr/books/about?id=c-A8DwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y&hl=tr
Google Play: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=c-A8DwAAQBAJ
Our book is free. The whole book can be read in “Free sample” section. Submission of credit card information in Google Play is just a technical requirement in order to buy the book for “0” (zero) Turkish Lira.
In Google Books and Google Play, it is not possible to open and view the links and videos just by clicking them. We suggest that you download the Pdf files from the address we provide before or from Google Books and read them. 
PRESENTATION
This book is penned down in order to introduce you a piece of work, that is so unbelievably and astonishingly perfect that it will surprise you with the high truths and grand scientific discoveries contained therein and will make some of you say “How come I have never heard of it until now!” (Or could not really discover it). The main subject of study of these books and the Treatise of Nature is the following:
To give correct answers to three basic questions of existence, which have remained as the unknown secrets of the universe that have been always wondered by the humanity.
The discovery of the right answers in these areas has been possible not only with the use of the mind/intellect which is incapable of reaching to the truth on its own but rather with the common guidance of divine revelation and the mind.
Nevertheless, the answers to the questions that were asked have been discovered solely with rational inferences and logical evidences. These three questions are:
“Where did this universe and those within it come from? Where will they go? And Why are they here, what is their mission? That is to ask “What are we doing here?”
High truths, which the whole humanity needs and which are appealing to all those who look for the explanation of the basic reality of existence and which is more interesting for the world of science and the scientists and which is brought by divine revelation, are discovered once again and proved with rational methods in these works.
Especially today, while quantum physics, astronomy and astrophysics have reached to such advanced levels, common answers are looked for these three questions on matter, universe and human being; the science and these works study the same subjects and share a common ground of work.
Here you are: The work, which contains in itself a spiritual/immaterial treasury for people who have an irresistible interest and passion for science and learning, is called RISALE-I NUR (TREATISE OF LIGHT).
The Treatise of Nature has a special place within Risale-i Nur.
In “the New Perspectives from the Treatise of Nature”, you are invited for an adventure of looking for and finding out the truth.
* Studying academically, on the basis of logic and science, the theories which are developed as alternatives to the existence of a Creator in order to explain the astonishing happenings and the liveliness in the universe.
*In a world where we stand as observers, looking for answers to questions: Where did we come from? Where are we going and who are we? What are we doing here?
Together we are setting on a journey of discovery along the lines that we wrote in order to make some contribution to the efforts to understand the functioning and the purposes of the universe, which is the final target and the arrival point for all sciences.
We have a very strong reason to begin this journey: to witness the magnificent details of the divine technology and uniqueness of the artful creation and hence, to take a big step on the way of achieving the true faith that was demanded from us by Allah.
We would like you to accompany us in this imaginary and mental journey of discovery. There is only one fixed price for a ticket of the Journey:  a strong sense of wonder in the search for truth.
YOU ARE INVITED TO THE ADVENTURE!
Discovering the high truths about the humanity, life, universe and religion…
Advancing along the way of progress for mind, soul and heart…
Making sense of the world in which we exist…
Obtaining an awareness that is more amazing than ever before…
Understanding the working mechanisms of the divine technology...
A Wonderful Mental journey... A Visual Festival
Amazing Facts... Stunning Images and Videos...
All These and Even More are Waiting for You!
COME WITH US FOR THIS EXTRAORDINARY JOURNEY OF DISCOVERY!
Our Website for Journeys of Discovery Risale-i Nur (Treatise of Light) Training Program
http://www.kesifyolculuklari.com
http://www.risaleinuregitimprogrami.com
Alternative Website: http://www.risaleinuregitimprogramidotcom.wordpress.com
Web address of our YouTube Video Channel:
http://www.youtube.com/c/EdizSözüer

This paper is excerpted from a prepublication copy of my upcoming history book

Phallacies in Fysics: Volume 2
Modern Physics: A fresh look and reappraisal of the Second Scientific Revolution

Einstein and his colleagues developed valid arguments against the quantum theory in the EPR paper of 1935 that have never been successfully or completely answered by science or philosophers. Through the gross misunderstanding of those arguments, experimental tests of spin and polarity entanglement have been used in attempts to convince scientists that EPR was wrong, but it is not. These experiments do not answer or even address the central issue raised by EPR and no valid test of the EPR paradox has ever been developed. EPR was about the simple mechanics of motion, not about electromagnetism or purely quantum effects. But Einstein and his colleagues were also wrong. They argued against the discrete nature of reality and the particle worldview, neither of which really address the real weaknesses of the quantum theory and the Copenhagen Interpretation. If they had taken a different approach and sought compatibility between relativity and the quantum they would have been able to demonstrate that the quantum theory does not depend on either a discrete view of nature or the particle worldview.

Both relativity and the quantum favor neither discreteness nor extended particles alone, so debates whether nature is deterministic or indeterministic are both misleading and irrelevant to the advance of physics. The whole issue can be settled by finding the physical conditions for compatibility and the material consequences for fulfilling those conditions. In this respect, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle can be interpreted in a manner that is not at odds with relativity theory and Planck’s constant can be defined as the minimum measurable limit for which the physical reality of space and time can be taken as separate thus rendering Planck’s constant a space-time coupling factor. By taking this interpretation of the quantum into account the unification of physics within a single paradigm cannot be not far behind while the emphasis of the history of physics on the revolutionary nature of the quantum and the overthrow of Newtonian physics becomes less of a factor than previously thought. In fact, Newtonian physics was so successful by the beginning of the twentieth century that it fostered the new revolution with Newtonian relativity of space and time falling to Einstein’s relativity of space-time at the extremes of speed and gravitational mass and Newtonian absolute space and time falling to quantum space-time at the lower extreme of physical size where the geometry of points becomes physically relevant.